Monika Hagen

Reducing cost of surgery by avoiding complications: the model of robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

BackgroundRobotic surgery is a complex technology offering technical advantages over conventional methods. Still, clinical outcomes and financial issues have been subjects of debate. Several studies have demonstrated higher costs for robotic surgery when compared to laparoscopy or open surgery. However, other studies showed fewer costly anastomotic complications after robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) when compared to laparoscopy.MethodsWe collected data for our gastric bypass patients who underwent open, laparoscopic, or robotic surgery from June 1997 to July 2010. Demographic data, BMI, complications, mortality, intensive care unit stay, hospitalization, and operating room (OR) costs were analyzed and a cost projection completed. Sensitivity analyses were performed for varied leak rates during laparoscopy, number of robotic cases per month, number of additional staplers during robotic surgery, and varied OR times for robotic cases.ResultsNine-hundred ninety patients underwent gastric bypass surgery at the University Hospital Geneva from June 1997 to July 2010. There were 524 open, 323 laparoscopic, and 143 robotic cases. Significantly fewer anastomotic complications occurred after open and robotic RYGBP when compared to laparoscopy. OR material costs were slightly less for robotic surgery (USD 5,427) than for laparoscopy (USD 5,494), but more than for the open procedure (USD 2,251). Overall, robotic gastric bypass (USD 19,363) was cheaper when compared to laparoscopy (USD 21,697) and open surgery (USD 23,000).ConclusionsRobotic RYGBP can be cost effective due to balancing greater robotic overhead costs with the savings associated with avoiding stapler use and costly anastomotic complications.

Intra-operative fluorescent cholangiography using indocyanin green during robotic single site cholecystectomy.

Very recently, robotic single site cholecystectomy (RSSC) has been reported feasible and safe for selected cases. While an intra‐operative cholangiography can be performed, data is scarce with respect to its use. Indocyanin green (ICG) has been shown to be a viable option to visualize biliary anatomy. Since the introduction of a new near infrared camera integrated to the da Vinci Si System (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA), the surgeon is able to assess the biliary anatomy by a non‐invasive and non‐ionizing method. This paper presents the first report of ICG imaging during a RSSC.

Robotic vs. laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: systematic review and meta-analysis.

The aim of this meta‐analysis was to compare clinical outcome following laparoscopic and robotic Nissen fundoplication. A systematic literature search of Medline, Embase and Cochrane Library databases was performed. Primary outcome measures were the requirement for re‐operation, postoperative mortality and postoperative dysphagia. Secondary outcome measures were operative time, length of hospital stay, operative complications and cost. Six randomized trials, of 226 patients, were included in this meta‐analysis. There was no significant difference in requirement for re‐operation or in postoperative dysphagia. There was a significantly reduced total operative time in the laparoscopic group (weighted mean difference = 4.154; 95% CI = 1.932–6.375; p = 0.0002). There was no significant difference between robotic and laparoscopic groups for hospital stay or operative complications. Clinical results from robotic Nissen fundoplication were comparable to the standard laparoscopic approach, but there was associated increased operative time and procedure cost. Copyright

Survey on Surgical Instrument Handle Design: Ergonomics and Acceptance

Minimally invasive surgical approaches have revolutionized surgical care and considerably improved surgical outcomes. The instrumentation has changed significantly from open to laparoscopic and robotic surgery with various usability and ergonomics qualities. To establish guidelines for future designing of surgical instruments, this study assesses the effects of current surgical approaches and instruments on the surgeon. Furthermore, an analysis of surgeons’ preferences with respect to instrument handles was performed to identify the main acceptance criteria. In all, 49 surgeons (24 with robotic surgery experience, 25 without) completed the survey about physical discomfort and working conditions. The respondents evaluated comfort, intuitiveness, precision, and stability of 7 instrument handles. Robotic surgery procedures generally take a longer time than conventional procedures but result in less back, shoulder, and wrist pain; 28% of surgeons complained about finger and neck pain during robotic surgery. Three handles (conventional needle holder, da Vinci wrist, and joystick-like handle) received significantly higher scores for most of the proposed criteria. The handle preference is best explained by a regression model related only to comfort and precision (R2 = 0.91) and is significantly affected by the surgeon’s background (P < .001). Although robotic surgery seems to alleviate physical discomfort during and after surgery, the results of this study show that there is room for improvement in the sitting posture and in the ergonomics of the handles. Comfort and precision have been found to be the most important aspects for the surgeon’s choice of an instrument handle. Furthermore, surgeons’ professional background should be considered when designing novel surgical instruments.

Preclinical cadaveric study of transanal endoscopic da Vinci® surgery

Single‐port platforms are increasingly being used for transanal surgery and may be associated with a shorter learning curve than transanal endoscopic microsurgery. However, these procedures remain technically challenging, and robotic technology could overcome some of the limitations and increase intraluminal manoeuvrability. An initial experimental experience with transanal endoscopic da Vinci® surgery (TEdS) using a glove port on human cadavers is reported.

Augmented reality to the rescue of the minimally invasive surgeon. The usefulness of the interposition of stereoscopic images in the Da Vinci ™ robotic console

Computerized management of medical information and 3D imaging has become the norm in everyday medical practice. Surgeons exploit these emerging technologies and bring information previously confined to the radiology rooms into the operating theatre. The paper reports the authors’ experience with integrated stereoscopic 3D‐rendered images in the da Vinci surgeon console.

Console-integrated stereoscopic OsiriX 3D volume-rendered images for da Vinci colorectal robotic surgery.

The increased distance between surgeon and surgical field is a significant problem in laparoscopic surgery. Robotic surgery, although providing advantages for the operator, increases this gap by completely removing force feedback. Enhancement with visual tools can therefore be beneficial. The goal of this preliminary work was to create a custom plugin for OsiriX to display volume-rendered images in the da Vinci surgeon’s console. The TilePro multi-input display made the generated stereoscopic pairs appear to have depth. Tumor position, vascular supply, spatial location, and relationship between organs appear directly within the surgeon’s field of view. This study presents a case of totally robotic right colectomy for cancer using this new technology. Sight diversion was no longer necessary. Depth perception was subjectively perceived as profitable. Total immersion in the operative field helped compensate for the lack of tactile feedback specific to robotic intervention. This innovative tool is a step forward toward augmented-reality robot-assisted surgery.

Robotic single-site cholecystectomy.

Minimally invasive approaches for cholecystectomy are evolving in a surge for the best possible clinical outcome for the patients. As one of the most recent developments, a robotic set of instrumentation to be used with the da Vinci Si Surgical System has been developed to overcome some of the technical challenges of manual single incision laparoscopy.

Set‐up and docking of the da Vinci® surgical system: prospective analysis of initial experience

Set‐up and docking of the da Vinci® surgical system are assumed to extend overall operating times. We hypothesized that these tasks could be achieved in adequate times. Therefore, a prospective analysis of set‐up and docking times of the da Vinci® Surgical System was conducted.

Robot-Assisted Oncologic Resection for Large Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor: A Preliminary Case Series

BACKGROUND Laparoscopic resection of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) has been shown as feasible and safe in terms of oncologic results. However, laparoscopic resection has been demonstrated to be mainly suitable for small, favorably localized GIST. The robotic approach may, by its characteristics, enable the surgeon to perform atypical gastrectomies in an unfavorable location (i.e., close to pylorus or cardia). Its use in oncologic gastric surgery has been poorly defined and has never been reported for GIST. MATERIALS AND METHODS All patients who underwent robotic-assisted gastric resection for GIST at a single institution from 2006 to 2009 were prospectively followed-up. RESULTS There were 5 patients (3 men and 2 women), with a median age of 39 years (range, 32-74), who had a complete resection (R0). Two patients had a cardial GIST and 3 of the antrum. Median tumor sizes were of 5.5 cm (range, 4.2-7). According to Fletcher criteria, 4 tumors (80%) were classified as intermediate or high risk. No postoperative morbidity and mortality were noted. One patient had a conversion to open surgery because of a suspicion of diffuse adenocarcinoma on fresh frozen section and necessitated a total gastrectomy with a radical lymph node dissection. Median operation time was 192 minutes (range, 132-285). With a median follow-up of 18 months (range, 11-27), disease-free survival rate was 100%. CONCLUSIONS The da Vinci robot (Intuitive Surgical, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA) is a valuable instrument for oncologically safe resection with esogastric or duodenogastric junction preservation for an unfavorably located gastric GIST. Moreover, the three-dimensional, high-definition vision, instrument mobility, and ease of performing a difficult suturing enable a safe, large atypical gastrectomy, close to the pylorus or cardia.