Monika Raut
Novartis
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Monika Raut.
The Journal of Urology | 2006
Matthew R. Smith; Simone Peart Boyce; Erick Moyneur; Mei Sheng Duh; Monika Raut; Jane Brandman
PURPOSE We assessed the relationship between GnRH agonists and the risk of clinical fractures in men with prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS Using a database of medical claims from 16 large American companies we identified a study group of 3,779 men with prostate cancer who received treatment with a GnRH agonist and a control group of 8,341 with prostate cancer who were not treated with a GnRH agonist. Men with 1 or more medical claims for bone metastases were excluded. The rates of any clinical fracture, hip fracture and vertebral fracture were compared between the groups. RESULTS The rate of any fracture was 7.91/100 vs 6.55/100 person-years at risk in men who received vs did not receive a GnRH agonist (relative risk 1.21, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.34). The rates of hip fracture (relative risk 1.76, 95% CI 1.33 to 2.33) and vertebral fracture (relative risk 1.18, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.48) were also higher in men who received a GnRH agonist. GnRH agonist treatment was independently associated with fracture risk on multivariate analyses. CONCLUSIONS GnRH agonists increase the risk of clinical fracture in men with prostate cancer.
Oncology | 2004
Thomas E. Delea; Corey J. Langer; James M. McKiernan; Martin Liss; John Edelsberg; Jane Brandman; Jennifer Sung; Monika Raut; Gerry Oster
Purpose: Patients with bone metastases from lung cancer often experience skeletal-related events (SREs) including pathological fracture, spinal cord compression, hypercalcemia or pain requiring surgery, radiotherapy or opioid analgesics. These complications result in impaired mobility and reduced quality of life and have a significant negative impact on survival. The economic consequences of SREs in patients with lung cancer have not been examined. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis using a large US health insurance claims database to estimate the incidence and costs of treatment of SREs in patients with bone metastases of lung cancer treated in a naturalistic setting. Study subjects had ≧2 encounters with a diagnosis of primary lung cancer and ≧2 encounters with a diagnosis of metastases to bone. SREs were identified based on the occurrence on or after the date of first diagnosis of bone metastases, of (1) ≧1 encounter with a diagnosis of pathological fracture, spinal cord compression or hypercalcemia, (2) ≧1 bone surgery or radiotherapy procedure, or (3) the initiation of opioid analgesic therapy. Survival and costs of SRE-related care in patients with SREs were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods. Results: We identified 534 patients with lung cancer and bone metastases, including 295 (55%) with ≧1 SRE. Radiotherapy (68%) and fracture (35%) were the most common SREs. Median survival after the first identified SRE was 4.1 months (95% confidence interval: 3.6–5.5 months). The estimated lifetime SRE-related cost per patient was USD 11,979 (95% confidence interval: USD 10,193–13,766). Radiotherapy accounted for the greatest proportion of cost (61%) by SRE type. Conclusion: The economic burden of SREs in patients with bone metastases of lung cancer is substantial. Intravenous bisphosphonates, such as zoledronic acid, which have been shown to prevent these events, may reduce these costs.
Critical Care | 2007
Marya D. Zilberberg; Chureen Carter; Patrick Lefebvre; Monika Raut; Francis Vekeman; Mei Sheng Duh; Andrew F. Shorr
IntroductionRecent data indicate that transfusion of packed red blood cells (pRBCs) may increase the risk for the development of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in critically ill patients. Uncertainty remains regarding the strength of this relationship.MethodsTo quantify the association between transfusions and intensive care unit (ICU)-onset ARDS, we performed a cohort study within Crit, a multicenter, prospective, observational study of transfusion practice in the ICU which enrolled 4,892 critically ill patients in 284 ICUs in the United States. Diagnostic criteria for ARDS were prospectively defined, and we focused on subjects without ARDS at admission. The development of ARDS in the ICU served as the primary endpoint.ResultsAmong the 4,730 patients without ARDS at admission, 246 (5.2%) developed ARDS in the ICU. At baseline, ARDS cases were younger, more likely to be in a surgical ICU, and more likely to be admitted with pneumonia or sepsis than controls without ARDS. Cases also were more likely to have a serum creatinine of greater than 2.0 mg/dl (23% versus 18%) and a serum albumin of less than or equal to 2.3 g/dl (54% versus 30%) and were more severely ill upon ICU admission as measured by either the APACHE II (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II) or SOFA (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment) score (p < 0.05 for all). Sixty-seven percent and 42% of cases and controls, respectively, had exposure to pRBC transfusions (p < 0.05), and the unadjusted odds ratio (OR) of developing ARDS in transfused patients was 2.74 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.09 to 3.59; p < 0.0001) compared to those never transfused. After age, baseline severity of illness, admitting diagnosis, and process-of-care factors were adjusted for, the independent relationship between pRBC transfusions and ICU-onset ARDS remained significant (adjusted OR, 2.80; 95% CI, 1.90 to 4.12; p < 0.0001).ConclusionDevelopment of ARDS after ICU admission is common, occurring in approximately 5% of critically ill patients. Transfusion of pRBCs is independently associated with the development of ARDS in the ICU.
Journal of Thoracic Oncology | 2006
Thomas E. Delea; James M. McKiernan; Jane Brandman; John Edelsberg; Jennifer Sung; Monika Raut; Gerry Oster
Introduction: Previous studies have estimated the costs of skeletal-related events (SREs) for patients with bone metastases of solid tumors by tallying costs for services specifically attributable to these events. This approach may underestimate costs if SREs indirectly increase use of other services. Methods: This is a retrospective observational study using a large health insurance claims database. Patients with bone metastases of lung cancer who experienced ≥1 SRE were matched to similar patients without SREs based on propensity scores. Kaplan-Meier estimated total medical care costs were compared for propensity-matched samples of patients with SREs and without SREs. Results: We identified 534 patients with lung cancer and bone metastases, including 295 (55%) with ≥1 SRE. After matching, there were 162 patients each in the SRE and no-SRE groups with mean follow-up of 5.3 and 3.9 months, respectively. In the SRE group, costs of treatment of SREs were
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes | 2006
Lori P. Potter; Susan D. Mathias; Monika Raut; Farid Kianifard; Amir Tavakkol
9,480 (95% CI
Journal of Dermatological Treatment | 2007
Lori P. Potter; Susan D. Mathias; Monika Raut; Farid Kianifard; Adam S. Landsman; Amir Tavakkol
7,625 to
Journal of the American College of Cardiology | 2016
Steven Deitelzweig; Jeffrey A. Kline; Jay M. Margolis; Monika Raut; Oth Tran; David Woodruff Smith; Concetta Crivera; Brahim Bookhart; Jeff Schein; William H. Olson
11,374) per patient. Total medical care costs were
The journal of supportive oncology | 2006
Delea T; McKiernan J; Brandman J; Edelsberg J; Jennifer Sung; Monika Raut; Gerry Oster
27,982 (95% CI
The journal of supportive oncology | 2005
Renée J. Goldberg Arnold; Nashat Gabrail; Monika Raut; Renée Kim; Jennifer Sung; Yonglong Zhou
15,921 to
Journal of Managed Care Pharmacy | 2007
Dong-Churl Suh; Jenny Sung; Douglas Gause; Monika Raut; Joice Huang; Is Choi
40,625) greater for SRE versus no-SRE patients (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The costs of SREs in patients with lung cancer and bone metastases are substantial and potentially greater than previously estimated.