Monique C.M. Baas-Thijssen

Benefit from preoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer treatment: disease-free patients' and oncologists' preferences

Preoperative radiotherapy (PRT) in resectable rectal cancer improves local control but increases probability of faecal incontinence and sexual dysfunction. Consensus was reached in 2001 in the Netherlands on a guideline advising PRT to new patients. Purpose was to assess at what benefit oncologists and rectal cancer patients prefer PRT followed by surgery to surgery alone, and how oncologists and patients value various treatment outcomes. Sixty-six disease-free patients and 60 oncologists (surgical, radiation, medical) were interviewed. Minimally desired benefit from PRT (local control) was assessed using the Treatment Tradeoff Method. Importance of survival, local control, faecal incontinence, and sexual dysfunction in determining treatment outcome preferences was assessed using Adaptive Conjoint Analysis. The range of required benefit from PRT varied widely within participant groups. Seventeen percent of patients would choose PRT at a 0% benefit; 11% would not choose PRT for the maximum benefit of 11%. Mean minimally desired benefit excluding these two groups was 4%. For oncologists, the required benefit was 5%. Also, how strongly participants valued treatment outcomes varied widely within groups. Of the four outcomes, participants considered incontinence most often as most important. Relative treatment outcome importance differed between specialties. Patients considered sexual functioning more important than oncologists. Large differences in treatment preferences exist between individual patients and oncologists. Oncologists should adequately inform their patients about the risks and benefits of PRT, and elicit patient preferences regarding treatment outcomes.

The relation between illness cognitions and quality of life in people with and without a stoma following rectal cancer treatment.

Objectives: To compare health‐related quality of life, emotional functioning and illness cognitions between people with and without a stoma after rectal cancer treatment about 8 years ago and to examine the relation between illness cognitions and health‐related quality of life and emotional functioning.

How important is the opinion of significant others to cancer patients’ adjuvant chemotherapy decision-making?

GoalsDecisions regarding adjuvant chemotherapy are difficult, since value tradeoffs are involved. Little is known about the importance of the significant others in patients’ decision-making regarding adjuvant treatment. We surveyed patients with breast and colorectal cancer about the importance they assigned to the opinions of their significant others and assessed correlates of these importance scores.Materials and methodsOne hundred and twenty-three patients rated on a five-point scale how much they cared about the opinion of six significant others.Main resultsMost important was the opinion of their treating specialist, followed by that of their partner, children, other family, friends, and colleagues. Women assigned higher scores to the opinion of their children, younger patients to that of their specialist, and patients who were about to undergo chemotherapy to that of their family. Patients with breast cancer and patients without paid employment assigned slightly more importance to the opinion of their partner.ConclusionsInformation on the influence of significant others may help clinicians when involving patients in treatment decision-making and discussing patients’ treatment preferences.

Explaining Differences in Attitude Toward Adjuvant Chemotherapy Between Experienced and Inexperienced Breast Cancer Patients

PURPOSE Previous studies have shown that patients who have experienced adjuvant chemotherapy (experienced patients) have a more favorable attitude towards chemotherapy than those who have not (inexperienced patients). However, not much is known about the reasons underlying this difference. According to the Theory of Planned Behavior, the attitude towards a particular behavior (eg, accepting chemotherapy) is based on beliefs about the likelihood of outcomes of the behavior and the evaluations of these outcomes. We used this theory to explore in what way the beliefs of experienced patients differed from those of inexperienced patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS A cross-sectional survey was undertaken among 719 patients who had been treated for early-stage breast cancer between 1998 and 2003. Patients were asked, first, to indicate the likelihood of six positive and six negative outcomes of undergoing chemotherapy and, second, to give their evaluation of these outcomes. RESULTS Four hundred forty-six women filled in the questionnaire (response rate, 62%). As hypothesized, experienced patients (ie, patients who had been treated with adjuvant chemotherapy as part of their primary treatment plan) had a more positive attitude towards chemotherapy. Experienced patients provided higher likelihood estimates of treatment advantages, such as life prolongation. In addition, they evaluated the positive outcomes of chemotherapy more favorably. With regard to the negative outcomes of chemotherapy, few differences were observed between treatment groups. CONCLUSION Experienced patients have more confidence in the positive outcomes of chemotherapy than inexperienced patients. This might be the result of a cognitive mechanism to justify the way in which patients were treated.

Shared decision making in oncology: A model based on patients’, healthcare professionals’, and researchers’ views

To construct a model of shared decision making (SDM) about cancer treatment by conducting an extensive consultation of stakeholders, informed by the literature.