Monique Tröbs

Comparison of Fractional Flow Reserve Based on Computational Fluid Dynamics Modeling Using Coronary Angiographic Vessel Morphology Versus Invasively Measured Fractional Flow Reserve

Invasive fractional flow reserve (FFRinvasive), although gold standard to identify hemodynamically relevant coronary stenoses, is time consuming and potentially associated with complications. We developed and evaluated a new approach to determine lesion-specific FFR on the basis of coronary anatomy as visualized by invasive coronary angiography (FFRangio): 100 coronary lesions (50% to 90% diameter stenosis) in 73 patients (48 men, 25 women; mean age 67 ± 9 years) were studied. On the basis of coronary angiograms acquired at rest from 2 views at angulations at least 30° apart, a PC-based computational fluid dynamics modeling software used personalized boundary conditions determined from 3-dimensional reconstructed angiography, heart rate, and blood pressure to derive FFRangio. The results were compared with FFRinvasive. Interobserver variability was determined in a subset of 25 narrowings. Twenty-nine of 100 coronary lesions were hemodynamically significant (FFRinvasive ≤ 0.80). FFRangio identified these with an accuracy of 90%, sensitivity of 79%, specificity of 94%, positive predictive value of 85%, and negative predictive value of 92%. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.93. Correlation between FFRinvasive (mean: 0.84 ± 0.11) and FFRangio (mean: 0.85 ± 0.12) was r = 0.85. Interobserver variability of FFRangio was low, with a correlation of r = 0.88. In conclusion, estimation of coronary FFR with PC-based computational fluid dynamics modeling on the basis of lesion morphology as determined by invasive angiography is possible with high diagnostic accuracy compared to invasive measurements.

Bioresorbable vascular scaffold thrombosis in a consecutive cohort of 550 patients.

To determine the rate of bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) thrombosis in a large, real‐world population.

Predictors of Technical Failure in Transradial Coronary Angiography and Intervention

Transradial access for coronary angiography and intervention is preferred over the femoral approach but can be technically challenging. Identification of predictors of transradial access failure is important, especially in the context of acute coronary syndromes. We therefore retrospectively analyzed 13,095 consecutive patients (66 ± 12 years, 64% male) in whom transradial access was attempted for coronary angiography or intervention to identify predictors of transradial access failure. Angiograms and patient files were systematically reviewed to analyze patient characteristics associated with failure. Transradial access failure rate was 6.8% (909 of 13,095). Patients with transradial access failure were more frequently female (9.5% vs 5.5%; p <0.001), significantly older (68 ± 12 vs 66 ± 12 years, p <0.001), and had a smaller body surface area (1.89 ± 0.21 vs 1.94 ± 0.2 m2; p <0.001). Transradial failure was not significantly more frequent in ST-elevation myocardial infarction versus other patients (8.1% vs 6.9%, p = 0.195). After multivariable adjustment, only female sex (odds ratio [OR] 1.44, p <0.001), higher patient age (OR 1.01/year, p = 0.002), and lower height (OR 0.98/cm, p = 0.004) independently predicted transradial access failure. In conclusion, female sex, higher age, and smaller height independently predict transradial access failure in coronary angiography and intervention. Failure rate in ST-elevation myocardial infarction is not significantly increased.

Treatment and outcome of coronary artery perforations using a dual guiding catheter technique

OBJECTIVES To evaluate the success rate and outcome of coronary artery perforation treatment using a dual guiding catheter technique. BACKGROUND Coronary artery perforation is a rare but severe complication during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with high mortality. The use of a second guiding catheter is a helpful technique to minimize hemorrhage through the perforation during interventional repair. METHODS We screened all patients between March 2004 and December 2014 who underwent PCI in our department for the occurrence of peri-interventional coronary perforation that was treated using a dual catheter technique. Patient and lesion characteristics as well as outcome were determined. RESULTS We identified 8 patients who experienced coronary artery perforations (Ellis grade III) during coronary intervention and were treated using a dual guiding catheter approach. The procedure was technically successful (placement of covered stent and sealing of perforation) in 6 patients. Pericardiocentesis was required in 3 patients (38%). Total mortality was 12% (n=1). No coronary or peripheral vascular access complication occurred due to the use of a second guiding catheter. CONCLUSIONS We suggest that the dual guiding catheter technique is a useful and alternative approach to treat severe Ellis grade III coronary artery perforations that occur in the context of percutaneous coronary interventions.

Comparison of invasively measured FFR with FFR derived from coronary CT angiography for detection of lesion-specific ischemia: Results from a PC-based prototype algorithm

BACKGROUND We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of a novel prototype for on-site determination of CT-based FFR (cFFR) on a standard personal computer (PC) compared to invasively measured FFR in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. METHODS A total of 91 vessels in 71 patients (mean age 65 ± 9 years) in whom coronary CT angiography had been performed due to suspicion of coronary artery disease, and who subsequently underwent invasive coronary angiography with FFR measurement were analyzed. For both cFFR and FFR, a threshold of ≤0.80 was used to indicate a hemodynamically relevant stenosis. The mean time needed to calculate cFFR was 12.4 ± 3.4 min. A very close correlation between cFFR and FFR could be shown (r = 0.85; p < 0.0001) with Bland-Altman analysis showing moderate agreement between FFR and cFFR with mild systematic overestimation of FFR values in CT (mean difference 0.0049, 95% limits of agreement ±2SD -0.007 to 0.008). Compared to FFR, the sensitivity of cFFR to detect hemodynamically significant lesions was 91% (19/21, 95% CI: 70%-99%), specificity was 96% (67/70, 95% CI: 88%-99%), positive predictive value 86% (95% CI: 65%-97%) and negative predictive value was 97% (95% CI: 90%-100%) with an accuracy of 93%. CONCLUSION cFFR obtained using an on-site algorithm implemented on a standard PC shows high diagnostic accuracy to detect lesions causing ischemia as compared to FFR. Importantly, the time needed for analysis is short which may be useful for improving clinical workflow.

Effect of non-compliant balloon postdilatation on magnesium-based bioresorbable vascular scaffolds

Optimal implantation results of bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) are typically assumed to require postdilatation with non‐compliant (NC) balloons to achieve full scaffold apposition and minimize event rates. We systematically evaluated the mechanical effect of NC balloon postdilatation on magnesium‐based BRS (Magmaris®, Biotronik AG, Bülach, Switzerland) in vivo.

Percutaneous coronary intervention of unprotected left main stenoses – procedural data and outcome depending on SYNTAX I Score

BACKGROUND We hypothesized that SYNTAX I score is a predictor for procedure complexity in left main PCI. Procedure complexity, duration and contrast load may contribute to adverse outcome of complex left main percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS In 105 consecutive patients who underwent PCI of unprotected left main coronary artery stenoses between 2014 and 2016, clinical parameters as well as PCI characteristics and follow-up data were analyzed. RESULTS The mean SYNTAX I score was 29 ± 12, with 66 patients having a SYNTAX I score ≤ 32 and 39 patients a SYNTAX I score > 32. In patients with high SYNTAX I score vs. low-to-intermediate SYNTAX I score, single stent techniques were performed significantly less frequently (18% vs. 68%; p < 0.001), while Crush (44% vs. 5%; p < 0.001) and Culotte techniques (20% vs. 5%; p = 0.003) were performed significantly more frequently. Procedural success was achieved in all 105 cases without periprocedural mortality. During follow up, repeat PCI was necessary significantly more frequently in patients with high compared to patients with low-to-intermediate SYNTAX I score (34% vs.13%; p = 0.003). Nevertheless, overall mortality did not differ between patients with high vs. low-to-intermediate SYNTAX I score (20% vs. 18%). CONCLUSIONS PCI strategies for the treatment of left main coronary artery stenoses get significantly more complex with increasing SYNTAX I scores. While this translates into a significantly longer procedure duration and contrast load, short-term outcome seems not to be influenced by the SYNTAX I score.

Major coronary evaginations following implantation of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds – Clinical and OCT characteristics

BACKGROUND Coronary evaginations can occur after implantation of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BRS) and may be associated with scaffold thrombosis. Aim of this study was to clarify the clinical manifestation, extent and time course of coronary artery remodeling in vessel segments that develop angiographically detectable evaginations following BRS implantation through optical coherence tomography (OCT) analysis. METHODS In 8 patients, 10 BRS (Absorb, Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA, USA) which displayed coronary evaginations in clinically driven late invasive coronary angiograms were identified and findings were compared to 10 BRS in 8 patients without coronary evaginations. Vessel and device geometry was analyzed in serial OCT cross-sections at a spacing of 200 μm. Measured BRS dimensions were normalized to the reference vessel size at implantation. RESULTS In OCT, major evaginations on average affected 24 ± 19% of the scaffold length. Scaffolds with major evaginations had a significantly larger lumen area than scaffolds without evaginations (mean normalized lumen area 1.19 ± 0.58 vs. 0.77 ± 0.38; p < 0.001), and also displayed a significantly larger scaffold area (mean normalized scaffold area: 1.36 ± 0.6 vs. 1.13 ± 0.43; p < 0.001), and scaffold diameter (mean normalized scaffold diameter: 1.17 ± 0.33 vs.1.04 ± 0.19; p < 0.001). Lumen area (r = 0.47; p < 0.001), scaffold area (r = 0.52; p < 0.001), and scaffold diameter (r = 0.74; p < 0.001) in the evagination group were positively correlated to the time since scaffold implantation. CONCLUSION Coronary evaginations following BRS implantation are associated with an increased scaffold area, indicating that the scaffold follows the outward remodeling of the artery. The process affects the entire scaffold length and seems to be continuously progressing following implantation.

Die neue ESC-Leitlinie Herzinsuffizienz

Im Jahr 2016 publizierten die europäische Gesellschaft für Kardiologie (ESC) wie auch die amerikanischen Fachgesellschaften (ACC/AHA/HFSA) aktualisierte Leitlinien zur „Diagnose und Therapie der akuten und chronischen Herzinsuffizienz“. Was ist neu?

Applicability and procedural success rate of bioresorbable ­vascular scaffolds for percutaneous coronary intervention in an all-comer cohort of 383 consecutive patients

Objectives The purpose of this study was to determine applicability and procedural success of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in an all-comer cohort. Background BVS use in bifurcations and severely calcified lesions is not recommended, and a relatively large crossing profile may cause limitations. It is has never been studied how widely BVS can be applied in all-comer cohorts. Methods In 383 consecutive patients (acute coronary syndrome: 124, stable coronary disease 259), a BVS (Absorb) was used as first-line device unless any of the following contraindications were present: bifurcation with side branch >2.0 mm, reference diameter <2.5 mm or >4.0 mm, required device length <12 mm, in-stent stenosis, or contraindications to 6 months of DAPT. Patients and lesions were evaluated regarding suitability for BVS treatment, procedural success (successful BVS placement and residual stenosis <30%), and outcome. Results Of 588 lesions, 303 (52%) were unsuitable for BVS placement due to presence of a bifurcation (30% of unsuitable lesions), reference diameter >4.0 mm (13%) or <2.5 mm (12%), contraindication to 6 months DAPT (13%), in-stent stenosis (14%), and desired device length <12 mm (4%). If BVS use was attempted, procedural success with a scaffold was 95% (271/285). Crossing failure occurred in 14 cases (5%), affected lesions were significantly more calcified. After a mean follow-up period of 259 days, definite/probable scaffold thrombosis occurred in 1.1% of patients. Conclusions Approximately one-half of lesions in an all-comer population can successfully be treated with BVS. Crossing failure is rare.