Montse Domingo-Sabat

Adult spinal deformity: a very heterogeneous population of patients with different needs

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to analyze and demonstrate the heterogeneity in adult spinal deformity (ASD) populations by baseline health-related quality of life (HRQL) data. METHODS ASD was defined as patients over 18 years of age with any of the following: coronal deformity >20°, sagittal vertical axis (SVA) >5 cm, pelvic tilt >25°, or thoracic kyphosis >60°. Three hundred fifty-two patients meeting the above definition of ASD were analyzed for measures of HRQL (Oswestry disability index [ODI], SRS-22 [Scoliosis Research Society-22], and SF-36 [Short form-36 health survey] questionnaires) at presentation. Age groups were defined as 18-40, 40-60, and >60 years. Deformity was analyzed as either degenerative (DS) or idiopathic (IS) (294 patients; 71 degenerative, 223 idiopathic). RESULTS There were significant differences between age groups--predominantly between the lower age group (18-40) and others--for all HRQL parameters except SRS-22 mental health and SF-36 mental component score. Similarly, HRQL measures for DS and IS deformities were significantly different. Regarding location of main curves, thoracolumbar/lumbar (TL/L) (70.2%) was dominant for the DS group and thoracic (55%) for the IS group. Mean age was 65 years for the DS group and 36 for the IS group, which were significantly different. Radiographic parameters were also significantly different between these groups, with IS patients having more coronal deformity and better sagittal balance. CONCLUSION ASD patients are very heterogeneous at presentation, depending on age and diagnosis. There is a distinct need to stratify ASD as early and late presentation ASD and/or by diagnosis. Patients with IS deformity may be very different from those with DS deformity, even at time of presentation. These differences must be taken into consideration in treatment of these patients, as well as for the analysis of the results of treatment.

Multiple Regression Analysis of Factors Affecting Health-Related Quality of Life in Adult Spinal Deformity.

BACKGROUND Previous studies demonstrated the adult spinal deformity (ASD) population is heterogeneous. Multiple parameters may affect health-related quality of life (HRQL). AIM To understand the ranking of parameters affecting HRQL in ASD using multiple regression analysis. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 483 patients enrolled in a prospective multicenter ASD database from the population. Multiple regression analysis was performed for Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) separately. Initially proposed primary variables of diagnosis (highest correlation), age, lordosis gap (L gap), and coronal curve location were regressed for each response variable (SRS-22 and ODI) univariately. Age and L gap could not be used together because of high colinearity. Coronal curve location was removed owing to an insignificant correlation. Two initial models were considered per response, consisting of diagnosis and age in one and diagnosis and L gap in the other. The rest of the potentially predictive variables were introduced in these models one at a time. Final models were evaluated using stepwise automatic model selection. RESULTS For ODI, body mass index (BMI), gender, and sagittal and spinopelvic parameters were in the basic model but only BMI and gender in the model with L gap and only gender in the model with age were highly predictive. For SRS-22, a large number of parameters were in the basic model but BMI, gender, coronal balance, lordosis curve, and sagittal vertical axis in the model with L gap and only gender in the model with age were highly predictive. Coronal curve location was not significantly predictive in any model. CONCLUSIONS These findings reiterate the importance of patient diagnosis, age, and/or the amount of lordosis as the most important factors affecting HRQL in ASD. Gender, BMI, and sagittal vertical axis appear to be consistently important co-variables whereas coronal balance and magnitude of L curves may also be important in SRS-22. These may aid in better understanding the problem in ASD and may be useful in future classifications.

Decision analysis to identify the ideal treatment for adult spinal deformity: What is the impact of complications on treatment outcomes?

Objective The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of treatment complications on outcomes in adult spinal deformity (ASD) using a decision analysis (DA) model. Methods The study included 535 ASD patients (371 with non-surgical (NS) and 164 with surgical (S) treatment) from an international multicentre database of ASD patients. DA was structured in two main steps; 1) Baseline analysis (Assessing the probabilities of outcomes, Assessing the values of preference -utilities-, Combining information on probability and utility and assigning the quality adjusted life expectancy (QALE) for each treatment) and 2) Sensitivity analysis. Complications were analyzed as life threatening (LT) and nonlife threatening (NLT) and their probabilities were calculated from the database as well as a thorough literature review. Outcomes were analyzed as improvement, no change and deterioration. Death/complete paralysis was considered as a separate category. Results All 535 patients were analyzed in regard to complications. Overall, there were 78 NLT and 12 LT complications and 3 death/paralysis. Surgical treatment offered significantly higher chances of clinical improvement but also was significantly more prone to complications (31.7% vs. 11.1%, p < 0.001). Conclusion Surgical treatment of ASD is more likely to cause complications compared to NS treatment. On the other hand, surgery has been shown to provide a higher likelihood of improvement in HRQoL scores. So, the decision on the type of treatment in ASD needs to take both chances of improvement and burden associated with S or NS treatments and better be arrived by the active participation of patients and physicians equipped with the present information. Level of evidence Level II, Decision analysis.

Is Routine Postoperative Radiologic Follow-up Justified in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis?

STUDY DESIGN Retrospective review. OBJECTIVES To determine whether routine periodic radiographic examination is worthwhile in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients undergoing instrumented fusion with third-generation implants. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA In common practice, patients who have undergone surgery for idiopathic scoliosis are followed up for a minimum of 2 years by clinical assessment and routine radiographic study at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. The radiation related to these examinations is not negligible. To our knowledge, the use of routine radiographic follow-up after posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis has not been evaluated. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed full-spine X-rays and clinical records from the first 2 postoperative years of 43 patients. We sought any clinical feature (eg, pain, deformity progression, material protrusion) justifying X-ray, and any relevant radiologic finding (eg, loss of correction, instrumentation loosening, junctional kyphosis). RESULTS Excluding the immediate postoperative films, 14.8% of X-rays were clinically justified, 8.3% were associated with a relevant finding, and 4.3% led to a therapy change. All patients with clinical deformity progression had a relevant X-ray finding. Pain was associated with a relevant finding in 23.5% of cases (positive predictive value, 0.1); 7.4% of films with no clinical justification showed a relevant finding (negative predictive value, 0.86). Lower Risser sign increased the risk of having a relevant radiographic finding (p < .05). CONCLUSIONS With the current use of third-generation implants, routine biplanar postoperative X-rays at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months do not seem to be justified in AIS and should be avoided in mature, asymptomatic patients.

Impact of early unanticipated revision surgery on health-related quality of life after adult spinal deformity surgery

BACKGROUND CONTEXT Revision surgery represents a major event for patients undergoing adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. Previous reports suggest that ASD surgery has minimal or no impact on health-related-quality of life (HRQOL) outcomes. PURPOSE The present study aims to investigate the impact of early reoperations within the first year on HRQOL and on the likelihood of reaching the minimally clinically important difference (MCID) after ASD surgery. DESIGN This is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from consecutive surgically treated adult deformity surgery patients included in a multicenter, international database. PATIENT SAMPLE The present study included 280 patients from a multicenter international prospective database. OUTCOME MEASURE Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Short Form-36 (SF-36), Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22), MCID were evaluated in this work. METHODS Consecutive surgical patients with ASD recruited prospectively in six different centers from four countries with a minimum 2-year follow-up were stratified into two groups: R (revision surgery within the first year) and NR (no revision). Health-related-quality of life (ODI, SF-36, SRS-22) was assessed and compared at 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year follow-up stages. Statistical analysis included chi-square tests, Student t tests, and linear mixed models. RESULTS Forty-three patients (R Group) received 46 revision surgeries. Nineteen patients (41.3%) had implant-related complications, 9 patients (19.6%) had deep surgical site infections, 9 patients (19.6%) had proximal junctional kyphosis, 3 patients (6.5%) had hematoma, and 6 patients (13%) had other complications. Baseline characteristics differed between groups. At 6 months, all HRQOL scores improved in both groups, except in the SF-36 Mental Component Summary and SRS-22 mental health domain in the R Group. At 1 year, ODI and SRS-22 improvement was significantly greater in the NR Group, exceeding the reported MCID. At the 2-year follow-up, ODI, SRS-22, SF-36 MCS, and SF-36 PCS improvement was similar in both groups. However, postoperative change was only above the MCID for SF-36 PCS, ODI, and SRS-22 in the NR Group. CONCLUSIONS Early unanticipated revision surgery has a negative impact on mental health at 6 months and reduces the chances of reaching an MCID improvement in SRS-22, SF-36 PCS, and ODI at the 2-year follow-up.

Are routine postoperative X-Rays justified in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis?

Results Records from 43 patients (mean age 16.5 years, 93% women) were evaluated. A total of 414 (212 posteroanterior, 202 lateral) full-spine X-rays (9.6/patient) were performed during the first 2 postoperative years: 392 were available for analysis, and 391 had an associated clinical note. Excluding the 89 immediate postoperative films, only 48 of 325 (14.8%) were clinically justified: pain in 17 (34%) patients, clinical progression of deformity in 4 (8%) and previous X-ray finding in 29 (58%). All patients with clinical progression had a relevant X-ray finding. Pain was associated with a relevant finding in 23.5% of cases (positive predictive value 0.1); 7.4% of films with no clinical justification showed a relevant finding (negative predictive value 0.86). Only 4.3% of films led to a therapy change. Lower Risser sign increased the risk of having a relevant radiographic finding (p<0.05). Conclusions Routine 3, 6, 12, and 24-month postoperative X-rays are not justified in AIS and should be avoided in mature, uncomplicated cases.

Minimum clinically important difference of the health-related quality of life scales in adult spinal deformity calculated by latent class analysis: is it appropriate to use the same values for surgical and nonsurgical patients?

BACKGROUND CONTEXT Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) parameters have been shown to be reliable and valid in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD). Minimum clinically important difference (MCID) has become increasingly important to clinicians in evaluating patients with a threshold of improvement that is clinically relevant. PURPOSE To calculate MCID and minimum detectable change (MDC) values of total scores of the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Physical Component Summary (PCS), Mental Component Summary (MCS) of the Short Form 36 (SF-36), and Scoliosis Research Society 22R (SRS-22R) in surgically and nonsurgically treated ASD patients who have completed an anchor question at pretreatment and 1-year follow-up. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING Prospective cohort. PATIENT SAMPLE Surgical and nonsurgical patients from a multicenter ASD database. OUTCOME MEASURES Self-reported HRQOL measures (COMI, ODI, SF-36, SRS-22R, and anchor question). METHODS A total of 185 surgical and 86 nonsurgical patients from a multicenter ASD database who completed pretreatment and 1-year follow-up HRQOL scales and the anchor question at the first year follow-up were included. The anchor question was used to determine MCID for each HRQOL measure. MCIDs were calculated by an anchor-based method using latent class analysis (LCA) and MDCs by a distribution-based method. RESULTS All differences between means of baseline and first year postoperative total score measures for all scales demonstrated statistically significant improvements in the overall population as well as the surgically treated patients but not in the nonsurgical group. The calculated MDC and MCID values of HRQOL parameters in the entire study population were 1.34 and 2.62 for COMI, 10.65 and 14.31 for ODI, 6.09 and 7.33 for SF-36 PCS, 6.14 and 4.37 for SF-36 MCS, and 0.42 and 0.71 for SRS-22R. The calculated MCID values for surgical and non-surgical treatment groups were 2.76 versus 1.20 for COMI, 14.96 versus 2.45 for ODI, 7.83 versus 2.15 for SF-36 PCS, 5.14 versus 2.03 for SF-36 MCS, and 0.94 versus 0.11 for SRS-22R; the MDC values for surgical and nonsurgical treatment groups were 1.22 versus 1.51 for COMI, 10.27 versus 9.45 for ODI, 5.16 versus 6.77 for SF-36 PCS, 6.05 versus 5.67 for SF-36 MCS, and 0.38 versus 0.43 for SRS-22R. CONCLUSIONS This study has demonstrated that MCID calculations for the HRQOL scales in ASD using LCA yield values comparable to other studies that had used different methodologies. The most important finding was the significantly different MCIDs for COMI, ODI, SF-36 PCS and SRS-22 in the surgically and nonsurgically treated cohorts. This finding suggests that a universal MCID value, inherent to a specific HRQOL for an entire cohort of ASD may not exist. Use of different MCIDs for surgical and nonsurgical patients may be warranted.