Moo-Rim Park
Wonkwang University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Moo-Rim Park.
British Journal of Haematology | 2001
Je-Jung Lee; Ik-Joo Chung; Jeung-A Na; Moo-Rim Park; Tai-Ju Hwang; Jae-Yong Kwak; Sang-Kyun Sohn; Hyeoung-Joon Kim
To investigate telomere changes in patients with aplastic anaemia (AA) and clinical factors influencing the telomere dynamics, telomere length (TL) was measured in peripheral blood mononuclear cells using Southern blot analysis of 42 patients with AA and 39 healthy normal controls. Nineteen patients received supportive treatment only, while the remaining 23 patients received immunosuppressive therapy with anti‐thymocyte globulin or anti‐lymphocyte globulin ± cyclosporin A. In AA patients, TL was on average 1·41 kb shorter than that of age‐matched normal controls (P < 0·001). In patients treated with immunosuppression, the mean TL of non‐responders was significantly shorter than that of age‐matched normal controls (P < 0·001), while no difference in TL was detected in responders compared with controls. Positive correlation was observed between the extent of telomere shortening, the severity of neutropenia (P = 0·05) and the degree of mean corpuscular volume elevation (P = 0·005) at the time of the study. However, there was no correlation with time elapsed since diagnosis (P = 0·214). These findings suggest that haematopoietic stem cells in patients with AA rapidly lose TL at the onset of the disease. The TL shortening may reflect the severity of impairment of haematopoiesis.
International Journal of Cancer | 2011
Ho-Young Yhim; Na-Ri Lee; Eun-Kee Song; Jae-Yong Kwak; Soo Teik Lee; Jong Hun Kim; Jung Soo Kim; Ho Sung Park; Ik-Joo Chung; Hyun-Jeong Shim; Jun-Eul Hwang; Hyeong Rok Kim; Taek-Keun Nam; Moo-Rim Park; Hyeok Shim; Hyo Sook Park; Hee Sun Kim; Chang-Yeol Yim
The prognostic relevance of tumor human papillomavirus (HPV) status in anal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) had not been previously investigated, although its relevance to cervical, head and neck SCC is known. We retrospectively evaluated outcomes in 47 patients with anal SCC treated with combined chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) and determined tumor HPV status by HPV DNA chip method and p16 expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) from paraffin‐embedded tumor tissues. The median age was 65 years (range, 44–90 years). Sixteen (34%) patients were diagnosed with T stage 3 to 4, and 18 (38%) patients had regional nodal disease (N‐positive). Thirty‐five (75%) patients were HPV positive, and 31 (66%) patients were genotype 16 (HPV16‐positive). Thirty‐nine (83.0%) patients were positive for p16. After median follow‐up of 51.7 months (range, 5.1–136.0 months), HPV16‐positive group had significantly better 4‐year progression‐free survival (PFS, 63.1% vs. 15.6%, p < 0.001) and overall survival (84.6% vs. 39.8%, p = 0.008) than HPV genotype 16 negative (HPV16‐negative) group. Patients with p16‐positive tumor also had a better 4‐year PFS (52.5% vs. 25.0%, p = 0.014) than those with p16‐negative tumor. In multivariate analysis for PFS, N‐positive and HPV16‐negative were independent prognostic factors for shorter PFS. Comparing patterns of failure, time to loco‐regional failure was statistically superior in HPV16‐positive over HPV16‐negative groups (p = 0.006), but time to systemic failure was not different (p = 0.098). Tumor HPV genotype 16 status is a prognostic and predictive factor in anal SCC treated with CCRT, and p16 expression determined by IHC might be advocated as a surrogate biomarker of HPV integration in anal SCC. Further studies are warranted.
Head and Neck-journal for The Sciences and Specialties of The Head and Neck | 2016
Yoon Seok Choi; Sang Gon Park; Eun-Kee Song; Sang-Hee Cho; Moo-Rim Park; Keon Uk Park; Ki-Hyeong Lee; Ik-Chan Song; Hyo Jin Lee; Deog-Yeon Jo; Samyong Kim; Hwan-Jung Yun
In T4a laryngeal cancer with thyroid cartilage invasion, no optimal frontline treatment has yet been defined in controlled trials.
Oncologist | 2015
Hye Sook Han; Ji Chan Park; Suk Young Park; Kyu Taek Lee; Sang Byung Bae; Han Jo Kim; Samyoung Kim; Hwan Jung Yun; Woo Kyun Bae; Hyun-Jeong Shim; Jun-Eul Hwang; Sang-Hee Cho; Moo-Rim Park; Hyeok Shim; Jihyun Kwon; Moon Ki Choi; Seung Taik Kim; Ki Hyeong Lee
BACKGROUND In a previous pilot study, adrenal suppression was found to be common after antiemetic dexamethasone therapy in cancer patients. The objective of this large prospective multicenter study was to confirm the incidence and factors associated with secondary adrenal suppression related to antiemetic dexamethasone therapy in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. METHODS Chemotherapy-naïve patients who were scheduled to receive at least three cycles of highly or moderately emetogenic chemotherapy with dexamethasone as an antiemetic were enrolled. Patients with a suppressed adrenal response before chemotherapy or those administered corticosteroids within 6 months of enrollment in the study were excluded. RESULTS Between October 2010 and August 2014, 481 patients receiving chemotherapy underwent the rapid adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) stimulation test to assess eligibility; 350 of these patients were included in the final analysis. Fifty-six patients (16.0%) showed a suppressed adrenal response in the rapid ACTH stimulation test at 3 or 6 months after the start of the first chemotherapy. The incidence of adrenal suppression was affected by age, performance status, stage, and use of megestrol acetate in univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis revealed that secondary adrenal suppression associated with antiemetic dexamethasone therapy was significantly associated with megestrol acetate treatment (odds ratio: 3.06; 95% confidence interval: 1.60 to 5.86; p < .001). CONCLUSION This large prospective study indicates that approximately 15% of cancer patients receiving chemotherapy with a normal adrenal response show suppressed adrenal responses after antiemetic dexamethasone therapy. This result was particularly significant for patients cotreated with megestrol acetate.
Leukemia Research | 2014
Dan-Bee Choi; Moo-Rim Park; Hak-Ryul Kim; Chang-Duk Jun; Hyeoung-Joon Kim; Hyeok Shim; Young-Dae Kim; Chan Choi; Keum-Ha Choi; Ki Jung Yun; Soo-Cheon Chae; Raekil Park; Seong-Kyu Choe; Young-Jin Lee; Do-Sim Park
We investigated three splicing factor proteins (SFPs; NSRP70, SRSF1, and HNRNPA1) in 187 adults with and without acute leukemia (AL). We showed that NSRP70 is a novel lymphoblastic AL (ALL) surrogate marker, which presented excellent diagnostic accuracy (92%) and disappeared during remission. Its highest molecular weight form, but not total amount, was associated with adverse genetic abnormalities in myeloid AL (AML). Furthermore, we identified that these SFPs were more prevalent in ALL than in AML; were not correlated with their mRNA levels; and their formations in AL may occur without coding mutations and relate to post-translational modifications.
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging | 2018
Sung-Hoon Jung; Seong Young Kwon; Jung-Joon Min; Hee-Seung Bom; Seo-Yeon Ahn; Seung-Yeon Jung; Seung-Shin Lee; Moo-Rim Park; Deok-Hwan Yang; Jae-Sook Ahn; Hyeoung-Joon Kim; Je-Jung Lee
PurposeThis study evaluated the prognostic role of 18F-FDG PET/CT at baseline in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloa (MM) and evaluated the prognostic relevance of 18F-FDG PET/CT for each stage according to the Revised International Staging System (R-ISS).MethodWe retrospectively analyzed the records of 167 patients with newly diagnosed MM. 18F-FDG PET/CT was performed prior to induction therapy in patients with newly diagnosed MM.ResultsIn the total cohort, the presence of more than three hypermetabolic focal lesions (FLs) or extramedullary disease (EMD) on baseline PET/CT was associated with significantly inferior progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) than other patients. Because most patients (91%) with EMD had more than three FLs, PET/CT positivity was defined as the presence of more than three FLs or the presence of EMD. In multivariate analyses, PET/CT positivity was an independent predictor of PFS and OS in all patients. Fifty-five patients (46.1%) with R-ISS II were PET/CT-positive at baseline and had significantly shorter PFS and OS. PET/CT positivity was also correlated with poor PFS and OS in patients with R-ISS III.Conclusion18F-FDG PET/CT was an independent predictor of survival outcomes in patients with newly diagnosed MM. In addition, performing 18F- FDG PET/CT at diagnosis may be useful for determining the survival outcomes of MM patients with R-ISS II and III.
Cancer Research and Treatment | 2018
So-Yeon Jeon; Hye Sook Han; Woo Kyun Bae; Moo-Rim Park; Hyeok Shim; Sang-Cheol Lee; Se-Il Go; Hwan Jung Yun; Yong-Jin Im; Eun-Kee Song
Purpose Data on the efficacy of olanzapine in patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC) are limited. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the efficacy of olanzapine versus placebo in controlling nausea and vomiting in patients receiving MEC. Materials and Methods We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to determine whether olanzapine can reduce the frequency of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) and improve the quality of life (QOL) in patients receiving palonosetron and dexamethasone as prophylaxis for MEC-induced nausea and vomiting. The primary end point was complete response for the acute phase (0-24 hours after chemotherapy). The secondary end points were complete response for the delayed (24-120 hours) and overall phase (0-120 hours), proportion of significant nausea (visual analogue scale ≥ 25 mm), use ofrescue medications, and effect on QOL. Results Fifty-six patients were randomized to the olanzapine (n=29) and placebo (n=27) groups. Complete response rates were not significantly different between the olanzapine and placebo groups in the acute (96.5% vs. 88.0%, p=0.326), delayed (69.0% vs. 48.0%, p=0.118), and overall phases (69.0% vs. 48.0%, p=0.118). However, the percentage of patients with significant nausea (17.2% vs. 44.0%, p=0.032) and the use of rescue medications (0.03±0.19 vs. 1.88±2.88, p=0.002) were lower in the olanzapine group than in the placebo. Furthermore, the olanzapine group demonstrated better QOL (p=0.015). Conclusion Olanzapine combined with palonosetron and dexamethasone significantly improved QOL and vomiting control among previously untreated patients receiving MEC, although the efficacy was limited to the reduction of the frequency of CINV.
Acta Haematologica | 2018
Gyeong-Won Lee; Sung Woo Park; Se-Il Go; Hoon-Gu Kim; Min Kyoung Kim; Chang-Ki Min; Jae-Yong Kwak; Sang-Byung Bae; Sung-Soo Yoon; Je-Jung Lee; Ki Hwan Kim; Seung-Hyun Nam; Yeung-Chul Mun; Hyo Jung Kim; Sung Hwa Bae; Ho-Jin Shin; Jung-Hee Lee; Joon Seong Park; Seong Hyun Jeong; Mark H. Lee; Ho Sup Lee; Keon Woo Park; Won-Sik Lee; Sang Min Lee; Jeong-Ok Lee; Myung Soo Hyun; Deog Yeon Jo; Sung-Nam Lim; Jae Hoon Lee; Hawk Kim
Background: The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is an independent prognostic marker in solid and hematological cancers. While the derived NLR (dNLR) was shown to be non-inferior to the NLR in large cohorts of patients with different cancer types, it has not been validated as a prognostic marker for multiple myeloma (MM) to date. Methods: Between May 22, 2011 and May 29, 2014, 176 patients with MM from 38 centers who were ineligible for autologous stem cell transplantation were analyzed. The dNLR was calculated using complete blood count differential data. The optimal dNLR cut-off value according to receiver operating characteristic analysis of overall survival (OS) was 1.51. All patients were treated with melphalan and prednisone combined with bortezomib. Results: The complete response rate was lower in the high dNLR group compared to the low dNLR group (7 vs. 26.1%, respectively; p = 0.0148); the corresponding 2-year OS rates were 72.2 and 84.7%, respectively (p = 0.0354). A high dNLR was an independent poor prognostic factor for OS (hazard ratio 2.217, 95% CI 1.015–4.842; p = 0.0458). Conclusion: The dNLR is a readily available and cheaply obtained parameter in clinical studies, and shows considerable potential as a new prognostic marker for transplantation-ineligible patients with MM.
Annals of Oncology | 2014
Yoon Seok Choi; Sang-Gon Park; Eun-Kyung Song; Sung-Bum Cho; Moo-Rim Park; K.U. Park; Ki Hyeong Lee; Hyo Jeong Yun
ABSTRACT Aim: Organ-preservation approach including (chemo)radiation has been established as standard treatment for advanced larynx cancer. However, in T4a disease with thyroid cartilage invasion, the optimal frontline treatment has not been evaluated within controlled trials. In this multicenter retrospective review, we aimed to assess and compare the therapeutic outcomes of total laryngectomy (TL) and larynx preservation (LP) in patients with T4a larynx cancer. Methods: Patients who were diagnosed larynx cancer with thyroid cartilage invasion and treated with either TL or LP in 7 institutes between Jan 2000 and Dec 2012 were examined. Patients were stratified by primary treatment and survival was compared using log-rank tests. Cox proportional hazards regression model were performed to determine the effect of treatment and other clinical parameters on therapeutic outcomes. Results: Eighty-nine patients were included. Median age was 67.15 years. ECOG performance status (PS) was 0-1 in 80 (89.9%) and 2 in 9 (10.1%).Median follow-up time was 27.2 months. Among them, 53 patients (59.6%) were treated with primary TL and 36 patients (40.4%) with LP. Median progression-free survival (PFS) of TL group was not reached at the time of analysis and significantly longer than LP group showing 13.5 months (CI: 6.5-20.6) (P Conclusions: In this analysis, patients treated with TL showed longer PFS than with LP. This result suggests that primary TL might be a better therapeutic option for T4a larynx cancer with thyroid cartilage invasion, especially in subjects with limited nodal involvement. Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
American Journal of Hematology | 2003
Je-Jung Lee; Duck Cho; Ik-Joo Chung; Sang-Hee Cho; Kyeong-Soo Park; Moo-Rim Park; Dong-Wook Ryang; Hyeoung-Joon Kim