Morten Seljeskog
SINTEF
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Morten Seljeskog.
Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power-transactions of The Asme | 2014
Sven Gunnar Sundkvist; Adrian Dahlquist; Jacek Janczewski; Mats Sjödin; Marie Bysveen; Mario Ditaranto; Øyvind Langørgen; Morten Seljeskog; Martin Siljan
A promising candidate for CO2 neutral power production is semiclosed oxyfuel combustion combined cycles (SCOC-CC). Two alternative SCOC-CCs have been investigated both with recirculation of the working fluid (WF) (CO2 and H2O) but with different H2O content due to different conditions for condensation of water from the working fluid. The alternative with low moisture content in the recirculated working fluid has shown the highest thermodynamic potential and has been selected for further study. The necessity to use recirculated exhaust gas as the working fluid will make the design of the gas turbine quite different from a conventional gas turbine. For a combined cycle using a steam Rankine cycle as a bottoming cycle, it is vital that the temperature of the exhaust gas from the Brayton cycle is well-suited for steam generation that fits steam turbine live steam conditions. For oxyfuel gas turbines with a combustor outlet temperature of the same magnitude as conventional gas turbines, a much higher pressure ratio is required (close to twice the ratio as for a conventional gas turbine) in order to achieve a turbine outlet temperature suitable for combined cycle. Based on input from the optimized cycle calculations, a conceptual combustion system has been developed, where three different combustor feed streams can be controlled independently: the natural gas fuel, the oxidizer consisting mainly of oxygen plus some impurities, and the recirculated working fluid. This gives more flexibility compared to air-based gas turbines, but also introduces some design challenges. A key issue is how to maintain high combustion efficiency over the entire load range using as little oxidizer as possible and with emissions (NOx, CO, unburnt hydrocarbons (UHC)) within given constraints. Other important challenges are related to combustion stability, heat transfer and cooling, and material integrity, all of which are much affected when going from air-based to oxygen-based gas turbine combustion. Matching with existing air-based burner and combustor designs has been done in order to use as much as possible of what is proven technology today. The selected stabilization concept, heat transfer evaluation, burner, and combustion chamber layout will be described. As a next step, the pilot burner will be tested both at atmospheric and high pressure conditions.
Scientific Reports | 2018
Anders Arvesen; Francesco Cherubini; Gonzalo del Alamo Serrano; Rasmus Astrup; Michael Becidan; Helmer Belbo; Franziska Goile; Tuva Grytli; Geoffrey Guest; Carine Lausselet; Per Kr. Rørstad; Line Rydså; Morten Seljeskog; Øyvind Skreiberg; Veena Sajith Vezhapparambu; Anders Hammer Strømman
Climate impacts of forest bioenergy result from a multitude of warming and cooling effects and vary by location and technology. While past bioenergy studies have analysed a limited number of climate-altering pollutants and activities, no studies have jointly addressed supply chain greenhouse gas emissions, biogenic CO2 fluxes, aerosols and albedo changes at high spatial and process detail. Here, we present a national-level climate impact analysis of stationary bioenergy systems in Norway based on wood-burning stoves and wood biomass-based district heating. We find that cooling aerosols and albedo offset 60–70% of total warming, leaving a net warming of 340 or 69 kg CO2e MWh−1 for stoves or district heating, respectively. Large variations are observed over locations for albedo, and over technology alternatives for aerosols. By demonstrating both notable magnitudes and complexities of different climate warming and cooling effects of forest bioenergy in Norway, our study emphasizes the need to consider multiple forcing agents in climate impact analysis of forest bioenergy.
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy | 2011
Torleif Weydahl; Madhavan Poyyapakkam; Morten Seljeskog; Nils Erland L. Haugen
Applied Energy | 2013
Torleif Weydahl; Jamal Jamaluddin; Morten Seljeskog; Rahul Anantharaman
Energy & Fuels | 2008
Roger A. Khalil; Morten Seljeskog; Johan E. Hustad
Energy Procedia | 2013
Morten Seljeskog; Alexis Sevault; Mario Ditaranto
J. of Design Research | 2016
Johannes Zachrisson Daae; Franziska Goile; Morten Seljeskog; Casper Boks
Energy Procedia | 2015
Mette Bugge; Øyvind Skreiberg; Nils Erland L. Haugen; Per Carlsson; Morten Seljeskog
Energy Procedia | 2017
Morten Seljeskog; Franziska Goile; Øyvind Skreiberg
Energy Procedia | 2017
Alexis Sevault; Roger A. Khalil; Bjørn Christian Enger; Øyvind Skreiberg; Franziska Goile; Liang Wang; Morten Seljeskog; Rajesh S. Kempegowda