Moshe Yeshurun

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation in AML and MDS using myeloablative versus reduced-intensity conditioning: the role of dose intensity.

Allogeneic stem-cell transplantation (SCT) with both myeloablative and reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) is an effective therapy in AML/MDS. However, the relative merits of each may differ in different settings. To define the role of dose intensity, we analyzed SCT outcomes of 112 consecutive patients with AML/MDS. A total of 45 patients met eligibility criteria for standard myeloablative conditioning and were given intravenous-busulfan (12.8 mg/kg) and cyclophosphamide (ivBuCy). A total of 67 noneligible patients were given RIC with fludarabine and intravenous-busulfan (6.4 mg/kg, FB2, n=41) or a modified myeloablative regimen with fludarabine and myeloablative doses of intravenous-busulfan (12.8 mg/kg, FB4, n=26). The overall survival (OS) at 2 years was 50, 49 and 47% after ivBuCy, FB4 and FB2, respectively (P=NS). Nonrelapse mortality was higher after ivBuCy, 22 vs 8% (P=0.05), but relapse rates were lower. Active disease at SCT was the most significant predictor of reduced survival in multivariable analysis (HR 4.5, P=0.0001). Myeloablative and RIC regimens had similar outcomes when leukemia was in remission at SCT; however, patients with active disease could only be salvaged by myeloablative conditioning. Among the latter, OS was 45% after ivBuCy but no FB2 recipient survived (P=0.02). Patients with active disease, ineligible for standard myeloablation, could tolerate modified myeloablation well; however, long-term outcome cannot be determined yet.

Antifungal Prophylaxis in Cancer Patients After Chemotherapy or Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplantation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE To evaluate the effect of antifungal prophylaxis on all-cause mortality as primary outcome, invasive fungal infections (IFIs), and adverse events. Many studies have evaluated the role of antifungal prophylaxis in cancer patients, with inconsistent conclusions. METHODS We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials comparing systemic antifungals with placebo, no intervention, or other antifungal agents for prophylaxis in cancer patients after chemotherapy. The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, conference proceedings, and references were searched. Two reviewers independently appraised the quality of trials and extracted data. RESULTS Sixty-four trials met inclusion criteria. Antifungal prophylaxis decreased all-cause mortality significantly at end of follow-up compared with placebo, no treatment, or nonsystemic antifungals (relative risk [RR], 0.84; 95% CI, 0.74 to 0.95). In allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) recipients, prophylaxis reduced all-cause mortality (RR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.45 to 0.85), fungal-related mortality, and documented IFI. In acute leukemia patients, there was a significant reduction in fungal-related mortality and documented IFI, whereas the difference in mortality was only borderline significant (RR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.74 to 1.06). Prophylaxis with itraconazole suspension reduced documented IFI when compared with fluconazole, with no difference in survival, and at the cost of more adverse events. On the basis of two studies, posaconazole prophylaxis reduced all-cause mortality (RR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.98), fungal-related mortality, and IFI when compared with fluconazole. CONCLUSION Antifungal prophylaxis decreases all-cause mortality significantly in patients after chemotherapy. Antifungal prophylaxis should be administered to patients undergoing allogeneic HSCT, and should probably be administered to high-risk acute leukemia patients.

Hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation from unrelated donors in elderly patients (age>55 years) with hematologic malignancies: older age is no longer a contraindication when using reduced intensity conditioning

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) is a potentially curative approach for patients with hematological malignancies. Reduced-intensity conditioning regimens allow SCT in elderly patients; however, there are only limited data on the feasibility and outcomes of unrelated donor SCT in these patients. In this study, we analyzed, retrospectively, data of 36 patients with various hematological malignancies and median age 58 years (range, 55–66), who were given unrelated donor SCT after reduced-intensity conditioning. The preparative regimen consisted of fludarabine combined with oral busulfan (8 mg/kg, n=8), intravenous busulfan (6.4 mg/kg, n=11), treosulfan (30 g/m2, n=5) or melphalan (100–150 mg/m2, n=12). Patients were also given serotherapy, ATG (n=32), or alemtuzumab (n=4). The probabilities of overall survival, disease-free survival, and nonrelapse mortality at 1 year after SCT were 52, 43, and 39%, respectively. Acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) grade II–IV and chronic GVHD occurred in 31 and 45%, respectively. Multivariable analysis determined that survival rates were higher in patients with chemosensitive disease (HR 4.5), and patients conditioned with intravenous busulfan or treosulfan (HR 3.9). Unrelated donor SCT is feasible in elderly patients, with outcomes that are similar to younger patients. Favorable outcome was observed in patients with myeloid malignancies, and those transplanted in remission and early in the course of disease. Age alone should not be considered a contraindication to unrelated donor SCT.

Imatinib mesylate (STI571) in preparation for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and donor lymphocyte infusions in patients with Philadelphia-positive acute leukemias

Chronic myeloid leukemia in blast crisis (BC) and Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL) are associated with extremely poor outcome. Allogeneic transplantation during BC or active leukemia is most often unsuccessful due to high-rates of both treatment-related complications and relapse. Long-term results are significantly better if a second chronic phase or remission can be achieved prior to transplantation. Similarly, DLI given for the treatment of post-transplant relapse is more successful when given during a second remission. In this study we report our results with a previously unreported approach consisting of short-term treatment with imatinib mesylate (formerly, STI571) to induce or maintain remission, followed by allogeneic transplantation or DLI and the impact on transplantation/DLI outcome. Sixteen patients were treated either in preparation for transplantation (n = 12), for DLI (n = 1), or for both (n = 3). Ten had CML in BC; seven myeloid and three lymphoid BC. Six patients had Ph+ ALL. The donors were matched unrelated (n = 9), matched siblings (n = 5) or haplo-identical (n = 2). Eleven of 15 patients given imatinib pre-transplant were transplanted in complete hematologic response. Engraftment and GVHD rates were not different from expected. Seven patients had grade II–III hepatic toxicity after transplantation. After a median follow-up of 10 months (range, 3–16 months) six remain alive, two after further therapy. The 1-year survival rate was 25%. Four patients were given imatinib prior to DLI, all had complete response. Two remain in remission >6 months from relapse. In conclusion, treatment with imatinib allows transplantation in a more favorable status or maintaining remission with low toxicity until transplantation is feasible. Pre-transplant imatinib seems safe and not associated with excess post-transplant complications. Imatinib may have substantial activity in combination with DLI. Further study of a larger group of patients is required to assess the impact on long-term outcome and the role of post-transplant imatinib in controlling residual disease.

A randomized study comparing yttrium‐90 ibritumomab tiuxetan (Zevalin) and high‐dose BEAM chemotherapy versus BEAM alone as the conditioning regimen before autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with aggressive lymphoma

High‐dose chemotherapy combined with autologous stem‐cell transplantation (ASCT) is the standard therapy for refractory/relapsed aggressive lymphoma. In the era of rituximab‐containing frontline regimens, it is becoming more challenging to salvage patients in this setting, and novel approaches are required. This is a randomized study evaluating the safety and efficacy of standard‐dose ibritumomab tiuxetan (Zevalin) combined with high‐dose BEAM chemotherapy (Z‐BEAM) and ASCT in refractory/relapsed aggressive lymphoma.

Rituximab reduces relapse risk after allogeneic and autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with high‐risk aggressive non‐Hodgkin's lymphoma

Summary. High‐dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (SCT) have limited success in patients with refractory aggressive lymphoma. Allogeneic SCT may offer some advantage in this setting by providing graft‐versus‐lymphoma effect, but the relapse risk remains substantial. In this study, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of rituximab administration after SCT in patients at high‐risk for post‐transplant relapse, in order to reduce relapse risk. Twenty‐eight patients were included with the intent to treat them with rituximab after autologous (n = 16) or allogeneic (n = 12) SCT. Twenty‐four were given rituximab starting a median of 47 d post SCT. Three died of SCT complications prior to therapy. Nine patients not achieving a complete remission (CR) post SCT converted to CR with rituximab and with the onset of graft‐versus‐host disease (GVHD) in three. With a median follow‐up of 12 months (range, 3–33 months) the estimated 2‐year overall survival and disease‐free survival was 85 ± 7% and 55 ± 13% respectively. When only those patients who were actually treated are analysed, these rates were 95 ± 7% and 64 ± 13% respectively. The relapse risk was 35 ± 14%. Seven patients had recurrent neutropenia episodes associated with severe hypogammaglobulinaemia, which were further prevented with intravenous immunoglobulin. None of the 10 allogeneic SCT recipients treated with rituximab had severe GVHD. Rituximab may be an effective adjuvant therapy after SCT to reduce the relapse rate and improve the outcome in high‐risk aggressive lymphoma. Larger scale comparative trials are necessary to better define its role in SCT.

5-azacitidine prolongs overall survival in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome - a systematic review and meta-analysis

Hypomethylating agents have recently been shown to improve the outcome of patients with myelodysplastic syndrome. A meta-analysis and systematic review was carried out of randomized controlled trials comparing treatment with hypomethylating agents to conventional care, i.e., best supportive care or chemotherapy, in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome. The outcomes assessed were overall survival, time to transformation or death, overall response rate and toxicity. Hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals were estimated and pooled for time-to-event data. For dichotomous data, relative risks were estimated and pooled. Four trials including 952 patients examined the effect of 5-azacitidine and decitabine. Treatment with hypomethylating agents significantly improved overall survival (hazard ratio 0.72, 95% confidence interval 0.60–0.85, three trials) and time to transformation or death (hazard ratio 0.69, 95% confidence interval 0.58–0.82, four trials). In a subgroup analysis per type of drug, these benefits could be shown for 5-azacitidine but not for decitabine. Both agents favorably influenced response rates. A higher rate of grade 3/4 adverse events was observed with their use. Since 5-azacitidine prolongs overall survival and time to transformation or death it should be highly considered in the treatment of patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome. Further studies are needed to establish the exact role of decitabine compared to 5-azacitidine in these patients.

Prophylaxis regimens for GVHD: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Opinions are divided regarding the best prophylactic regimen for GVHD. The aim of this study was to evaluate potential survival benefit of different prophylactic regimens for acute GVHD (aGVHD). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including patients undergoing Allo-SCT. We included trials that assessed the addition of MTX, compared CsA and tacrolimus and evaluated the addition of steroids. Outcomes assessed were all-cause mortality (ACM) at the longest follow-up, aGVHD, chronic GVHD, TRM, relapse rate and regimen-specific adverse events. Relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated and pooled. The regimen of MTX–CsA vs CsA alone (four trials) yielded no statistically significant difference in ACM (RR=0.84 (0.61–1.14)), but a significant decrease in aGVHD (RR=0.52 (0.39–0.7)). There was no difference in ACM for the comparison of MTX–CsA and MTX–tacrolimus (three trials); however, MTX–tacrolimus was superior to MTX–CsA in the reduction of aGVHD (RR=0.62 (0.52–0.75)) and severe aGVHD (RR=0.67 (0.47–0.95)). The addition of steroids did not affect the outcomes (four trials). We conclude that MTX–CsA and MTX–tacrolimus are both acceptable alternatives for GVHD prophylaxis, although MTX–tacrolimus may be superior in terms of aGVHD reduction.

Hematopoietic growth factors in aplastic anemia patients treated with immunosuppressive therapy-systematic review and meta-analysis

Immunosuppressive therapy is the treatment for aplastic anemia patients ineligible for transplantation. The role of hematopoietic growth factors as adjunct to treatment in these patients is unclear. Findings of this study indicate that the addition of hematopoietic growth factors does not affect mortality, response rate or infections occurrence. Therefore, it should not be recommended routinely as an adjunct to the immunosuppressive therapy for patients with aplastic anemia. Immunosuppressive therapy is the treatment for aplastic anemia patients ineligible for transplantation. The role of hematopoietic growth factors as adjunct to treatment in these patients is unclear. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing treatment with immunosuppressive therapy and hematopoietic growth factors to immunosuppressive therapy alone in patients with aplastic anemia. Two reviewers appraised the quality of trials and extracted data. For each trial, results were expressed as relative risks with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for dichotomous data. The addition of hematopoietic growth factors yielded no difference in overall mortality at 100 days, one year and five years [relative risks 1.33 (95% CI 0.56–3.18), relative risks 0.90 (95% CI 0.50–1.63) and relative risks 0.89 (95% CI 0.55–1.46), respectively]. There was no difference in overall hematologic response and in the occurrence of infections. HGF significantly decreased the risk for relapse, relative risks 0.45 (95% CI 0.30–0.68, 3 trials). Hematopoietic growth factors were not associated with higher occurrence of myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia or paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria. The addition of hematopoietic growth factors does not affect mortality, response rate or infections occurrence. Therefore, it should not be recommended routinely as an adjunct to the immunosuppressive therapy for patients with aplastic anemia.

Antiviral prophylaxis in haematological patients: Systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE Antiviral prophylaxis is commonly prescribed to haematological cancer patients. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to quantify its overall benefit in specific clinical scenarios. METHODS Randomised controlled trials assessing antiviral prophylaxis versus placebo, no treatment, pre-emptive treatment or another antiviral drug were included. Patients undergoing haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) or intensive chemotherapy for acute leukaemia or high-grade lymphoma were included. No restrictions on language, year or publication status were applied. Overall mortality, herpes simplex virus (HSV) and cytomegalovirus (CMV) diseases were assessed as primary outcomes. Pooled relative risks (RRs) and numbers needed to treat (NNT) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) are reported. RESULTS HSCT was the condition assessed in 22 trials and intensive chemotherapy in 5 trials. In the pre-engraftment setting of autologous or allogeneic HSCT, antiviral prophylaxis (mainly acyclovir for HSV seropositive recipients) significantly reduced HSV (NNT 2, 2-2, control event rate (CER) 61.9%) and CMV disease, with no effect on overall mortality. In the allogeneic post-engraftment setting (mainly CMV-seropositive recipients/donors), antiviral prophylaxis resulted in a significant reduction in overall mortality, RR 0.79 (0.65-0.95), NNT 12 (7-50, CER 39.4%) and all viral-related outcomes. In this setting, acyclovir significantly reduced overall mortality (RR 0.71, 0.53-0.96, 4 trials) and ganciclovir/maribavir significantly reduced CMV disease (RR 0.26, 0.14-0.48, 5 trials). During chemotherapy, acyclovir significantly decreased HSV disease (NNT 3, 2-4, CER 37.4%) and infection rates, with no effect on mortality. CONCLUSIONS Antiviral prophylaxis reduced mortality with a small NNT in the post-engraftment setting of allogeneic HSCT. In the pre-engraftment phase and during chemotherapy only viral-related morbidity was reduced.