Mostafa Abdelrahman

Respiratory health outcomes and air pollution in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: a systematic review.

Abstract Exposure to air pollution can cause detrimental health and be an economic burden. With newly developed equipment, monitoring of different air pollutants, identifying the sources, types of air pollutants and their corresponding concentrations, and applying mitigation intervention techniques became a crucial step in public health protection. Countries in the Eastern Mediterranean Region (EMR) are highly exposed to dust storms, have high levels of particulate matter (PM) concentrations, and have a unique climatic as well as topographic and socio-economic structure. This is the first study conducted to systemically and qualitatively assess the health impacts of air pollution in the EMR, identify susceptible populations, and ascertain research and knowledge gaps in the literature to better inform decisions by policy makers. We screened relevant papers and reports published between 2000 and 2014 in research databases. A total of 36 published studies met the inclusion criteria. A variety of indoor and outdoor exposures associated with various acute and chronic respiratory health outcomes were included. Respiratory health outcomes ranged in severity, from allergies and general respiratory complaints to lung cancer and mortality. Several adverse health outcomes were positively associated with various indoor/outdoor air pollutants throughout the EMR. However, epidemiological literature concerning the EMR is limited to a few studies in a few countries. More research is needed to elucidate the health outcomes of air pollution. Standardized reliable assessments on the national level for various air pollutants in different regions should be implemented and made publically available for researchers to utilize in their research. Moreover, advancing and utilizing more sound epidemiological designs and studies on the effect of air pollution on the respiratory health outcomes is needed to portray the actual situation in the region.

Climate change and health in the Eastern Mediterranean countries: a systematic review

Abstract Objectives: To summarize the existing knowledge of the impact of climate change on health from previous research in the Eastern Mediterranean region (EMR) and identify knowledge and research gaps. Methods: Different databases were searched for relevant studies published in the region between 2000 and 2014. The review was limited to studies reporting the impacts of climate change on health or studying associations between meteorological parameters and well-defined human health outcomes. Results: This systematic review of 78 studies identified many knowledge and research gaps. Research linking climate change and health is scarce in the most vulnerable countries of the region. There is limited information regarding how changes in temperature, precipitation and other weather variables might affect the geographic range and incidence of mortality and morbidity from various diseases. Available research has many limitations and shortcomings that arise from inappropriate study designs, poor assessment of exposure and outcomes, questionable sources of data, lack of standardized methods, poor adjustment of confounders, limited geographical area studies, small sample sizes, poor statistical modeling and not testing for possible interactions between exposures. Conclusions: Research and information on the effect of climate change on health are limited. Longitudinal studies over extended periods of time that investigate the link between climate change and health are needed. There is a need for studies to be expanded to include more countries in the region and to include other environmental, social and economic factors that might affect the spread of the disease.

Assessment of Jordanian Radiologist Performance in the Detection of Breast Cancers

This study aims to monitor diagnostic accuracy amongst Jordanian mammography readers and identify parameters linked to higher levels of performance. In this study, we have used the Breast Screen Reader Assessment Strategy (BREAST) platform to facilitate 27 radiologists in reading a case set of 60 digital mammograms, 20 of which included cancers. Each case consisted of the four standard cranio-caudal (CC) and medio-lateral oblique (MLO) projections. All radiologists were registered to read mammograms at their workplace by the Jordanian Ministry of Health. Each reader was asked to locate any malignancies, provide a confidence rating using a scale of 1 - 5, and identify the type of appearance. All images were displayed using 8 MP monitor, supported by radiology workstations with full image manipulation facilities. Results were evaluated using Jackknife Alternative Free-Response Receiver Operating Characteristic (JAFROC). Demographics obtained from each radiologist regarding their experience, qualifications and breast-reading activities were correlated against JAFROC scores using Spearman techniques. The results showed that the mean JAFROC score was 0. 52 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.46, 0.58); location sensitivity score was 0. 41 (95% CI: 0.41, 0.56); specificity score was 0.73 (95% CI: 0.68, 0.83). Higher performance in term of JAFROC scores was directly related to number of years since professional qualification (r = 0.433; p = 0.024), number of years reading breast images (r = 0.62; r = 0.001) and number of mammography images read per year (r = 0.69; p = 0.001). On the other hand, higher performance was inversely linked to the frequency of reading other modalities per week (r = -0.48; p = 0.010). No other statistical differences were significant. Finally, higher radiologists’ performance in cancer detection is correlated with increasing the number of mammograms reads per week.

Knowledge and awareness of CT radiation dose and risk among patients

The study aims to assess the level of patients’ awareness and knowledge regarding radiation and dosage along with the associated risks from computed tomography (CT) scan. This cross-sectional study used questionnaires, which were distributed to the diagnostic imaging departments of six large local hospitals in Jordan between September 2014 and March 2015. A total of 600 patients completed the questionnaire, out of which, 52.33% of respondents were female and 47.6% male. The findings show insignificant effects of gender on patient’s knowledge (P = .596) and significant effect of employment and profession on positive scores (P = .000). Similarly, no statistical differences were found between gender and correct answers (P = .707). This cohort of patients demonstrated a lack of awareness and knowledge about the use of ionizing radiation for diagnostic imaging. Thus, there may exist a similar lack of information that will require imaging professionals to raise patients’ awareness and offer them the appropriate information.

Knowledge and practice of computed tomography exposure parameters amongst radiographers in Jordan

OBJECTIVE To investigate the knowledge and practice of computed tomography (CT) radiographers working in Jordan. MATERIALS AND METHODS This Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved study disseminated a questionnaire via social media and recruited 54 Jordanian CT radiographers. The questionnaire comprised 36 questions divided into four sections: demographics; an evaluation of knowledge regarding CT exposure; modifications to CT exposure for paediatric patients; dose units and diagnostic reference levels (DRLs). Descriptive and inferential statistics including Chi-square tests, Mann-Whitney U tests, independent samples t-tests and Kruskal-Wallis H tests were employed. Statistical significance was considered below p < 0.05. RESULTS The 54 participants had various qualifications, with the majority holding a Bachelors degree (n = 35, 64.8%) and the rest holding a Diploma (n = 19, 35.2%). In order to pass the questionnaire, participants needed to score 13 correct answers. The overall number of radiographers who correctly passed the questionnaire was 48 (88.9%). None of the participants correctly stated all the DRL values for chest, abdomen and brain CT. However, four out of 54 respondents (7.4%) knew the chest DRL value, three (5.6%) participants correctly estimated the abdominal DRL value but only two (3.7%) knew the DRL for the brain. CONCLUSION Good general knowledge was found amongst radiographers regarding the relationship of each exposure parameter to the image quality and patient dose. However, there was poor knowledge of diagnostic reference levels and the order of the organ radiation sensitivity. The need for CT radiographers to undertake further education that focuses on radiation exposure in CT is highlighted.