Motoki Kumagai

Four-dimensional measurement of intrafractional respiratory motion of pancreatic tumors using a 256 multi-slice CT scanner

PURPOSE To quantify pancreas and pancreatic tumor movement due to respiratory motion using volumetric cine CT images. MATERIALS AND METHODS Six patients with pancreatic tumors were scanned in cine mode with a 256 multi-slice CT scanner under free breathing conditions. Gross tumor volume (GTV) and pancreas were manually contoured on the CT data set by a radiation oncologist. Intrafractional respiratory movement of the GTV and pancreas was calculated, and the results were compared between the respiratory ungated and gated phases, which is a 30% duty cycle around exhalation. RESULTS Respiratory-induced organ motion was observed mainly in the anterior abdominal side than the posterior side. Average GTV displacement (ungated/gated phases) was 0.7 mm/0.2mm in both the left and right directions, and 2.5mm/0.9 mm in the anterior, 0.1 mm/0mm in the posterior, and 8.9 mm/2.6mm in the inferior directions. Average pancreas center of mass displacement relative to that at peak exhalation was mainly in the inferior direction, at 9.6mm in the ungated phase and 2.3mm in the gated phase. CONCLUSIONS By allowing accurate determination of the margin, quantitative analysis of tumor and pancreas displacement provides useful information in treatment planning in all radiation approaches for pancreatic tumors.

Impact of Intrafractional Bowel Gas Movement on Carbon Ion Beam Dose Distribution in Pancreatic Radiotherapy

PURPOSE To assess carbon ion beam dose variation due to bowel gas movement in pancreatic radiotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS Ten pancreatic cancer inpatients were subject to diagnostic contrast-enhanced dynamic helical CT examination under breath-holding conditions, which included multiple-phase dynamic CT with arterial, venous, and delayed phases. The arterial-venous phase and arterial-delayed phase intervals were 35 and 145 s, respectively. A compensating bolus was designed to cover the target obtained at the arterial phase. Carbon ion dose distribution was calculated by applying the bolus to the CT data sets at the other two phases. RESULTS Dose conformation to the clinical target volume was degraded by beam overshoot/undershoot due to bowel gas movement. The D95 for clinical target volume was degraded from 98.2% (range, 98.0-99.1%) of the prescribed dose to 94.7% (range, 88.0-99.0%) at 145 s. Excessive dosing to normal tissues varied among tissues and was, for example, 12.2 GyE/13.1 GyE (0 s/145 s) for the cord and 38.8 GyE/39.8 GyE (0 s/145 s) for the duodenum. The magnitude of beam overshoot/undershoot was particularly exacerbated from the anterior and left directions. CONCLUSIONS Bowel gas movement causes dosimetric variation to the target during treatment for radiotherapy. The effect of bowel gas movement varies with beam angle, with greatest influence on the anterior-posterior and left-right beams.

COMPARISON OF RESPIRATORY-GATED AND RESPIRATORY-UNGATED PLANNING IN SCATTERED CARBON ION BEAM TREATMENT OF THE PANCREAS USING FOUR-DIMENSIONAL COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY

PURPOSE We compared respiratory-gated and respiratory-ungated treatment strategies using four-dimensional (4D) scattered carbon ion beam distribution in pancreatic 4D computed tomography (CT) datasets. METHODS AND MATERIALS Seven inpatients with pancreatic tumors underwent 4DCT scanning under free-breathing conditions using a rapidly rotating cone-beam CT, which was integrated with a 256-slice detector, in cine mode. Two types of bolus for gated and ungated treatment were designed to cover the planning target volume (PTV) using 4DCT datasets in a 30% duty cycle around exhalation and a single respiratory cycle, respectively. Carbon ion beam distribution for each strategy was calculated as a function of respiratory phase by applying the compensating bolus to 4DCT at the respective phases. Smearing was not applied to the bolus, but consideration was given to drill diameter. The accumulated dose distributions were calculated by applying deformable registration and calculating the dose-volume histogram. RESULTS Doses to normal tissues in gated treatment were minimized mainly on the inferior aspect, which thereby minimized excessive doses to normal tissues. Over 95% of the dose, however, was delivered to the clinical target volume at all phases for both treatment strategies. Maximum doses to the duodenum and pancreas averaged across all patients were 43.1/43.1 GyE (ungated/gated) and 43.2/43.2 GyE (ungated/gated), respectively. CONCLUSIONS Although gated treatment minimized excessive dosing to normal tissue, the difference between treatment strategies was small. Respiratory gating may not always be required in pancreatic treatment as long as dose distribution is assessed. Any application of our results to clinical use should be undertaken only after discussion with oncologists, particularly with regard to radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy.

Patient handling system for carbon ion beam scanning therapy

Our institution established a new treatment facility for carbon ion beam scanning therapy in 2010. The major advantages of scanning beam treatment compared to the passive beam treatment are the following: high dose conformation with less excessive dose to the normal tissues, no bolus compensator and patient collimator/ multi‐leaf collimator, better dose efficiency by reducing the number of scatters. The new facility was designed to solve several problems encountered in the existing facility, at which several thousand patients were treated over more than 15 years. Here, we introduce the patient handling system in the new treatment facility. The new facility incorporates three main systems, a scanning irradiation system (S‐IR), treatment planning system (TPS), and patient handling system (PTH). The PTH covers a wide range of functions including imaging, geometrical/position accuracy including motion management (immobilization, robotic arm treatment bed), layout of the treatment room, treatment workflow, software, and others. The first clinical trials without respiratory gating have been successfully started. The PTH allows a reduction in patient stay in the treatment room to as few as 7 min. The PTH plays an important role in carbon ion beam scanning therapy at the new institution, particularly in the management of patient handling, application of image‐guided therapy, and improvement of treatment workflow, and thereby allows substantially better treatment at minimum cost. PACS numbers: 87.56.‐v; 87.57.‐s; 87.55.‐x

Effective and organ doses using helical 4DCT for thoracic and abdominal therapies

The capacity of 4DCT to quantify organ motion is beyond conventional 3DCT capability. Local control could be improved. However we are unaware of any reports of organ dose measurements for helical 4DCT imaging. We therefore quantified the radiation doses for helical 4DCT imaging. Organ and tissue dose was measured for thoracic and abdominal 4DCT in helical mode using an adult anthropomorphic phantom. Radiation doses were measured with thermoluminescence dosimeter chips inserted at various anatomical sites on the phantom. For the helical thoracic 4DCT, organ doses were 57.2 mGy for the lung, 76.7 mGy for the thyroids, 48.1 mGy for the breasts, and 10.86 mGy for the colon. The effective doses for male and female phantoms were very similar, with a mean value of 33.1 mSv. For abdominal 4DCT imaging, organ doses were 14.4 mGy for the lung, 0.78 mGy for the thyroids, 9.83 mGy for breasts, and 58.2 mGy for the colon (all obtained by using ICRP 103). We quantified the radiation exposure for thoracic and abdominal helical 4DCT. The doses for helical 4DCT were approximately 1.5 times higher than those for cine 4DCT, however the stepwise image artifact was reduced. 4DCT imaging should be performed with care in order to minimize radiation exposure, but the advantages of 4DCT imaging mandates its incorporation into routine treatment protocols.

Four-Dimensional Lung Treatment Planning in Layer-Stacking Carbon Ion Beam Treatment: Comparison of Layer-Stacking and Conventional Ungated/Gated Irradiation

PURPOSE We compared four-dimensional (4D) layer-stacking and conventional carbon ion beam distribution in the treatment of lung cancer between ungated and gated respiratory strategies using 4DCT data sets. METHODS AND MATERIALS Twenty lung patients underwent 4DCT imaging under free-breathing conditions. Using planning target volumes (PTVs) at respective respiratory phases, two types of compensating bolus were designed, a full single respiratory cycle for the ungated strategy and an approximately 30% duty cycle for the exhalation-gated strategy. Beams were delivered to the PTVs for the ungated and gated strategies, PTV(ungated) and PTV(gated), respectively, which were calculated by combining the respective PTV(Tn)s by layer-stacking and conventional irradiation. Carbon ion beam dose distribution was calculated as a function of respiratory phase by applying a compensating bolus to 4DCT. Accumulated dose distributions were calculated by applying deformable registration. RESULTS With the ungated strategy, accumulated dose distributions were satisfactorily provided to the PTV, with D95 values for layer-stacking and conventional irradiation of 94.0% and 96.2%, respectively. V20 for the lung and Dmax for the spinal cord were lower with layer-stacking than with conventional irradiation, whereas Dmax for the skin (14.1 GyE) was significantly lower (21.9 GyE). In addition, dose conformation to the GTV/PTV with layer-stacking irradiation was better with the gated than with the ungated strategy. CONCLUSIONS Gated layer-stacking irradiation allows the delivery of a carbon ion beam to a moving target without significant degradation of dose conformity or the development of hot spots.

Development of a GPU-based multithreaded software application to calculate digitally reconstructed radiographs for radiotherapy

To provide faster calculation of digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs) in patient-positioning verification, we developed and evaluated a graphic processing unit (GPU)-based DRR software application and compared it with a central processing unit (CPU)-based application. The evaluation metrics were calculation speed and image quality for various slice thicknesses. The results showed that the GPU-based DRR computation was an average of 50 times faster than the CPU-based methodology, whereas the image quality was very similar. This excellent performance may increase the accuracy of patient positioning and improve the patient treatment throughput time.

Practical approaches to four-dimensional heavy-charged-particle lung therapy.

We have developed new design algorithms for compensating boli to facilitate the implementation of four-dimensional charged-particle lung therapy in clinical applications. Four-dimensional CT (4DCT) data for eight lung cancer patients were acquired with a 16-slice CT under free breathing. Six compensating boli were developed that may be categorized into three classes: (1) boli-based on contoured gross tumor volumes (GTV) from a 4DCT data set during each respiratory phase, subsequently combined into one (GTV-4DCT bolus); (2) boli-based on contoured internal target volume (ITV) from image-processed 3DCT data only [temporal-maximum-intensity-projection (TMIP)/temporal-average-intensity-projection (TAIP)] with calculated boli (ITV-TMIP and ITV-TAIP boli); and (3) boli-based on contoured ITV utilizing image-processed 3DCT data, applied to 4DCT for design of boli for each phase, which were then combined. The carbon beam dose distribution within each bolus was calculated as a function of time and compared to plans in which respiratory-ungated/gated strategies were used. The GTV-4DCT treatment plan required a prohibitively long time for contouring the GTV manually for each respiratory phase, but it delivered more than 95% of the prescribed dose to the target volume. The TMIP and TAIP treatments, although more time-efficient, resulted in an unacceptable excess dose to normal tissues and underdosing of the target volume. The dose distribution for the ITV-4DCT bolus was similar to that for the GTV-4DCT bolus and required significantly less practitioner time. The ITV-4DCT bolus treatment plan is time-efficient and provides a high-quality dose distribution, making it a practical alternative to the GTV-4DCT bolus treatment plan.

Dosimetric impact of 4DCT artifact in carbon-ion scanning beam treatment: Worst case analysis in lung and liver treatments

INTRODUCTION We evaluated the impact of 4DCT artifacts on carbon-ion pencil beam scanning dose distributions in lung and liver treatment. METHODS & MATERIALS 4DCT was performed in 20 liver and lung patients using area-detector CT (original 4DCT). 4DCT acquisition by multi-detector row CT was simulated using original 4DCT by selecting other phases randomly (plus/minus 20% phases). Since tumor position can move over the respiratory range in original 4DCT, mid-exhalation was set as reference phase. Total prescribed dose of 60Gy (RBE) was delivered to the clinical target volume (CTV). Reference dose distribution was calculated with the original CT, and actual dose distributions were calculated with treatment planning parameters optimized using the simulated CT (simulated dose). Dose distribution was calculated by substituting these parameters into the original CT. RESULTS For liver cases, CTV-D95 and CTV-Dmin values for the reference dose were 97.6±0.5% and 89.8±0.6% of prescribed dose, respectively. Values for the simulated dose were significantly degraded, to 88.6±14.0% and 46.3±26.7%, respectively. Dose assessment results for lung cases were 84.8±12.8% and 58.0±24.5% for the simulated dose, showing significant degradation over the reference dose of 95.1±1.5% and 87.0±2.2%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS 4DCT image quality should be closely checked to minimize degradation of dose conformation due to 4DCT artifacts. Medical staff should pay particular attention to checking the quality of 4DCT images as a function of respiratory phase, because it is difficult to recognize 4DCT artifact on a single phase in some cases.

Development of fast patient position verification software using 2D-3D image registration and its clinical experience.

To improve treatment workflow, we developed a graphic processing unit (GPU)-based patient positional verification software application and integrated it into carbon-ion scanning beam treatment. Here, we evaluated the basic performance of the software. The algorithm provides 2D/3D registration matching using CT and orthogonal X-ray flat panel detector (FPD) images. The participants were 53 patients with tumors of the head and neck, prostate or lung receiving carbon-ion beam treatment. 2D/3D-ITchi-Gime (ITG) calculation accuracy was evaluated in terms of computation time and registration accuracy. Registration calculation was determined using the similarity measurement metrics gradient difference (GD), normalized mutual information (NMI), zero-mean normalized cross-correlation (ZNCC), and their combination. Registration accuracy was dependent on the particular metric used. Representative examples were determined to have target registration error (TRE) = 0.45 ± 0.23 mm and angular error (AE) = 0.35 ± 0.18° with ZNCC + GD for a head and neck tumor; TRE = 0.12 ± 0.07 mm and AE = 0.16 ± 0.07° with ZNCC for a pelvic tumor; and TRE = 1.19 ± 0.78 mm and AE = 0.83 ± 0.61° with ZNCC for lung tumor. Calculation time was less than 7.26 s.The new registration software has been successfully installed and implemented in our treatment process. We expect that it will improve both treatment workflow and treatment accuracy.