Munehisa Koizumi

Disc regeneration therapy using marrow mesenchymal cell transplantation: a report of two case studies.

Study Design. Marrow mesenchymal cells (MSCs) contain stem cells and possess the ability to regenerate bone, cartilage, and fibrous tissues. Here, we applied this regenerative ability to intervertebral disc regeneration therapy in an attempt to develop a new spinal surgery technique. Objective. We analyzed the regenerative restoration ability of autologous MSCs in the markedly degenerated intervertebral discs. Summary of Background Data. Fusion for lumbar intervertebral disc instability improves lumbago. However, fused intervertebral discs lack the natural and physiologic functions of intervertebral discs. If intervertebral discs can be regenerated and repaired, then damage to adjacent intervertebral discs can be avoided. We verified the regenerative ability of MSCs by animal studies, and for the first time, performed therapeutic intervertebral disc regeneration therapy in patients and obtained favorable findings. Methods. Subjects were 2 women aged 70 and 67 years; both patients had lumbago, leg pain, and numbness. Myelography and magnetic resonance imaging showed lumbar spinal canal stenosis, and radiograph confirmed the vacuum phenomenon with instability. From the ilium of each patient, marrow fluid was collected, and MSCs were cultured using the medium containing autogenous serum. In surgery, fenestration was performed on the stenosed spinal canal and then pieces of collagen sponge containing autologous MSCs were grafted percutaneously to degenerated intervertebral discs. Results. At 2 years after surgery, radiograph and computed tomography showed improvements in the vacuum phenomenon in both patients. On T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging, signal intensity of intervertebral discs with cell grafts was high, thus indicating high moisture contents. Roentgenkymography showed that lumbar disc instability improved. Symptom was alleviated in both patients. Conclusion. The intervertebral disc regeneration therapy using MSC brought about favorable results in these 2 cases. It seems to be a promising minimally invasive treatment.

Evaluation of Reliability of Post-tetanic Motor-evoked Potential Monitoring During Spinal Surgery Under General Anesthesia

Study Design. A prospective research. Objective. Compare the reliability of post-tetanic motor-evoked potential (p-MEP) monitoring in the detection of motor injury during spinal surgery with that of conventional MEP (c-MEP). Summary of Background Data. Myogenic MEPs are sensitive to suppression by anesthetics and neuromuscular blockade. Recently, we reported a new technique for MEP recording, called “p-MEP” in which MEP amplitude can be enlarged by tetanic stimulation of peripheral nerve before transcranial stimulation in comparison with that of c-MEP. The purpose of this study is to compare the reliability of p-MEP monitoring in the detection of motor injury during spinal surgery with that of c-MEP. Methods. Eighty patients undergoing elective spinal surgery were enrolled in the study. Both c-MEP and p-MEP monitoring were performed throughout the operation in each patient. For recording c-MEPs, transcranial electrical train of five pulses stimulation with an interstimulus interval of 2 milliseconds was performed and compound muscle action potentials were bilaterally recorded from abductor pollicis brevis, abductor hallucis, tibialis anterior, and soleus muscles. For recording p-MEPs, tetanic stimulation (50 Hz, 50 mA, 5 sec) was applied to the left median nerve and bilateral tibial nerves 1 second before transcranial stimulation and compound muscle action potentials were recorded from the same muscles. The false positive, false negative, and accuracy of MEP monitoring in the detection of change in motor function were compared between p-MEP and c-MEP. Results. At the baseline, success rates of baseline c-MEP and p-MEP recording were 66.3% (53/80) and 92.5% (74/80), respectively. The false positive, false negative, and accuracy of p-MEP monitoring were 0%, 0%, and 100%, respectively, whereas c-MEP were 4%, 20%, and 95%, respectively. Conclusion. The results indicate that p-MEP is a more reliable method to detect changes in motor function during spinal surgery under general anesthesia in comparison with c-MEP.

Cervical laminoplasty combined with muscle release in patients with athetoid cerebral palsy.

Study Design. A retrospective study comparing cervical laminoplasty with or without muscle release for the treatment of cervical myelopathy resulting from athetoid cerebral palsy. Objective. To assess the effectiveness of muscle release in the treatment of athetoid cerebral palsy. Summary of Background Data. While anterior and/or posterior spinal fusion has been generally accepted as necessary in surgical treatment for cervical myelopathy due to athetoid cerebral palsy, several studies have shown relatively favorable results following laminoplasty. Better results can be obtained by combining muscle release. Methods. Study participants were 10 patients who underwent cervical laminoplasty combined with muscle release (mean age, 44.6 years) and 15 patients who underwent cervical laminoplasty alone (mean age, 48.2 years). Therapeutic outcomes 1 year after surgery, as assessed by Kurokawa’s methods and JOA scores, were compared between groups. Results. Recovery rate 1 year after surgery was significantly higher for the muscle release group than for the control group. In both groups, recovery rates were significantly better for patients who could walk before surgery. Conclusions. Cervical laminoplasty combined with muscle release for the treatment of cervical myelopathy due to athetoid cerebral palsy is effective in simplifying postoperative therapy and improving JOA scores.

Extent and contraindications for sacral amputation in patients with recurrent rectal cancer: a systematic literature review

BackgroundAbdominosacral amputation is a potentially curative surgical approach for patients with recurrent rectal cancer. Previous reports have described differing extents of sacral resection. Most of these reports stated that high sacral involvement of the tumor is a contraindication for surgery; however, the basis for this is unclear.MethodsIn this study, we reviewed the highest level of sacral amputation and the “contraindications” for this technique. Using a systematic literature survey, we analyzed the theoretical basis and the changes in surgical indications for recurrent rectal cancer.ResultsWe retrieved 33 articles from Medline and one study from the Cochrane Center Register of Controlled Trials. The highest level of resection was at the level of L5/S and S1 in one article, S1/2 and S2 in nine articles and S2/3 and S3 in 11 articles. Fifteen articles stated contraindications regarding sacral level, including tumor involvement of S1, the S1/2 junction, or the level above the S2/3 junction. Reasons stated for these contraindications included the risks associated with surgery, namely bladder dysfunction, anorectal dysfunction, genital dysfunction, walking disorder, and spinal fluid leak. In terms of the rationale for the contraindications, three articles referred to four previously published reviews or case series. None of these supporting publications were randomized controlled trials and they did not include any statistical evaluation.ConclusionThe consensus for contraindications for sacral amputation was formed empirically, without strong supporting evidence. The balance between curability and dysfunction should be further evaluated scientifically.

Revision surgery after cervical laminoplasty: report of five cases and literature review

BACKGROUND CONTEXT Revision surgery after laminoplasty is rarely performed, and there are few reports of this procedure in the English literature. PURPOSE To evaluate the reasons why patients underwent revision surgery after laminoplasty and to discuss methods of preventing the need for revision surgery. A literature review with a comparative analysis between previous reports and present cases was also performed. STUDY DESIGN Case report and literature review. PATIENT SAMPLE Five patients who underwent revision surgery after laminoplasty. OUTCOME MEASURES Diagnosis was based on the preoperative computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging findings. Neurologic findings were evaluated using the Japanese Orthopedic Association score. METHODS A total of 237 patients who underwent cervical laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy from 1990 to 2010 were reviewed. Patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament, renal dialysis, infection, tumor, or rheumatoid arthritis were excluded. Five patients who underwent revision surgery for symptoms of recurrent myelopathy or radiculopathy were identified, and the clinical courses and radiological findings of these patients were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS The average interval from the initial surgery to revision surgery was 15.0 (range 9-19) years. The patients were four men and one woman with an average age at the time of the initial operation of 49.8 (range 34-65) years. Four patients developed symptoms of recurrent myelopathy after their initial surgery, for the following reasons: adjacent segment canal stenosis, restenosis after inadequate opening of the lamina with degenerative changes, and trauma after inadequate opening of the lamina. One patient developed new radiculopathy symptoms because of foraminal stenosis secondary to osteoarthritis at the Luschka and zygapophyseal joints. All patients experienced resolution of their symptoms after revision surgery. CONCLUSIONS Revision surgery after laminoplasty is rare. Inadequate opening of the lamina is one of the important reasons for needing revision surgery. Degenerative changes after laminoplasty may also result in a need for revision surgery. Surgeons should be aware of the degenerative changes that can cause neurologic deterioration after laminoplasty.

The application of tetanic stimulation of the unilateral tibial nerve before transcranial stimulation can augment the amplitudes of myogenic motor-evoked potentials from the muscles in the bilateral upper and lower limbs.

BACKGROUND: Recently, we reported a new technique to augment motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) under general anesthesia, posttetanic MEP (p-MEP), in which tetanic stimulation of the peripheral nerve before transcranial stimulation enlarged amplitudes of MEPs from the muscle innervated by the nerve subjected to tetanic stimulation. In the present study, we tested whether tetanic stimulation of the left tibial nerve can also augment amplitudes of MEPs from the muscles which are not innervated by the nerve subjected to tetanic stimulation. METHODS: Thirty patients undergoing spinal surgery under propofol-fentanyl anesthesia with partial neuromuscular blockade were examined. For conventional MEP (c-MEP) recording, transcranial stimulation with train-of-five pulses was delivered to C3-4, and the compound muscle action potentials were bilaterally recorded from the abductor pollicis brevis, abductor hallucis (AH), tibialis anterior, and soleus muscles. For p-MEP recording, tetanic stimulation (50 Hz, 50 mA of stimulus intensity) with a duration of 5 s was applied to the left tibial nerve at the ankle 1 s before transcranial stimulation. Transcranial stimulation and recording of compound muscle action potentials were performed in the same manner as c-MEP recording. Amplitudes of c-MEP and p-MEP were compared using Wilcoxons signed rank test. RESULTS: Amplitudes of p-MEPs from the left AH muscle innervated by the left tibial nerve with tetanic stimulation were significantly larger compared with those of c-MEPs. Amplitudes of p-MEPs from the bilateral abductor pollicis brevis and soleus muscles and right AH and tibialis anterior muscles, which were not innervated by the left tibial nerve with tetanic stimulation, were also significantly larger compared with those of c-MEPs. CONCLUSION: In patients under propofol and fentanyl anesthesia with partial neuromuscular blockade, the application of tetanic stimulation to the left tibial nerve augmented the amplitudes of MEPs from the muscles without tetanic nerve stimulation and those with stimulation.

Bone marrow stromal cell sheets may promote axonal regeneration and functional recovery with suppression of glial scar formation after spinal cord transection injury in rats

OBJECTIVE Transplantation of bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) is a theoretical potential as a therapeutic strategy in the treatment of spinal cord injury (SCI). Although a scaffold is sometimes used for retaining transplanted cells in damaged tissue, it is also known to induce redundant immunoreactions during the degradation processes. In this study, the authors prepared cell sheets made of BMSCs, which are transplantable without a scaffold, and investigated their effects on axonal regeneration, glial scar formation, and functional recovery in a completely transected SCI model in rats. METHODS BMSC sheets were prepared from the bone marrow of female Fischer 344 rats using ascorbic acid and were cryopreserved until the day of transplantation. A gelatin sponge (GS), as a control, or BMSC sheet was transplanted into a 2-mm-sized defect of the spinal cord at the T-8 level. Axonal regeneration and glial scar formation were assessed 2 and 8 weeks after transplantation by immunohistochemical analyses using anti-Tuj1 and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) antibodies, respectively. Locomotor function was evaluated using the Basso, Beattie, and Bresnahan scale. RESULTS The BMSC sheets promoted axonal regeneration at 2 weeks after transplantation, but there was no significant difference in the number of Tuj1-positive axons between the sheet- and GS-transplanted groups. At 8 weeks after transplantation, Tuj1-positive axons elongated across the sheet, and their numbers were significantly greater in the sheet group than in the GS group. The areas of GFAP-positive glial scars in the sheet group were significantly reduced compared with those of the GS group at both time points. Finally, hindlimb locomotor function was ameliorated in the sheet group at 4 and 8 weeks after transplantation. CONCLUSIONS The results of the present study indicate that an ascorbic acid-induced BMSC sheet is effective in the treatment of SCI and enables autologous transplantation without requiring a scaffold.

Isolated inflammatory myopathy with rimmed vacuoles presenting with dropped head

We describe an unusual case of inflammatory myopathy with rimmed vacuoles associated with dropped head syndrome. Muscle biopsy in our patient revealed variations in fiber size with fiber necrosis and regeneration, accompanied by many rimmed vacuoles and areas of endomysial cell infiltration. Electron microscopy demonstrated autophagic vacuoles and tubulofilamentous inclusions. This myopathy can cause dropped head syndrome in a subgroup of patients.

Evaluation of the applicability of sevoflurane during post-tetanic myogenic motor evoked potential monitoring in patients undergoing spinal surgery

PurposeRecent evidence has indicated that post-tetanic motor evoked potentials (p-MEPs) can be used to improve the reliability of the monitoring of motor function during spinal surgery. However, data on p-MEP monitoring are limited to those in subjects under propofol anesthesia. The present study was conducted to assess the applicability of sevoflurane during p-MEP monitoring in patients undergoing spinal surgery.MethodsThirty-five patients undergoing spinal surgery under sevoflurane anesthesia were enrolled in the study and classified as being without preoperative motor deficits (n = 25) or with preoperative motor deficits (n = 10). For conventional MEP (c-MEP), transcranial train-pulse stimulation was delivered and the compound muscle action potentials were bilaterally recorded from the abductor pollicis brevis, abductor hallucis, tibialis anterior, and soleus muscles. For p-MEP, tetanic stimulation (50 Hz, 50 mA stimulus intensity) for 5 s was applied to the bilateral median and left tibial nerves 1 s prior to transcranial stimulation.ResultsThe amplitudes of p-MEP were significantly higher in all muscle recording sites than those of c-MEP in patients without motor deficits, whereas these amplitudes were significantly higher in only four of the eight muscles in patients with motor deficits (P < 0.05). The success rates of c-MEP and p-MEP recording were 48% and 64%, respectively, in patients without motor deficits and 30% and 60%, respectively, in patients with motor deficits. There were no statistically significant differences in success rates between c-MEP and p-MEP recording.ConclusionAlthough the application of tetanic stimulation prior to transcranial stimulation did not significantly increase the success rates of MEP recording, it significantly enlarged MEP amplitude under sevoflurane anesthesia in patients without preoperative motor deficits.

Magnification Error in Digital Radiographs of the Cervical Spine Against Magnetic Resonance Imaging Measurements

Study Design Prospective study. Purpose The main purpose of this study was to clarify the range of magnification errors on digital plain radiographs and to determine if there is a correlation between the body mass index (BMI) of a patient and the magnification error. Overview of Literature Most clinicians currently use digital plain radiography. This new method allows one to access images and measure lengths and angles more easily than with the past technologies. In addition, conventional plain radiography has magnification errors. Although few articles mention magnification errors in regards to digital radiographs, they are known to have the same errors. Methods We used plain digital radiography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to acquire images of the cervical spine with the goal of evaluating magnification errors by measuring the anteroposterior vertebral body lengths of C2 and C5. The magnification error (ME) was then calculated: ME=(length on radiograph-length on MRI)/length on MRI ×100 (%). The correlation coefficient between the magnification error and BMI was obtained using Pearsons correlation analysis. Results Average magnification errors in C2 and C5 were approximately 18.5%±5.4% (range, 0%-30%) and 20.7%±6.3% (range, 1%-32%). There was no positive correlation between BMI and the magnification error. Conclusions There were magnification errors on the digital plain radiographs, and they were different in each case. Maximum magnification error differences were 30% (C2) and 31% (C5). Based on these finding, clinicians must pay attention to magnification errors when measuring lengths using digital plain radiography.