Murray L Lawson
La Trobe University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Murray L Lawson.
Clinical and Experimental Optometry | 2007
Sheila Gillard-Crewther; Murray L Lawson; Katrina D. Bello; David P. Crewther
Background: Most theories related to the attentional blink (AB), defined as the refractory period of 300 to 500 msecs following a conscious visual identification, during which a second detection task is impaired, argue that limitations of ‘visual working memory’ (VWM) underlie the phenomenon rather than suppression of attention. The current study examined the relationship between performance on an AB task and classical measures of visual and auditory memory and executive function (EF).
Clinical and Experimental Optometry | 2005
Murray L Lawson; Sheila G. Crewther; Barbara M Junghans; David P. Crewther; Patricia M. Kiely
Background: The link between cognitive changes in attentional focus and the physiological parameters of the eye is not well understood. The aim of the current work was to examine the role of ocular accommodation, that is, the process of changing the shape of the crystalline lens in order to focus an image onto the retina, in active shifts of visual attention between global and local information.
Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology | 2002
Murray L Lawson; Sheila G. Crewther; Astrid Blume‐Tari; Michael Guminsky; Nektaria Perdikeas; Gillian Roebuck; Sara Simmonds; David P. Crewther
The concept of global precedence, which suggests that the global aspect of a scene is processed more rapidly than local details, was examined using the attentional blink paradigm. Eighteen adult subjects observed multiple sequences of complex global−local letter figures to see whether the attentional blink duration would be affected by the visual angle size of the stimulus. Within each sequence, the subject was directed to identify either a global or local red target letter and to detect whether a global or local probe letter (X) was presented in the sequence following the target letter. Stimuli were presented at three different sizes. Results showed significantly higher probe detection rates for global probes than for local at small stimulus sizes. However, using large stimulus sizes, mean correct probe detection was significantly higher in conditions requiring local attention compared to global. No significant difference in probe detection performance was observed between global and local conditions at medium stimulus sizes. The results suggest that the rate of visual information processing varies according to the visual angle of the particular information. The results support the suggestion that the precedence of information is an important factor in the temporal processing of global−local information.
Journal of Vision | 2007
David P. Crewther; Murray L Lawson; Sheila G. Crewther
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Ophthalmology | 1998
Murray L Lawson; David P. Crewther; Cc Duke; L. Henry; Peter. Kiely; Sj West BSc(Hons); Sheila G. Crewther
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Ophthalmology | 1999
Murray L Lawson; David P. Crewther; Sheila G. Crewther
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Ophthalmology | 1998
Cc Duke; Sheila G. Crewther; Murray L Lawson; L. Henry; Patricia M. Kiely; Sj West BSc(Hons); David P. Crewther
Journal of Vision | 2010
Murray L Lawson; Sheila G. Crewther; Patricia M. Kiely; David P. Crewther
Journal of Vision | 2010
Murray L Lawson; Bendon Booth; Karen Burns; Elizabeth Thorpe Davis; Matthew Fuller; Georgina Labropoulos; Somer Thorneycroft; Sheila G. Crewther
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science | 2003
Murray L Lawson; Sheila G. Crewther; Barbara M Junghans; David P. Crewther