Murray O. Robinson

Reconstitution of human telomerase activity in vitro

Telomerase is a ribonucleoprotein enzyme complex that adds single-stranded telomere DNA to chromosome ends [1]. The RNA component of telomerase contains the template for telomeric DNA addition and is essential for activity [1,2]. Telomerase proteins have been identified in ciliates, yeast and mammals [3-12]. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the Est2 protein is homologous to the 123 kDa reverse transcriptase subunit of Euplotes telomerase, and is essential for telomerase activity [8]. In humans, telomerase activity is associated with the telomerase RNA hTR [13], the telomerase RNA-binding protein TP1/TLP1 [5,12] and the TP2 protein encoded by the human EST2 homolog [12] (also known as TRT1, hEST2 or TCS1 [9-11]). The minimal complex sufficient for activity is, however, unknown. We have reconstituted human telomerase activity in reticulocyte lysates and find that only exogenous hTR and TP2 are required for telomerase activity in vitro. Recognition of telomerase RNA by TP2 was species specific, and nucleotides 10-159 of hTR were sufficient for telomerase activity. Telomerase activity immunoprecipitated from the reticulocyte lysate contained hTR and recombinant TP2. Substitution of conserved amino acid residues in the reverse transcriptase domain of TP2 completely abolished telomerase activity. We suggest that TP2 and hTR might represent the minimal catalytic core of human telomerase.

The telomerase reverse transcriptase is limiting and necessary for telomerase function in vivo

Mammalian telomerase is essential for the maintenance of telomere length [1-5]. Its catalytic core comprises a reverse transcriptase component (TERT) and an RNA component. While the biochemical role of mammalian TERT is well established [6-11], it is unknown whether it is sufficient for telomere-length maintenance, chromosome stability or other cellular processes. Cells from mice in which the mTert gene had been disrupted showed progressive loss of telomere DNA, a phenotype similar to cells in which the gene encoding the telomerase RNA component (mTR) has been disrupted [1,12]. On prolonged growth, mTert-deficient embryonic stem (ES) cells exhibited genomic instability, aneuploidy and telomeric fusions. ES cells heterozygous for the mTert disruption also showed telomere attrition, a phenotype that differs from heterozygous mTR cells [12]. Thus, telomere maintenance in mammals is carried out by a single, limiting TERT.

Functional Conservation of the Telomerase Protein Est1p in Humans

Eukaryotic telomerase contains a telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) and an RNA template component that are essential for telomerase catalytic activity and several other telomerase-associated factors of which only a few appear to be integral enzyme components [1-3]. The first essential telomerase protein identified was S. cerevisiae Est1p, whose deletion leads to ever-shorter telomeres despite the persistence of telomerase activity [4-6]. Extensive genetic and biochemical data show that Est1p, via its interaction with the telomerase RNA and telomere end DNA binding complex Cdc13p/Stn1p/Ten1p, promotes the ability of telomerase to elongate telomeres in vivo [7-22]. The characterization of Est1p homologs outside of yeast has not been documented. We report the characterization of two putative human homologs of Est1p, hEST1A and hEST1B. Both proteins specifically associated with telomerase activity in human cell extracts and bound hTERT in rabbit reticulocyte lysates independently of the telomerase RNA. Overproduction of hEST1A cooperated with hTERT to lengthen telomeres, an effect that was specific to cells containing telomerase activity. Like Est1p, hEST1A (but not hEST1B) exhibited a single-stranded telomere DNA binding activity. These results suggest that the telomerase-associated factor Est1p is evolutionarily conserved in humans.

Cyclin E2, a novel G1 cyclin that binds Cdk2 and is aberrantly expressed in human cancers.

ABSTRACT A novel cyclin gene was discovered by searching an expressed sequence tag database with a cyclin box profile. The human cyclin E2 gene encodes a 404-amino-acid protein that is most closely related to cyclin E. Cyclin E2 associates with Cdk2 in a functional kinase complex that is inhibited by both p27Kip1 and p21Cip1. The catalytic activity associated with cyclin E2 complexes is cell cycle regulated and peaks at the G1/S transition. Overexpression of cyclin E2 in mammalian cells accelerates G1, demonstrating that cyclin E2 may be rate limiting for G1 progression. Unlike cyclin E1, which is expressed in most proliferating normal and tumor cells, cyclin E2 levels were low to undetectable in nontransformed cells and increased significantly in tumor-derived cells. The discovery of a novel second cyclin E family member suggests that multiple unique cyclin E-CDK complexes regulate cell cycle progression.

E2F-1 blocks terminal differentiation and causes proliferation in transgenic megakaryocytes.

The transcription factor E2F-1 plays a central role in the cell cycle through its ability to activate genes involved in cell division. E2F-1 activity is regulated by a number of proteins, including the retinoblastoma susceptibility gene product, cyclin-dependent kinases, and their inhibitors, proteins that have been implicated in the control of certain developmental processes. To investigate a potential role of E2F-1 in differentiation, we assayed the ability of megakaryocytes to form platelets in an in vivo transgenic model. E2F-1 expression in megakaryocytes blocked differentiation during maturation, resulting in severe thrombocytopenia. Ultrastructural analysis of megakaryocytes revealed abnormal development characterized by hyperdemarcation of cytoplasmic membranes and reduced numbers of alpha granules. Administration of megakaryocyte growth and development factor or interleukin 6 could not overcome the differentiation block. Additionally, E2F-1 caused massive megakaryocyte accumulation in both normal and ectopic sites, first evident in E15 embryonic liver. Furthermore, significant apoptosis was observed in transgenic megakaryocytes. These data indicate that E2F-1 can prevent terminal differentiation, probably through its cell cycle-stimulatory activity.

Telomerase-associated protein TEP1 is not essential for telomerase activity or telomere length maintenance in vivo.

ABSTRACT TEP1 is a mammalian telomerase-associated protein with similarity to the Tetrahymena telomerase protein p80. Like p80, TEP1 is associated with telomerase activity and the telomerase reverse transcriptase, and it specifically interacts with the telomerase RNA. To determine the role of mTep1 in telomerase function in vivo, we generated mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells and mice lacking mTep1. ThemTep1-deficient (mTep1−/−) mice were viable and were bred for seven successive generations with no obvious phenotypic abnormalities. All murine tissues frommTep1−/− mice possessed a level of telomerase activity comparable to that in wild-type mice. In addition, analysis of several tissues that normally lack telomerase activity revealed no reactivation of telomerase activity in mTep1−/− mice. Telomere length, even in later generations ofmTep1−/− mice, was equivalent to that in wild-type animals. ES cells deficient in mTep1 also showed no detectable alteration in telomerase activity or telomere length with increased passage in culture. Thus, mTep1 appears to be completely dispensable for telomerase function in vivo. Recently, TEP1 has been identified within a second ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complex, the vault particle. TEP1 can also specifically bind to a small RNA, vRNA, which is associated with the vault particle and is unrelated in sequence to mammalian telomerase RNA. These results reveal that TEP1 is an RNA binding protein that is not restricted to the telomerase complex and that TEP1 plays a redundant role in the assembly or localization of the telomerase RNP in vivo.

Telomere dysfunction: multiple paths to the same end

The molecular cloning of telomerase and telomere components has enabled the analysis and precise manipulation of processes that regulate telomere length maintenance. In mammalian cells and in other organisms, we now recognize that disruption of telomere integrity via any one of a number of perturbations induces chromosome instability and the activation of DNA damage responses. Thus, telomere dysfunction may represent a physiological trigger of the DNA damage or apoptotic response in an analogous fashion to other genotoxic insults that introduce chromosome breaks. Initial studies in mice lacking the murine telomerase RNA and in cells expressing a dominant negative version of the telomere binding protein TRF2 revealed a strong p53-dependent response to telomere dysfunction. Yet, telomere dysfunction exhibits p53-independent effects as well, an observation supported by p53-independent responses to telomere dysfunction in p53 mutant human tumor cell lines and mouse cells. As most tumors are compromised for p53 function, examination of this p53-independent response warrants closer attention. A better understanding of this p53-independent response may prove critical for determining the ultimate utility of telomerase inhibitors in the clinic. This review will summarize our current understanding of the molecular responses to telomere dysfunction in mammalian cells.

Telomerase and Cancer

The past few years have brought a flood of new information to the telomerase field. The identification of multiple components of both the telomere and telomerase, the understanding of the importance of telomere maintenance to the long term viability of cells, and the demonstration of the utility of telomerase inhibition in limiting tumor cell growth all convene to provide great enthusiasm for the prospects of targeting the telomerase enzyme in cancer. However, there is clearly much to be learned. Because tumor cells evolve under powerful selection, the emergence of non-telomerase based mechanisms for telomere maintenance should be examined closely. Additionally, the nature of telomerase regulation is currently only poorly understood. More work on the tumor specific regulation of telomerase activity might provide either more opportunities for telomerase inhibition, or more skepticism, as a tumor cell might possess mechanisms for upregulating telomerase activity in the presence of inhibitors. The potential for such regulation has already been observed in certain cell types (46). Currently, the field is intensively investigating the biology and applications of telomere and telomerase biology. In it are great hopes that these fundamental cellular processes might be manipulated to success in the treatment of cancer.

Inhibition of Megakaryocyte Differentiation in Vivo by E2F-1

The transcription factor E2F-1 plays a central role in the cell cycle through its ability to activate genes involved in cell division (La Thangue, 1994; Nevins, 1992). E2F-1 activity is regulated directly by retinoblastoma (Flemington et al., 1993; Helin et al., 1993) and indirectly by the cyclin dependent kinases (Skapek et al., 1995) and their inhibitors (Halevy et al., 1995; Parker et al., 1995), regulators that are known to affect differentiation. Here we investigated a potential role of E2F-1 in differentiation by assaying the ability of megakaryocytes to form platelets in an in vivo transgenic model. E2F-1 expression in megakaryocytes blocked differentiation during maturation resulting in severe thrombocytopenia and apoptosis. Furthermore, E2F-1 caused massive megakaryocyte accumulation in both normal and ectopic sites, first evident in E15 embryonic liver. These data indicate that E2F-1 can prevent terminal differentiation directly through its cell cycle stimulatory activity.