Mustafa Raoof

Development and Validation of a Prognostic Score for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

Importance In patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), the oncologic benefit of surgery and perioperative outcomes for large multifocal tumors or tumors with contiguous organ involvement remain to be defined. Objectives To develop and externally validate a simplified prognostic score for ICC and to determine perioperative outcomes for large multifocal ICCs or tumors with contiguous organ involvement. Design, Setting, and Participants This study of a contemporary cohort merged data from the California Cancer Registry (January 1, 2004, through December 31, 2011) and the Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development inpatient database. Clinicopathologic variables were compared between tumors that were intrahepatic, small (<7 cm), and solitary (ISS) and those that had extrahepatic extension and were large (≥7 cm) and multifocal (ELM). External validation of the prognostic model was performed using an independent data set from the National Cancer Institute’s Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database from January 1, 2004, through December 31, 2013. Main Outcomes and Measures Patient overall survival after hepatectomy. Results A total of 275 patients (123 men [44.7%] and 152 women [55.3%]; median [interquartile range] age, 65 [55-72] years) met the inclusion criteria. No significant differences in overall complication rate (ISS, 48 [34.5%]; ELM, 37 [27.2%]; P = .19) and mortality rate (ISS, 10 [7.2%]; ELM, 6 [4.4%]; P = .32) were found. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards model demonstrated that multifocality, extrahepatic extension, grade, node positivity, and age greater than 60 years are independently associated with worse overall survival. These variables were used to develop the MEGNA prognostic score. The prognostic separation/discrimination index was improved with the MEGNA prognostic score (0.21; 95% CI, 0.11-0.33) compared with the staging systems of the American Joint Committee on Cancer sixth (0.17; 95% CI, 0.09-0.29) and seventh (0.18; 95% CI, 0.08-0.30) editions. Conclusions and Relevance The MEGNA prognostic score allows more accurate and superior estimation of patient survival after hepatectomy compared with current staging systems.

Prognostic significance of lymph node yield in ypN0 rectal cancer.

Neoadjuvant radiation therapy for locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma decreases lymph node yield. This study investigated the association between survival and number of lymph nodes evaluated in patients with pathologically negative nodes after neoadjuvant therapy.

Comparison of Rates and Outcomes of Readmission to Index vs Nonindex Hospitals After Major Cancer Surgery

Importance Increasing regionalization of cancer surgery has the inadvertent potential to lead to fragmentation of care if readmissions occur at a facility other than the index hospital. The magnitude and adverse effects of readmission to a facility other than the one where the surgery was performed are unclear. Objectives To assess rates of readmission to nonindex hospitals after major cancer surgery and to compare outcomes between index and nonindex hospital readmissions. Design, Setting, and Participants In this multicenter, population-based, nationally representative study of adult patients undergoing a major cancer operation (defined as esophagectomies or gastrectomies, hepaticobiliary resections, pancreatectomies, colorectal resections, or cystectomies), retrospective analyses were performed using the Nationwide Readmissions Database (admissions from January 1 through September 30, 2013). Descriptive analyses were performed to determine 90-day readmission characteristics, including timing, cost, and outcomes. Adjusting for clustering by facility, the study used multivariate logistic regression to identify factors associated with nonindex vs index readmissions. The study also used regression models to identify differences in mortality, major complications, and subsequent readmissions between the 2 groups. Data analysis was performed from January 1 through December 31, 2013. Exposures Readmission to index vs nonindex hospitals (defined as any hospital other than the hospital where the major cancer operation was performed). Main Outcomes and Measures Proportion of 90-day readmissions and nonindex readmissions after major cancer surgery, factors associated with nonindex readmissions, and difference between in-hospital mortality, hospital costs, and subsequent readmissions for patients admitted to index vs nonindex hospitals. Results A total of 60 970 patients were included in the study (mean [SD] age, 67 [13] years; 7619 [55.6%] male and 6075 [44.4%] female). The 90-day readmission rate was 23.0%. Of the 13 695 first readmissions, 20.1% were to a nonindex hospital. Independent factors associated with readmission to a nonindex hospital included type of procedure, comorbidities (OR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.15-1.70), elective admission (OR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.06-1.37), discharge to a nursing facility (OR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.07-1.36), and surgery at a teaching hospital (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.00-1.34) (all P < .05). After risk adjustment, patients readmitted to nonindex hospitals had 31.2% higher odds of mortality (odds ratio, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.05-1.64) and 27.3% higher odds of having a major complication (odds ratio, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.14-1.42). Subsequent readmissions and hospital costs were not different between the 2 groups. Conclusions and Relevance Approximately one-fifth of readmissions were to a nonindex hospital and were associated with higher mortality and morbidity than readmission to index hospitals. Factors that influence nonindex readmissions have been identified to target interventions.

Propensity score-matched comparison of oncological outcomes between laparoscopic and open distal pancreatic resection: Oncological outcomes after laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatic resection

Selected studies have reported improved outcomes in laparoscopic compared with open distal pancreatic resection. Concerns regarding failure to achieve proper oncological resection and compromised long‐term outcomes remain. This study investigated whether postoperative outcomes and long‐term survival after laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy are comparable to those after an open procedure.

Association of Fluid Administration With Morbidity in Cytoreductive Surgery With Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy

Importance Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for peritoneal cancers can be associated with significant complications. Randomized trials have demonstrated increased morbidity with liberal fluid regimens in abdominal surgery. Objective To investigate the association of intraoperative fluid administration and morbidity in patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC. Design, Setting, and Participants A retrospective analysis of information from a prospectively collected institutional database was conducted at a National Cancer Institute–designated comprehensive cancer center. A total of 133 patients from April 15, 2009, to June 23, 2016, with primary or secondary peritoneal cancers were included. Exposures Cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Main Outcomes and Measures Morbidity associated with intraoperative fluid management calculated by the comprehensive complication index, which uses a formula combining all perioperative complications and their severities into a continuous variable from 0 to 100 in each patient. Results Of the 133 patients identified, 38% and 37% had diagnoses of metastatic appendiceal and colorectal cancers, respectively. Mean age was 54 (interquartile range [IQR], 47-64) years, and mean peritoneal cancer index was 13 (IQR, 7-18). Mitomycin and platinum-based chemotherapeutic agents were used in 96 (72.2%) and 37 (27.8%) of the patients, respectively. Mean intraoperative fluid (IOF) rate was 15.7 (IQR, 11.3-18.7) mL/kg/h. Mean comprehensive complication index (CCI) was 26.0 (IQR, 8.7-36.2). On multivariate analysis, age (coefficient, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.01-0.64; P = .04), IOF rate (coefficient, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.19-1.75; P = .02), and estimated blood loss (coefficient, 0.02; 95% CI, 0.01-0.03; P = .002) were independent predictors of increased CCI. In particular, patients who received greater than the mean IOF rate experienced a 43% increase in the CCI compared with patients who received less than the mean IOF rate (31.5 vs 22.0; P = .02). Conclusions and Relevance Intraoperative fluid administration is associated with a significant increase in perioperative morbidity in patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC. Fluid administration protocols that include standardized restrictive fluid rates can potentially help to mitigate morbidity in patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC.

Mesenteric Lymphadenectomy in Well-Differentiated Appendiceal Neuroendocrine Tumors

BACKGROUND: Surgical resection is the primary therapy for local and locally advanced appendiceal neuroendocrine tumors. The role of mesenteric lymphadenectomy in these patients is undefined. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to define the role and prognostic significance of mesenteric lymphadenectomy. DESIGN: This was a retrospective, observational study. SETTINGS: A population-based cohort from the National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry (January 1988 to November 2013) was used. PATIENTS: Patients with well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors and nonmixed histologies undergoing surgical resection were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The risk of lymph node metastases as a function of tumor size and overall survival with respect to lymph node count and tumor size was measured. Lymph node cut-point was determined using the Contal and O’Quigely method. RESULTS: Of the 573 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 64% were women, 79% were white, and 76% were <60 years of age. Seventy percent of the tumors were ⩽2 cm, and 77% were lymph node negative. Median lymph nodes retrieved were 0 (interquartile range, 0–14). The probability of nodal metastases was 2.7% in tumors ⩽1.0 cm, 31.0% in tumors 1.1 to 2.0 cm, and 64.0% in tumors >2.0 cm. The probability of a positive lymph node increased with increasing lymph node count up to 26 lymph nodes. An ideal cut-point of 12 lymph nodes was identified by statistical modeling. After adjustment in the multivariable model, the group with 12 or fewer lymph nodes examined had significantly worse overall survival (HR = 4.33 (95% CI, 1.54–12.15); p = 0.005; 5-year survival, 88% versus 96%) than the group with more than 12 lymph nodes examined. LIMITATIONS: Analysis was limited by the variables available in the database. CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest study to date that looks at prognostic significance of lymph node count for well-differentiated appendiceal neuroendocrine tumors. Overall survival was worse where 12 or fewer lymph nodes were identified for tumors >1 cm. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A352.

Hypothermia Is Associated with Surgical Site Infection in Cytoreductive Surgery with Hyperthermic Intra-Peritoneal Chemotherapy

BACKGROUND Maintenance of peri-operative normothermia remains a global quality metric for hospitals. Hypothermia is associated with surgical site infections (SSIs) in colorectal surgery. Patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intra-peritoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) can experience multiple complications post-operatively. We sought to investigate the association of peri-operative hypothermia with SSIs in patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC at our institution. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC from 2009-2017 were identified retrospectively from a prospectively collected institutional database. Hypothermia defined as less than 36.0°C in accordance with the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality metric. Regression analyses were performed with SSIs diagnosed within 30 days post-operatively as the primary outcome. RESULTS A total of 170 patients were identified, 14 (8.2%) of whom developed an SSI. Patients who developed an SSI experienced lower median temperatures (p = 0.027) and a greater percentage of operative time in hypothermia (p = 0.008). On a multivariable analysis adjusting for known risk factors for SSI, the percentage of operative time in hypothermia (odds ratio [OR] 1.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.07, p = 0.008) was the only parameter associated with SSI within 30 days post-operatively. CONCLUSION Hypothermia is associated with the development of SSIs in patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC. Our findings suggest that minimizing peri-operative temperatures to less than 36.0°C may decrease peri-operative SSI in this patient population.

Academic productivity in surgical oncology: Where is the bar set for those training the next generation?: LAROCCA et al.

Promotion and tenure are important milestones for academic surgical oncologists. The aim of this study was to quantify academic metrics associated with rank in surgical oncologists training the next generation.

Oncologic outcomes after robot-assisted versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: Analysis of the National Cancer Database: RAOOF et al.

How the oncologic outcomes after robotic distal pancreatectomy (RDP) compare to those after laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) remains unknown.

A collaborative surgical approach to upper and lower abdominal cytoreductive surgery in ovarian cancer: ENG et al.

Cytoreductive surgery with complete macroscopic resection in patients with ovarian cancer is associated with improved survival. Institutional reports of combined upper and lower abdominal cytoreductive surgery for more advanced disease have described multidisciplinary approaches. We sought to investigate outcomes in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery in patients with upper and lower abdominal disease at our institution.