Myron P. Zalucki
University of Queensland
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Myron P. Zalucki.
Australian Journal of Zoology | 1986
Myron P. Zalucki; G. J. Daglish; S. Firempong; P. Twine
The taxonomy and identification of Heliothis armigera and H. punctigera, their distribution and host plants in Australia, the effect of host plant on reproduction and on the development and survival of immature stages, their movements, population biology and dynamics, and their control, are reviewed. Areas where further study is desirable include: the nature of host plant selection and host species preference; adaptability to new cultivars; effects of host plant on development; detailed life-table studies on different host plants; the contribution of predation, parasitism and disease to mortality; factors responsible for fluctuations in populations between years, including the origins of outbreak populations; and control strategies other than insecticide treatment.
Journal of Economic Entomology | 2012
Myron P. Zalucki; Asad Shabbir; Rehan Silva; David Adamson; Liu ShuSheng; Michael J. Furlong
ABSTRACT Since 1993, the annual worldwide cost of diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae), control has been routinely quoted to be US
Evolutionary Applications | 2011
Andrew P. Hendry; Michael T. Kinnison; Mikko Heino; Troy Day; Thomas B. Smith; Gary P. Fitt; Carl T. Bergstrom; John G. Oakeshott; Peter Stanley Jørgensen; Myron P. Zalucki; George Gilchrist; Simon G. Southerton; Andrew Sih; Sharon Y. Strauss; Robert Ford Denison; Scott P. Carroll
1 billion. This estimate requires updating and incorporation of yield losses to reflect current total costs of the pest to the world economy. We present an analysis that estimates what the present costs are likely to be based on a set of necessary, but reasoned, assumptions. We use an existing climate driven model for diamondback moth distribution and abundance, the Food and Agriculture Organization country Brassica crop production data and various management scenarios to bracket the cost estimates. The “length of the string” is somewhere between US
Australian Journal of Zoology | 1994
Myron P. Zalucki; David Murray; P. C. Gregg; Gary P. Fitt; P. Twine; C. Jones
1.3 billion and US
Entomologia Experimentalis Et Applicata | 1996
Stephen B. Malcolm; Myron P. Zalucki
2.3 billion based on management costs. However, if residual pest damage is included then the cost estimates will be even higher; a conservative estimate of 5% diamondback moth-induced yield loss to all crops adds another US
Ecological Entomology | 2001
Myron P. Zalucki; Lincoln P. Brower; Alfonso Alonso-M
2.7 billion to the total costs associated with the pest. A conservative estimate of total costs associated with diamondback moth management is thus US
Environmental Entomology | 2002
Shu-Sheng Liu; Fei-Zhou Chen; Myron P. Zalucki
4 billion-US
Evolutionary Applications | 2011
Peter H. Thrall; John G. Oakeshott; Gary P. Fitt; Simon G. Southerton; Jeremy J. Burdon; A. W. Sheppard; Robyn J. Russell; Myron P. Zalucki; Mikko Heino; R. Ford Denison
5 billion. The lower bound represents rational decision making by pest managers based on diamondback moth abundance driven by climate only. The upper estimate is due to the more normal practice of weekly insecticide application to vegetable crops and the assumption that canola (Brassica napus L.) is treated with insecticide at least once during the crop cycle. Readers can decide for themselves what the real cost is likely to be because we provide country data for further interpretation. Our analysis suggests that greater efforts at implementation of even basic integrated pest management would reduce insecticide inputs considerably, reducing negative environmental impacts and saving many hundreds of millions of dollars annually.
Bulletin of Entomological Research | 1999
John Paul Cunningham; Myron P. Zalucki; Stuart A. West
Evolutionary principles are now routinely incorporated into medicine and agriculture. Examples include the design of treatments that slow the evolution of resistance by weeds, pests, and pathogens, and the design of breeding programs that maximize crop yield or quality. Evolutionary principles are also increasingly incorporated into conservation biology, natural resource management, and environmental science. Examples include the protection of small and isolated populations from inbreeding depression, the identification of key traits involved in adaptation to climate change, the design of harvesting regimes that minimize unwanted life‐history evolution, and the setting of conservation priorities based on populations, species, or communities that harbor the greatest evolutionary diversity and potential. The adoption of evolutionary principles has proceeded somewhat independently in these different fields, even though the underlying fundamental concepts are the same. We explore these fundamental concepts under four main themes: variation, selection, connectivity, and eco‐evolutionary dynamics. Within each theme, we present several key evolutionary principles and illustrate their use in addressing applied problems. We hope that the resulting primer of evolutionary concepts and their practical utility helps to advance a unified multidisciplinary field of applied evolutionary biology.
Nature | 2014
Shuai Zhan; Wei Zhang; Kristjan Niitepõld; Jeremy Hsu; Juan Fernández Haeger; Myron P. Zalucki; Sonia Altizer; Jacobus C. de Roode; Steven M. Reppert; Marcus R. Kronforst
Extensive surveys during the winter months in inland areas of Australia have greatly extended both the range and known hosts of Australias two pest Helicoverpa species. H. punctigera was the more common species, being collected from c. half of the sites sampled. Here a further 47 plant species in 8 families are recorded as possible host plants; the majority (all except two) are new records of native hosts, and greatly extend the existing lists. H. armigera was less common, being recorded from c. 10% of the 554 sites sampled. This species was reared from 28 species in 10 plant families. Both moth species are recorded for the first time from various native plant species, predominantly in the Asteraceae and Fabaceae. The Goodeniaceae is also added to the host list of both species. Determination of the status of host plants is discussed.
Collaboration
Dive into the Myron P. Zalucki's collaboration.
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
View shared research outputsCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
View shared research outputs