Myung-Hoon Shin

Accuracy and Safety in Pedicle Screw Placement in the Thoracic and Lumbar Spines : Comparison Study between Conventional C-Arm Fluoroscopy and Navigation Coupled with O-Arm® Guided Methods.

Objective The authors performed a retrospective study to assess the accuracy and clinical benefits of a navigation coupled with O-arm® system guided method in the thoracic and lumbar spines by comparing with a C-arm fluoroscopy-guided method. Methods Under the navigation guidance, 106 pedicle screws inserted from T7 to S1 in 24 patients, and using the fluoroscopy guidance, 204 pedicle screws from T5 to S1 in 45 patients. The position of screws within the pedicle was classified into four groups, from grade 0 (no violation cortex) to 3 (more than 4 mm violation). The location of violated pedicle cortex was also assessed. Intra-operative parameters including time required for preparation of screwing procedure, times for screwing and the number of X-ray shot were assessed in each group. Results Grade 0 was observed in 186 (91.2%) screws of the fluoroscopy-guided group, and 99 (93.4%) of the navigation-guided group. Mean time required for inserting a screw was 3.8 minutes in the fluoroscopy-guided group, and 4.5 minutes in the navigation-guided group. Mean time required for preparation of screw placement was 4 minutes in the fluoroscopy-guided group, and 19 minutes in the navigation-guided group. The fluoroscopy-guided group required mean 8.9 times of X-ray shot for each screw placement. Conclusion The screw placement under the navigation-guidance coupled with O-arm® system appears to be more accurate and safer than that under the fluoroscopy guidance, although the preparation and screwing time for the navigation-guided surgery is longer than that for the fluoroscopy-guided surgery.

Prospective Comparison Study Between the Fluoroscopy-guided and Navigation Coupled With O-arm-guided Pedicle Screw Placement in the Thoracic and Lumbosacral Spines.

Study Design: This is a prospective randomized comparison study between the fluoroscopy-guided and navigation coupled with O-arm–guided pedicle screw placement in the thoracic and lumbosacral spines. Objective: The objective of the study was to evaluate the accuracy and clinical benefits of a navigation coupled with O-arm–guided method in the thoracic and lumbar spines by comparing with a C-arm fluoroscopy-guided method. Methods: Under fluoroscopy guidance, 138 pedicle screws were inserted from T9 to S1 in 20 patients, and 124 pedicle screws were inserted from T9 to S1 in 20 patients using the navigation. The position of the screws within the pedicle was assessed from grade 0 (no violation cortex) to grade 3 (>4 mm violation), and the location of the violated cortex was determined. Preparation time of each equipment setting, time for screwing, and the number of x-ray shots were evaluated. Results: The number of screws observed as grade 0 was 121 (87.7%) in the fluoroscopy-guided group and 114 (91.9%) in the navigation-guided group. The lateral cortex was most commonly involved in the fluoroscopy-guided group (6 cases, 35.3%), and the medial cortex was most common in the navigation-guided group (4 cases, 40%). The mean time required for preparation for screw placement was 3.7 minutes in the fluoroscopy-guided group and 14.2 minutes in the navigation-guided group. Average screwing time was 3.6 minutes in the fluoroscopy-guided group and 4.3 minutes in the navigation-guided group. The mean number of x-ray shots for each screw placement in the fluoroscopy-guided group was 6.5. Postoperatively, 2 patients with misplacement of a screw under fluoroscopy guidance presented ipsilateral leg paresthesia, possibly related to the screw position. Conclusions: The present prospective study reveals that the pedicle screw placement guided by the navigation coupled with O-arm system was more accurate and safer than that under fluoroscopy guidance.

Direct pars repair surgery using two different surgical methods : pedicle screw with universal hook system and direct pars screw fixation in symptomatic lumbar spondylosis patients.

Objective The authors performed a retrospective study to assess the clinical and radiological outcome in symptomatic lumbar spondylolysis patients who underwent a direct pars repair surgery using two different surgical methods; pedicle screw with universal hook system (PSUH) and direct pars screw fixation (DPSF), and compared the results between two different treated groups. Methods Forty-seven consecutive patients (PSUH; 23, DPSF; 15) with symptomatic lumbar spondylolysis who underwent a direct pars repair surgery were included. The average follow-up period was 37 months in the PSUH group, and 28 months in the DPSF group. The clinical outcome was measured using visual analogue pain scale (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI). The length of operation time, the amount of blood loss, the duration of hospital stay, surgical complications, and fusion status were also assessed. Results When compared to the DPSF group, the average preoperative VAS and ODI score of the PSUH group were less decreased at the last follow-up; (the PSUH group; back VAS : 4.9 vs. 3.0, leg VAS : 6.8 vs. 2.2, ODI : 50.6% vs. 24.6%, the DPSF group; back VAS : 5.7 vs. 1.1, leg VAS : 6.1 vs. 1.2, ODI : 57.4% vs. 18.2%). The average operation time was 174.9 minutes in the PSUH group, and 141.7 minutes in the DPSF group. The average blood loss during operation was 468.8 cc in the PSUH group, and 298.8 cc in the DPSF group. The average hospital stay after operation was 8.9 days in the PSUH group, and 7 days in the DPSF group. In the PSUH group, there was one case of a screw misplacement requiring revision surgery. In the DPSF group, one patient suffered from transient leg pain. The successful bone fusion rate was 78.3% in the PSUH group, and 93.3% in the DPSF group. Conclusion The present study suggests that the technique using direct pars screw would be more effective than the method using pedicle screw with lamina hook system, in terms of decreased operation time, amount of blood loss, hospital stay, and increased fusion success rate, as well as better clinical outcome.

Comparative study of lumbopelvic sagittal alignment between patients with and without sacroiliac joint pain after lumbar interbody fusion.

Study Design. A retrospective case-control study. Objective. To elucidate the role of changes of lumbopelvic sagittal alignment in the pathogenesis of sacroiliac joint (SIJ) pain after posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) by comparing these values with the control, patients without SIJ pain. Summary of Background Data. There has been no study specifically addressing the relation between lumbopelvic sagittal alignment and SIJ pain after PLIF. Methods. Among 346 patients who underwent PLIF between June 2009 and April 2012, patients with postoperative SIJ pain who responded to SIJ block were enrolled. For a control group, patients who were matched for sex, age group, the number of fused level, and fusion to sacrum were randomly selected. The patients were assessed using clinical and radiological parameters including age, sex, diagnosis, bone mineral density, body mass index, lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt, and sacral slope. Target LL (PI + 9°), achieved rate of LL (postoperative LL/target LL × 100), and LL-PI mismatch (&Dgr;) were also calculated and compared between 2 groups. Results. Twenty-three patients (9 males and 14 females) with SIJ pain and 46 patients (18 males and 28 females) without SIJ pain were assessed. Postoperatively, the SIJ pain group showed significantly greater pelvic tilt (19.88 ± 10.42°, P = 0.03), smaller achieved rate of LL (64.3%, P = 0.02), and substantial residual LL-PI mismatch (−14.45 ± 12.16°, P = 0.03) than the non-SIJ pain group (14.25 ± 7.68°, 73.2%, and −8.26 ± 9.12°, respectively). The degree of correlation between LL and PI in both the SIJ pain group and the non-SIJ pain group was positive preoperatively (r = 0.569; P = 0.003, r = 0.591; P = 0.000, respectively). Although correlation of the SIJ pain group remained positive postoperatively (r = 0.601, P = 0.002), it became strongly positive in the non-SIJ pain group (r = 0.856, P = 0.000). Conclusion. This study indicates that lumbopelvic sagittal imbalance inferred from greater pelvic tilt and inadequately restored LL may play a central role in the development of SIJ pain after PLIF. Thus, it is important to restore lumbopelvic sagittal balance and to evaluate PI to determine the ideal LL that is needed to prevent postoperative SIJ pain. Level of Evidence: 3

Sagittal Sacropelvic Morphology and Balance in Patients with Sacroiliac Joint Pain Following Lumbar Fusion Surgery

Objective To investigate the sagittal sacropelvic morphology and balance of the patients with SIJ pain following lumbar fusion. Methods Among 452 patients who underwent posterior lumbar interbody fusion between June 2009 and January 2013, patients with postoperative SIJ pain, being responded to SIJ block were enrolled. For a control group, patients matched for sex, age group, the number of fused level and fusion to sacrum were randomly selected. Patients were assessed radiologic parameters including lumbar lordosis, pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT) and sacral slope (SS). To evaluate the sagittal sacropelvic morphology and balance, the ratio of PT/PI, SS/PI and PT/SS were analyzed. Results A total of 28 patients with SIJ pain and 56 patients without SIJ pain were assessed. Postoperatively, SIJ pain group showed significantly greater PT (p=0.02) than non-SIJ pain group. Postoperatively, PT/PI and SS/PI in SIJ pain group was significantly greater and smaller than those in non-SIJ pain group respectively (p=0.03, 0.02, respectively) except for PT/SS (p=0.05). SIJ pain group did not show significant postoperative changes of PT/PI and SS/PI (p=0.09 and 0.08, respectively) while non-SIJ pain group showed significantly decrease of PT/PI (p=0.00) and increase of SS/PI (p=0.00). Conclusion This study presents different sagittal sacropelvic morphology and balance between the patients with/without SIJ pain following lumbar fusion surgery. The patients with SIJ pain showed retroversed pelvis and vertical sacrum while the patients without SIJ pain have similar morphologic features with asymptomatic populations in the literature.

The ossification pattern in paediatric occipito-cervical spine: is it possible to estimate real age?

AIM To retrospectively analyse the synchondrosis from the occipital bone to the whole cervical spine and determine the feasibility and validity of age estimation using computed tomography (CT) images. MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 231 cervical spine or neck CT images of young children (<7 years of age) were examined. Twelve ossification centres were assessed (occiput: n = 2; atlas: n = 2; axis, n = 6; whole sub-axial vertebra: n = 2), and the ossification process was graded as open (O, fully lucent), osseous bridging (B, partially ossified), and fusion (F, totally ossified). After the first analysis was completed, the resulting chronological chart was used to estimate the age of 10 new cases in order to confirm the usefulness of the chart. RESULTS Infancy was easily estimated using the sub-axial or C2 posterior ossification centres, while the posterior occipital regions provided good estimation of age between 1-2 years. The most difficult period for accurate age estimation was between 2-4 years. However, the C2 anterior (neurocentral ossification) and C1 posterior regions did yield information to help determine the age around 3 years. The anterior occipital region was useful for age estimation between 4-5 years, and the C1-anterior region was potentially useful to help decide among the other parameters. The test for age estimation (TAE) had a very high ICC score (0.973) among the three observers. CONCLUSION Segmentalised analysis can enhance the ability to estimate real age, at least by the year. The analysis of the occipital bone made a strong contribution to the usefulness of the chorological chart. An organised chronological chart can provide readily available information for age estimation, and the primary application of the above data (TAE) demonstrated the validity of this approach.

Unrecognized Shoulder Disorders in Treatment of Cervical Spondylosis Presenting Neck and Shoulder Pain

Objective Cervical spondylosis and shoulder disorders share with neck and shoulder pain. Differentiating between the two can be challenging and patient with combined pathologies is less likely to have pain improvement even after successful cervical operation. We investigated clinical characteristics of the patients who were diagnosed as cervical spondylosis however, were turned out to have shoulder disorders or the patients whose pain was solely originated from shoulder. Methods Between January 2008 and October 2009, the patients presenting neck and shoulder pain with diagnosis of cervical spondylosis were enrolled. Among them, the patients who met following inclusion criteria were grouped into shoulder disorder group and the others were into cervical spondylosis group. Inclusion criteria were as follows. (1) To have residual or unresponsive neck and shoulder pain despite of optimal surgical treatment due to concomitant shoulder disorders. (2) When the operation was cancelled for the reason that shoulder and neck pain was proved to be related with unrecognized shoulder disorders. The authors retrospectively reviewed and compared clinical characteristics, level of pathology, diagnosis of cervical spondylosis and shoulder disorders. Results A total of 96 patients were enrolled in this study. Shoulder disorder group was composed of 15 patients (15.8%) and needed additional orthopedic treatment. Cervical spondylosis group was composed of 81 patients (84.2%). There was no significant differences in mean age, sex ratio and major diagnosis in both shoulder disorder and cervical spondylosis group (p=0.33, 0.78, and 0.68 respectively). However, the distribution of pathologic levels was found to be significantly different (p=0.03). In shoulder disorder group, the majority of lesions (15 of 19 levels, 78.9%) were located at the level of C4-5 (36.8%) and C5-6 (42.1%). On the other hand, in cervical spondylosis group, C5-6 (39.0%) and C6-7 (37.1%) were the most frequently observed level of lesions (80 of 105 levels, 16.1%). Conclusion It is very important for spine surgeons to perform a complete history taking and physical examination using the special tests, and to discover the underlying shoulder disorders causing of symptom in treatment of cervical spondylosis presenting neck and shoulder pain.

Gas containing disc herniations: dual nerve root compression at the single disc level

A 72-year-old man presented with gas-containing disc herniations resulting in dual nerve root (exiting and traversing root) compression at the single level manifesting as lower back pain with the right anterolateral thigh and medial calf pain and no response to 4 weeks of conservative treatment. Physical examination revealed positive Lasegues sign at 40°, but the patient had no evidence of neurological deficit. Magnetic resonance imaging showed two separate disc herniations, a posterocentral herniated disc that had migrated inferiorly at the L3-4 level and compressed the L4 traversing root, and another that had compressed the L3 exiting root in the extraforaminal area at the same level. Coronal computed tomography demonstrated the presence of gas in the spinal canal and extraforaminal area at the L3-4 level, and the vacuum phenomenon was also noted at the L3-4 intervertebral disc. Microscopic discectomy was performed using midline and paramedian approaches, and the presence of gas was confirmed by bubbles after pouring saline into the area intraoperatively. Histological examination revealed fibrous tissue. The patient was discharged with complete relief of pain. This is a rare case of symptomatic gas-containing disc herniations causing dual compression of exiting and traversing roots at a single disc level.