Myung Jin Kim

CLINICAL COURSE OF DIABETIC RETINOPATHY IN KOREAN TYPE 2 DIABETES AFTER BARIATRIC SURGERY: A Pilot Study.

Purpose: To assess the changes in diabetic retinopathy (DR) in Type 2 diabetes (T2DM) patients after bariatric surgery. Methods: Consecutive 20 patients with T2DM who underwent bariatric surgery and were followed for at least 12 months were enrolled. The case history was reviewed retrospectively, and laboratory data were assessed at baseline and every 3 months postoperatively. Two retinal specialists evaluated the severity of DR with dilated fundus examination preoperatively and postoperatively. Factors associated with DR progression were assessed. Results: During the follow-up period, 2 of 12 patients without DR and 2 of 3 patients with mild nonproliferative DR before surgery developed moderate nonproliferative DR. All five patients with moderate nonproliferative DR or worse preoperatively had progression requiring intervention. Preexisting DR (P = 0.005) and albuminuria (P = 0.01) were identified as associated with DR progression. Six patients (30%) entered remission of T2DM, but remission of T2DM could not halt the DR progression. Conclusion: Diabetic retinopathy progression can occur in patients with or without before DR after bariatric surgery, regardless of remission of T2DM. All patients with T2DM should be examined regularly by an ophthalmologist postoperatively, and more carefully patients with previous DR or albuminuria.

Is transverse abdominis plane block effective following local anesthetic infiltration in laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal hernia repair

Background Transverse abdominis plane (TAP) block can be recommended as a multimodal method to reduce postoperative pain in laparoscopic abdominal surgery. However, it is unclear whether TAP block following local anesthetic infiltration is effective. We planned this study to evaluate the effectiveness of the latter technique in laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal hernia repair (TEP). Methods We randomly divided patients into two groups: the control group (n = 37) and TAP group (n = 37). Following the induction of general anesthesia, as a preemptive method, all of the patients were subjected to local anesthetic infiltration at the trocar sites, and the TAP group was subjected to ultrasound-guided bilateral TAP block with 30 ml of 0.375% ropivacaine in addition before TEP. Pain was assessed in the recovery room and post-surgery at 4, 8, and 24 h. Additionally, during the postoperative 24 h, the total injected dose of analgesics and incidence of nausea were recorded. Results: On arrival in the recovery room, the pain score of the TAP group (4.33 ± 1.83) was found to be significantly lower than that of the control group (5.73 ± 2.04). However, the pain score was not significantly different between the TAP group and control group at 4, 8, and 24 h post-surgery. The total amounts of analgesics used in the TAP group were significantly less than in the control group. No significant difference was found in the incidence of nausea between the two groups. Conclusions TAP block following local infiltration had a clinical advantage only in the recovery room.