N.A. Beresford

The ERICA Tool

The ERICA Tool is a computerised, flexible software system that has a structure based upon the ERICA Integrated Approach to assessing the radiological risk to biota. The Tool guides the user through the assessment process, recording information and decisions and allowing the necessary calculations to be performed to estimate risks to selected animals and plants. Tier 1 assessments are media concentration based and use pre-calculated environmental media concentration limits to estimate risk quotients. Tier 2 calculates dose rates but allows the user to examine and edit most of the parameters used in the calculation including concentration ratios, distribution coefficients, percentage dry weight soil or sediment, dose conversion coefficients, radiation weighting factors and occupancy factors. Tier 3 offers the same flexibility as Tier 2 but allows the option to run the assessment probabilistically if the underling parameter probability distribution functions are defined. Results from the Tool can be put into context using incorporated data on dose-effects relationships and background dose rates.

Effects of acute gamma irradiation on chemical, physical and biological properties of soils

The use of gamma (γ-) irradiation as a method for soil sterilisation for laboratory experiments has been recommended over other sterilisation techniques. We reviewed literature dating back over 50 years to investigate the chemical and biological effects on γ-irradiated soils and to determine its practicality for sterilising soils which will subsequently be used for experimental purposes. Typically, γ-irradiation at 10 kGy will eliminate actinomycetes, fungi and invertebrates in most soils. The majority of soil bacteria are eliminated by 20 kGy, however, a dose higher than 70 kGy may be required to kill certain radio-resistant bacteria. We recommend prior to experimentation that the radiosensitivity of soils are determined so as to ensure the desired chemical and biological effects are achieved. γ-Irradiation may not be an appropriate method for all experiments as it can influence soil chemical properties, in particular soil nitrate and ammonium levels. Where chemical stability is required we recommend sterilising soils air-dry rather than moist.

Derivation of transfer parameters for use within the ERICA Tool and the default concentration ratios for terrestrial biota.

An ability to predict radionuclide activity concentrations in biota is a requirement of any method assessing the exposure of biota to ionising radiation. Within the ERICA Tool fresh weight whole-body activity concentrations in organisms are estimated using concentration ratios (the ratio of the activity concentration in the organism to the activity concentration in an environmental media). This paper describes the methodology used to derive the default terrestrial ecosystem concentration ratio database available within the ERICA Tool and provides details of the provenance of each value for terrestrial reference organisms. As the ERICA Tool considers 13 terrestrial reference organisms and the radioisotopes of 31 elements, a total of 403 concentration ratios were required for terrestrial reference organisms. Of these, 129 could be derived from literature review. The approaches taken for selecting the remaining values are described. These included, for example, assuming values for similar reference organisms and/or biogeochemically similar elements, and various simple modelling approaches.

Environmental protection : transfer parameters for reference animals and plants

In Publication 103 (ICRP, 2007), the Commission included a section on the protection of the environment, and indicated that it would be further developing its approach to this difficult subject by way of a set of Reference Animals and Plants (RAPs) as the basis for relating exposure to dose, and dose to radiation effects, for different types of animals and plants. Subsequently, a set of 12 RAPs has been described in some detail (ICRP, 2008), particularly with regard to estimation of the doses received by them, at a whole-body level, in relation to internal and external radionuclide concentrations; and what is known about the effects of radiation on such types of animals and plants. A set of dose conversion factors for all of the RAPs has been derived, and the resultant dose rates can be compared with evaluations of the effects of dose rates using derived consideration reference levels (DCRLs). Each DCRL constitutes a band of dose rates for each RAP within which there is likely to be some chance of the occurrence of deleterious effects. Site-specific data on Representative Organisms (i.e. organisms of specific interest for an assessment) can then be compared with such values and used as a basis for decision making. It is intended that the Commissions approach to protection of the environment be applied to all exposure situations. In some situations, the relevant radionuclide concentrations can be measured directly, but this is not always possible or feasible. In such cases, modelling techniques are used to estimate the radionuclide concentrations. This report is an initial step in addressing the needs of such modelling techniques. After briefly reviewing the basic factors relating to the accumulation of radionuclides by different types of biota, in different habitats, and at different stages in the life cycle, this report focuses on the approaches used to model the transfer of radionuclides through the environment. It concludes that equilibrium concentration ratios (CRs) are most commonly used to model such transfers, and that they currently offer the most comprehensive data coverage. The report also reviews the methods used to derive CRs, and describes a means of summarising statistical information from empirical data sets. Emphasis has been placed on using data from field studies, although some data from laboratory experiments have been included for some RAPs. There are, inevitably, many data gaps for each RAP, and other data have been used to help fill these gaps. CRs specific to each RAP were extracted from a larger database, structured in terms of generic wildlife groups. In cases where data were lacking, values from taxonomically-related organisms were used to derive suitable surrogate values. The full set of rules which have been applied for filling gaps in RAP-specific CRs is described. Statistical summaries of the data sets are provided, and CR values for 39 elements and 12 RAP combinations are given. The data coverage, reliance on derived values, and applicability of the CR approach for each of the RAPs is discussed. Finally, some consideration is given to approaches where RAPs and their life stages could be measured for the elements of interest under more rigorously controlled conditions to help fill the current data gaps.

The importance of soil adhered to vegetation as a source of radionuclides ingested by grazing animals

Soil ingestion has been identified as a potentially important source of radionuclides to grazing animals. Seasonal patterns of soil adherence to vegetation and its implications for the radionuclide intake of grazing animals were measured at two west Cumbrian sites. Soil adhesion to vegetation was highly seasonal, being highest in autumn and winter. At Site 1 (a lowland pasture close to the British Nuclear Fuels plc Sellafield Reprocessing Plant, Cumbria, UK), vegetation samples were found to consist of up to 46% soil (by dry weight). Therefore, the importance of soil as a potential source of radionuclides to grazing animals was also seasonal; soil comprised up to 92% of the 137Cs and potentially all of the 239/240Pu of vegetation samples at Site 1 and up to 62% of the 137Cs at Site 2 (an upland farm contaminated following the Chernobyl accident). Analyses of sheep faecal samples confirmed the seasonal importance of soil as a potential source of radionuclides. The importance of soil adhering to vegetation, as a source of contaminant 137Cs, increased with time after the Chernobyl accident. Calculations of soil ingestion must be made when the intake of radionuclides by grazing animals is being studied. In some circumstances, present radioecological models may considerably underestimate the importance of soil ingestion.

The IAEA handbook on radionuclide transfer to wildlife

An IAEA handbook presenting transfer parameter values for wildlife has recently been produced. Concentration ratios (CRwo-media) between the whole organism (fresh weight) and either soil (dry weight) or water were collated for a range of wildlife groups (classified taxonomically and by feeding strategy) in terrestrial, freshwater, marine and brackish generic ecosystems. The data have been compiled in an on line database, which will continue to be updated in the future providing the basis for subsequent revision of the Wildlife TRS values. An overview of the compilation and analysis, and discussion of the extent and limitations of the data is presented. Example comparisons of the CRwo-media values are given for polonium across all wildlife groups and ecosystems and for molluscs for all radionuclides. The CRwo-media values have also been compared with those currently used in the ERICA Tool which represented the most complete published database for wildlife transfer values prior to this work. The use of CRwo-media values is a pragmatic approach to predicting radionuclide activity concentrations in wildlife and is similar to that used for screening assessments for the human food chain. The CRwo-media values are most suitable for a screening application where there are several conservative assumptions built into the models which will, to varying extents, compensate for the variable data quality and quantity, and associated uncertainty.

Use of GPS to identify the grazing areas of hill sheep

Abstract Within flocks grazing land contaminated with radioactive fallout following the Chernobyl nuclear accident, certain sheep have comparatively high levels of radiocaesium. To understand why only certain sheep are affected, the precise grazing areas of these animals need to be identified. An animal behaviour and tracking system, that utilises the Global Positioning System (GPS), has been developed and was tested in upland West Cumbria, UK. Although there was evidence that hilly terrain did occasionally affect the function of the GPS receiver, this was for only 2.5% of the time in the worst case. The study clearly demonstrates that GPS can be used to track domestic sheep, and could be used to identify home ranges and the specific areas giving rise to contaminated animals.

Inter-comparison of models to estimate radionuclide activity concentrations in non-human biota

A number of models have recently been, or are currently being, developed to enable the assessment of radiation doses from ionising radiation to non-human species. A key component of these models is the ability to predict whole-organism activity concentrations in a wide range of wildlife. In this paper, we compare the whole-organism activity concentrations predicted by eight models participating within the IAEA Environmental Modelling for Radiation Safety programme for a range of radionuclides to terrestrial and freshwater organisms. In many instances, there was considerable variation, ranging over orders of magnitude, between the predictions of the different models. Reasons for this variability (including methodology, data source and data availability) are identified and discussed. The active participation of groups responsible for the development of key models within this exercise is a useful step forward in providing the transparency in methodology and data provenance required for models which are either currently being used for regulatory purposes or which may be used in the future. The work reported in this paper, and supported by other findings, demonstrates that the largest contribution to variability between model predictions is the parameterisation of their transfer components. There is a clear need to focus efforts and provide authoritative compilations of those data which are available.

Transfer of radiocesium to ruminants in natural and semi-natural ecosystems and appropriate countermeasures

A review of studies conducted before and after the Chernobyl accident is presented, showing that both the duration and the extent of radiocesium contamination of ruminants will be more severe in unimproved ecosystems compared with agricultural areas. Although such unimproved ecosystems provide comparatively small quantities of food for human consumption, the integrated dose from these areas to the human population can be large. Ecological characteristics that make unimproved ecosystems particularly vulnerable to this form of pollution include the presence of (1) soils that do not immobilize radiocesium and therefore allow its uptake into vegetation; (2) vegetation species with high uptake rates of radiocesium; (3) the predominant utilization by small ruminants which attain higher muscle radiocesium levels than cattle. Unimproved ecosystems, which often are located at high altitudes, are predisposed to receiving higher fallout because of high precipitation rates which enhance the likelihood of deposition. Countermeasures have been developed and used successfully to reduce radiocesium levels in ruminants grazing in unimproved ecosystems. Apart from decontamination by altering farming practices and providing uncontaminated feeds, sustained reductions of 50% to 80% in the radiocesium concentrations of both milk and meat have been achieved in many ruminant species when AFCF is given via a sodium chloride lick or as a sustained-release bolus. Food production in unimproved ecosystems must be evaluated separately from that of ordinary agricultural systems. In addition to detailed studies on the behavior of radiocesium, consideration should be given to the collection of aggregated transfer coefficients from various ecosystems which were affected by Chernobyl fallout. By combining bioavailability estimates and aggregated transfer coefficients, based on Chernobyl and nuclear weapons test fallout data, it may in the future be possible to make a rapid assessment of both the immediate and the long-term impact of a future nuclear accident on food production in unimproved ecosystems.

An international comparison of models and approaches for the estimation of the radiological exposure of non-human biota.

Over the last decade a number of models and approaches have been developed for the estimation of the exposure of non-human biota to ionising radiations. In some countries these are now being used in regulatory assessments. However, to date there has been no attempt to compare the outputs of the different models used. This paper presents the work of the International Atomic Energy Agencys EMRAS Biota Working Group which compares the predictions of a number of such models in model-model and model-data inter-comparisons.