N. E. Faull
University of Oxford
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by N. E. Faull.
Nature | 2005
David A. Stainforth; Tolu Aina; Claus Lynge Christensen; Matthew D. Collins; N. E. Faull; David J. Frame; J. A. Kettleborough; Sylvia H. E. Knight; Andrew R. Martin; J. M. Murphy; C. Piani; D. Sexton; Leonard A. Smith; Robert A. Spicer; A. J. Thorpe; Myles R. Allen
The range of possibilities for future climate evolution needs to be taken into account when planning climate change mitigation and adaptation strategies. This requires ensembles of multi-decadal simulations to assess both chaotic climate variability and model response uncertainty. Statistical estimates of model response uncertainty, based on observations of recent climate change, admit climate sensitivities—defined as the equilibrium response of global mean temperature to doubling levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide—substantially greater than 5 K. But such strong responses are not used in ranges for future climate change because they have not been seen in general circulation models. Here we present results from the ‘climateprediction.net’ experiment, the first multi-thousand-member grand ensemble of simulations using a general circulation model and thereby explicitly resolving regional details. We find model versions as realistic as other state-of-the-art climate models but with climate sensitivities ranging from less than 2 K to more than 11 K. Models with such extreme sensitivities are critical for the study of the full range of possible responses of the climate system to rising greenhouse gas levels, and for assessing the risks associated with specific targets for stabilizing these levels.
Journal of Climate | 2008
Benjamin M. Sanderson; Reto Knutti; Tolu Aina; Carl Christensen; N. E. Faull; David J. Frame; William Ingram; Claudio Piani; David A. Stainforth; Dáithí A. Stone; Myles R. Allen
A climate model emulator is developed using neural network techniques and trained with the data from the multithousand-member climateprediction.net perturbed physics GCM ensemble. The method recreates nonlinear interactions between model parameters, allowing a simulation of a much larger ensemble that explores model parameter space more fully. The emulated ensemble is used to search for models closest to observations over a wide range of equilibrium response to greenhouse gas forcing. The relative discrepancies of these models from observations could be used to provide a constraint on climate sensitivity. The use of annual mean or seasonal differences on top-of-atmosphere radiative fluxes as an observational error metric results in the most clearly defined minimum in error as a function of sensitivity, with consistent but less well-defined results when using the seasonal cycles of surface temperature or total precipitation. The model parameter changes necessary to achieve different values of climate sensitivity while minimizing discrepancy from observation are also considered and compared with previous studies. This information is used to propose more efficient parameter sampling strategies for future ensembles.
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A | 2007
David J. Frame; N. E. Faull; Manoj Joshi; Myles R. Allen
The development of ensemble-based ‘probabilistic’ climate forecasts is often seen as a promising avenue for climate scientists. Ensemble-based methods allow scientists to produce more informative, nuanced forecasts of climate variables by reflecting uncertainty from various sources, such as similarity to observation and model uncertainty. However, these developments present challenges as well as opportunities, particularly surrounding issues of experimental design and interpretation of forecast results. This paper discusses different approaches and attempts to set out what climateprediction.net and other large ensemble, complex model experiments might contribute to this research programme.
Geophysical Research Letters | 2007
F. Hugo Lambert; N. E. Faull
The responses of the HadSM3 and NCAR CCM3 general circulation models to a change in solar insolation are compared to their responses to a doubling of CO 2 concentration. In both models, it is found that the important difference is a rapid adjustment of the troposphere in the solar case that reduces the value of effective radiative forcing by about 25%. Clear-sky warming appears to make the major contribution. Subsequent warming of the coupled troposphere, land-surface, ocean mixed-layer system occurs with a very similar sensitivity to that expected under a CO 2 forcing of the reduced value. Because of adjustment, the overall precipitation response to solar forcing is similar to, or less than the response to CO 2 forcing, despite being smaller per unit temperature change.
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A | 2009
David J. Frame; Tolu Aina; C.M Christensen; N. E. Faull; Sylvia H. E. Knight; Claudio Piani; Suzanne M. Rosier; K. Yamazaki; Y Yamazaki; Myles R. Allen
Perturbed physics experiments are among the most comprehensive ways to address uncertainty in climate change forecasts. In these experiments, parameters and parametrizations in atmosphere–ocean general circulation models are perturbed across ranges of uncertainty, and results are compared with observations. In this paper, we describe the largest perturbed physics climate experiment conducted to date, the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) climate change experiment, in which the physics of the atmosphere and ocean are changed, and run in conjunction with a forcing ensemble designed to represent uncertainty in past and future forcings, under the A1B Special Report on Emissions Scenarios (SRES) climate change scenario.
Nature Geoscience | 2012
Daniel J. Rowlands; David J. Frame; Duncan Ackerley; Tolu Aina; Ben B. B. Booth; Carl Christensen; Matthew D. Collins; N. E. Faull; Chris E. Forest; Benjamin S. Grandey; Edward Gryspeerdt; Eleanor J. Highwood; William Ingram; Sylvia H. E. Knight; Ana Lopez; Neil Massey; Frances McNamara; Nicolai Meinshausen; Claudio Piani; Suzanne M. Rosier; Benjamin M. Sanderson; Leonard A. Smith; Dáithí A. Stone; Milo Thurston; K. Yamazaki; Y. Hiro Yamazaki; Myles R. Allen
Geophysical Research Letters | 2012
Peter A. G. Watson; David J. Karoly; Myles R. Allen; N. E. Faull; David S. Lee
Geophysical Research Letters | 2012
Peter A. G. Watson; David J. Karoly; Myles R. Allen; N. E. Faull; David S. Lee
Archive | 2007
David J. Frame; Tolu Aina; Claus Lynge Christensen; N. E. Faull; Ana Lopez; Frank J. McNamara; Daniel Stone; Milo Thurston; Myles R. Allen
Archive | 2006
N. E. Faull; F. Hugo Lambert; Myles R. Allen