N Gopishankar

Three-dimensional dosimetry of TomoTherapy by MRI-based polymer gel technique

Verification of the dose calculation model and the software used for treatment planning is an important step for accurate radiation delivery in radiation therapy. Using BANG3 polymer gel dosimeter with a 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner, we examined the accuracy of TomoTherapy treatment planning and radiation delivery. We evaluated one prostate treatment case and found the calculated three‐dimensional (3D) dose distributions agree with the measured 3D dose distributions with an exception in the regions where the dose was much smaller (25% or less) than the maximum dose (2.5 Gy). The analysis using the gamma‐index (3% dose difference and 3 mm distance‐to‐agreement) for a volume of 12 cm×11 cm×9 cm containing the planning target volume showed that the gamma values were smaller than unity for 53% of the voxels. Our measurement protocol and analysis tools can be easily applied to the evaluation of other newer complex radiation delivery techniques, such as intensity‐modulated arc therapy, with a reasonably low financial investment. PACS numbers: 87.53Bn, 87.56Fc

MRI-based polymer gel dosimetry for validating plans with multiple matrices in Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery.

One of treatment planning techniques with Leksell GammaPlan (LGP) for Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery (GKSRS) uses multiple matrices with multiple dose prescriptions. Computational complexity increases when shots are placed in multiple matrices with different grid sizes. Hence, the experimental validation of LGP calculated dose distributions is needed for those cases. For the current study, we used BANG3 polymer gel contained in a head‐sized glass bottle to simulate the entire treatment process of GKSRS. A treatment plan with three 18 mm shots and one 8 mm shot in separate matrices was created with LGP. The prescribed maximum dose was 8 Gy to three shots and 16 Gy to one of the 18 mm shots. The 3D dose distribution recorded in the gel dosimeter was read using a Siemens 3T MRI scanner. The scanning parameters of a CPMG pulse sequence with 32 equidistant echoes were as follows: TR=7s, echo step = 13.6 ms, field‐of‐view = 256 mm× 256 mm, and pixel size=1 mm×1 mm. Interleaved acquisition mode was used to obtain 15 to 45 2‐mm‐thick slices. Using a calibration relationship between absorbed dose and the spin‐spin relaxation rate (R2), we converted R2 images to dose images. MATLAB‐based in‐house programs were used for R2 estimation and dose comparison. Gamma‐index analysis for the 3D data showed gamma values less than unity for 86% of the voxels. Through this study we accomplished the first application of polymer gel dosimetry for a true comparison between measured 3D dose distributions and LGP calculations for plans using multiple matrices for multiple targets. PACS number: 87.53.Ly, 87.55‐x, 87.56 ‐g

Three-dimensional radiation dosimetry using polymer gel and solid radiochromic polymer: From basics to clinical applications

Accurate dose measurement tools are needed to evaluate the radiation dose delivered to patients by using modern and sophisticated radiation therapy techniques. However, the adequate tools which enable us to directly measure the dose distributions in three-dimensional (3D) space are not commonly available. One such 3D dose measurement device is the polymer-based dosimeter, which changes the material property in response to radiation. These are available in the gel form as polymer gel dosimeter (PGD) and ferrous gel dosimeter (FGD) and in the solid form as solid plastic dosimeter (SPD). Those are made of a continuous uniform medium which polymerizes upon irradiation. Hence, the intrinsic spatial resolution of those dosimeters is very high, and it is only limited by the method by which one converts the dose information recorded by the medium to the absorbed dose. The current standard methods of the dose quantification are magnetic resonance imaging, optical computed tomography, and X-ray computed tomography. In particular, magnetic resonance imaging is well established as a method for obtaining clinically relevant dosimetric data by PGD and FGD. Despite the likely possibility of doing 3D dosimetry by PGD, FGD or SPD, the tools are still lacking wider usages for clinical applications. In this review article, we summarize the current status of PGD, FGD, and SPD and discuss the issue faced by these for wider acceptance in radiation oncology clinic and propose some directions for future development.

MAGAT gel and EBT2 film‐based dosimetry for evaluating source plugging‐based treatment plan in Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery

This work illustrates a procedure to assess the overall accuracy associated with Gamma Knife treatment planning using plugging. The main role of source plugging or blocking is to create dose falloff in the junction between a target and a critical structure. We report the use of MAGAT gel dosimeter for verification of an experimental treatment plan based on plugging. The polymer gel contained in a head‐sized glass container simulated all major aspects of the treatment process of Gamma Knife radiosurgery. The 3D dose distribution recorded in the gel dosimeter was read using a 1.5T MRI scanner. Scanning protocol was: CPMG pulse sequence with 8 equidistant echoes, TR=7 s, echo step=14 ms, pixel size=0.5 mm x 0.5 mm, and slice thickness of 2 mm. Using a calibration relationship between absorbed dose and spin‐spin relaxation rate (R2), we converted R2 images to dose images. Volumetric dose comparison between treatment planning system (TPS) and gel measurement was accomplished using an in‐house MATLAB‐based program. The isodose overlay of the measured and computed dose distribution on axial planes was in close agreement. Gamma index analysis of 3D data showed more than 94% voxel pass rate for different tolerance criteria of 3%/2 mm, 3%/1 mm and 2%/2 mm. Film dosimetry with GAFCHROMIC EBT 2 film was also performed to compare the results with the calculated TPS dose. Gamma index analysis of film measurement for the same tolerance criteria used for gel measurement evaluation showed more than 95% voxel pass rate. Verification of gamma plan calculated dose on account of shield is not part of acceptance testing of Leksell Gamma Knife (LGK). Through this study we accomplished a volumetric comparison of dose distributions measured with a polymer gel dosimeter and Leksell GammaPlan (LGP) calculations for plans using plugging. We propose gel dosimeter as a quality assurance (QA) tool for verification of plug‐based planning. PACS number: 87.53.Ly, 87.55.‐x, 87.56.N‐

Indigenously developed multipurpose acrylic head phantom for verification of IMRT using film and gel dosimetry

The purpose of this study was to validate the newly designed acrylic phantom for routine dosimetric purpose in radiotherapy. The phantom can be used to evaluate and compare the calculated dose and measured dose using film and gel dosimetric methods. In this study, a doughnut‐shaped planning target volume (8.54 cm3) and inner organ at risk (0.353 cm3) were delineated for an IMRT test plan using the X‐ray CT image of the phantom. The phantom consists of acrylic slabs which are integrated to form a human head with a hole in the middle where several dosimetric inserts can be positioned for measurement. An inverse planning with nine coplanar intensity‐modulated fields was created using Pinnacle TPS. For the film analysis, EBT2 film, flatbed scanner, in‐house developed MATLAB codes and ImageJ software were used. The 3D dose distribution recorded in the MAGAT gel dosimeter was read using a 1.5 T MRI scanner. Scanning parameters were CPMG pulse sequence with 8 equidistant echoes, TR=5600, echo step=22 ms, pixel size=0.5 times 0.5, slice thickness=2 mm. Using a calibration relationship between absorbed dose and spin‐spin relaxation rate (R2), R2 images were converted to dose images. The dose comparison was accomplished using in‐house MATLAB‐based graphical user interface named “IMRT3DCMP”. For gel measurement dose grid from the TPS was extracted and compared with the measured dose grid of the gel. Gamma index analysis of film measurement for the tolerance criteria of 2%/2 mm, 1%/1 mm showed more than 90% voxels pass rate. Gamma index analysis of 3D gel measurement data showed more than 90% voxels pass rate for different tolerance criteria of 2%/2 mm and 1%/1 mm. Overall both 2D and 3D measurement were in close agreement with the Pinnacle TPS calculated dose. The phantom designed is cost‐effective and the results are promising, but further investigation is required to validate the phantom with other 3D conformal techniques for dosimetric purpose. PACS numbers: 87.53.Kn, 87.55.km, 87.56.N‐

Draining vein shielding in intracranial arteriovenous malformations during gamma-knife: a new way of preventing post gamma-knife edema and hemorrhage.

BACKGROUND Following gamma knife (GK) therapy for intracranial arteriovenous malformations (AVMs), obliteration of the nidus occurs over several years. During this period, complications like rebleeding have been attributed to early draining vein occlusion. OBJECTIVE To evaluate if shielding the draining vein(s) during GK therapy prevents early draining vein obliteration and complications following GK therapy. METHODS This was a nonrandomized case-control study over 5 years (January 2009-February 2014) and included patients with intracranial AVM who underwent GK therapy at our center. All patients who underwent draining vein shielding by the senior author (D.A.) were included in the test group, and patients who did not undergo draining vein shielding were put in the control group. Patients were followed up for at least 6 months (and every 6 months thereafter) clinically as well as radiologically with computed tomography head scans/magnetic resonance imaging brain scans to check for postradiosurgery imaging (PRI) changes. RESULTS One hundred eighty-five patients were included in this study, of which 96 were in the control group and 89 were in the test group. Both groups were well matched in demographics, comorbidities, adjuvant treatment, angioarchitecture, and radiation dosing. Because of shielding, the test group patients received significantly less radiation to the draining vein than the control group (P = .001). On follow-up, a significantly lower number of patients in the test group had new neurological deficits (P = .001), intracranial hemorrhage (P = .03), and PRI changes (P = .002). CONCLUSION Shielding of the draining vein is a potent new strategy in minimizing PRI and hemorrhage as well as clinical deterioration following GK therapy for intracranial AVMs.

MAGAT gel dosimetry for its application in small field treatment techniques

Purpose of this work is to present the role of in-house manufactured MAGAT gel for treatment verification in small field dosimetric techniques such as Gammaknife (GK) and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is one of the most extensively used imaging technique for polymer gel dosimetry hence we used this method for gel evaluation. Different MR scanners and MRI sequences were used in this study for obtaining calibration plot between R2 and absorbed dose. An experimental plan was created for Gammaknife and IMRT. The prepared gel was filled in spherical glass phantom and in-house designed human head shape phantom for verification purpose. We used 8 TE values for all the imaging sequences for two reasons. Firstly it is sufficient enough to give good signal to noise ratio. Second considering the enormous scanning time involved in multiple spin echo sequence. MATLAB based in-house programs were used for R2 estimation and dose comparison. The isodose comparison with MAGAT gel showed reasonable agreement for both Gammaknife and IMRT techniques.

Polymer gel dosimetry for measuring the dose near thin high‐Z materials irradiated with high energy photon beams

PURPOSE To investigate the feasibility of three-dimensional (3D) dose measurements near thin high-Z materials placed in a water-like medium by using a polymer gel dosimeter (PGD) when the medium was irradiated with high energy photon beams. METHODS PGD is potentially a useful tool for this application because it can record the dose around a small object made of a high-Z material in a continuous 3D medium. In this study, the authors manufactured a methacrylic acid-based normoxic PGD, nMAG. Two 0.5 mm thick lead foils (1 × 1 cm) were placed in foil supports with 0.7 cm separation in a 1000 ml polystyrene container filled with nMAG. The authors used two foil configurations, i.e., orthogonal and parallel. In the orthogonal configuration, two foils were placed in the direction orthogonal to the beam axis. The parallel configuration had two foils arranged in parallel to the beam axis. The phantom was irradiated with an 18 MV photon beam of 5 × 5 cm field size. It was imaged with a three-Tesla (3 T) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanned using the Car-Purcell-Meiboom-Gill pulse sequence. The spin-spin relaxation time (R2) to-dose calibration data were obtained by using small vials filled with nMAG and exposing to known doses. The DOSXYZnrc Monte Carlo (MC) code was used to get the expected dose distributions. More than 35 × 106 of histories were simulated so that the average error was less than 1%. An in-house matlab-based software was used to obtain the dose distributions from the measured R2 data as well as to compare the measurements and the MC predictions. The dose change due to the presence of the foils was studied by comparing the dose distributions with and without foils (or the reference). RESULTS For the orthogonal configuration, the measured dose along the beam axis showed an increase in the upstream side of the first foil, between the foils, and on the downstream side of the second foil. The range of increased dose area was 1.1 cm in the upstream of the first foil. However, in the downstream of the second foil, it was 0.2 cm, beyond which the dose fell below the reference dose by 10%. The dose profile between the foils showed a well-like shape with the minimum dose still larger than the reference dose by 1.8%. The minimum dose point was closer to the first foil than to the second foil. For the parallel configuration, the dose between foils was the largest at the center. The increased dose area opposite to the gap between foils extended outward to 1 cm. The spatial dose distributions of PGD and MC showed the same geometrical patterns except for the points inside the foils for both orthogonal and parallel foil arrangements. CONCLUSIONS The authors demonstrated that the nMAG PGD with MRI could be used to measure the 3D dosimetric structures at the mm-scale in the vicinity of the foil. The current study provided more accurate 3D spatial dose distribution than the previous studies. Furthermore, the measurements were validated by the MC simulation.

SU-E-T-14: A Comparative Study Between Forward and Inverse Planning in Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Acoustic Neuroma Tumours

Purpose: To evaluate forward and inverse planning methods for acoustic neuroma cases treated in Gamma Knife Perfexion. Methods: Five patients with acoustic neuroma tumour abutting brainstem were planned twice in LGP TPS (Version 10.1) using TMR10 algorithm. First plan was entirely based on forward planning (FP) in which each shot was chosen manually. Second plan was generated using inverse planning (IP) for which planning parameters like coverage, selectivity, gradient index (GI) and beam-on time threshold were set. Number of shots in IP was automatically selected by objective function using iterative process. In both planning methods MRI MPRAGE sequence images were used for tumour localization and planning. A planning dose of 12Gy at 50% isodose level was chosen. Results and Discussion: Number of shots used in FP was greater than IP and beam-on time in FP was in average 1.4 times more than IP. One advantage of FP was that the brainstem volume subjected to 6Gy dose (25% isodose) was less in FP than IP. Our results showed use of more number of shots as in FP results in GI less than or equal to 2.55 which is close to its lower limit. Dose homogeneity index (DHI) analysis of FP and IP showed average values of 0.59 and 0.67 respectively. General trend in GK for planning in acoustic neuroma cases is to use small collimator shots to avoid dose to adjacent critical structures. More number of shots and prolonged treatment time causes inconvenience to the patients. Similarly overuse of automatic shot shaping as in IP results in increased scatter dose. A compromise is required in shot selection for these cases. Conclusion: IP method could be used in acoustic neuroma cases to decrease treatment time provided the source sector openings near brainstem are shielded or adjusted appropriately to reduce brainstem dose.

SU-E-T-678: Response Calibration Using Electron Depth-Dose Data for MRI-Based 3D Polymer Gel Dosimetry

Purpose: To evaluate a calibration method using the depth-dose data of an electron beam for MRI-based polymer gel dosimetry. Methods: MAGAT was manufactured in-house to fill two 400mL-cylindrical phantoms and nine 22mL-glass vials. Phantom-A was irradiated along the cylinder axis with a 9MeV electron beam of 6 cm x 6 cm field size (FS). Phantom-B was irradiated with a 6MV photon beam of 3 cm x 3 cm FS by a 360-degree arc technique. Eight vials were irradiated in a water-bath to various doses with a 20 cm x 20 cm FS 6MV photon beam. All irradiated phantoms and one un-irradiated vial were scanned with a 3T MRI scanner to obtain the spin-spin relaxation rate (R2) distributions. By comparing the measured R2-to-depth data with the known depth-dose data for Phantom-A, R2-to-dose calibration data were obtained (e-beam method). Another calibration data were obtained from the 9 vials data (9-vial method). We tested two regression equations, i.e., third-order polynomial and tangent functions, and two dose normalization methods, i.e., one-point and two-point methods. Then, these two calibration methods were used to obtain the 3D dose distribution of Phantom-B and evaluated by comparing the measured data with the dose distribution from a treatment planning system. The comparison was made with gamma passing rate (2%/2mm criteria). Results: We did not observe a clear advantage of the e-beam method over the 9-vial method for the 3D dose comparison with the test case. Nevertheless, we found that the e-beam method required a smaller dose scaling for the dose comparison. Furthermore, the tangent function showed better data fitting than the polynomial function with smaller uncertainty of the estimated coefficients. Conclusions: Considering the overall superior performance, we recommend the e-beam method with the tangent function as the regression equation and one-point dose normalization for the MRI-based polymer gel dosimetry.