N. Head

Noninvasive continuous blood pressure measurement from the finger: optimal measurement conditions and factors affecting reliability.

We recorded finger arterial blood pressure (FINAP) in 50 male patients during various types of surgical operations. Three different types of cuffs were used on four fingers of each patient. Measurements were made by the arterial volume-clamp method of Penaz. The FINAP measurements were compared with pressure data obtained ipsilaterally from a radial artery catheter-transducer system (intraarterial pressure [IAP]) to find optimal recording conditions and to document factors affecting FINAP readings. The thumb, with a specially designed cuff, gave the most accurate results. The mean FINAP- IAP difference for the thumb was −4.8 mm Hg for systolic pressure, 1.49 mm Hg for diastolic pressure, and 0.29 mm Hg for mean pressure. The differences were statistically significant for systolic and diastolic pressure but not for mean pressure. The regression slope for thumb systolic FINAP/IAP was 0.979, that for thumb diastolic FINAP/IAP was 0.963, and that for mean thumb FINAP/IAP was 0.996, whereas the intercepts were 7.499 for systolic pressure, 0.802 for diastolic pressure, and 0.083 for mean pressure. The correlation coefficients were 0.945 (systolic), 0.884 (diastolic), and 0.949 (mean). The correlation coefficients with the other fingers ranged from 0.502 to 0.922 for systolic pressure, 0.757 to 0.932 for diastolic pressure, and 0.767 to 0.892 for mean pressure. The slopes for the various finger-cuff combinations ranged from 0.537 to 0.996, and the intercepts ranged from 0.083 to 32.387 from mean pressure. In 3 patients (6%) the FINAP measurement was not possible because of insufficient peripheral circulation. In 9 other patients (18%) the FINAP measurements were not accurate during some periods of time.In 5 of those 9 patients the difficulties were related to arterial cannulation and began immediately after cannulation. In 1 of those 5 patients the FINAP subsequently decreased dramatically after the onset of phenylephrine infusion because of peripheral vasoconstriction and diminished blood flow. In the 4 other patients the FINAP readings were accurate at the beginning of anesthesia but later decreased out of proportion to changes in IAP. These periods were associated with one-lung ventilation. The FINAP accurately reflects systemic arterial pressure. Measurements from the thumb fitted with a specially designed cuff approximate IAP best. Factors affecting peripheral circulation must be taken into consideration when this device is used in the monitoring of FINAP.

Physiology of Alfentanil-induced Rigidity

The authors investigated the hemodynamic, metabolic, electroencephalographic (EEG), and electromyographic (EMG) characteristics of narcotic-induced rigidity during induction of anesthesia with alfentanil (175 μg/kg) in 10 patients. Thiopental (4 mg/kg) was administered to a ten-patient control group. Rigidity was quantified in eight muscle groups (sternocleidomastoid, deltoid, biceps, forearm flexors, intercostal, rectus abdominus, vastus medialis/lateralis, and gastrocnemius). Marked rigidity was observed in all muscle groups in all patients receiving alfentanil and in none receiving thiopental. Central venous pressure increased with onset of rigidity, while mean arterial pressure and cardiac index remained unchanged. Manual ventilation was extremely difficult during alfentanil-induced rigidity. Arterial oxygen tension decreased more rapidly during rigidity than during the same time interval in the control group, while patients experiencing rigidity were more acidotic, as reflected by greater increases in base deficit. The EEG demonstrated an anesthetic state without seizure activity. The immediate increase in central venous pressure with the onset of rigidity, along with occasional simultaneous parallel variations in central venous pressure and the EMG, strongly suggest a mechanical mechanism for the change in central venous pressure. The metabolic changes during rigidity may be partly related to the absence of the normal cardiovascular reflexes that are reported to occur during voluntary isometric muscle contractions. A neurochemical mechanism of narcotic-induced rigidity is briefly reviewed.

Seizures during opioid anesthetic induction: are they opioid-induced rigidity?

The tape recorded EEGs of 127 patients anesthetized with large doses of opioids were retrospectively analyzed for evidence of opioid-induced seizures, and in particular, correlated with movements that occurred during induction and could be clinically interpreted as seizures. Bilateral EEG leads in patients receiving fentanyl (20), sufentanil (20), or alfentanil (87) were recorded. Forty-six of these patients from all opioid groups manifested intense rigidity, as assessed both clinically and by EMGs recorded from eight muscles in 69 of the patients receiving alfentanil. This intense rigidity often resembled seizures, in that the phenomenon entailed severe stiffness of both limbs and trunk, with an explosive onset of myoclonic limb movements, and associated vertical nystagmus. Electroencephalographic observations were extensive, entailing 69 h of paper recordings played back from the tapes, at paper speeds of 30 or 60 mm/s, with detailed annotations from the voice track. These paper recordings were examined in detail independently by three of the investigators, who were unaware of the clinical phenomena that had occurred. The only observed EEG activity that could have been interpreted as epileptiform consisted of small sharp waves related to muscle activity or other artifact. The EEG never indicated seizure activity during these drug-induced movements and rigidity. Reports of opioid-induced seizures are reviewed and a set of criteria is offered to help achieve future consistency and credibility in evaluating this phenomenon. The available evidence does not support the existence of opioid-induced seizures in the clinical setting.

Pulse oximetry and finger blood pressure measurement during open-heart surgery.

Pulse oximeter arterial hemoglobin oxygen saturation (SpO2) and finger arterial pressure (FINAP) were continuously monitored before, during, and after cardiopulmonary bypass in 15 male patients. SpO2 was monitored simultaneously with two pulse oximeters, a Nellcor N-100 and an Ohmeda Biox III. The readings obtained from the two pulse oximeters were compared with arterial blood measurements obtained using a CO-oximeter. FINAP was monitored by a prototype device (Finapres) based on the Peňaz volume-clamp method. FINAP was correlated with intraarterial pressure (IAP). Both pulse oximeters functioned well before cardiopulmonary bypass. The correlations with CO-oximeter values were 0.927 for the N-100 and 0.921 for the Biox III. Immediately after the onset of cardiopulmonary bypass, the N-100 pulse oximeter stopped displaying values. The Biox III pulse oximeter continued to display values during the cardiopulmonary bypass period; the correlation with CO-oximeter values was 0.813. After cardiopulmonary bypass, the N-100 began displaying values in 2 to 10 minutes. After cardiopulmonary bypass the correlation with CO-oximeter values was 0.792 for the N-100 and 0.828 for the Biox III pulse oximeter. The Finapres finger blood pressure device functioned well in 13 of 15 patients before cardiopulmonary bypass. The mean bias ± precision of FINAP-IAP for mean pressure was 8.3±10.2 mm Hg (SD) and the correlation coefficient was 0.814. During cardiopulmonary bypass, the Finapres device functioned well in 10 of 15 patients. The mean bias precision of FINAP-IAP, for mean pressure in these 10 patients was 6.6±8.7 mm Hg and the correlation coefficient was 0.902. Immediately after cardiopulmonary bypass, the Finapres functioned well in 11 of 15 patients. The mean bias ± precision of FINAP-IAP for mean pressure was 8.6±14.1 mm Hg and the correlation coefficient was 0.533. This study documented that devices for continuous noninvasive monitoring can usually function well under the extreme conditions seen during open-heart surgery. Pulse oximeters may find a place in the monitoring of patients during open-heart surgery, although they cannot totally replace the invasive techniques. Under the conditions of diminished pulsatile peripheral blood flow we observed some differences between the two pulse oximeters.