N. J. A. Sloane
AT&T Labs
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by N. J. A. Sloane.
Archive | 1999
A. S. Hedayat; N. J. A. Sloane; John Stufken
This chapter contains several tables: (a) Tables showing the smallest possible index (and hence the smallest number of runs) in 2-, 3- and 4-level orthogonal arrays with at most 32 factors and strengths between 2 and 10. (b) Tables summarizing most of the arrays constructed in this book, including a table of both mixed-and fixed-level orthogonal arrays of strength 2 with up to 100 runs. (c) A table summarizing the connections between orthogonal arrays and other combinatorial structures. We also discuss what can be done if the orthogonal array you want does not exist, or is not presently known to exist, or exists but is too large for your application.
Archive | 1999
A. S. Hedayat; N. J. A. Sloane; John Stufken
Rao (1947) introduced orthogonal arrays because of their desirable statistical properties when used in “fractional factorial” experiments. Nowadays the main statistical application of orthogonal arrays, with mixed levels or otherwise, is still as fractional factorials, although other applications have been discovered. We will present the main application in considerable detail, while only giving key references for the other applications. Unless stated otherwise, throughout this chapter the term orthogonal array is to be interpreted as including mixed level arrays.
Archive | 1999
A. S. Hedayat; N. J. A. Sloane; John Stufken
In this chapter we investigate orthogonal arrays in which the various factors may have different numbers of levels — these are called mixed or asymmetrical orthogonal arrays.
Archive | 1999
A. S. Hedayat; N. J. A. Sloane; John Stufken
In this chapter we introduce the concept of a difference scheme and some of its generalizations. Difference schemes were first defined by Bose and Bush (1952), and are a simple but powerful tool for the construction of orthogonal arrays of strength two.
Archive | 1999
A. S. Hedayat; N. J. A. Sloane; John Stufken
In this chapter we introduce error-correcting codes and discuss their connections with orthogonal arrays. The two subjects are very closely related, since we can use the codewords in an error-correcting code as the runs of an orthogonal array, or conversely we can regard the runs of an orthogonal array as forming a code.
Archive | 1999
A. S. Hedayat; N. J. A. Sloane; John Stufken
A large number of techniques are known for constructing orthogonal arrays. This chapter, the first of several describing these techniques, discusses some constructions due to Bush (1952b), Addelman and Kempthorne (1961a), Rao (1946a, 1947, 1949) and Bose and Bush (1952), that have the common theme of using Galois fields and finite geometries. We also describe a number of basic properties of orthogonal arrays, including the important concept of linearity.
Archive | 1999
A. S. Hedayat; N. J. A. Sloane; John Stufken
This chapter discusses a number of different topics that do not quite fit into any of the earlier chapters. These are n n nConstructions for orthologonal arrays inspired by coding theory n n nBounds on the size of orthogonal arrays with many factors n n nCompound orthogonal arrays n n nOrthogonal multi-arrays n n nTransversal designs, resilient functions and nets n n nOthogonal arrays and association schemes
Archive | 1999
A. S. Hedayat; N. J. A. Sloane; John Stufken
The subject of pairwise or mutually orthogonal Latin squares has fascinated researchers for many years. Although there are a number of intriguing results in this area, many open problems remain to which the answers seem as elusive as ever. The known results, however, are well documented, for example in the books by Denes and Keedwell (1974, 1991) and Laywine and Mullen (1998), or the article by Jungnickel (1990).
Archive | 1999
A. S. Hedayat; N. J. A. Sloane; John Stufken
In this chapter we present some of the most important families of codes and the orthogonal arrays that are derived from them.
Archive | 1999
A. S. Hedayat; N. J. A. Sloane; John Stufken
If the other parameters of an orthogonal array are specified, there is a limit on the number of possible factors, imposed by the defining conditions. We shall discuss these restrictions in this chapter and in Chapter 4. Section 2.2 presents the celebrated inequalities found by Rao (dy1947). Section 2.3 discusses improvements on Rao’s bounds for orthogonal arrays of strength two and three. Results on improvements for arrays of general strength are contained in Section 2.4, while Section 2.5 pays special attention to orthogonal arrays in which all the factors are at two levels.