N. Kasperts

Modality-specific target definition for laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer on FDG-PET, CT and MRI

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The goal of this study was to improve target definition by deriving modality-specific margins for clinical target volumes (CTV) for laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer on CT, MRI and 18-FDG-PET. MATERIAL AND METHODS Twenty-five patients with T3/T4 laryngeal/hypopharyngeal cancer underwent CT, MRI and 18-FDG-PET scans before laryngectomy. HE-sections were obtained from the surgical specimen and tumor was delineated (tumorHE). The GTVs on CT and MRI were delineated in consensus. PET-based GTVs were automatically segmented. The three-dimensionally reconstructed specimen was registered to the various images. Modality-specific CTV margins were derived and added to the GTVs to achieve adequate tumor coverage. The resulting CTVs were compared with each other, to tumorHE, and to CTVCT10 constructed on CT with the clinical margin of 10mm. RESULTS CTV margins of 4.3mm (CT), 6.1mm (MRI) and 5.2mm (PET) were needed to achieve adequate tumor coverage. The median volumes of the resulting modality-specific CTVs were 44ml (CT), 48ml (MRI) and 39ml (PET), while the CTV10mm was 80ml. CONCLUSION For laryngohypopharyngeal tumors, 45-52% target volume reduction compared with CTV10mm is achievable when modality-specific CTV margins are used. PET-based CTVs were significantly smaller compared to CT- and MRI-based CTVs.

The accuracy of target delineation in laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer

Abstract Background and purpose. To determine the spatial correspondence between the gross tumor volume (GTV) delineated on computer tomography (CT) and the actual tumor on histopathology. Material and methods. Sixteen patients with T3 or T4 laryngeal or hypopharyngeal cancer underwent a CT scan before total laryngectomy. The GTV was delineated on CT by three independent observers and by consensus between the three observers. After surgery, whole-mount hematoxylin-eosin stained (H&E) sections were obtained. One pathologist delineated the tumor in the H&E sections (tumorH&E). The reconstructed specimen was registered to the CT scan in order to compare the GTV to the tumorH&E in three dimensions. The overlap between the GTV and the tumorH&E was calculated and the distance between the volumes was determined. Results. Tumor tissue was delineated in 203 of 516 H&E sections. For 14 patients a detailed analysis could be performed. The GTV volume was on average 1.7 times larger than the volume of the tumorH&E. The mean coverage of the tumorH&E by the consensus GTV was 88%. tumorH&E tissue was found at 1.6 mm to 12.9 mm distance outside the GTV depending on observer and patient. Conclusions. GTVs delineated on CT for laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer were 1.7 times larger than the tumor. Complete coverage of the tumor by the GTV was, however, not obtained.

Comparing conVEntional RadioTherapy with stereotactIC body radiotherapy in patients with spinAL metastases : study protocol for an randomized controlled trial following the cohort multiple randomized controlled trial design

BackgroundStandard radiotherapy is the treatment of first choice in patients with symptomatic spinal metastases, but is only moderately effective. Stereotactic body radiation therapy is increasingly used to treat spinal metastases, without randomized evidence of superiority over standard radiotherapy. The VERTICAL study aims to quantify the effect of stereotactic radiation therapy in patients with metastatic spinal disease.Methods/designThis study follows the ‘cohort multiple Randomized Controlled Trial’ design. The VERTICAL study is conducted within the PRESENT cohort. In PRESENT, all patients with bone metastases referred for radiation therapy are enrolled. For each patient, clinical and patient-reported outcomes are captured at baseline and at regular intervals during follow-up. In addition, patients give informed consent to be offered experimental interventions. Within PRESENT, 110 patients are identified as a sub cohort of eligible patients (i.e. patients with unirradiated painful, mechanically stable spinal metastases who are able to undergo stereotactic radiation therapy). After a protocol amendment, also patients with non-spinal bony metastases are eligible. From the sub cohort, a random selection of patients is offered stereotactic radiation therapy (n = 55), which patients may accept or refuse. Only patients accepting stereotactic radiation therapy sign informed consent for the VERTICAL trial. Non-selected patients (n = 55) receive standard radiotherapy, and are not aware of them serving as controls. Primary endpoint is pain response after three months. Data will be analyzed by intention to treat, complemented by instrumental variable analysis in case of substantial refusal of the stereotactic radiation therapy in the intervention arm.DiscussionThis study is designed to quantify the treatment response after (stereotactic) radiation therapy in patients with symptomatic spinal metastases. This is the first randomized study in palliative care following the cohort multiple Randomized Controlled Trial design. This design addresses common difficulties associated with classic pragmatic randomized controlled trials, such as disappointment bias in patients allocated to the control arm, slow recruitment, and poor generalizability.Trial registrationThe Netherlands Trials Register number NL49316.041.14. ClinicalTrials.gov registration number NCT02364115. Date of trial registration February 1, 2015.

Validated guidelines for tumor delineation on magnetic resonance imaging for laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer

Abstract Background: Validation of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and development of guidelines for the delineation of the gross tumor volume (GTV) is of utmost importance to benefit from the visibility of anatomical details on MR images and to achieve an accurate GTV delineation. In the ideal situation, the GTV delineation corresponds to the histopathologically determined ‘true tumor volume’. Consequently, we developed guidelines for GTV delineation of laryngeal and hypopharyngeal tumors on MRI and determined the accuracy of the resulting delineation of the tumor outline on histopathology as gold standard. Material and methods: Twenty-seven patients with T3 or T4 laryngeal/hypopharyngeal cancer underwent a MRI scan before laryngectomy. Hematoxylin and eosin sections were obtained from surgical specimens and tumor was delineated by one pathologist. GTV was delineated on MR images by three independent observers in two sessions. The first session (del1) was performed according to clinical practice. In the second session (del2) guidelines were used. The reconstructed specimen was registered to the MR images for comparison of the delineated GTVs to the tumor on histopathology. Volumes and overlap parameters were analyzed. A target margin needed to assure tumor coverage was determined. Results: The median GTVs (del1: 19.4 cm3, del2: 15.8 cm3) were larger than the tumor volume on pathology (10.5 cm3). Comparable target margins were needed for both delineation sessions to assure tumor coverage. By adding these margins to the GTVs, the target volumes for del1 (median: 81.3 cm3) were significantly larger than for del2 (median: 64.2 cm3) (p ≤ 0.0001) with similar tumor coverage. Conclusions: In clinical radiotherapy practice, the delineated GTV on MRI is twice as large as the tumor volume. Validated delineation guidelines lead to a significant decrease in the overestimation of the tumor volume.

Consequences of tumor planning target volume reduction in treatment of T2-T4 laryngeal cancer

Background and purposeSince lymph nodes volumes are generally four times the volume of the primary PTV, the advantage of using tight margins around the primary PTV is not clear. Therefore treatment margins of T2-T4 laryngeal carcinoma for IMRT are generally chosen in such a way that the PTV is comparable to that in conventional radiotherapy. The aim of this study is to quantify the effect of volume reduction of the primary PTV of T2-T4 laryngeal carcinoma with regard to late toxicity despite elective irradiation of lymph node levels II to IV.MethodsTwo treatment plans based on conservative (GTV-PTV = 15 mm and 20 mm cranial), and on evidence-based tight margins (GTV-PTV = 8 mm) were calculated for 16 patients. Toxicity effects were estimated based on the dose distributions.ResultsCompared to conservative margins, using tight margins resulted in: 1) significant reduction of the normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) for swallowing muscles and submandibular glands, 2) significant reduction of the mean dose in all organs at risk (OAR), 3) a mean dose smaller than 60 Gy for all OARs except for the laryngeal cartilages. When the lymph node levels II to IV were prescribed with an elective dose, an NTCP reduction of 53% for the swallowing muscles and of 23% for the submandibular glands was found by using tight instead of conservative margins. When positive nodes were present, NTCP reduction amounted to 29% and 15%, respectively.ConclusionsThere is a potential benefit in realizing evidence-based tight margins for laryngeal cancer patients despite elective irradiation of lymph node levels II to IV.

Inter-observer agreement in GTV delineation of bone metastases on CT and impact of MR imaging: A multicenter study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The use of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) for bone metastases is increasing rapidly. Therefore, knowledge of the inter-observer differences in tumor volume delineation is essential to guarantee precise dose delivery. The aim of this study is to compare inter-observer agreement in bone metastases delineated on different imaging modalities. MATERIAL AND METHODS Twenty consecutive patients with bone metastases treated with SBRT were selected. All patients received CT and MR imaging in treatment position prior to SBRT. Five observers from three institutions independently delineated gross tumor volume (GTV) on CT alone, CT with co-registered MRI and MRI alone. Four contours per imaging modality per patient were available, as one set of contours was shared by 2 observers. Inter-observer agreement, expressed in generalized conformity index [CIgen], volumes of contours and contours center of mass (COM) were calculated per patient and imaging modality. RESULTS Mean GTV delineated on MR (45.9±52.0cm3) was significantly larger compared to CT-MR (40.2±49.4cm3) and CT (34.8±41.8cm3). A considerable variation in CIgen was found on CT (mean 0.46, range 0.15-0.75) and CT-MRI (mean 0.54, range 0.17-0.71). The highest agreement was found on MRI (mean 0.56, range 0.20-0.77). The largest variations of COM were found in anterior-posterior direction for all imaging modalities. CONCLUSIONS Large inter-observer variation in GTV delineation exists for CT, CT-MRI and MRI. MRI-based GTV delineation resulted in larger volumes and highest consistency between observers.

Superior target delineation for stereotactic body radiotherapy of bone metastases from renal cell carcinoma on MRI compared to CT

BACKGROUND In metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) there has been a treatment shift towards targeted therapy, which has resulted in improved overall survival. Therefore, there is a need for better local control of the tumor and its metastases. Image-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in bone metastases provides improved symptom palliation and local control. With the use of SBRT there is a need for accurate target delineation. The hypothesis is that MRI allows for better visualization of the extend of bone metastases in mRCC and will optimize the accuracy of tumor delineation for stereotactic radiotherapy purposes, compared with CT only. METHODS From 2013 to 2016, patients who underwent SBRT for RCC bone metastases were included. A planning CT and MRI were performed in radiotherapy treatment position. Gross tumor volumes (GTV) in both CT and MRI were delineated. Contouring was performed by a radiation oncologist specialized in bone metastases and verified by a radiologist, based on local consensus contouring guidelines. In both CT and MRI, the GTV volumes, conformity index (CI) and distance between the centers of mass (dCOM) were compared. RESULTS Nine patients with 11 RCC bone metastases were included. The GTV volume as defined on MRI was in all cases larger or at least as large as the GTV volume on CT. The median GTV volume on MRI was 33.4 mL (range 0.2-247.6 mL), compared to 18.1 mL on CT (range 0.1-195.9) (P=0.013). CONCLUSIONS Contouring of RCC bone metastases on MRI resulted in clinically relevant and statistically significant larger lesions (mean increase 41%) compared with CT. MRI seems to represent the extend of the GTV in RCC bone metastases more accurately. Contouring based on CT-only could result in an underestimation of the actual tumor volume, which may cause underdosage of the GTV in SBRT treatment plans.

Target Volume Delineation Using Diffusion-weighted Imaging for MR-guided Radiotherapy: A Case Series of Laryngeal Cancer Validated by Pathology

In radiotherapy treatment planning, tumor delineation based on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a promising technique. MR-only-based target definition becomes important with the recent development of MRI integrated radiotherapy treatment modalities. In this case series, DWI-based gross tumor volume (GTV) was validated using pathology and compared with a clinical GTV based on computed tomography (CT) imaging and MRI. This case series includes three patients with a laryngeal tumor. Prior to total laryngectomy (TLE), imaging was performed on CT and MRI, including a DWI scan. After TLE, the surgical specimen was processed and cut into 3-mm thick slices. The tumor was delineated on hematoxylin-eosin (HE) stained sections by a pathologist (tumorHE). This pathological imaging, including the tumorHE delineation, was three-dimensionally reconstructed and registered to the imaging. The GTV was delineated by a radiation oncologist based on CT and MR imaging (GTVclinical) and semi-automatically delineated based on DWI (GTVDWI). The microscopic tumor extent outside the GTVDWI contour was 3.0 mm, 2.7 mm, and 11.3 mm for cases I, II, and III, respectively. The microscopic tumor extent outside the GTVclinical was 7.5 mm, 2.1 mm, and 1.5 mm for cases I, II, and III, respectively. The tumor, on histology, was covered by the GTVs for 80%, 74%, and 31% (GTVDWI) and 73%, 72%, and 89% (GTVclinical) for the three subsequent cases, respectively. The GTVDWI resembled the tumorHE more than the GTVclinical in case I and case II. In case III, GTVDWI missed the caudal part of the tumor that was included in the clinical delineation due to a lack of contrast and the heterogeneous signal intensity of the tumor in DWI. In this case series, we showed the potential of DWI for MR-guided radiotherapy treatment if a clear contrast is visible. DWI-based GTV delineation might be a fast alternative to manual delineation, which could speed up the on-table target definition using an MRI-linac system. A larger case series is needed to verify these results.

PV-0516: Guideline development for tumor delineation on MR-images for laryngeal and hypophargeal cancer

Conclusion: In all modalities, delineated GTVs overestimated tumor volume. Nevertheless, some tumor volume was missed in all cases. Automated delineation on PET resulted in the smallest target volume compared to manual delineation on CT and MRI, while covering an equivalent amount of tumor. This study suggests that delineation or segmentation inaccuracies can be corrected using a margin between 5.6 and 8.7 mm.

Improvement of Target Definition for Laryngeal and Hypopharyngeal Cancer on Computed Tomography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and 18-FDG Positron Emission Tomography Validated by Histopathology.

Proceedings of the American Society for Radiation Oncology 25 September 2016 - 28 September 2016