N. Kawata

Effect of Pravastatin on Outcomes after Cardiac Transplantation

BACKGROUND Hypercholesterolemia is common after cardiac transplantation and may contribute to the development of coronary vasculopathy. Pravastatin, a 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor, has been shown to be effective and safe in lowering cholesterol levels after cardiac transplantation. Cell-culture studies using inhibitors of HMG-CoA reductase have suggested an immunosuppressive effect. METHODS Early after transplantation, we randomly assigned consecutive patients to receive either pravastatin (47 patients) or no HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor (50 patients). RESULTS Twelve months after transplantation, the pravastatin group had lower mean (+/- SD) cholesterol levels than the control group (193 +/- 36 vs. 248 +/- 49 mg per deciliter, P < 0.001), less frequent cardiac rejection accompanied by hemodynamic compromise (3 vs. 14 patients, P = 0.005), better survival (94 percent vs. 78 percent, P = 0.025), and a lower incidence of coronary vasculopathy in the transplant as determined by angiography and at autopsy (3 vs. 10 patients, P = 0.049). There was no difference between the two groups in the incidence of mild or moderate episodes of cardiac rejection. In a subgroup of study patients, intracoronary ultrasound measurements at base line and one year after transplantation showed less progression in the pravastatin group in maximal intimal thickness (0.11 +/- 0.09 mm, vs. 0.23 +/- 0.16 mm in the control group; P = 0.002) and in the intimal index (0.05 +/- 0.03 vs. 0.10 +/- 0.10, P = 0.031). In a subgroup of patients, the cytotoxicity of natural killer cells was lower in the pravastatin group than in the control group (9.8 percent vs. 22.2 percent specific lysis, P = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS After cardiac transplantation, pravastatin had beneficial effects on cholesterol levels, the incidence of rejection causing hemodynamic compromise, one-year survival, and the incidence of coronary vasculopathy.

A Controlled Trial of Exercise Rehabilitation after Heart Transplantation

BACKGROUND In patients who have received a cardiac transplant, the denervated donor heart responds abnormally to exercise and exercise tolerance is reduced. The role of physical exercise in the treatment of patients who have undergone cardiac transplantation has not been determined. We assessed the effects of training on the capacity for exercise early after cardiac transplantation. METHODS Twenty-seven patients who were discharged within two weeks after receiving a heart transplant were randomly assigned to participate in a six-month structured cardiac-rehabilitation program (exercise group, 14 patients) or to undergo unstructured therapy at home (control group, 13 patients). Each patient in the exercise group underwent an individualized program of muscular-strength and aerobic training under the guidance of a physical therapist, whereas control patients received no formal exercise training. Cardiopulmonary stress testing was performed at base line (within one month after heart transplantation) and six months later. RESULTS As compared with the control group, the exercise group had significantly greater increases in peak oxygen consumption (mean increase, 4.4 ml per kilogram of body weight per minute [49 percent] vs. 1.9 ml per kilogram per minute [18 percent]; P=0.01) and workload (mean increase, 35 W [59 percent] vs. 12 W [18 percent]; P=0.01) and a greater reduction in the ventilatory equivalent for carbon dioxide (mean decrease, 13 [20 percent] vs. 6 [11 percent]; P=0.02). The mean dose of prednisone, the number of patients taking antihypertensive medications, the average number of episodes of rejection and of infection during the study period, and weight gain did not differ significantly between the groups. CONCLUSIONS When initiated early after cardiac transplantation, exercise training increases the capacity for physical work.

Is intravenous glucocorticoid therapy better than an oral regimen for asymptomatic cardiac rejection? A randomized trial

OBJECTIVES This study assessed whether treatment with oral prednisone (bolus plus tapered doses) is comparable to intravenous methylprednisolone sodium succinate (Solu-Medrol) therapy in patients with asymptomatic moderate cardiac allograft rejection episodes without hemodynamic compromise. BACKGROUND Intravenous Solu-Medrol therapy is frequently administered for moderate rejection episodes after heart transplantation but has not previously been compared with an oral prednisone therapy for asymptomatic cardiac rejection in a randomized trial. Compared with oral prednisone therapy, the administration of intravenous Solu-Medrol is more costly and resource intensive, and it can require loss of work time for patients and the family members who accompany them to treatment. METHODS Forty-one heart transplant patients with 43 episodes of asymptomatic moderate cardiac rejection were randomized to receive 3 days of 1,000 mg of intravenous Solu-Medrol (20 episodes) or prednisone as a bolus dose of 100 mg orally for 3 days, tapering to the previous maintenance dosage over 14 days (23 episodes). Follow-up endomyocardial biopsies were performed at 2 and 4 weeks. Infectious complications were monitored and the cost of the two forms of therapy was assessed. RESULTS Resolution of moderate rejection occurred within 4 weeks in 19 (95%) of 20 patients treated with intravenous steroids and in 21 (91%) of 23 patients treated with oral prednisone. No significant difference in infectious complications occurred between the two groups in the ensuing 3 months after therapy. The cost of the oral prednisone therapy was

Pretransplant panel reactive-antibody screens : Are they truly a marker for poor outcome after cardiac transplantation ?

6.30 compared with the cost of

Low-dose lovastatin safely lowers cholesterol after cardiac transplantation.

180 to

Initial success of steroid weaning late after heart transplantation.

966 for administration of intravenous Solu-Medrol. CONCLUSIONS Oral prednisone (bolus plus tapered doses) appears to be as effective and to have similar infectious complication rates as intravenous Solu-Medrol for the treatment of asymptomatic cardiac rejection. The convenience and lower cost of oral prednisone therapy may warrant its routine use for this type of cardiac rejection.