N. M. Cox
Mississippi State University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by N. M. Cox.
Theriogenology | 1987
N. M. Cox; J.L. Ramirez; I.A. Matamoros; W.A. Bennett; J.H. Britt
The objective of this experiment was to determine whether seasonal differences existed in estrous and LH responses to estradiol benzoate (EB) in ovariectomized sows. Sows were ovariectomized after weaning their first litter, and treatment was begun 120 d after ovariectomy. Sows were given 400 mug EB intramuscularly (i.m.) on July 24, 1982 (summer), October 24, 1984 (fall), January 29, 1985 (winter), and March 27, 1985 (spring). Beginning 24 h after EB, sows were checked for estrus four times daily. Proportion in estrus was affected by season, with all sows exhibiting estrus within 5 d after EB in summer, winter, and spring. Only three of five sows exhibited estrus within 5 d after EB in fall. Interval (h) to estrus was delayed in fall (80 h) compared to other seasons (62.6 h; SEM = 4.5). Concentrations of LH were suppressed within 6 h after EB in all seasons but rebounded to pre-injection levels more slowly in fall and spring than in winter and summer. Frequency of LH peaks (3.2 +/- .4 4 h ) was not affected by season, but amplitude (1.9 vs 0.9 ng/ml) and baseline (2.7 vs 1.6 ng/ml) were greater (P < 0.05) for summer than for the other seasons combined. At 6 h after injection, concentrations of estradiol-17beta (pg/ml) were greater in summer (58.3) than in fall (19.0), winter (32.4), or spring (16.6; SEM = 10.4). We conclude that environmental factors associated with season alter responsiveness of the brain to estradiol, thereby controlling sexual behavior and LH secretion.
Domestic Animal Endocrinology | 1996
C.A. Angell; R.C. Tubbs; A.B. Moore; C.R. Barb; N. M. Cox
The influence of the acute withdrawal of insulin therapy in streptozocin-diabetic female swine was examined for changes in 1) the in vivo pulsatile secretion of luteinizing hormone (LH), 2) the preovulatory-like gonadotropin patterns after exogenous estradiol, and 3) the in vitro LH secretion by cultured pituitary cells. In Experiment 1, ovariectomized diabetic pigs (n = 4) were maintained with insulin therapy until 4 d before estradiol benzoate (EB; 7 micrograms/kg body weight; subcutaneous) was administered. Four normal ovariectomized pigs, matched for age and weight, served as controls. The diabetic state was confirmed by the measurement of glucose and insulin concentrations during a glucose tolerance test. Pulsatile LH secretion was not influenced by experimental diabetes mellitus. However, the expected surge in LH was not induced by EB in diabetic gilts. In contrast, three of four normal gilts had a preovulatory-type surge in LH. Concentrations of follicle-stimulating hormone in serum were not affected by diabetes mellitus. Estradiol concentrations in serum after ER were influenced by diabetes mellitus (treatment by time interaction; P < 0.001). In individual estradiol profiles, maximum concentrations were similar (104 +/- 10.4 and 91 +/- 12.0 ng/ml for normal and diabetic pigs, respectively), but the interval to maximum concentration was delayed in diabetic pigs (27.5 vs. 9.0 h; SE = 3.0; P < 0.05). However, the duration of standing estrus (2.2 +/- .3 d) and the interval from EB to estrus (3.6 +/- 0.3 d) were not influenced by diabetes mellitus. In Experiment 2, LH secretion by cultured cells and residual cellular LH content were greater in the pituitaries of normal than diabetic pigs (P < 0.05), and only cells from normal pigs responded to gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH), with increased production of LH (P < 0.05). In conclusion, diabetes mellitus did not affect pulsatile LH secretion but did lower the ability of exogenous estradiol to stimulate a surge in vivo and of GnRH to increase LH in vitro, suggesting that the pituitary response to estradiol and GnRH is more severely affected by diabetes than is the GnRH pulse generator.
Theriogenology | 1998
N.C Whitley; D.B Payne; H Zhang; N. M. Cox
Primiparous crossbred sows (n = 43), lactating for an average of 21.1 +/- 0.1 d and weaning 8.7 +/- 0.1 pigs, were used to evaluate the influence of insulin on ovulation rate and embryo survival. The sows were maintained on 2.3 kg/head/d of a 14% protein gestation diet during pregnancy, fed ad libitum during lactation, given 2.7 kg/head/d from weaning until re-breeding and fed 2.3 kg/head/d after mating. Beginning the day after weaning (Day 0) sows were treated with 0.4 IU/kg body weight (BW) insulin (n = 21) or were administered an equivalent volume of saline (n = 22) for 4 d. Beginning on Day 3 and continuing until Day 14 after weaning, the sows were checked for estrus twice daily and were artificially inseminated using pooled semen from 2 fertile boars. At slaughter (days 30 to 40 of gestation), ovaries and uteri were collected, and the ovulation rate, embryo number and viability, and uterine weight and length were evaluated and recorded. Use of insulin decreased the average interval from weaning to estrus compared with saline by increasing percentage in estrus by Day 14 after weaning (5.0 +/- 0.57 vs 6.9 +/- 0.56 d, respectively; P < 0.03). Ovulation rate, number of embryos, embryo survival, and average uterine length and weight were not influenced by insulin treatment. Overall, insulin affected reproductive efficiency in primiparous sows by increasing the percentage of sows in estrus.
Theriogenology | 1990
R.C. Tubbs; D.K. Hardin; N. M. Cox; A.W. Groce
Abstract Post-weaning patterns of serum progesterone were studied in 32 primiparous and 67 multiparous sows (approximately 35 sows per week for 3 weeks). Blood samples were obtained on Days 0, 7, 10, 14, 17, 21, 24 and 28 after weaning. There was a significant parity effect for days to estrus (17.83 ± 2.44 for primiparous sows vs 5.86 ± 1.60 for multiparous sows; P
Journal of Animal Science | 1987
N. M. Cox; M. J. Stuart; T. G. Althen; W. A. Bennett; H. W. Miller
Journal of Animal Science | 1982
Robert R. Kraeling; George B. Rampacek; N. M. Cox; T.E. Kiser
Journal of Animal Science | 1991
Isidro A. Matamoros; N. M. Cox; Moore Ab
Journal of Animal Science | 1990
M. R. Rainey; R. C. Tubbs; L. W. Bennett; N. M. Cox
Biology of Reproduction | 1990
Isidro A. Matamoros; N. M. Cox; Moore Ab
Journal of Animal Science | 1981
S. E. Dunlap; T.E. Kiser; N. M. Cox; F. N. Thompson; George B. Rampacek; L. L. Benyshek; Robert R. Kraeling