N. Mounier

Vascular endothelial growth factor-A is expressed both on lymphoma cells and endothelial cells in angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma and related to lymphoma progression

Vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF-A), a main stimulator of endothelial cell proliferation, plays an important role on tumor angiogenesis. Angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL) show the most prominent vascular component among lymphomas and their prognosis is difficult to predict. To assess the clinical significance of VEGF-A in AITL, VEGF-A gene expression was studied in the tumoral lymph nodes of 24 patients using laser microdissection and quantitative polymerase chain reaction. VEGF-A gene was overexpressed in both microdissected lymphoma and endothelial cells. Increased levels of VEGF-A gene expression in lymphoma cells, as in endothelial cells, were related to extranodal involvement and to short survival time. Accordingly, VEGF-A protein expression was also found in both types of cells in lymph nodes and bone marrows with lymphomatous involvement. Triple immunofluorescent labeling on lymph node sections showed that VEGF-A protein and its receptor VEGF-R1 were coexpressed on endothelial cells of microvessels in the areas of lymphoma invasion. In these areas, ultrastructural study showed dystrophic microvessels. Taken together, the value of VEGF-A gene expression as an adverse prognostic marker in AITL should thus be considered. In addition to lymphoma cells themselves, the vascular component, a critical pathologic characteristic in AITL, also contributes to lymphoma progression.

Rituximab versus observation after high-dose consolidative first-line chemotherapy with autologous stem-cell transplantation in patients with poor-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

BACKGROUNDnThis study compared the induction regimens doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide and etoposide (ACE) with doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, bleomycin and prednisone (ACVBP) before high-dose therapy (HDT) followed by autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) for patients with poor-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). A second randomisation compared rituximab with observation post-ASCT.nnnMATERIALS AND METHODSnFour hundred and seventy-six patients <60 years old with newly diagnosed CD20+ DLBCL were randomised to induction with ACE or ACVBP. Three hundred and thirty responders received HDT followed by ASCT. After ASCT, 269 patients were re-randomised to receive either maintenance rituximab or observation alone. Randomisation was stratified by the quality of response to ASCT. The primary end point of this study was event-free survival (EFS).nnnRESULTSnAt a median of 4 years follow-up from the second randomisation, there was a trend (P = 0.1) towards increased EFS for patients who received rituximab compared with observation.nnnCONCLUSIONnThe type of induction therapy (ACVBP or ACE) did not significantly affect overall survival at a median 51 months follow-up.

T-Cell/Histiocyte-Rich Large B-Cell Lymphomas and Classical Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphomas Have Similar Outcome After Chemotherapy: A Matched-Control Analysis

PURPOSEnBecause it is unclear whether T-cell/histiocyte-rich large B-cell lymphomas (H/TCRBCL) should be considered as a true clinicopathologic entity, we conducted a matched-control analysis comparing patients with H/TCRBCL and patients with diffuse large-B cell lymphoma (B-DLCL).nnnPATIENTS AND METHODSnMore than 4,500 patients were enrolled onto non-Hodgkins lymphoma trials conducted by the Groupe dEtude des Lymphomes de lAdulte. After histologic review, 50 patients were subclassified as H/TCRBCL. They were matched to 150 patients with B-DLCL for each of the factors of the International Prognostic Index (IPI).nnnRESULTSnClinical characteristics of H/TCRBCL patients showed a male predominance and a median age of 47 years. Performance status was normal in 89% of patients, whereas lactate dehydrogenase level was increased in 60% of patients. The disease was disseminated in 81% of patients, and 48% had two or more involved extranodal sites. The IPI score was >or= 2 in 53% of patients. The complete response rate to chemotherapy was 63%, and 5-year overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) rates (mean +/- SD) were 58% +/- 18% and 53% +/- 16%, respectively. The matched-control analysis showed a trend toward a better response to chemotherapy for patients with B-DLCL (P =.06), whereas no difference was observed in OS (P =.9) and EFS (P =.8).nnnCONCLUSIONnH/TCRBCL is an aggressive disease that often presents with adverse prognostic factors. However, when treatment is adapted to the disease risk, outcome is equivalent to that observed in patients with B-DLCL. Thus H/TCRBCL should be considered a pathologic variant that belongs to the B-DLCL category.

ABVD (8 cycles) versus BEACOPP (4 escalated cycles ≥4 baseline): Final results in stage III-IV low-risk Hodgkin lymphoma (IPS 0-2) of the LYSA H34 randomized trial

BACKGROUNDnTreatment with escalated BEACOPP achieved a superior time to treatment failure over ABVD in patients with disseminated Hodgkin lymphoma. However, recent clinical trials have failed to confirm BEACOPP overall survival (OS) superiority over ABVD. In addition, the gain in low-risk patients is still a matter of debate.nnnPATIENTS AND METHODSnWe randomly compared ABVD (8 cycles) with BEACOPP (escalated 4 cycles ≥ baseline 4 cycles) in low-risk patients with an International Prognostic Score (IPS) of 0-2. The primary end point was event-free survival (EFS). This parallel group, open-label phase 3 trial was registered under #RECF0219 at French National Cancer Institute.nnnRESULTSnOne hundred and fifty patients were randomized in this trial (ABVD 80, BEACOPP 70): 28 years was the median age, 50% were male and IPS was 0-1 for 64%. Complete remission rate was 85% for ABVD and 90% for BEACOPP. Progression or relapses were more frequent in the ABVD patients than in the BEACOPP patients (17 versus 5 patients). With a median follow-up period of 5.5 years, seven patients died: six in the ABVD arm and one in the BEACOPP arm (HL 3 and 0, 2nd cancer 2 and 1, accident 1 and 0). The EFS at 5 years was estimated at 62% for ABVD versus 77%, for BEACOPP [hazards ratio (HR) = 0.6, P = 0.07]. The progression-free survival (PFS) at 5 years was 75% versus 93% (HR = 0.3, P = 0.007). The OS at 5 years was 92% versus 99% (HR = 0.18, P = 0.06).nnnCONCLUSIONnFewer progressions/relapses were observed with BEACOPP, demonstrating the high efficacy of the more intensive regimen, even in low-risk patients. However, additional considerations, balancing treatment-related toxicity and late morbidity due to salvage may help with decision-making with regard to treatment with ABVD or BEACOPP.

Rituximab plus gemcitabine and oxaliplatin in patients with refractory/relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma who are not candidates for high-dose therapy. A phase II lymphoma study Association trial

A previous pilot study with rituximab, gemcitabine and oxaliplatin showed promising activity in patients with refractory/relapsed B-cell lymphoma. We, therefore, conducted a phase II study to determine whether these results could be reproduced in a multi-institutional setting. This phase II study included 49 patients with refractory (n=6) or relapsing (n=43) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. The median age of the patients was 69 years. Prior treatment included rituximab in 31 (63%) and autologous transplantation in 17 (35%) patients. International Prognostic Index at enrollment was >2 in 34 patients (71%). The primary endpoint was overall response rate after four cycles of treatment. Patients were planned to receive eight cycles if they reached at least partial remission after four cycles. After four cycles 21 patients (44%) were in complete remission and 8 (17%) in partial remission, resulting in an overall response rate of 61%. Factors significantly affecting overall response rate were early (<1 year) progression/relapse (18% versus 54%; P=0.001) and prior exposure to rituximab (23% versus 65%; P=0.004). Five-year progression-free and overall survival rates were 12.8% and 13.9%, respectively. Rituximab, gemcitabine and oxaliplatin were well tolerated with grade 3–4 infectious episodes in 22% of the cycles. These results are the first confirmation from a multicenter study that rituximab, gemcitabine and oxaliplatin provide a consistent response rate in patients with refractory/relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. This therapy can now be considered as a platform for new combinations with targeted treatments. This trial was registered at clinicaltrial.gov under #NCT00169195.

Primary cutaneous large-cell lymphoma: analysis of 49 patients included in the LNH87 prospective trial of polychemotherapy for high-grade lymphomas

The objectives of this study were to evaluate the outcome after polychemotherapy for patients with primary cutaneous large-cell lymphomas (PCLL) and to validate the recently proposed immunohistologic classification of cutaneous lymphomas. Among 140 patients with positive skin biopsies included in the LNH87 protocol (for treatment of aggressive lymphomas), 49 patients met the criteria of PCLL. Characteristics were: sex ratio M/F, 2.3; age 18 to 83 years (median, 52), peripheral lymph nodes, nu2009=u200922; diffuse disease, nu2009=u200912; median tumor size, 4.5u2009cm; elevated lactate dehydrogenase, nu2009=u20099; ECOG: 0/1, nu2009=u200949. Histology was: follicular center B cell, nu2009=u200923; B-lymphoblastic, nu2009=u20091; anaplastic large-cell lymphoma, nu2009=u200914 (T cell phenotype nu2009=u20098); CD30− T cell lymphoma, nu2009=u200911. All patients received polychemotherapy: under 70 years, ACVBP (three to four cycles and consolidation for 6 months) nu2009=u200925; mBACOD (eight cycles) nu2009=u200916; over 70 years, C(T)VP (six cycles) nu2009=u20098. Radiation therapy was not included in the protocol. With a median follow-up of 5 years, 24/49 patients had relapsed, with 20 skin relapses. Event-free (EFS) and overall survival (OS) at 5 years were, respectively, 50 and 77%. Significant adverse prognostic factors were: histology (CD30− T cell lymphoma) and diffuse cutaneous disease (>10% of skin). The presence of nodal involvement was only significant for EFS. When compared to 140 non-cutaneous lymphoma patients included in the same trial and fully matched for the main clinical characteristics, OS was similar. In conclusion, PCLL behaves like other localized B or T cell extranodal lymphomas with the same prognostic factors (LDH, ECOG, age) except for CD30+ PCLL which have a very good prognosis.

Outcome of patients with relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma who fail second-line salvage regimens in the International CORAL study

Salvage chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is the standard second-line treatment for relapsed and refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). However, the strategy is less clear in patients who require third-line treatment. Updated outcomes of 203 patients who could not proceed to scheduled ASCT in the Collaborative Trial in Relapsed Aggressive Lymphoma (CORAL) are herein reviewed. In the intent-to-treat analysis, overall response rate to third-line chemotherapy was 39%, with 27% CR or CR unconfirmed, and 12% PR. Among the 203 patients, 64 (31.5%) were eventually transplanted (ASCT 56, allogeneic SCT 8). Median overall survival (OS) of the entire population was 4.4 months. OS was significantly improved in patients with lower tertiary International Prognostic Index (IPI), patients responding to third-line treatment and patients transplanted with a 1-year OS of 41.6% compared with 16.3% for the not transplanted (P<0.0001). In multivariate analysis, IPI at relapse (hazard ratio (HR) 2.409) and transplantation (HR 0.375) independently predicted OS. Third-line salvage chemotherapy can lead to response followed by transplantation and long-term survival in DLBCL patients. However, improvement of salvage efficacy is an urgent need with new drugs.

A multivariate analysis of the survival of patients with aggressive lymphoma: variations in the predictive value of prognostic factors during the course of the disease. Groupe d'Etudes des Lymphomes de l'Adulte.

BACKGROUNDnAggressive non-Hodgkins lymphoma is now often curable with chemotherapy. The International Prognostic Index (IPI) was recently developed to predict patient survival on the basis of pretreatment clinical features. However, classical multivariate regression models such as the IPI fail to detect time-dependent changes in the predictive value of covariates. In this study, an extension of the Cox proportional hazards model was used to determine whether the value of prognostic factors might decay over time.nnnMETHODSnA total of 1271 patients younger than 60 years, entered on the LNH-84 and LNH-87 studies of an ACVBP induction regimen (consisting of doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vindesine, bleomycin, methylprednisolone, and IT methotrexate), were analyzed in terms of overall survival and monthly risk of dying. By a standard method, prognostic factors were identified in a training sample and confirmed in a validation sample. The independently significant covariates were then included in a step-function regression model (3-step) that permitted determination of their value in predicting the short term and long term survival of the entire population.nnnRESULTSnDuring the entire follow-up period (median, 5.5 years), lactate dehydrogenase level, tumor stage, performance status, and number of extranodal sites remained independently predictive of overall survival. However, these covariates had nonproportional hazard functions. The study of their time-dependent effect with the 3-step model confirmed that they were predictive of overall survival during the short term follow-up period of 3 months to 2 years. However, during the induction period of 0-3 months and the long term follow-up period of 2-10 years, there was only 1 independently predictive factor for each of these periods: performance status and tumor stage, respectively.nnnCONCLUSIONSnThe IPI factors are relevant to short term follow-up and permit the selection of routine or experimental therapeutic regimens. In contrast, only performance status is predictive of a patients ability to tolerate induction chemotherapy, and only tumor stage is predictive of long term survival.

VEGF and VEGFR-1 are coexpressed by epithelial and stromal cells of renal cell carcinoma.

Tumor angiogenesis is a dynamic process that plays a major role in cancer progression. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and its receptors play a pivotal role in angiogenesis. The expression of VEGF and its receptors VEGFR‐1 and VEGFR‐2 in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) was investigated in the perspective of anti‐VEGF treatments.

FcgammaRIIB expression in diffuse large B-cell lymphomas does not alter the response to CHOP+rituximab (R-CHOP).

Fc γ RIIB expression in diffuse large B-cell lymphomas does not alter the response to CHOP+rituximab (R-CHOP)