N. Pearce
Structural Genomics Consortium
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by N. Pearce.
bioRxiv | 2017
P. Collins; J.T. Ng; R. Talon; K. Nekrosiute; T. Krojer; Alice Douangamath; J. Brandao-Neto; N. Wright; N. Pearce; F von Delft
A high-throughput method is described for crystal soaking using acoustic droplet ejection, and its effectiveness is demonstrated.
Acta Crystallographica Section D Structural Biology | 2017
T. Krojer; R. Talon; N. Pearce; P. Collins; Alice Douangamath; J. Brandao-Neto; A Dias; Brian D. Marsden; F von Delft
XChemExplorer is a graphical workflow and data-management tool for the parallel determination of protein–ligand complexes. Its implementation, usage and application are described here.
bioRxiv | 2017
N. Pearce; T. Krojer; F von Delft
The importance of modelling the superpositions of ligand-bound and unbound states that commonly occur in crystallographic data sets is emphasized and demonstrated. The generation of an ensemble that models not only the state of interest is important for the high-quality refinement of low-occupancy ligands, as well as to explain the observed density more completely.
Structural Dynamics | 2017
N. Pearce; A. Bradley; T. Krojer; Brian D. Marsden; Charlotte M. Deane; F von Delft
Crystallographic fragment screening uses low molecular weight compounds to probe the protein surface and although individual protein-fragment interactions are high quality, fragments commonly bind at low occupancy, historically making identification difficult. However, our new Pan-Dataset Density Analysis method readily identifies binders missed by conventional analysis: for fragment screening data of lysine-specific demethylase 4D (KDM4D), the hit rate increased from 0.9% to 10.6%. Previously unidentified fragments reveal multiple binding sites and demonstrate: the versatility of crystallographic fragment screening; that surprisingly large conformational changes are possible in crystals; and that low crystallographic occupancy does not by itself reflect a protein-ligand complexs significance.
bioRxiv | 2016
N. Pearce; A. Bradley; P. Collins; T. Krojer; R. Nowak; Romain Talon; Brian D. Marsden; Sebastian Kelm; Jiye Shi; Charlotte M. Deane; Frank von Delft
Macromolecular crystallography is relied on to reveal subtle atomic difference between samples (e.g. ligand binding); yet their detection and modelling is subjective and ambiguous density is experimentally common, since molecular states of interest are generally only fractionally present. The existing approach relies on careful modelling for maximally accurate maps to make contributions of the minor fractions visible (1); in practice, this is time-consuming and non-objective (2–4). Instead, our PanDDA method automatically reveals clear electron density for only the changed state, even from poor models and inaccurate maps, by subtracting a proportion of the confounding ground state, accurately estimated by averaging many ground state crystals. Changed states are objectively identifiable from statistical distributions of density values; arbitrarily large searches are thus automatable. The method is completely general, implying new best practice for all changed-state studies. Finally, we demonstrate the incompleteness of current atomic models, and the need for new multi-crystal deconvolution paradigms. One Sentence Summary Normally uninterpretable map regions are reliably modelled by deconvoluting superposed crystal states, even with poor starting models.
PLOS Computational Biology | 2017
Samuel Demharter; N. Pearce; Kylie A. Beattie; Isabel Frost; Jinwoo Leem; Alistair Martin; Robert Oppenheimer; Cristian Regep; Tammo Rukat; Alexander Skates; Nicola Trendel; David J. Gavaghan; Charlotte M. Deane; Bernhard Knapp
1 Doctoral Training Centre for Systems Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom, 2 Doctoral Training Centre for Systems Approaches to Biomedical Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom, 3 Doctoral Training Centre for Life Sciences Interface, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom, 4 Doctoral Training Centre for Synthetic Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
Nature Communications | 2017
N. Pearce; T. Krojer; A. Bradley; P. Collins; R. Nowak; R. Talon; Brian D. Marsden; Sebastian Kelm; Jiye Shi; Charlotte M. Deane; F von Delft
Archive | 2018
R. Talon; T. Krojer; Cynthia Tallant; G. Nunez-Alonso; M. Fairhead; A. Szykowska; P. Collins; N. Pearce; J.T. Ng; E. MacLean; N. Wright; Alice Douangamath; J. Brandao-Neto; N. Burgess-Brown; Kilian Huber; Stefan Knapp; Paul E. Brennan; C.H. Arrowsmith; A. Edwards; C. Bountra; F. von Delft
Archive | 2017
R. Nowak; T. Krojer; C. Johansson; K. Kupinska; A. Szykowska; N. Pearce; R. Talon; P. Collins; C. Gileadi; C. Strain-Damerell; N. Burgess-Brown; C.H. Arrowsmith; C. Bountra; A. Edwards; F. von Delft; Paul E. Brennan; U. Oppermann
Archive | 2016
N. Pearce; P. Collins; R. Talon; Frank von Delft; T. Krojer