N. Rotmensz

“Classical” CMF versus a 3-weekly intravenous CMF schedule in postmenopausal patients with advanced breast cancer: An EORTC Breast Cancer Co-operative Group Phase III Trial (10808)

The classical CMF (cyclophosphamide/methotrexate/5-fluorouracil) schedule was compared with a modified 3-weekly intravenous CMF schedule in postmenopausal patients with advanced breast cancer, as concern had arisen as to whether the classical schedule was the optimal way to give these drugs. The response rate with classical CMF was 48% compared with 29% for intravenous CMF (P = 0.003). Response duration was similar at 11 months, but survival longer for the classical schedule (17 versus 12 months, P = 0.016). We conclude that classical CMF is the superior regimen and attribute this to the higher dose intensity achieved.

Locally advanced breast cancer: The contribution of cytotoxic and endocrine treatment to radiotherapy. An EORTC breast cancer co-operative group trial (10792)

Patients with locally advanced carcinoma of the breast were randomized to receive either radiotherapy alone, radiotherapy + endocrine therapy, radiotherapy + chemotherapy or radiotherapy + endocrine therapy + chemotherapy. In 363 evaluable patients, time to first progression was delayed significantly by both endocrine treatment and chemotherapy, the greatest effect being achieved by the combination of endocrine treatment and chemotherapy. This effect was almost entirely due to a major effect of systemic treatment on time to loco-regional progression, for which the result is highly significant, rather than time to distant metastasis in which only a non-significant trend was observed. For survival, a trend was seen in favour of the combination of hormone treatment and chemotherapy, but this effect did not achieve statistical significance. This trial suggests that current endocrine and cytotoxic treatments are only of marginal value in improving the prognosis in locally advanced breast cancer.

Quality control of validity of data collected in clinical trials

In a study initiated by the EORTC Study Group on Data Management, 15 site visits to main participating centers in ongoing cancer clinical trials have been carried out over a 1 year period. The aim was to evaluate the quality level of EORTC clinical trial data, to find out the order of magnitude of possible problems encountered and to test a technique to objectively assess the quality of data. The process of data collection and the quality of data transfer from hospital charts to EORTC case report forms (CRF) were checked. The data quality was scored and the causes of incorrectness were evaluated. Percentages of correct data ranged from 78% up to 98%; 11/15 centers had greater than 90% correct data. The median rate of error encountered in key data was 2.8% (range 0.5-7%). The main source of error was incorrect transfer of the information recorded in the patient chart to the CRF. Equally good overall results have been observed in the centers where data managers fill in the forms (DM) and those centers without an administrative trial structure (PH). The mean percentage of correct data for both types of centers is 91.4%. The wider range in percentage for incorrect data (DM mean value 3.0%, range 0.5-7%; PH mean value 2.3%, range 1.4-3.1) suggests the important impact of the knowledge and experience of the people involved in data management. The data quality evaluation was hampered by the impossibility of checking part of the data present on the CRF, 0.4-14.5%. Besides knowledge and experience, the main aspects influencing good data quality appeared to be the efficacy of the internal organization and good local data monitoring. The importance of the design of CRFs was also highlighted. As this study was run for on-going protocols, the site visiting team had the opportunity to point out and report to the trial coordinator all shortcomings and controversial points that could thus be corrected during the course of the trial.

Doxorubicin vs epirubicin, report of a second-line randomized phase II/III study in advanced breast cancer

The EORTC Breast Cancer Cooperative Group carried out a randomized trial to compare doxorubicin with epirubicin as second-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Two hundred and fifty-nine patients with at least one site of metastatic disease entered this trial, of whom 232 patients were eligible. Treatment consisted of doxorubicin 75 mg m(-2) or epirubicin 90 mg m(-2) i.v. every 3 weeks. The overall response rates for doxorubicin and epirubicin were 36% and 28% respectively (P = 0.173). The median time to progression was 23 weeks for doxorubicin and 19 weeks for epirubicin (P = 0.063) and the median duration of response was 40 weeks for doxorubicin and 32 weeks for epirubicin (P = 0.059). The median survival was 47 weeks for doxorubicin and 44 weeks for epirubicin (P = 0.196). Leucocyte count on retreatment day (P = 0.011) and platelet nadir (P = 0.031) were significantly lower in the doxorubicin-treated group. Also mucositis (P < 0.001), diarrhoea (P = 0.005) and haemorrhage (P = 0.048) were significantly worse in the doxorubicin arm. Nine patients on doxorubicin and two patients on epirubicin experienced congestive heart failure (CHF). At the dose levels used in this study, no statistical differences in response rate and survival were found between the two treatment arms. Treatment with doxorubicin tended to result in a slightly longer duration of response and time to progression but doxorubicin was more toxic than epirubicin.

Carboplatin in combination therapy for ovarian cancer

Cisplatin today is a cornerstone of combination chemotherapy for ovarian cancer. Carboplatin seems equal to cisplatin in antitumour activity, but has a different toxicity profile. After a feasibility study, a randomized phase III study in ovarian cancer stage II, III, and IV was undertaken, comparing carboplatin with cisplatin in combination with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin and hexamethylmelamine. Preliminary analysis of this study reveals no statistically significant difference in response rate. Notwithstanding equal haematological toxicity, the other side effects evoked by carboplatin in combination treatment are much milder than those evoked by cisplatin. Further analysis will be necessary to draw definite conclusions about the results obtained.

Combined cytotoxic and endocrine therapy in postmenopausal patients with advanced breast cancer. A randomized study of CMF vs CMF plus tamoxifen

In this study 263 patients with advanced measurable breast cancer were randomized to receive cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) or CMF + tamoxifen (T). Each cycle of CMF (C, 100 mg/m2 p.o. days 1-14, M 40 mg/m2 i.v. days 1 and 8, F, 600 mg/m2 i.v. days 1 and 8) was repeated every 4 weeks. Tamoxifen, 20 mg twice daily, was given continuously. The treatment results have been assessed by external review for the 220 evaluable patients and were the following for the CMF and CMF + T groups, respectively: PD: 24 and 10%; NC: 27 and 15%; PR: 29 and 44%; and CR: 20 and 31%. The difference between response (CR + PR) rates is highly significant (P = 0.0001). The median duration of remission was 12 months in the CMF-treated group and 18 months in patients treated with CMF + T (P = 0.09). The median duration of survival was 19 months and 24 months respectively (P = 0.07). However, in the group of responders patients receiving CMF + T survived significantly longer than those who received CMF alone (32 months vs 21 months, P = 0.005). The addition of T appeared to be of benefit in all subgroups. The largest differences were seen in patients with the dominant site of disease in the viscera, in patients with a Karnofsky index of 100, and in patients of more than 60 yr of age. The amount of CMF given was identical in the two treatment groups and there was a trend toward a decrease in dose with increasing age. No relationship between response and dose given was observed. In conclusion, the simultaneous use of T and CMF improves the therapeutic results in patients with advanced breast cancer.

PHASE-II STUDY OF HIGH-DOSE MEGESTROL-ACETATE IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED OVARIAN-CARCINOMA

The EORTC Gynaecological Cancer Cooperative Group conducted a phase II study of high dose oral megestrol acetate: 800 mg/day for 1 month followed by 400 mg/day as maintenance treatment, in heavily pretreated patients with ovarian cancer. Of 72 patients included in this study, 54 were fully evaluable for response and toxicity. The response rate was low with only 1 patient having a partial response, 9 patients with stable disease and 44 patients with progressive disease. The toxicity profile was low. However, 1 patient died after 2 months of treatment, and in 3 patients thrombo-embolic events occurred. Weight gain varied in 20 of the 61 patients from 0.5 to 16 kg. This study does not suggest that the overall 10% benefit from hormonal therapy for chemotherapy refractory ovarian cancer will improve by increasing the dose.

Phase II study of mitomycin-C and cisplatin in disseminated, squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix. A European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Gynecological Cancer Group study.

The aim of this study was to investigate the tumour response rate and toxicity of a combination chemotherapy consisting of mitomycin-C and cisplatin in patients with disseminated squamous-cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Chemotherapy consisted of mitomycin, 6 mg/m(2) intravenously (i.v.), and cisplatin, 50 mg/m(2) given i.v., both administered on day 1 of each cycle. The regimen was repeated at 4-weekly intervals. Mitomycin-C/cisplatin were used to treat 33 evaluable patients aged 29-67 years (median: 50 years). All patients except 1 had previously been treated with either surgery, radiation or both. At the initiation of chemotherapy, 8 patients had loco-regional and disseminated disease and 25 women had only distant metastases. The overall response rate was 42% (95% confidence interval (CI): 26-61%). Five complete and nine partial responses were observed with a median duration of response of 7.9 months (95% CI: 3.7-23.5 months). 9 patients had stable disease and 10 developed progressive disease during mitomycin-C/cisplatin-treatment. World Health Organization (WHO) grade III/IV side-effects were documented in 15 women, of whom 10 had gastro-intestinal toxicity, 3 had haematological toxicity, 1 had alopecia and 1 developed an allergic reaction to cisplatin. There were neither drug-related deaths nor severe or irreversible renal or hepatic dysfunction or peripheral neuropathy. The median progression-free survival was 5.0 months (95% CI: 3.6-6.2 months) for all patients and 10.5 months (95% CI: 6.2-15.2 months) for the responders. The median overall survival was 11.2 months (95% CI: 6.5-18.4 months).The mitomycin-C/cisplatin combination showed antitumour activity in the treatment of advanced or recurrent squamous-cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix. The regimen was well tolerated and could be administered on an outpatient basis.

Carminomycin versus doxorubicin in advanced breast cancer, a randomized phase II study of the E.O.R.T.C. breast cancer cooperative group☆

Sixty-four patients with advanced progressive breast cancer resistant to conventional treatments were entered into the present study. They were randomized to receive either Carminomycin (CMM) 20 mg/m2 or Doxorubicin (DOX) 75 mg/m2, both drugs being administered by i.v. bolus every 3 weeks until progression of the disease. Five patients were not eligible and response could not be evaluated in another eight patients. Three patients had only one course due to disease-related early death. Among twenty-seven evaluable patients who received at least two courses of DOX one complete response and seven partial responses were observed for an overall response rate of 30%. CMM showed significantly lower (P = 0.04) antitumor activity with only one partial response (4%) among the 24 patients who received at least two courses of therapy. Median duration of response dating from the start of chemotherapy was 46 weeks on DOX (range 18-102+) and 30 weeks for the single partial response on CMM. Although the median time to progression for all patients receiving CMM (9 weeks) was significantly shorter (P = 0.04) than for those receiving DOX (30 weeks), patients on DOX had only a marginally longer duration of survival (P = .28) than those initially treated with CMM. Myelotoxicity was more severe in the CMM treated group than in the DOX group. Other toxicities such as alopecia, nausea and vomiting were slightly more severe in the DOX treated group. On the basis of this and other similar randomized studies, CMM cannot be recommended for further application in the treatment of advanced breast cancer.

Phase II trial of bleomycin in patients with advanced ovarian cancer: an EORTC gynecological cancer cooperative group study

Bleomycin was administered by continuous i.v. infusion at a dose of 20 mg/m2/day for 7 days to 18 evaluable patients with advanced ovarian epithelial cancer resistant to conventional chemotherapy. The toxicity pattern was no different from that known from earlier studies using continuous infusion of bleomycin with the exception of the occurrence of a life-threatening allergic reaction in one patient, which led to discontinuation of treatment after 3 days. Only one patient showed a partial response for 2 months (5.5%), indicating that the drug has no significant activity in this unfavorable group of patients.