N.U. Owase Jeelani
Great Ormond Street Hospital
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by N.U. Owase Jeelani.
British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery | 2013
Alistair R.M. Cobb; N.U. Owase Jeelani; Peter Ayliffe
In children, differences in the properties and proportions of bone in the craniofacial skeleton and the lack of development of the paranasal sinuses result in orbital fractures that present differently from those in adults. Facial growth may be disturbed by such injuries and also by surgical intervention, which should therefore be as conservative as possible. However, urgent operation is needed to prevent irreversible changes when fractures of the orbital floor involve entrapped muscle. We present an approach to such injuries.
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery | 2017
Will Rodgers; Graeme E. Glass; Silvia Schievano; Alessandro Borghi; Naiara Rodriguez-Florez; Arpan Tahim; Freida Angullia; William Breakey; Paul G.M. Knoops; Maik Tenhagen; Justine O’Hara; Allan Ponniah; Gregory James; David Dunaway; N.U. Owase Jeelani
Background: Spring-assisted cranioplasty has been proposed as an alternative to total calvarial remodeling for sagittal craniosynostosis. Advantages include its minimally invasive nature, and reduced morbidity and hospital stay. Potential drawbacks include the need for a second procedure for removal and the lack of published long-term follow-up. The authors present a single-institution experience of 100 consecutive cases using a novel spring design. Methods: All patients treated at the authors’ institution between April of 2010 and September of 2014 were evaluated retrospectively. Patients with isolated nonsyndromic sagittal craniosynostosis were included. Data were collected for operative time, anesthetic time, hospital stay, transfusion requirement, and complications in addition to cephalic index preoperatively and at 1 day, 3 weeks, and 6 months postoperatively. Results: One hundred patients were included. Mean cephalic index was 68 preoperatively, 71 at day 1, and 72 at 3 weeks and 6 months postoperatively. Nine patients required transfusion. Two patients developed a cerebrospinal fluid leak requiring intervention. One patient required early removal of springs because of infection. One patient had a wound dehiscence over the spring and one patient sustained a venous infarct with hemiplegia. Five patients required further calvarial remodeling surgery. Conclusions: The authors’ modified spring design and protocol represents an effective strategy in the management of single-suture sagittal craniosynostosis with reduced total operative time and blood loss compared with alternative treatment strategies. In patients referred within the first 6 months of birth, this technique has become the authors’ procedure of choice. In a minority of cases, especially in the older age groups, further remodeling surgery is required. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.
Journal of Neurosurgery | 2017
Alessandro Borghi; Silvia Schievano; Naiara Rodriguez Florez; Roisin McNicholas; Will Rodgers; Allan Ponniah; Greg James; Richard Hayward; David Dunaway; N.U. Owase Jeelani
OBJECTIVE Scaphocephaly secondary to sagittal craniosynostosis has been treated in recent years with spring-assisted cranioplasty, an innovative approach that leverages the use of metallic spring distractors to reshape the patient skull. In this study, a population of patients who had undergone spring cranioplasty for the correction of scaphocephaly at the Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children was retrospectively analyzed to systematically assess spring biomechanical performance and kinematics in relation to spring model, patient age, and outcomes over time. METHODS Data from 60 patients (49 males, mean age at surgery 5.2 ± 0.9 months) who had received 2 springs for the treatment of isolated sagittal craniosynostosis were analyzed. The opening distance of the springs at the time of insertion and removal was retrieved from the surgical notes and, during the implantation period, from planar radiographs obtained at 1 day postoperatively and at the 3-week follow-up. The force exerted by the spring to the patient skull at each time point was derived after mechanical testing of each spring model-3 devices with the same geometry but different wire thicknesses. Changes in the cephalic index between preoperatively and the 3-week follow-up were recorded. RESULTS Stiffer springs were implanted in older patients (p < 0.05) to achieve the same opening on-table as in younger patients, but this entailed significantly different-higher-forces exerted on the skull when combinations of stiffer springs were used (p < 0.001). After initial force differences between spring models, however, the devices all plateaued. Indeed, regardless of patient age or spring model, after 10 days from insertion, all the devices were open. CONCLUSIONS Results in this study provide biomechanical insights into spring-assisted cranioplasty and could help to improve spring design and follow-up strategy in the future.
Seminars in Pediatric Surgery | 2015
David Dunaway; N.U. Owase Jeelani
Craniopagus twins are rare and account for up to 6% of all conjoined twins. No hospital will encounter many such twins and the opportunity to develop expertise is limited. We have dealt with 2 such sets and illustrate our approach by reference to our most recent set. We believe that detailed imaging allows precise delineation of the anatomy and facilitates detailed planning of the surgery. When venous drainage from the 2 brains is connected, we believe that staged separation is preferable as gradual alteration of hemodynamics may be safer than a single-stage procedure.
computer assisted radiology and surgery | 2017
Naiara Rodriguez-Florez; Jan L. Bruse; Alessandro Borghi; Herman Vercruysse; Juling Ong; Greg James; Xavier Pennec; David Dunaway; N.U. Owase Jeelani; Silvia Schievano
PurposeSpring-assisted cranioplasty is performed to correct the long and narrow head shape of children with sagittal synostosis. Such corrective surgery involves osteotomies and the placement of spring-like distractors, which gradually expand to widen the skull until removal about 4 months later. Due to its dynamic nature, associations between surgical parameters and post-operative 3D head shape features are difficult to comprehend. The current study aimed at applying population-based statistical shape modelling to gain insight into how the choice of surgical parameters such as craniotomy size and spring positioning affects post-surgical head shape.MethodsTwenty consecutive patients with sagittal synostosis who underwent spring-assisted cranioplasty at Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children (London, UK) were prospectively recruited. Using a nonparametric statistical modelling technique based on mathematical currents, a 3D head shape template was computed from surface head scans of sagittal patients after spring removal. Partial least squares (PLS) regression was employed to quantify and visualise trends of localised head shape changes associated with the surgical parameters recorded during spring insertion: anterior–posterior and lateral craniotomy dimensions, anterior spring position and distance between anterior and posterior springs.ResultsBivariate correlations between surgical parameters and corresponding PLS shape vectors demonstrated that anterior–posterior (Pearson’s
British Journal of Haematology | 2017
Ronald Tan; Mario Ganau; N.U. Owase Jeelani; Zubair Tahir; Kshitij Mankad; Carolina Kachramanoglou; Prab Prabhakar; Nicholas Goulden; Sujith Samarasinghe
Childs Nervous System | 2012
David Dunaway; Johnathan A. Britto; Christopher Abela; Robert D. Evans; N.U. Owase Jeelani
r=0.64, p=0.002
Journal of Neurosurgery | 2009
N.U. Owase Jeelani; Abhaya V. Kulkarni; Pani DeSilva; Dominic Thompson; Richard Hayward
Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery | 2017
Paul G.M. Knoops; Caroline A.A. Beaumont; Alessandro Borghi; Naiara Rodriguez-Florez; Richard William Francis Breakey; William Rodgers; Freida Angullia; N.U. Owase Jeelani; Silvia Schievano; David Dunaway
r=0.64,p=0.002) and lateral craniotomy dimensions (Spearman’s
The Journal of Pediatrics | 2007
Jean-Rodolphe Vignes; N.U. Owase Jeelani; Ashfaq Jeelani; Michel Dautheribes; Dominique Liguoro