Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by N. van Dijk.
Environmental Pollution | 2010
J.N. Cape; Lucy J. Sheppard; Alan Crossley; N. van Dijk; Y.S. Tang
The content of organic N has been shown in many studies to increase during the passage of rain water through forest canopies. The source of this organic N is unknown, but generally assumed to come from canopy processing of wet or dry-deposited inorganic N. There have been very few experimental studies in the field to address the canopy formation or loss of organic N. We report two studies: a Scots pine canopy exposed to ammonia gas, and a Sitka spruce canopy exposed to ammonium and nitrate as wet deposition. In both cases, organic N deposition in throughfall was increased, but only represented a small fraction (<10%) of the additional inorganic N supplied, suggesting a limited capacity for net organic N production, similar in both conifer canopies under Scottish summertime conditions, of less than 1.6 mmol N m(-2) mth(-1) (equivalent to 3 kg N ha(-1) y(-1)).
Environmental Pollution | 2008
Ian D. Leith; Ruth J. Mitchell; A.‐M. Truscott; J.N. Cape; N. van Dijk; R.I. Smith; D. Fowler; Mark A. Sutton
The spatial relationship between the concentration and deposition of the major ions in precipitation and stemflow and their influence on the tissue nitrogen concentration of three epiphytic bryophytes on Quercus petraea (Matt) Liebl. and Q. robur L. was investigated at seven UK Atlantic oak woodland sites with a range of total N deposition of 55-250 mmol m(-2). The main driver of change in tissue N concentrations of three epiphytic bryophytes (Isothecium myosuroides Brid. (Eurhynchium myosuroides (Brid.) Schp.), Dicranum scoparium Hewd. and Thuidium tamariscinum (Hewd.) Schimp.) was total N deposition in stemflow, dominated by ammonium deposition. The three epiphytic species also showed strong relationships between tissue N concentration and total N deposition in rainfall but a poor correlation with total N ion concentration in rainfall. This study shows that epiphytic bryophytes utilise stemflow N and thus increase their risk from inputs of total N deposition compared to terricolous species at the same site.
The Scientific World Journal | 2004
Sutton; U. Dragosits; S. Hellsten; C.J. Place; Anthony J. Dore; Y.S. Tang; N. van Dijk; L. Love; N. Fournier; Massimo Vieno; K.J. Weston; R.I. Smith; Mhairi Coyle; D. Roy; Jane Hall; D. Fowler
The main source of atmospheric ammonia (NH3) in Scotland is livestock agriculture, which accounts for 85% of emissions. The local magnitude of emissions therefore depends on livestock density, type, and management, with major differences occurring in various parts of Scotland. Local differences in agricultural activities therefore result in a wide range of NH3 emissions, ranging from less than 0.2 kg N ha−1 year−1 in remote areas of the Scottish Highlands to over 100 kg N ha−1 year−1 in areas with intensive poultry farming. Scotland can be divided loosely into upland and lowland areas, with NH3 emission being less than and more than 5 kg N ha−1 year−1, respectively.Many semi-natural ecosystems in Scotland are vulnerable to nitrogen deposition, including bogs, moorlands, and the woodland ground flora. Because NH3 emissions occur in the rural environment, the local deposition to sensitive ecosystems may be large, making it essential to assess the spatial distribution of NH3 emissions and deposition. A spatial model is applied here to map NH3 emissions and these estimates are applied in atmospheric dispersion and deposition models to estimate atmospheric concentrations of NH3 and NH4+, dry deposition of NH3, and wet deposition of NHx. Although there is a high level of local variability, modelled NH3 concentrations show good agreement with the National Ammonia Monitoring Network, while wet deposition is largest at high altitude sites in the south and west of Scotland. Comparison of the modelled NHx deposition fields with estimated thresholds for environmental effects (“critical loads”) shows that thresholds are exceeded across most of lowland Scotland and the Southern Uplands. Only in the cleanest parts of the north and west is nitrogen deposition not a cause for concern. Given that the most intense effects occur within a few kilometres of sources, it is suggested that local spatial abatement policies would be a useful complement to traditional policies that mitigate environmental effects based on emission reduction technologies.
Environmental Pollution | 2004
J.N. Cape; Y.S. Tang; N. van Dijk; L. Love; Mark A. Sutton; S.C.F. Palmer
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment | 2009
U. Skiba; Julia Drewer; Y.S. Tang; N. van Dijk; Carole Helfter; E. Nemitz; D. Famulari; J.N. Cape; S.K. Jones; Marsailidh Twigg; Mari Pihlatie; Timo Vesala; Klaus Steenberg Larsen; Mette S. Carter; Per Ambus; Andreas Ibrom; C. Beier; A. Hensen; A. Frumau; J.W. Erisman; Nicolas Brüggemann; Rainer Gasche; Klaus Butterbach-Bahl; Albrecht Neftel; C. Spirig; László Horváth; A. Freibauer; Pierre Cellier; Patricia Laville; Benjamin Loubet
Journal of Ecology | 2005
Ruth J. Mitchell; A.M. Truscot; Ian D. Leith; J.N. Cape; N. van Dijk; Y.S. Tang; D. Fowler; Mark A. Sutton
Archive | 2004
Sutton; C.E.R. Pitcairn; Clare Whitfield; Ian D. Leith; Lucy J. Sheppard; N. van Dijk; Sim Tang; U. Skiba; Simon M. Smart; Ruth J. Mitchell; P. Wolsley; Peter W. James; W. Purvis; D. Fowler
Functional Ecology | 2004
R. J. Mitchell; Mark A. Sutton; A.‐M. Truscott; Ian D. Leith; J.N. Cape; C.E.R. Pitcairn; N. van Dijk
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment | 2009
Y.S. Tang; I. Simmons; N. van Dijk; C. Di Marco; E. Nemitz; Ulrich Dämmgen; K. Gilke; Vesna Djuricic; Sonja Vidic; Z. Gliha; D. Borovecki; M. Mitosinkova; J.E. Hanssen; T.H. Uggerud; M. J. Sanz; P. Sanz; J.V. Chorda; Christophe Flechard; Yannick Fauvel; Martin Ferm; C. Perrino; Mark A. Sutton
Water, Air, & Soil Pollution: Focus | 2004
Lucy J. Sheppard; Alan Crossley; Ian D. Leith; K.J. Hargreaves; J.A. Carfrae; N. van Dijk; J.N. Cape; Darren Sleep; D. Fowler; John A. Raven