N. Xiros

Combination chemotherapy with gemcitabine and ifosfamide as second-line treatment in metastatic urothelial cancer. A phase II trial conducted by the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group

PURPOSE The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination of gemcitabine and ifosfamide as a second-line treatment for advanced urothelial cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Thirty-four patients with metastatic urothelial cancer previously treated with cisplatin (CDDP)/ carboplatin (CBDCA) and/or taxanes-based chemotherapy were studied. Gemcitabine was administered at a dose of 800 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 and ifosfamide at a dose of 2 g/m2 on days 1 and 8 with adequate amount of Mesna. every three weeks. Hematopoietic growth factors were given between days 3 to 5 and 12 to 16 to maintain the treatment schedule. RESULTS On an intent to treat basis, there was one complete response (CR) (3%) (95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0% to 10%) and six partial responses (PR) (18%) (95% CI: 7% to 34%). inducing an objective response rate (RR) of 21% (95% CI: 9% to 38%); 12 (35%) patients achieved a stable disease (SD) and 15 (44%) a progressive disease (PD). The median time to tumor progression (TTP) was four months (range, 0.52 to 21.6 months) and the median survival nine months (range 0.52 to 28 months). This regimen also provided the opportunity for symptomatic improvement of pain, dysuria, haematuria and leg oedema. Grade 3-4 neutropenia was experienced by 9 (27%) patients, grade 3 4 anemia by 6 (18%) and grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia by 4 (12%). Six patients were hospitalized due to febrile neutropenia. Despite the prophylactic use of hematopoietic growth factors, 8 (23.5%) patients required dose reduction due to myelosuppression. Grade 3 alopecia occurred in 14 (41%) patients, grade 3-4 nausea in 1 (3%), grade 2 fever in 3 (9%), grade 2-3 diarrhea in 2 ( 6%) and grade 2 allergic reaction in 1 (3%). CONCLUSION We conclude that the combination of gemcitabine and ifosfamide is an active salvage regimen for the treatment of urothelial cancer and that the treatment also has a tolerable toxicity profile; it warrants further investigation in combination with CDDP in chemotherapy-naïve patients.

Monoclonal gammopathies in B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphomas

The association of monoclonal gammopathy (MG) with B-cell non-Hodgkins lymphomas (NHL) is a well known phenomenon. The aim of the present work was to study the incidence, type of monoclonal component and prognostic significance of MG in a population of 255 cases with B-cell NHL. Among 255 evaluable patients with B-cell NHL, 145 were males and 110 females with a median age of 58 years (range 18-85). There were 166 patients with the various subtypes of aggressive (intermediate/high grade) NHL and 89 with the various subtypes of low risk. MG was detected in 44 patients (17.2%) with a median age of 61 years (range 23-79). There were 22 cases (8.6%) with IgG type (IgG/(k) 15, IgG/(lambda) 7), 4 cases (1.6%) with (IgA/(k) 3, IgA/(lambda) 1) and 18 cases (7.0%) with IgM (IgM/(k) 12 IgM/(lambda) 6). MG was found in 15.6% of the patients with aggressive NHL, while in low risk NHL the incidence was 20.2% (N.S.). The type of MG according to histological classification was as follows: Aggressive NHL: IgG 17 cases, IgA 2 cases, IgM 7 cases: low risk NHL: IgG 5 cases, IgA 2 cases, IgM 11 cases. The distribution of MG according to stage of the disease was as follows: stage I (4.5%), stage II (18%), stage III (6.8%) and stage IV (70.4%). The median survival of patients with aggressive NHL with MG was 17 months compared to 40 months of those without (P=0.22). Similarly the median survival of patients with low risk NHL and MG was 51.5 months compared to 38.5 months of those without (P=0.90). In conclusion MG was detected in 17.2% of cases with B-cell NHL. IgG-MG was more frequent in cases with aggressive NHL, while IgM in cases with low risk NHL. MG was mostly associated with advanced stage and had not any prognostic significance on survival.

Ceop-21 Versus Ceop-14 Chemotherapy With or Without Rituximab for the First-line Treatment of Patients With Aggressive Lymphomas: Results of the He22a99 Trial of the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group

Background:In this study we investigated whether administering CEOP (cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, vincristine [Oncovin], and prednisone) every 2 weeks (CEOP-14) instead of every 3 weeks (the standard CEOP-21 regimen) improves outcomes in patients with previously untreated aggressive lymphomas. In a secondary analysis we evaluated the impact of adding rituximab to CEOP-14/CEOP-21 chemotherapy. Study Design:The trial opened in March 1999, and patients were randomly assigned to either CEOP-14 or CEOP-21. All patients enrolled from May 2002 onward received rituximab with each chemotherapy cycle, and those attaining a complete response received rituximab consolidation. Results:Complete and overall response rates in the CEOP-21 ± rituximab (N = 114) and CEOP-14 ± rituximab (N = 103) arms were similar, as were the overall survival (P = 0.769) and time to progression distributions (P = 0.969). Rituximab was shown to have a beneficial effect both on the overall survival and on the time to progression. Conclusions:Thus far, no significant improvement in outcome has been demonstrated with CEOP-14 ± rituximab versus CEOP-21 ± rituximab. However, with addition of rituximab to CEOP-21/CEOP-14, significant improvements in time to progression and overall survival were achieved.

Mitoxantrone Plus Vinorelbine in Pretreated Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer

Abstract Vinorelbine and mitoxantrone have both been demonstrated to have significant antitumor activity in patients with breast cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination as second or third line treatment in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Fifty-one previously treated patients with MBC were enrolled from October 2001 to May 2004 and 48 were eligible for evaluation. Median age was 59 years (range 33-82) and ECOG performance status was ≤2. Distant sites of metastasis were as follows: liver 64%, bone 49%, lung 36%, lymph nodes 6%, skin 4%, brain 2% and other sites 6%. All patients received vinorelbine 20 mg/m2, D1+8 and mitoxantrone 10 mg/m2 D8 every 21 days for 6 cycles. All eligible patients were analyzed for toxicity and response. Two patients (4%) achieved complete response and 12 (25.5%) partial response. The objective overall response rate was 29.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 17 - 45), 9 (19%) patients had stable disease, 17 (36%) had progressive disease and 7 (15%) were non-evaluable. After a median follow up of 18 months, overall survival was 13 months (range 0.8 - 38+) and median time to disease progression was 5 months (range 1 - 32). A total of 280 cycles was delivered. The relative dose intensities of mitoxantrone and vinorelbine were 79% and 77%, respectively. Toxicities (grade III-IV) were as follows: leukopenia 18 (38%), neutropenia 21 (45%), thrombocytopenia 1 (2%), anemia 4 (8.5%), alopecia 2 (4%) and constipation 1 (2%). Febrile neutropenia was recorded in one patient. There were no treatment related deaths. The combination of mitoxantrone and vinorelbine is an effective regimen with manageable toxicity in pretreated patients with advanced breast cancer.

Combination docetaxel (Taxotere), fluorouracil, and leucovorin (TFL), as first-line chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer: a Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group phase II study

BackgroundWe assessed the efficacy and safety profile of a docetaxel (Taxotere; Sanofi-Aventis, France), fluorouracil (FU), and leucovorin (LV) combination (TFL), as first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer.MethodsFifty-eight patients with advanced gastric cancer were entered in this phase II study. The chemotherapy regimen (TFL) was administered in an outpatient setting as follows: docetaxel 7mg/m2 on day 1 and FU 50mg/m2 and LV 30mg/m2 on days 1 to 3, every 3 weeks for six cycles.ResultsOn an intent-to-treat basis, 4 complete (7%) and 11 partial responses (19%) were observed, with an objective overall response rate of 26%; in addition, 22 patients (38%) had stable and 15 (26%) had progressive disease. For 6 (10%) patients, response could not be evaluated. Responses were noted at all metastatic sites. With a median follow-up of 55 months, median survival was 9 months; median time to progression, 5.9 months; and median duration of response, 10 months. Toxicity was manageable and no toxic death was reported. Neutropenia was the most frequent severe toxicity and occurred in 30% of the patients. The main non-hematologic toxicities were alopecia (76%), diarrhea (30%), and stomatitis (30%).ConclusionThe results of this phase II study seem to indicate that the TFL regimen has moderate activity in patients with advanced gastric cancer, with acceptable toxicity.

Treatment of intermediate and advanced stage Hodgkin's disease with modified baseline BEACOPP regimen: a Hellenic Co-operative Oncology Group Study

Abstract: The purpose of this prospective phase II trial was to investigate the safety and efficacy of a modified baseline BEACOPP (bleomycin, etoposide, adriamycin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone) regimen in the treatment of intermediate and advanced stage Hodgkins disease (HD). From October 1997 to November 2001, 51 consecutive, previously untreated patients with stage IIA (bulky), IIB, III, and IV disease were treated with a modified baseline BEACOPP regimen with the etoposide administered i.v. on day 1 and orally at a dose of 100 mg/m2, on days 2 and 3. Each patient was scheduled to receive eight courses of BEACOPP with consolidation radiotherapy to bulky (≥5 cm) or residual disease. There were 25 males and 26 females with a median age of 32 yr (16–65 yr); 80.3% of the patients had nodular sclerosis HD, 41% had bulky disease (≥5 cm), 10 were in stage IIA (bulky ≥10 cm), 15 in stage IIB, 19 in stage III, and seven in stage IV. Thirty‐seven patients (72.5%) achieved a complete response and 17.6% partial response. No significant difference in overall response rate was observed between patients with: (i) 0–2 vs. ≥3 negative prognostic factors, (ii) in stage II vs. stages III/IV, LDH level, and bulky disease. With a median follow up period of 39.5 months, actuarial 3‐yr survival rate is 82% and time to progression rate 72.5%. Treatment with this combination was well tolerated. Grades 3 and 4 leukopenia and neutropenia occured in 26% and 28% of the patients, respectively, whereas in 16.3% of the patients infection was observed. Support with granulocyte colony‐stimulating factor was given to 59% of the patients. No case of secondary MDS/leukemia has been observed. The results of the present study demonstrate that the modified baseline BEACOPP regimen with radiotherapy used in our patients was well tolerated and effective therapy for intermediate and advanced stage HD. Further follow up time is required to evaluate long‐term toxicity.

DCC and TS protein expression in resected gastric cancer: A Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group Study

There is a high risk of relapse after resection of gastric cancer. We studied the prognostic significance of the deleted colorectal cancer (DCC) gene and thymidylate synthase (TS) protein expression after resection of gastric cancer. Protein expression in the primary tumor of 146 patients with serosal and/or lymph node involvement was studied immunohistochemically by using anti-DCC and anti-TS monoclonal antibodies. DCC expression was found in 69.9%, while low TS staining intensity (0+,1+) and focal staining (<25% of tumor cells stained) were found in 44.6% and 33.8%, respectively. Overall survival (OS) was significantly longer in patients with DCC (p=0.014) negative tumors. TS expression was not an independent prognostic factor. Lack of DCC expression was associated with significantly longer cause-specific survival (CSS) (p=0.040) after curative resection. In conclusion, DCC expression is an independent prognostic factor in patients undergoing resection of gastric cancer while TS expression was not associated with the prognosis in our study.