Nadim Al-Mubarak

Immediate and Late Clinical Outcomes of Carotid Artery Stenting in Patients With Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis

Background—Carotid stenting is a less invasive percutaneous procedure than carotid endarterectomy for the treatment of carotid stenosis. Reports suggest that it can be performed with periprocedural complication rates similar to those of carotid endarterectomy. The purpose of this study was to determine short- and long-term outcomes in the largest prospective cohort of carotid stenting patients. Methods and Results—This study followed 528 consecutive patients (604 hemispheres/arteries) undergoing carotid stenting. There was a 0.6% (n=3) fatal stroke rate and 1% (n=5) nonstroke death rate at 30 days. The major stroke rate was 1% (n=6), and the minor stroke rate was 4.8% (n=29). The overall 30-day stroke and death rate was 7.4% (n=43). Over the 5-year study period, the 30-day minor stroke rate improved from 7.1% (n=7) for the first year to 3.1% (n=5) for the fifth year (P<0.05 for trend). The best predictor of 30-day stroke and death was age ≥80 years. After the 30-day period, the incidence of fatal and nonf...

Multicenter evaluation of carotid artery stenting with a filter protection system

OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of carotid artery stenting (CAS) with a filter protection system. BACKGROUND Neurologic events linked to the embolization of particulate matter to the cerebral circulation may complicate CAS. Strategies designed to capture embolic particles during carotid intervention are being evaluated for their efficacy in reducing the risk of these events. METHODS Between September 1999 and July 2001, a total of 162 patients (164 hemispheres) underwent CAS with filter protection (NeuroShield, MedNova Ltd., Galway, Ireland) according to prospective protocols evaluating the filter system at three institutions. RESULTS Angiographic success was achieved in 162 of the procedures (99%) and filter placement was successful in 154 (94%) procedures. Carotid access was unsuccessful in two cases (1%) and filter placement in eight cases (5%). Of the latter, five procedures were completed with no protection and three were completed using alternative protection devices. On an intention-to-treat basis, the overall combined 30-day rate of all-stroke and death was 2% (four events: two minor strokes and two deaths). This includes one minor stroke in a patient with failed filter placement and CAS completed without protection. There was one cardiac arrhythmic death and one death from hyperperfusion-related intracerebral hemorrhage. There were no major embolic strokes. CONCLUSIONS Carotid artery stenting with filter protection is technically feasible and safe. Early clinical outcomes appear to be favorable and need to be confirmed in a larger comparative study.

Safety, efficacy, and durability of carotid artery stenting for restenosis following carotid endarterectomy: a multicenter study.

Purpose: To present the results of a multicenter registry established to collect data on carotid stent procedures in patients with restenosis following carotid endarterectomy. Methods: The procedural details, outcomes, and late follow-up results were collected from 14 centers in the United States. Thirty-day and late stroke and death rates were analyzed. Results: Three hundred and thirty-eight patients (201 men; 71 ± 8 years) underwent carotid stenting in 358 arteries. The average duration from carotid endarterectomy was 5.5 ± 7.3 years. Sixty-one percent of the patients were asymptomatic. The overall 30-day stroke and death rate was 3.7%. The minor stroke rate was 1.7% (6/358), and the major nonfatal stroke rate was 0.8% (3/358). The fatal stroke rate was 0.3% (1/358), and the nonstroke-related death rate was 0.9% (3/338). There was 1 (0.3%) fatal and 1 (0.3%) nonfatal stroke during the follow-up period. The overall 3-year rate of freedom from all fatal and nonfatal strokes was 96% ± 1% (±SE). Conclusions: Carotid artery stenting can be performed in patients with restenosis following carotid endarterectomy with 30-day complication rates comparable to those of most published studies on repeat carotid endarterectomy. Results of late follow-up suggest that this technique is durable and efficacious.

Carotid artery stenting in patients with high neurologic risks

Forty-four patient with high neurologic risks (Mayo class IV) successfully underwent carotid artery stenting with combined major stroke and death rates of 4.5%. Late follow-up at a mean of 23 +/- 1.8 months showed 1 non-neurologic death, but no neurologic events or repeat stenting procedures.

Carotid Stenting with Distal-Balloon Protection via the Transbrachial Approach:

Purpose: To document the feasibility of brachial artery access for carotid stenting with distal-balloon protection of the internal carotid artery (ICA). Technique: Via percutaneous access to the brachial artery, a large double-curve catheter is advanced into the aortic arch over a hydrophilic guidewire to cannulate the left common carotid artery. Following sheath exchange, a GuardWire distal-protection balloon is positioned within the left ICA distal to the stenosis. The lesion is dilated, followed by deployment and dilation of a self-expanding stent. Transcranial Doppler monitoring shows only scarce microembolic signals during the procedure. Conclusions: Carotid stenting with distal balloon protection via the brachial artery appears feasible as an alternative to standard femoral access.

Embolization via collateral circulation during carotid stenting with the distal balloon protection system.

Purpose: To describe a potential route for embolization to the middle cerebral artery (MCA) during carotid stenting with the distal balloon protection system. Case Report: An 82-year-old man with symptomatic severe carotid artery stenosis underwent elective carotid stenting with distal-balloon protection. Despite complete occlusion of the distal internal carotid artery, frequent emboli were detected in the ipsilateral MCA by transcranial Doppler (TCD) during the procedure. Intracranial angiography, performed during the distal-balloon protection, revealed filling of the MCA through collaterals from the ipsilateral external carotid artery. The procedure was successfully completed without complications. The patient remains asymptomatic at 6 months. Conclusions: During carotid stenting with distal-balloon protection, asymptomatic embolization into the ipsilateral MCA may occur through collateral circulation. The clinical significance of these emboli is uncertain.

Integrated minimally invasive approaches for the treatment of atherosclerotic vascular diseases: Hybrid procedures

Patients may develop simultaneous symptoms of atherosclerotic vascular disease from different arterial beds. A concurrent minimally invasive approach to the management of these clinical situations may be an advantage over conventional surgical procedures. This study describes two separate case series of patients undergoing coronary/peripheral (n = 38) and peripheral/peripheral procedures (n = 10). Technical and clinical success was achieved in all patients. There were two periprocedural complications (retroperitoneal bleed and septicemia) in the coronary/peripheral series and no complications in the peripheral/peripheral series. We also present five case reports to illustrate the utility of hybrid procedures in various clinical settings. This study suggests that the use of simultaneous or sequential minimally invasive procedures appears to be a safe and feasible strategy for the treatment of patients with symptoms from more than one vascular bed. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent 2001;52:154–161.

Carotid stenting with distal balloon protection: technical considerations (preliminary experience)

Abstract Background and purpose: Most peri-procedural neurological events associated with carotid angioplasty and stenting are due to cerebral embolization. This study was undertaken to determine the safety and efficacy of the distal balloon protection using Guard Wire® temporary occlusion and aspiration system (PercuSurge) in patients with obstructive carotid stenosis during carotid stenting. Methods: A total of 90 patients underwent carotid artery stenting with distal balloon protection. Stenting was performed using coaxial system with 6F-90 cm sheath through femoral approach, pre-dilatation, placement of the stent and stent dilatation. Patients were pre-treated with anti-platelet medication. Results: In our more recent experience with 465 stented carotid arteries without distal protection, the complication rate was 4.5% (including two retinal emboli and two hyperperfusion syndromes). In symptomatic patients 80 years of age the complication rate was 3%. In symptomatic and asymptomatic patients >80, the complication rate was unacceptable, at 21% and 12%, respectively. With distal balloon protection, the complication rate in patients >80 decreased to 3.7%. Balloon protection placement was successful in all patients. Conclusion: The application of distal balloon protection system in carotid stenting was associated with favorable immediate and short-term outcome especially among patients >80 years of age.