Naeem Soomro

Systematic review and economic modelling of the relative clinical benefit and cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic surgery and robotic surgery for removal of the prostate in men with localised prostate cancer

BACKGROUND Complete surgical removal of the prostate, radical prostatectomy, is the most frequently used treatment option for men with localised prostate cancer. The use of laparoscopic (keyhole) and robot-assisted surgery has improved operative safety but the comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of these options remains uncertain. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to determine the relative clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of robotic radical prostatectomy compared with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in the treatment of localised prostate cancer within the UK NHS. DATA SOURCES MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, EMBASE, BIOSIS, Science Citation Index and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from January 1995 until October 2010 for primary studies. Conference abstracts from meetings of the European, American and British Urological Associations were also searched. Costs were obtained from NHS sources and the manufacturer of the robotic system. Economic model parameters and distributions not obtained in the systematic review were derived from other literature sources and an advisory expert panel. REVIEW METHODS Evidence was considered from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomised comparative studies of men with clinically localised prostate cancer (cT1 or cT2); outcome measures included adverse events, cancer related, functional, patient driven and descriptors of care. Two reviewers abstracted data and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. For meta-analyses, a Bayesian indirect mixed-treatment comparison was used. Cost-effectiveness was assessed using a discrete-event simulation model. RESULTS The searches identified 2722 potentially relevant titles and abstracts, from which 914 reports were selected for full-text eligibility screening. Of these, data were included from 19,064 patients across one RCT and 57 non-randomised comparative studies, with very few studies considered at low risk of bias. The results of this study, although associated with some uncertainty, demonstrated that the outcomes were generally better for robotic than for laparoscopic surgery for major adverse events such as blood transfusion and organ injury rates and for rate of failure to remove the cancer (positive margin) (odds ratio 0.69; 95% credible interval 0.51 to 0.96; probability outcome favours robotic prostatectomy = 0.987). The predicted probability of a positive margin was 17.6% following robotic prostatectomy compared with 23.6% for laparoscopic prostatectomy. Restriction of the meta-analysis to studies at low risk of bias did not change the direction of effect but did decrease the precision of the effect size. There was no evidence of differences in cancer-related, patient-driven or dysfunction outcomes. The results of the economic evaluation suggested that when the difference in positive margins is equivalent to the estimates in the meta-analysis of all included studies, robotic radical prostatectomy was on average associated with an incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year that is less than threshold values typically adopted by the NHS (£30,000) and becomes further reduced when the surgical capacity is high. LIMITATIONS The main limitations were the quantity and quality of the data available on cancer-related outcomes and dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrated that robotic prostatectomy had lower perioperative morbidity and a reduced risk of a positive surgical margin compared with laparoscopic prostatectomy although there was considerable uncertainty. Robotic prostatectomy will always be more costly to the NHS because of the fixed capital and maintenance charges for the robotic system. Our modelling showed that this excess cost can be reduced if capital costs of equipment are minimised and by maintaining a high case volume for each robotic system of at least 100-150 procedures per year. This finding was primarily driven by a difference in positive margin rate. There is a need for further research to establish how positive margin rates impact on long-term outcomes. FUNDING The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.

Long-term renal function in kidneys from non-heart-beating donors: A single-center experience

BACKGROUND Cadaveric kidneys from brain-stem-dead donors continue to be limited because the number of donors has reached a plateau. Wide recruitment of non-heart-beating donors (NHBD) could significantly increase the donor pool. NHBD renal transplants are underused because of the concern of poor quality graft function from such donors. In response to this perception, we reviewed 46 NHBD renal transplants performed in our center since 1998. METHODS All NHBD kidneys were machine-perfused using the Newcastle continuous-hypothermic pulsatile preservation system before transplantation. A control heart-beating-donor (HBD) group was taken as the next consecutive HBD renal transplant to the NHBD transplant. The outcome and quality of function of the groups of renal transplants were analyzed for short-term and long-term performance. RESULTS The renal transplant patients were matched for donor and recipient factors. Survival rates for allografts and patients were similar for 1 to 3 years. There was an increased incidence of delayed graft function in the NHBD renal transplants in the perioperative period. The creatinine clearance was 22.8+/-2.3 mL/minute for NHBD patients and 44.4+/-2.9 mL/minute for HBD patients at the time of discharge from hospital. This difference equalized after 3 months and the creatinine clearance for NHBD was 44.2+/-2.4 mL/minute and for HBD 49.2+/-3.4 mL/minute. CONCLUSIONS Our results for NHBD renal transplants confirm that such grafts suffer primary warm ischemic injury, shown by the increased incidence of acute tubular necrosis and consequent delayed graft function. This produced poor renal function at the time of hospital discharge. After 3 months, the renal function of NHBD cases improved to the level seen in HBD patients.

How to improve the quality of kidneys from non-heart-beating donors: a randomised controlled trial of thrombolysis in non-heart-beating donors.

Background. The growth in the prevalence of end-stage renal failure has been accompanied with a rise in the waiting list for renal transplantation, which has not been matched by an increase in the kidney donor pool. Non–heart-beating donors (NHBD) offer a potential source of kidneys that are not currently being significantly used. Cardiac arrest for a protracted period of time leads to in situ thrombosis, and, as a consequence, the discard rates for harvested kidneys is higher than brain–stem-dead donors. Methods. A double-blinded, randomised, controlled trial of streptokinase preflush or placebo for NHBD was performed. An initial 30 donors were entered into the study. After routine nephrectomy, NHBD kidneys were machine perfused as part of viability screening before transplantation. Kidneys were then transplanted within 24 hours of cardiac arrest. The primary objectives were the improvements of viability parameters (perfusion, enzyme levels, and histopathology) of the kidneys. The secondary objective was to increase the number of kidneys passing the viability tests and thus transplanted. Results. The two groups of NHBD donors and their kidneys were similar in their descriptive epidemiologic characteristics. The NHBD kidneys from the streptokinase-treated donors had a better appearance at procurement (P <0.001) and performed better during machine preservation (P <0.001). Enzyme biomarkers present in the kidney perfusate were all significantly reduced by the use of streptokinase. These included glutathione S-transferase (P <0.001), fatty acid binding protein (P <0.001), and alanine aminopeptidase (P <0.001). However, although there was a higher proportion of kidneys transplanted through the use of streptokinase (63.6% with streptokinase vs. 42.6% with placebo), this did not achieve significance. There was no difference with respect to postoperative bleeding and transfusion requirements in the recipient whether streptokinase preflush or placebo was used. Conclusion. This study using streptokinase preflush in the NHBD was found to improve the condition of the kidneys retrieved. The improvement in the quality of the donor kidneys was not associated with an increased morbidity in the recipient.

Prospective study comparing three-dimensional computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for evaluating the renal vascular anatomy in potential living renal donors

To prospectively compare the accuracy of multislice spiral computed tomographic angiography (CTA) and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) in evaluating the renal vascular anatomy in potential living renal donors.

Comparison of laparoscopic and open donor nephrectomy: UK experience.

A comparison of laparoscopic and open donor nephrectomy is presented by authors from the UK. They found that the laparoscopic approach could safely be offered to patients treated in experienced units and after adequate training fo the surgeon, with no increase in complications or decrease in efficacy.

A CROSSOVER RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF TRANSCUTANEOUS ELECTRICAL NERVE STIMULATION AND OXYBUTYNIN IN PATIENTS WITH DETRUSOR INSTABILITY

PURPOSE Management of idiopathic detrusor instability is difficult in most patients mainly due to the lack of a complete understanding of the pathophysiology. Oxybutynin and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation have been used but to our knowledge no direct comparisons have been made. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with frequency, urgency, urge incontinence and proved detrusor instability were studied with urodynamics, quality of life instruments, and frequency and volume charts. Patients were randomized to transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation or oxybutynin. After 6 weeks of treatment, they were reassessed and after a washout of 2 weeks, they were started on the second arm of treatment and reassessed 6 weeks later. RESULTS A total of 13 male and 30 female patients were studied. Functional capacity had increased and number of voids daily had decreased significantly compared with before treatment in both arms (p <0.005). There were significant improvements in symptom specific quality of life measures but no changes were found on the global Short Form 36 (SF-36) quality of life questionnaire. The volume to first desire to void and first unstable contraction had increased significantly with oxybutynin but not with transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation. Of 23 patients 7 were stabilized with treatment, including 2 with oxybutynin only, 2 with either nerve stimulation or oxybutynin and the remaining 3 with only nerve stimulation. Total bladder capacity did not change significantly with either treatment but patients noticed side effects more commonly with oxybutynin. CONCLUSIONS Both treatments clearly improved subjective parameters. However, only oxybutynin showed significant improvements in objective urodynamic parameters. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation can be used in patients who cannot take oxybutynin. Further studies are needed to show the long-term efficacy and cost analyses of nerve stimulation.

Evaluation of the ischemic protection efficacy of a laparoscopic renal cooling device using renal transplantation viability assessment criteria in a porcine model.

PURPOSE We assessed the efficacy of a prototype laparoscopic topical cooling device. The aim of regional renal hypothermia in laparoscopic surgery is to limit ischemic injury and extend safe operative time. A reliable model for assessing renal ischemic injury exists in the field of nonheart beating donor renal transplantation. Hypothermic machine perfusion allows calculation of the pressure flow index and measurement of glutathione S-transferase in the perfusate. These parameters allow accurate assessment of the extent of renal damage. MATERIALS AND METHODS The device incorporates a 2-layer cooling bag and coolant circuit. The system achieves hypothermia by circulating coolant across the surface of the kidney. Using 10 pigs individual kidneys were subjected to periods of renal ischemia with or without device in situ cooling. Each kidney was then machine perfused and assessed using nonheart beating donor viability criteria. RESULTS The best performance of the device achieved a renal parenchymal temperature of 15C in 11.2 minutes (mean +/- SD 21.4 +/- 8.42). In the warm ischemia groups significant deterioration of pressure flow index compared to controls occurred by 60 minutes (p = 0.0001). In cooled kidneys at 60 minutes the mean pressure flow index was not significantly different from that in controls. Greater mean glutathione S-transferase measurements were associated with the warm ischemia groups. CONCLUSIONS Our study reinforces the efficacy of topical renal cooling in the laparoscopic setting. We report the use of assessment techniques capable of accurate quantitative measurement of renal injury in an animal model. Our cooling device is currently undergoing further development to enhance its efficiency.

Accuracy of the revised 2010 TNM classification in predicting the prognosis of patients treated for renal cell cancer in the north east of England

Background The TNM classification for renal cell cancer (RCC) should accurately predict and assign prognostic information for patients. In this study the recent 2010 revision to the TNM classification was compared with the previous 2002 classification with regard to survival outcomes. Methods All patients having radical nephrectomy for RCC in the 5-year period 2004–8 at a tertiary referral centre were included. Pathological and radiological records were reviewed to identify TNM stage (2002 and 2010 classification) and survival data were captured. Results 345 patients with RCC were identified. Based on the 2002 TNM staging system and using outcomes in T1 staged tumours as a baseline, statistically significant differences in disease-specific survival were noted between patients with T1 and T3b tumours (log rank p<0.001) but not between those with T1 and T3a tumours (p=0.33). However, when tumour stage was reassigned according to the 2010 classification, patients with T3a tumours were also found to do statistically worse than T1 staged disease (p<0.001). Conclusion In our cohort, the new 2010 TNM reclassification of T3 tumours showed better correlation with predicting worsening outcomes compared with localised disease.

The effect of inadequate in situ perfusion in the non heart-beating donor

In situ aortic perfusion in the nonheart‐beating donors (NHBD) is an important procedure to reduce primary warm ischaemic injury prior to formal donor organ retrieval. It allows an interim period to obtain donor family consent and theatre preparation. This study describes our experience of inadequate aortic perfusions resulting from difficult aortic cannulations and associated adverse outcome despite reasonable viability tests. Since 1998, all NHBD in our institution are perfused in situ using a double balloon triple lumen (DBTL) catheter inserted through a femoral artery cut‐down procedure. The DBTL catheter is positioned with distal occlusive balloon at the aortic bifurcation using the ‘pull‐back’ technique, the proximal occlusive balloon lies above the renal arteries. This provides selective aortic perfusion in particular the kidneys. Venous decompression using a femoral vein catheter enables a ‘two‐way infusion system’. Pre‐transplant viability status of retrieved kidneys is determined by measuring pressure/resistance characteristics to the flow and biochemical markers for ischaemic injury. There were 90 NHBD renal transplants performed from 72 donors. Three renal transplants were carried out from three donors of ineffective in situ perfusion secondary to cannulation difficulties. Femoral cannulation was difficult as a result of extensive atherosclerosis of donor vessels. The comparison of allograft outcome from effective and ineffective in situ perfusion of donors showed high rate of primary nonfunction (PNF) from ineffective perfusion (chi‐squared, P < 0.0001). The cases demonstrated poor outcome from ineffective perfusion related to the cannulation difficulties. Therefore a strict policy should be taken in cases where aortic cannulation and perfusion is inadequate, despite pretransplant assessment. In these circumstances, the primary warm ischaemia time should be extended to include this period of ineffective perfusion.

Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in Cadaveric Nonheart Beating, Cadaveric Heart Beating and Live Donor Renal Transplants

PURPOSE Ischemia-reperfusion injury is gaining importance in transplantation as being responsible for allograft dysfunction. Ischemia occurs during kidney procurement, which is shortest in LDs, and prolonged in cadaveric HBDs and NHBDs. MATERIALS AND METHODS Renal transplants from 17 LDs, 15 HBDs and 19 NHBDs were assessed during reperfusion for biochemical markers of ischemia-reperfusion injury and assessed clinically. Central venous blood sampling was assayed for free radicals using electron spin resonance and tissue injury biomarkers, namely lactate dehydrogenase, fatty acid binding protein, alanine aminopeptidase, lactate and total antioxidants. RESULTS The return to stable renal function was more rapid in LD renal transplants, while recovery continued from 3 months after hospital discharge in NHBD renal transplants. Injury markers, such as lactate dehydrogenase, fatty acid binding protein, alanine aminopeptidase and lactate, were raised at the time of reperfusion, especially in NHBD renal transplants. Free radical release measured by electron spin resonance showed 2 phase release, that is early (0 to 10-minute) and late (20 to 40-minute) release. In NHBD, HBD and LD renal transplants the index of free radical release in the early phase was 1.43, 1.36 and 1.20, and in the late phase it was 1.43, 1.38 and 0.97, respectively (each ANOVA p <0.05). CONCLUSIONS NHBD renal transplants were accompanied by a greater release of free radicals at reperfusion (NHBD > HBD > LD), which was associated with an increase in tissue injury markers at reperfusion. This was reflected in a slower return to stable renal function in NHBD compared to HBD and LD renal transplants.