Nancy E. Clarke
Acadia University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Nancy E. Clarke.
Discrete Mathematics | 2012
Nancy E. Clarke; Gary MacGillivray
We give two characterizations of the graphs on which k cops have a winning strategy in the game of Cops and Robber. One of these is in terms of an order relation, and one is in terms of a vertex ordering. Both generalize characterizations known for the case k=1.
Discrete Mathematics | 2005
Nancy E. Clarke; Richard J. Nowakowski
In this version of the Cops and Robber game, the cops move in tandems, or pairs, such that they are at distance at most one after every move. We present a recognition theorem for tandem-win graphs, and a characterization of triangle-free tandem-win graphs.
Graphs and Combinatorics | 2014
Nancy E. Clarke; Samuel Fiorini; Gwenaël Joret; Dirk Oliver Theis
We consider the two-player, complete information game of Cops and Robber played on undirected, finite, reflexive graphs. A number of cops and one robber are positioned on vertices and take turns in sliding along edges. The cops win if, after a move, a cop and the robber are on the same vertex. The minimum number of cops needed to catch the robber on a graph is called the cop number of that graph. Let c(g) be the supremum over all cop numbers of graphs embeddable in a closed orientable surface of genus g, and likewise
Discussiones Mathematicae Graph Theory | 2005
Nancy E. Clarke; Richard J. Nowakowski
Ars Mathematica Contemporanea | 2013
Nancy E. Clarke; Stephen Finbow; Gary MacGillivray
{\tilde c(g)}
Discrete Mathematics | 2010
Nancy E. Clarke; Shannon L. Fitzpatrick; A. Hill; Richard J. Nowakowski
Discrete Applied Mathematics | 2016
Nancy E. Clarke; Stephen Finbow; Shannon L. Fitzpatrick; Margaret-Ellen Messinger; Rebecca Milley; Richard J. Nowakowski
for non-orientable surfaces. It is known (Andreae, 1986) that, for a fixed surface, the maximum over all cop numbers of graphs embeddable in this surface is finite. More precisely, Quilliot (1985) showed that c(g) ≤ 2g + 3, and Schröder (2001) sharpened this to
Discrete Mathematics | 2017
Nancy E. Clarke; Robert P. Gallant
Archive | 2002
Nancy E. Clarke
{c(g)\le \frac32g + 3}
Discrete Mathematics | 2009
Nancy E. Clarke