Naohiro Nishiyama

Data integration of non-animal tests for the development of a test battery to predict the skin sensitizing potential and potency of chemicals.

Recent changes in regulatory restrictions and social views against animal testing have accelerated development of reliable alternative tests for predicting skin sensitizing potential and potency of many chemicals. Lately, a test battery integrated with different in vitro tests has been suggested as a better approach than just one in vitro test for replacing animal tests. In this study, we created a dataset of 101 test chemicals with LLNA, human cell line activation test (h-CLAT), direct peptide reactivity assay (DPRA) and in silico prediction system. The results of these tests were converted into scores of 0-2 and the sum of individual scores provided the accuracy of 85% and 71% for the potential and potency prediction, compared with LLNA. Likewise, the straightforward tiered system of h-CLAT and DPRA provided the accuracy of 86% and 73%. Additionally, the tiered system showed a higher sensitivity (96%) compared with h-CLAT alone, indicating that sensitizers would be detected with higher reliability in the tiered system. Our data not only demonstrates that h-CLAT can be part of a test battery with other methods but also supports the practical utility of a tiered system when h-CLAT and DPRA are the first screening methods for skin sensitization.

Biodegradation of alkyltrimethylammonium salts in activated sludge

Trimethylamine, dimethylamine and methylamine (actually existing as a salt form in the culture medium) were identified as the intermediates of alkyltrimethylammonium salts in activated sludge obtained from a municipal sewage treatment plant. It was considered that the quaternary ammonium salts with long alkyl chains were degraded to tertiary amine by N-dealkylation at the first stage of the biodegradation pathway. The tertiary amine formed in this pathway rapidly disappeared. In the activated sludge, biodegradabilities based on biochemical oxygen consumption and dissolved organic matter were 7.2-53.7% and 97.4-100%, respectively. These results and the disappearance of intermediates as described above indicate that long chain alkyltrimethylammonium salts are ultimately biodegradable.

Development of the short time exposure (STE) test: an in vitro eye irritation test using SIRC cells.

Using SIRC (rabbit corneal cell line) cells, we developed an alternative eye irritation test: the short time exposure (STE) test. This STE test is a cytotoxicity test using physiological saline or mineral oil as the test solvent. Evaluation exposure time is short (5 min), which is similar to actual exposure situations, and uses the cell viability (CV) at a constant concentration as the endpoint for irritation potential. First, in order to confirm the usefulness of this STE test in assessing eye irritation potential of chemicals, 51 raw materials were tested and the correlation between CV in the STE test and the eye irritation score in the Draize test was examined. For the undiluted raw materials tested in the Draize test, the 5% test concentration in the STE test gave irritation classes that correlated well with the irritation classes from the Draize test (accuracy: 89.6%). For those materials tested as a 10% solution in the Draize test, STE irritation classes with 0.05% test concentration corresponded well with the Draize irritation classes (accuracy: 80.0%). Next, using the cell viabilities at these two concentrations, the STE prediction model (PM) was developed. A score of 1 or 2 was given for the results from each tested concentration in the STE test and Draize test. The scores from each test were then summed to yield a 3-level (Rank 1: minimally irritant, Rank 2: moderate irritant, Rank 3: severe irritant) eye irritation potential classification. Rank classification in the STE test showed a good correlation mostly to that in the Draize test (irritation class correspondence rate: 70.2%, but after exclusion of data of alcoholic materials, the rate was 91.7%). In most cytotoxicity test, the cytotoxicity of acids and amines is generally underestimated due the use of medium as the solvent. This is the result of the buffering capacity of the media. On the other hand, the STE test could predict the eye irritation potential by evaluating the chemical with a 5% test concentration. Eleven water insoluble materials such as toluene, octanol, and hexanol could be evaluated by using mineral oil as test solvent in the STE test. The STE test demonstrated itself to be simple, promising, have great potential, be of value, and to be an easily standardized alternative eye irritation test.

Prediction of skin sensitization potency of chemicals by human Cell Line Activation Test (h-CLAT) and an attempt at classifying skin sensitization potency.

The human Cell Line Activation Test (h-CLAT), an in vitro skin sensitization test, is based on the augmentation of CD86 and CD54 expression in THP-1 cells following exposure to chemicals. The h-CLAT was found to be capable of determining the hazard of skin sensitization. In contrast, the local lymph node assay (LLNA), widely used as a stand-alone method in Europe and US, identifies the same hazard, but also classifies the potency by using the estimated concentration of SI=3 (EC3). In this study, several values calculated from the h-CLAT data were evaluated for its correlation to the LLNA EC3 determination. A statistically significant correlation was observed between h-CLAT concentration providing a cell viability of 75% (CV75), h-CLAT estimated concentration of RFI=150 for CD86 (EC150), and for CD54 (EC200) with LLNAs EC3. From EC150 and EC200, a minimum induction threshold (MIT) was determined as the smaller of either EC150 or EC200. MIT showed a correlation with EC3 (R=0.638). Also, MIT had an approximate 80% accuracy for sub-categories of the globally harmonized system (GHS) when a tentative threshold of 13 μg/mL was used. From these data, the h-CLAT values may be one of the useful tools to predict the allergic potency of chemicals.

Genotoxicity studies on green tea catechin.

The beneficial effects of tea catechins are well documented. We evaluated the genotoxic potential of a green tea catechin preparation using established genotoxicity assays, including a bacterial reverse mutation assay (Ames test), a chromosomal aberration assay in cultured Chinese hamster lung cells (CHL/IU), a mouse lymphoma L5178Y/tk assay, and a bone marrow micronucleus (MN) assay in ICR CD mice and SD rats. No significant increases in the number of revertant colonies were observed in the Ames test, but positive responses were observed in two in vitro assays: the chromosomal aberration assay and mouse lymphoma L5178/tk assay. However, the in vivo study demonstrated no significant increase in micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes (MNPCE) in the bone marrow of both ICR CD mice and SD rats administered a high dose of the green tea catechin preparation up to 2000mg/kg. Combined with favorable epidemiological information suggesting a chemopreventive effect of tea catechins on carcinogenesis, we conclude that green tea catechin presents no significant genotoxic concern under the anticipated conditions of use. These results are consistent with other genotoxicity studies of tea catechins, which show minimal, if any, genotoxic potential.

Predictive performance for human skin sensitizing potential of the human cell line activation test (h-CLAT)

Background. Recent changes in regulatory restrictions and social opposition to animal toxicology experiments have driven the need for reliable in vitro tests for predicting the skin sensitizing potentials of a wide variety of industrial chemicals. Previously, we developed the human cell line activation test (h‐CLAT) as a cell‐based assay to predict the skin sensitizing potential of chemicals, and showed the correspondence between the h‐CLAT and the murine local lymph node assay results.

The Short Time Exposure (STE) test for predicting eye irritation potential: intra-laboratory reproducibility and correspondence to globally harmonized system (GHS) and EU eye irritation classification for 109 chemicals.

Short Time Exposure (STE) test is an easy in vitro eye irritation test that assesses cytotoxicity in SIRC cells (rabbit corneal cell line) following a 5 min dose treatment. To assess intra-laboratory reproducibility, medium control, three vehicles (saline, saline containing 5% (w/w) dimethyl sulfoxide, and mineral oil) and three standard chemicals (sodium lauryl sulfate, calcium thioglycolate, and Tween 80) were evaluated. Assessments were repeated 30 times for vehicles and 18 times for standard chemicals; resulting in almost the same cell viability and a low coefficient of variation value. In addition, the STE eye irritation rankings of three standard chemicals, as calculated on the cell viabilities in 5% and 0.05% solutions were in agreement in all tests. Based on these results, high intra-laboratory reproducibility was confirmed. In addition, the irritation category (irritant and non-irritant) was evaluated for 109 chemicals with STE test, globally harmonized system (GHS) classification, and European Union (EU) classification. The results of the evaluation found the STE classification to have an accuracy with GHS classification of 87% and with EU classification of 83%, which confirmed the excellent correspondence. The correspondence of STE rankings (1, 2, and 3) based on the prediction model by STE test with the eye irritation rankings by GHS (non-irritant, categories 2 and 1) and EU (non-irritant, R36, and R41) was 76% and 71%, respectively. Based on the above results, STE test was considered to be a promising alternative method for assessing eye irritation that has high intra-laboratory reproducibility as well as an excellent predictability of eye irritation.

Development of a new in vitro skin sensitization assay (Epidermal Sensitization Assay; EpiSensA) using reconstructed human epidermis.

Recent changes in regulatory requirements and social views on animal testing have accelerated the development of reliable alternative tests for predicting skin sensitizing potential of chemicals. In this study, we aimed to develop a new in vitro skin sensitization assay using reconstructed human epidermis, RhE model, which is expected to have broader applicability domain rather than existing in vitro assays. Microarray analysis revealed that the expression of five genes (ATF3, DNAJB4, GCLM, HSPA6 and HSPH1) related to cellular stress response were significantly up-regulated in RhE model after 6h treatment with representative skin sensitizers, 1-fluoro-2,4-dinitrobenzene and oxazolone, but not a non-sensitizer, benzalkonium chloride. The predictive performance of five genes was examined with eight skin sensitizers (e.g., cinnamic aldehyde), four non-sensitizers (e.g., sodium lauryl sulfate) and four pre-/pro-haptens (e.g., p-phenylenediamine, isoeugenol). When the positive criteria were set to obtain the highest accuracy with the animal testing (LLNA), ATF3, DNAJB4 and GCLM exhibited a high predictive accuracy (100%, 93.8% and 87.5%, respectively). All tested pre-/pro-haptens were correctly predicted by both ATF3 and DNAJB4. These results suggested that the RhE-based assay, termed epidermal sensitization assay (EpiSensA), could be an useful skin sensitization assay with a broad applicability domain including pre-/pro-haptens.

Two-stage bottom-up tiered approach combining several alternatives for identification of eye irritation potential of chemicals including insoluble or volatile substances.

For the assessment of eye irritation, one alternative test may not completely replace the rabbit Draize test. In the present study, we examined the predictive potential of a tiered approach analyzing the results from several alternatives (i.e., the Short Time Exposure (STE) test, the EpiOcular assay, the Hens Egg Test-Chorioallantoic Membrane (HET-CAM) assay and the Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability (BCOP) assay) for assessing Globally Harmonized System (GHS) eye irritation categories. Fifty-six chemicals including alcohols, surfactants, and esters were selected with a balanced GHS category and a wide range of chemical classes. From a standpoint of both assessable sample numbers and predictive accuracy, the more favorable tiered approach was considered to be the two-stage bottom-up tiered approach combining the STE test, the EpiOcular assay followed by the BCOP assay (accuracy 69.6%, under prediction rate 8.9%). Moreover, a more favorable predictive capacity (accuracy 71.4%, under prediction rate 3.6%) was obtained when high volatile alcohols/esters with vapor pressures >6 kilopascal (kPa) at 25°C were evaluated with EpiOcular assay instead of the STE test. From these results, the two-stage bottom-up tiered approach combining the STE test, the EpiOcular assay followed by the BCOP assay might be a promising method for the classification of GHS eye irritation category (Not classified (NC), Category 2 (Cat. 2), and Category 1 (Cat. 1)) for a wide range of test chemicals regardless of solubility.

Involvement of hydrogen peroxide in chromosomal aberrations induced by green tea catechins in vitro and implications for risk assessment.

Catechins, which are polyphenol compounds found in abundance in green tea, have elicited high interest due to their beneficial effects on health. Catechins have also been demonstrated to induce chromosomal aberrations in vitro, although no clastogenicity was confirmed in studies in vivo. We investigated the mechanism of catechin-induced chromosomal aberrations in CHL/IU cells. Addition of catalase suppressed chromosomal aberrations, indicating involvement of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). We confirmed that substantial amounts of H2O2 are generated when catechins are incubated under in vitro culture conditions, whereas, interestingly, extremely low amounts of H2O2 were detected when catechins were incubated at the same concentration in water. Generation of H2O2 increased steeply above pH 6, indicating that pH is a key factor in determining how much H2O2 is generated via catechins in vitro. Our assessment indicates that humans have practically non-existent exposure to H2O2 when catechins are ingested in a beverage. Polyphenols, including catechins, are known to act as antioxidants due to their reducing potential. However, under in vitro culture conditions, catechins are thought to act primarily as pro-oxidants by reducing ambient or dissolved oxygen to form H2O2. Based on the above observations, we conclude that in vitro culture conditions as currently employed are inappropriate to address genotoxicity concerns regarding polyphenols, including catechins.