Naomi R. Boyer

Rapid conversion of an IT degree program to online delivery: impact, problems, solutions and challenges

At our institution, online delivery was initially seen as a way to extend the geographic reach of a specialized upper-division degree program, the Bachelor of Science in Applied Sciences (BSAS), targeting holders of community college Associates in Science (AS) degrees, with the hoped-for impact of increasing enrollment. This program shared many required courses with our flagship program, the BS in Information Technology (BSIT), including the upper-division entry point for both programs, CGS3303 IT Concepts. Implementing this course in an asynchronous online mode resulted in an increase in enrollment from 17 (fall, 2007) to 70 (spring, 2008); most of these 70 students identified as BSIT, leading us to fast-track conversion to online modes for all of our core courses and electives. This accelerated pace of online development presented many challenges and difficulties, including ensuring the quality of our finished course product. Faculty buy-in, assisted by a stipend program for online development, was essential, as was the presence of quality instructional technology support. An NSF-funded infrastructure (SOFTICE) allowed the offering of problematic laboratory courses (Operating Systems, Networks) safely and securely in an online mode. A course quality review process was implemented as part of the stipend program, which also largely resolved intellectual property issues. Nonetheless, remaining are some issues and concerns, which are discussed in this paper. Recommendations, observations and suggested processes are included for those who may be considering transitioning an IT degree program to online delivery.

Multi-perspective survey of the relevance of the revised bloom's taxonomy to an introduction to linux course

Equipping students with higher-order thinking skills as part of a program in information technology is no trivial aim. Course creation must always have this goal in mind. In particular, learning activities and assessments must be designed to teach, encourage the use of, and assess success in achieving this goal beyond merely teaching facts, methods and techniques. In this paper, we examine the degree to which we were able to assess higher-order thinking skills in students enrolled in the first course of an online Linux system administration curriculum. To assist other educators contemplating similar efforts, we briefly describe methods used to classify quiz and assignment items using the Revised Bloom Taxonomy (RBT) and discuss results from a survey administered to students who completed the course. Lessons learned throughout the process are described.

Using Action Research to Innov8: Facilitating Culture Shifts in the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning

ABSTRACT The mission of a community college is distinct from a research one university, where empirical research is valued over investigation of discipline-based teaching and learning. The open-access, affordable, workforce, and transfer emphasis that serves many non-traditional community college students is a rich, meaningful environment for fostering the scholarship of teaching and learning, yet despite an emphasis on best practices and student success outcomes, teaching, and learning in this environment is an underappreciated element of the faculty role. This study explores the use of action research to facilitate engagement in the scholarship of teaching and instructional innovation. The mixed-method action research design incorporated quantitative and qualitative analysis from a wide variety of data sources and triangulated findings through a variation of techniques, including ongoing researcher dialogue and ratings. Action research serves as both the method for this study and the mechanism for faculty research on classroom innovations. This was substantiated as a catalyst for cultivating ongoing inquiry and professional growth. The Innov8 program and integration of action research appears to have a long-term, substantive impact on faculty perspectives, specifically influencing faculty culture, continued educational investigation, and ultimately student learning outcomes.