Naresh A. Dewan
Creighton University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Naresh A. Dewan.
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine | 2010
Kathryn Rice; Naresh A. Dewan; Hanna E. Bloomfield; Joseph Grill; Tamara M. Schult; David B. Nelson; Sarita Kumari; Mel Thomas; Lois J. Geist; Caroline Beaner; Michael Caldwell; Dennis E. Niewoehner
RATIONALE The effect of disease management for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is not well established. OBJECTIVES To determine whether a simplified disease management program reduces hospital admissions and emergency department (ED) visits due to COPD. METHODS We performed a randomized, adjudicator-blinded, controlled, 1-year trial at five Veterans Affairs medical centers of 743 patients with severe COPD and one or more of the following during the previous year: hospital admission or ED visit for COPD, chronic home oxygen use, or course of systemic corticosteroids for COPD. Control group patients received usual care. Intervention group patients received a single 1- to 1.5-hour education session, an action plan for self-treatment of exacerbations, and monthly follow-up calls from a case manager. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS We determined the combined number of COPD-related hospitalizations and ED visits per patient. Secondary outcomes included hospitalizations and ED visits for all causes, respiratory medication use, mortality, and change in Saint Georges Respiratory Questionnaire. After 1 year, the mean cumulative frequency of COPD-related hospitalizations and ED visits was 0.82 per patient in usual care and 0.48 per patient in disease management (difference, 0.34; 95% confidence interval, 0.15-0.52; P < 0.001). Disease management reduced hospitalizations for cardiac or pulmonary conditions other than COPD by 49%, hospitalizations for all causes by 28%, and ED visits for all causes by 27% (P < 0.05 for all). CONCLUSIONS A relatively simple disease management program reduced hospitalizations and ED visits for COPD. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00126776).
European Respiratory Journal | 2016
T.W. Effing; Jan H. Vercoulen; Jean Bourbeau; Jaap C.A. Trappenburg; Anke Lenferink; Paul Cafarella; David Coultas; Paula Meek; Paul van der Valk; Erik Bischoff; Christine Bucknall; Naresh A. Dewan; Frances Early; Vincent S. Fan; Peter Frith; Daisy J.A. Janssen; Katy Mitchell; Mike Morgan; Linda Nici; Irem Patel; Haydn Walters; Kathryn Rice; Sally Singh; Richard ZuWallack; Roberto P. Benzo; Roger S. Goldstein; Martyn R Partridge; Jacobus Adrianus Maria van der Palen
There is an urgent need for consensus on what defines a chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) self-management intervention. We aimed to obtain consensus regarding the conceptual definition of a COPD self-management intervention by engaging an international panel of COPD self-management experts using Delphi technique features and an additional group meeting. In each consensus round the experts were asked to provide feedback on the proposed definition and to score their level of agreement (1=totally disagree; 5=totally agree). The information provided was used to modify the definition for the next consensus round. Thematic analysis was used for free text responses and descriptive statistics were used for agreement scores. In total, 28 experts participated. The consensus round response rate varied randomly over the five rounds (ranging from 48% (n=13) to 85% (n=23)), and mean definition agreement scores increased from 3.8 (round 1) to 4.8 (round 5) with an increasing percentage of experts allocating the highest score of 5 (round 1: 14% (n=3); round 5: 83% (n=19)). In this study we reached consensus regarding a conceptual definition of what should be a COPD self-management intervention, clarifying the requisites for such an intervention. Operationalisation of this conceptual definition in the near future will be an essential next step. Consensus of a conceptual definition of what should be a COPD self-management intervention with its requisites http://ow.ly/Zfr0F
Peptides | 2000
David Duethman; Naresh A. Dewan; J. Michael Conlon
The decapeptide Leu-Val-Val-Tyr-Pro-Trp-Thr-Gln-Arg-Phe was isolated in high yield (1.5 nmol/ml) from bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid from a patient with an adenocarcinoma of the lung. This peptide, termed LVV-hemorphin-7 represents residues 32-41 of the beta-chain of hemoglobin and has been shown to be an endogenous ligand for opioid receptors. The N-terminal flanking peptide of LVV-hemorphin-7 [residues (1-31) of hemoglobin beta-chain] was also isolated in high yield. Neither peptide was detected in BAL fluid from the tumor-free lung of the same patient or from patients with non-neoplastic inflammatory lung disease. LVV-hemorphin-7 was not identified in BAL fluid from seven additional patients with non-small cell lung cancer, indicating that the formation of the peptide is unlikely to be of any diagnostic significance. However, the ability of LVV-hemorphin-7 to inhibit angiotensin-converting enzyme suggests that its formation may be of pathophysiological significance in the regulation of tumor blood flow in certain patients.
COPD: Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease | 2011
Naresh A. Dewan; Kathryn Rice; Michael Caldwell; Daniel E. Hilleman
Background: The data on cost savings with disease management (DM) in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is limited. A multicomponent DM program in COPD has recently shown in a large randomized controlled trial to reduce hospitalizations and emergency department visits compared to usual care (UC). The objectives of this study were to determine the cost of implementing the DM program and its impact on healthcare resource utilization costs compared to UC in high-risk COPD patients. Materials and Methods: This study was a post-hoc economic analysis of a multicenter randomized, adjudicator-blinded, controlled, 1-year trial comparing DM and UC at 5 Midwest region Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) medical centers. Health-care costs (hospitalizations, ED visits, respiratory medications, and the cost of the DM intervention) were compared in the COPD DM intervention and UC groups. Results: The composite outcome for all hospitalizations or ED visits were 27% lower in the DM group (123.8 mean events per 100 patient-years) compared to the UC group (170.5 mean events per 100 patient-years) (rate ratio 0.73; 0.56–0.90; p < 0.003). The cost of the DM intervention was
International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease | 2012
Haamid H Siddique; Raymond H A Olson; Connie M. Parenti; Thomas S. Rector; Michael Caldwell; Naresh A. Dewan; Kathryn Rice
241,620 or
The Consultant Pharmacist | 2011
Pamela A. Foral; Naresh A. Dewan; Mark A. Malesker
650 per patient. The total mean ± SD per patient cost that included the cost of DM in the DM group was 4491 ± 4678 compared to
Chest | 2018
Bernardo J. Selim; Lisa Wolfe; John M. Coleman; Naresh A. Dewan
5084 ± 5060 representing a
The Journal of pharmacy technology | 1997
Luella Bangura; Mark A. Malesker; Naresh A. Dewan
593 per patient cost savings for the DM program. Conclusions: The DM intervention program in this study was unique for producing an average cost savings of
Chest | 1993
Naresh A. Dewan; Naresh C. Gupta; Lisa S. Redepenning; James J. Phalen; Mathis P. Frick
593 per patient after paying for the cost of DM intervention.
Chest | 2000
Daniel E. Hilleman; Naresh A. Dewan; Mark A. Malesker; Mitchell Friedman
Background: Most interventions aimed at reducing hospitalizations and emergency department (ED) visits in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have employed resource-intense programs in high-risk individuals. Although COPD is a progressive disease, little is known about the effectiveness of proactive interventions aimed at preventing hospitalizations and ED visits in the much larger population of low-risk (no known COPD-related hospitalizations or ED visits in the prior year) patients, some of whom will eventually become high-risk. Methods: We tested the effect of a simple educational and self-efficacy intervention (n = 2243) versus usual care (n = 2182) on COPD/breathing-related ED visits and hospitalizations in a randomized study of low-risk patients at three Veterans Affairs (VA) medical centers in the upper Midwest. Administrative data was used to track VA admissions and ED visits. A patient survey was used to determine health-related events outside the VA. Results: Rates of COPD-related VA hospitalizations in the education and usual care group were not significantly different (3.4 versus 3.6 admissions per 100 person-years, respectively; 95% CI of difference −1.3 to 1.0, P = 0.77). The much higher patient-reported rates of non-VA hospitalizations for breathing-related problems were lower in the education group (14.0 versus 19.0 per 100 person-years; 95% CI −8.6 to −1.4, P = 0.006). Rates of COPD-related VA ED visits were not significantly different (6.8 versus 5.3; 95% CI −0.1 to 3.0, P = 0.07), nor were non-VA ED visits (32.4 versus 36.5; 95% CI −9.3 to 1.1, P = 0.12). All-cause VA admission and ED rates did not differ. Mortality rates (6.9 versus 8.3 per 100 person-years, respectively; 95% CI −3.0 to 0.4, P = 0.13) did not differ. Conclusion: An educational intervention that is practical for large numbers of low-risk patients with COPD may reduce the rate of breathing-related hospitalizations. Further research that more closely tracks hospitalizations to non-VA facilities is needed to confirm this finding.