Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Natale Cascinelli is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Natale Cascinelli.


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2001

Final version of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for cutaneous melanoma

Charles M. Balch; Antonio C. Buzaid; Seng Jaw Soong; Michael B. Atkins; Natale Cascinelli; Daniel G. Coit; Irvin D. Fleming; Jeffrey E. Gershenwald; Alan N. Houghton; John M. Kirkwood; Kelly M. McMasters; Martin F. Mihm; D.L. Morton; Douglas S. Reintgen; Merrick I. Ross; Arthur J. Sober; John A. Thompson; John F. Thompson

PURPOSE To revise the staging system for cutaneous melanoma under the auspices of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS The prognostic factors analysis described in the companion publication (this issue), as well as evidence from the published literature, was used to assemble the tumor-node-metastasis criteria and stage grouping for the melanoma staging system. RESULTS Major changes include (1) melanoma thickness and ulceration but not level of invasion to be used in the T category (except for T1 melanomas); (2) the number of metastatic lymph nodes rather than their gross dimensions and the delineation of clinically occult (ie, microscopic) versus clinically apparent (ie, macroscopic) nodal metastases to be used in the N category; (3) the site of distant metastases and the presence of elevated serum lactic dehydrogenase to be used in the M category; (4) an upstaging of all patients with stage I, II, and III disease when a primary melanoma is ulcerated; (5) a merging of satellite metastases around a primary melanoma and in-transit metastases into a single staging entity that is grouped into stage III disease; and (6) a new convention for defining clinical and pathologic staging so as to take into account the staging information gained from intraoperative lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy. CONCLUSION This revision will become official with publication of the sixth edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual in the year 2002.


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2001

Prognostic Factors Analysis of 17,600 Melanoma Patients: Validation of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Melanoma Staging System

Charles M. Balch; Seng Jaw Soong; Jeffrey E. Gershenwald; John F. Thompson; Douglas S. Reintgen; Natale Cascinelli; Marshall Urist; Kelly M. McMasters; Merrick I. Ross; John M. Kirkwood; Michael B. Atkins; John A. Thompson; Daniel G. Coit; David R. Byrd; Renee Desmond; Yuting Zhang; P. Y. Liu; Gary H. Lyman; Aberto Morabito

PURPOSE The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) recently proposed major revisions of the tumor-node-metastases (TNM) categories and stage groupings for cutaneous melanoma. Thirteen cancer centers and cancer cooperative groups contributed staging and survival data from a total of 30,450 melanoma patients from their databases in order to validate this staging proposal. PATIENTS AND METHODS There were 17,600 melanoma patients with complete clinical, pathologic, and follow-up information. Factors predicting melanoma-specific survival rates were analyzed using the Cox proportional hazards regression model. Follow-up survival data for 5 years or longer were available for 73% of the patients. RESULTS This analysis demonstrated that (1) in the T category, tumor thickness and ulceration were the most powerful predictors of survival, and the level of invasion had a significant impact only within the subgroup of thin (< or = 1 mm) melanomas; (2) in the N category, the following three independent factors were identified: the number of metastatic nodes, whether nodal metastases were clinically occult or clinically apparent, and the presence or absence of primary tumor ulceration; and (3) in the M category, nonvisceral metastases was associated with a better survival compared with visceral metastases. A marked diversity in the natural history of pathologic stage III melanoma was demonstrated by five-fold differences in 5-year survival rates for defined subgroups. This analysis also demonstrated that large and complex data sets could be used effectively to examine prognosis and survival outcome in melanoma patients. CONCLUSION The results of this evidence-based methodology were incorporated into the AJCC melanoma staging as described in the companion publication.


The Lancet | 1998

Immediate or delayed dissection of regional nodes in patients with melanoma of the trunk: a randomised trial

Natale Cascinelli; Alberto Morabito; Mario Santinami; Rona M. MacKie; Filiberto Belli

BACKGROUND The use of elective regional node dissection in patients with cutaneous melanoma without any clinical evidence of metastatic spread is still debated. Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy of immediate node dissection in patients with melanoma of the trunk and without clinical evidence of regional node and distant metastases. METHODS An international multicentre randomised trial was carried out by the WHO Melanoma Programme from 1982 to 1989. The trial included only patients with a trunk melanoma 1.5 mm or more in thickness. After wide excision of primary melanoma, patients were randomised to either immediate regional node dissection or a regional node dissection delayed until appearance of regional-node metastases. FINDINGS Of the 252 patients entered, 240 (95%) were eligible and evaluable for analysis. 122 of these were randomised to immediate node dissection. 5-year survival observed in patients who had delayed node dissection was 51.3% (95% CI 41.7-60.1) compared with 61.7% (52.0-70.1) of patients who had immediate node dissection (p=0.09). 5-year survival rate in patients with occult regional node metastases was 48.2% (28.0-65.8) and 26.6% (13.4-41.8, p=0.04) in patients in whom the regional node dissection was delayed until the time of appearance of regional node metastases. Multivariate analysis showed that routine use of immediate node dissection had no impact on survival (hazard ratio 0.72, 95% CI 0.5-1.02), whilst the status of regional nodes affected survival significantly (p=0.007). The patients with regional nodes that became clinically and histologically positive during follow-up had the poorest prognosis. INTERPRETATION Node dissection offers increased survival in patients with node metastases only. Sentinel node biopsy may become a tool to identify patients with occult node metastases, who could then undergo node dissection.


The New England Journal of Medicine | 1977

Inefficacy of Immediate Node Dissection in Stage 1 Melanoma of the Limbs

Umberto Veronesi; Jerzy Adamus; D. C. Bandiera; I. O. Brennhovd; E. Caceres; Natale Cascinelli; F. Claudio; R. L. Ikonopisov; V. V. Javorskj; S. Kirov; A. Kulakowski; J. Lacour; Ferdy Lejeune; Z. Mechl; Alberto Morabito; I. Rodé; S. Sergeev; E.A. van Slooten; K. Szczygiel; N. N. Trapeznikov; R. I. Wagner

From September, 1967, to January, 1974, a clinical trial was carried out by the WHO Melanoma Group to evaluate the efficacy of elective lymph-node dissection in the treatment of malignant melanoma of the extremities with clinically uninvolved regional lymph nodes. Treatment was prospectively randomized: 267 patients to excision of primary melanoma and immediate regional-lymph-node dissection and 286 to excision of primary melanoma and regional-lymph-node dissection at the time of appearance of metastases. The statistical analysis showed no difference in survival between the two groups of patients, regardless of how the data were analyzed (according to sex, site of origin, maximum diameter of primary tumor or Clarks level or Breslows thickness). Elective lymph-node dissection in malignant malanoma of the limbs does not improve the prognosis and is not recommended when patients can be followed at intervals of three months.


Cancer | 1982

Delayed regional lymph node dissection in stage I melanoma of the skin of the lower extremities

Umberto Veronesi; Jerzy Adamus; D. C. Bandiera; I. O. Brennhovd; E. Caceres; Natale Cascinelli; F. Claudio; R. L. Ikonopisov; V. V. Javorski; S. Kirov; A. Kulakowski; J. Lacour; F. Lejeune; Z. Mechl; Alberto Morabito; I. Rodé; S. Sergeev; E. van Slooten; K. Szczygiel; N. N. Trapeznikov; R. I. Wagner

Results of a prospective randomized clinical trial conducted by the WHO Collaborating Centers for the Evaluation of Methods of Diagnosis and Treatment of Melanoma are reported. Five‐hundred‐fifty‐three Stage I patients whose limbs were affected entered the study; 267 were submitted to wide excision and immediate node dissection and 286 had wide excision and node dissection at the time clinically positive nodes were detected. Survival curves of the two treatment groups could be superimposed. No subsets of patients benefitted from immediate node dissection. The authors conclude that delayed node dissection is as effective as the immediate dissection in Stage I melanoma of the extremities if the patient can be checked every three months. If the quarterly follow‐up is not guaranteed, immediate node dissection is advisable, at least for melanomas thicker than 2 mm.


The New England Journal of Medicine | 1988

Thin Stage I Primary Cutaneous Malignant Melanoma

Umberto Veronesi; Natale Cascinelli; Jerzy Adamus; Charles M. Balch; Dino Bandiera; A. Barchuk; Rosaria Bufalino; Peter Craig; Jaime de Marsillac; J. Durand; A.N. van Geel; Hans Holmström; Ole G. Jorgensen; Bela Kiss; B. B. R. Kroon; E.A. van Slooten; J. Lacour; Ferdy Lejeune; Rona MacKie; Zdenek Mechl; G. Mitrov; Alberto Morabito; Henryk Nosek; R. Panizzon; M. Prade; Pierluigi Santi; Radmilo Tomin; Nikolaj Trapeznikov; Tsanko Tsanov; Marshall M. Urist

Although wide surgical excision is the accepted treatment for thin malignant melanomas, there is reason to believe that narrower margins may be adequate. We conducted a randomized prospective study to assess the efficacy of narrow excision (excision with 1-cm margins) for primary melanomas no thicker than 2 mm. Narrow excision was performed in 305 patients, and wide excision (margins of 3 cm or more) was performed in 307 patients. The major prognostic criteria were well balanced in the two groups. The mean thickness of melanomas was 0.99 mm in the narrow-excision group and 1.02 mm in the wide-excision group. The subsequent development of metastatic disease involving regional nodes and distant organs was not different in the two groups (4.6 and 2.3 percent, respectively, in the narrow-excision group, as compared with 6.5 and 2.6 percent in the wide-excision group). Disease-free survival rates and overall survival rates (mean follow-up period, 55 months) were also similar in the two groups. Only three patients had a local recurrence as a first relapse. All had undergone narrow excision, and each had a primary melanoma with a thickness of 1 mm or more. The absence of local recurrence in the group of patients with a primary melanoma thinner than 1 mm and the very low rate of local recurrences indicate that narrow excision is a safe and effective procedure for such patients.


Cancer | 2000

A new American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for cutaneous melanoma.

Charles M. Balch; Antonio C. Buzaid; Michael B. Atkins; Natale Cascinelli; Daniel G. Coit; Irvin D. Fleming; Alan N. Houghton; John M. Kirkwood; Martin F. Mihm; Donald L. Morton; Douglas S. Reintgen; Merrick I. Ross; Arthur J. Sober; Seng-jaw Soong; John A. Thompson; John F. Thompson; Jeffrey E. Gershenwald; Kelly M. McMasters

The Melanoma Staging Committee of the AJCC has proposed major revisions of the melanoma TNM and stage grouping criteria. The committee members represent most of the major cooperative groups and cancer centers worldwide with a special interest in melanoma; the committee also collectively has had clinical experience with over 40,000 patients. The new staging system better reflects independent prognostic factors that are used in clinical trials and in reporting the outcomes of various melanoma treatment modalities. Major revisions include 1) melanoma thickness and ulceration, but not level of invasion, to be used in the T classification; 2) the number of metastatic lymph nodes, rather than their gross dimensions, the delineation of microscopic versus macroscopic lymph node metastases, and presence of ulceration of the primary melanoma to be used in the N classification; 3) the site of distant metastases and the presence of elevated serum LDH, to be used in the M classification; 4) an upstaging of all patients with Stage I,II, and III disease when a primary melanoma is ulcerated; 5) a merging of satellite metastases around a primary melanoma and in-transit metastases into a single staging entity that is grouped into Stage III disease; and 6) a new convention for defining clinical and pathologic staging so as to take into account the new staging information gained from intraoperative lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy. The AJC Melanoma Staging Committee invites comments and suggestions regarding this proposed staging system before a final recommendation is made.


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2002

Vaccination of Metastatic Melanoma Patients With Autologous Tumor-Derived Heat Shock Protein gp96-Peptide Complexes: Clinical and Immunologic Findings

Filiberto Belli; Alessandro Testori; Licia Rivoltini; Michele Maio; Giovanna Andreola; Mario Roberto Sertoli; Gianfrancesco Gallino; Adriano Piris; Alessandro Cattelan; Ivano Lazzari; Matteo Carrabba; Giorgio Scita; Cristina Santantonio; Lorenzo Pilla; Gabrina Tragni; Claudia Lombardo; Alfonso Marchianò; Paola Queirolo; Francesco Bertolini; Agata Cova; Elda Lamaj; Lucio Ascani; Roberto Camerini; Marco Corsi; Natale Cascinelli; Jonathan J. Lewis; Pramod K. Srivastava; Giorgio Parmiani

PURPOSE To determine the immunogenicity and antitumor activity of a vaccine consisting of autologous, tumor-derived heat shock protein gp96-peptide complexes (HSPPC-96, Oncophage; Antigenics, Inc, Woburn, MA) in metastatic (American Joint Committee on Cancer stage IV) melanoma patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS Sixty-four patients had surgical resection of metastatic tissue required for vaccine production, 42 patients were able to receive the vaccine, and 39 were assessable after one cycle of vaccination (four weekly injections). In 21 patients, a second cycle (four biweekly injections) was given because no progression occurred. Antigen-specific antimelanoma T-cell response was assessed by enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT) assay on peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) obtained before and after vaccination. Immunohistochemical analyses of tumor tissues were also performed. RESULTS No treatment-related toxicity was observed. Of 28 patients with measurable disease, two had a complete response (CR) and three had stable disease (SD) at the end of follow-up. Duration of CR was 559+ and 703+ days, whereas SD lasted for 153, 191, and 272 days, respectively. ELISPOT assay with PBMCs of 23 subjects showed a significantly increased number of postvaccination melanoma-specific T-cell spots in 11 patients, with clinical responders displaying a high frequency of increased T-cell activity. Immunohistochemical staining of melanoma tissues from which vaccine was produced revealed high expression of both HLA class I and melanoma antigens in seven of eight clinical responders (two with CR, three with SD, and the three with long-term disease-free survival) and in four of 12 nonresponders. CONCLUSION Vaccination of metastatic melanoma patients with autologous HSPPC-96 is feasible and devoid of significant toxicity. This vaccine induced clinical and tumor-specific T-cell responses in a significant minority of patients.


CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians | 2004

An evidence-based staging system for cutaneous melanoma.

Charles M. Balch; Seng Jaw Soong; Michael B. Atkins; Antonio C. Buzaid; Natale Cascinelli; Daniel G. Coit; Irvin D. Fleming; Jeffrey E. Gershenwald; Alan N. Houghton; John M. Kirkwood; Kelly M. McMasters; Martin F. Mihm; Donald L. Morton; Douglas S. Reintgen; Merrick I. Ross; Arthur J. Sober; John A. Thompson; John F. Thompson

A completely revised staging system for cutaneous melanoma was implemented in 2003. The changes were validated with a prognostic factors analysis involving 17,600 melanoma patients from prospective databases. This major collaborative study of predicting melanoma outcome was conducted specifically for this project, and the results were used to finalize the criteria for this evidence‐based staging system. In fact, this was the largest prognostic factors analysis of prospectively followed melanoma patients ever conducted. Important results that shaped the staging criteria involved both the tumor‐node‐metastasis (TNM) criteria and stage grouping for all four stages of melanoma. Major changes in the staging include: (1) melanoma thickness and ulceration are the dominant predictors of survival in patients with localized melanoma (Stages I and II); deeper level of invasion (ie, IV and V) was independently associated with reduced survival only in patients with thin or T1 melanomas. (2) The number of metastatic lymph nodes and the tumor burden were the most dominant predictors of survival in patients with Stage III melanoma; patients with metastatic nodes detected by palpation had a shorter survival compared with patients whose nodal metastases were first detected by sentinel node excision of clinically occult or “microscopic” metastases. (3) The site of distant metastases (nonvisceral versus lung versus all other visceral metastatic sites) and the presence of elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) were the dominant predictors of outcome in patients with Stage IV or distant metastases. (4) An upstaging was implemented for all patients with Stage I, II, and III disease when a primary melanoma is ulcerated by histopathological criteria. (5) Satellite metastases around a primary melanoma and in‐transit metastases were merged into a single staging entity that is grouped into Stage III disease. (6) A new convention was implemented for defining clinical and pathological staging so as to take into account the new staging information gained from lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy.


Annals of Surgery | 1985

Prognosis of breast cancer patients after mastectomy and dissection of internal mammary nodes.

Umberto Veronesi; Natale Cascinelli; Marco Greco; Rosaria Bufalino; A Morabito; Domenico Galluzzo; R Conti; R De Lellis; V Delle Donne; P Piotti

The results of the analysis carried out on data on 1119 patients with operable breast cancer treated at the National Cancer Institute of Milan from 1965 to 1979 with enlarged mastectomy are reported. Metastases to internal mammary chain were found to be significantly associated with the maximum diameter of primary (16.1% for tumors less than 2 cm and 24.5% for larger tumors, p = 0.007), the age of the patients (27.6% in patients younger than 40 years, 19.7% in patients between 41-50 years, and 15.6% in patients older than 50 years, p = 0.01). The site of origin of the cancer had no impact on internal mammary node metastases. Patients with positive axillary nodes showed metastases to internal mammary nodes in 29.1% of the cases, while 9.1% of patients with axillary negative nodes had positive retrosternal nodes. Survival was significantly affected by the presence of positive internal mammary nodes: the percentage of 10-year survival varied from 80.4% in patients with axillary and internal mammary negative nodes to 30.0% in patients with both nodal basins involved. Intermediate survival rates (54.6% and 53.0%) were found when one or the other of the nodal stations (axillary and internal mammary) was separately affected. Maximum diameter of the primary significantly affected the survival of each group identified by the status of both axillary and internal mammary nodes. In conclusion, the information on the presence or absence of internal mammary node metastases would be of great importance in formulating the prognosis of breast cancer patients. To obtain this information, a biopsy at the first intercostal space may be reasonable in selected patients (age, maximum diameter, and axillary node involvement being the basis for selection) as long as noninvasive methods of diagnosis are available.

Collaboration


Dive into the Natale Cascinelli's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Umberto Veronesi

European Institute of Oncology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Giorgio Parmiani

Vita-Salute San Raffaele University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Charles M. Balch

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge