Natan Zundel

Laparoscopic Surgery for Morbid Obesity: 1,001 Consecutive Bariatric Operations Performed at the Bariatric Institute, Cleveland Clinic Florida

Background: Morbid obesity is an epidemic in America. This series evaluates the safety and efficacy in the first 1,001 laparoscopic bariatric operations performed at The Bariatric Institute, Cleveland Clinic Florida. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted examining all patients undergoing a primary bariatric procedure (either laparoscopic gastric bypass or laparoscopic gastric banding) from July 2000 to December 2003. Results: 2 surgeons performed 1,001 laparoscopic bariatric operatons. Average age was 47 (19-75) years, average BMI was 55.6 (35-97) kg/m2, and average ASA class was III. Excess weight loss was 51% at 6 months, 73.4% at 1 year for the gastric bypass group and 54% at 1 year for the laparoscopic banding group. The overall complication rate was 31.8% (12.4% major and 19.4% minor) in the gastric bypass group and 13% in the laparoscopic banding group. There was no postoperative mortality. Conclusion: Laparoscopic bariatric surgery is feasible and safe for weight loss. Results obtained have been comparable to those reported for the open approach for weight loss, with a similar major morbidity rate and an improved mortality rate.

Human hybrid NOTES transvaginal sleeve gastrectomy: initial experience

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy is gaining popularity as a treatment of morbid obesity. It is a relatively new procedure with a postoperative follow-up not exceeding 5 years. The natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgical procedures are also gaining in popularity, and we are now experiencing the first transition from animal to human trials. We describe the first sleeve gastrectomy surgery for morbid obesity using the vagina as the natural orifice in the form of a hybrid natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery transvaginal sleeve gastrectomy, including the short-term outcomes and complications.

Routine Abdominal Drains After Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: A Retrospective Review of 593 Patients

Background: The authors reviewed the benefits of routine placement of closed drains in the peritoneal cavity following laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP). The purpose of the study was to determine whether routine closed abdominal drainage provides diagnostic and therapeutic advantages in the presence of complications such as bleeding and leaks. Materials and Methods: The medical records of 593 consecutive patients who had undergone LRYGBP from July 2001 through May 2003 were retrospectively reviewed. In all cases, antecolic antegastric LRYGBP was performed. Two 19-Fr Blake closed suction drains were left in place, one at the gastrojejunostomy and the other at the jejunojejunostomy. The incidence of bleeding and leaks was reviewed, and the utility of the drains relative to diagnosis and management was evaluated. Results: Bleeding presented in 24 patients (4.4%); in 8, the diagnosis was based on increased sanguinous output from the drain and decreased hematocrit. None of the patients with intraabdominal bleeding required reoperation. Of the 10 patients (1.68%) who presented with leaks, the diagnosis was made within 48 hours postoperatively in 5 patients (50%), based on the characteristics of the drain output. Nonoperative management with drainage and total parenteral nutrition was accomplished in 5 (50%) of the 10 patients with leaks. There was no mortality in the series. Conclusion: The routine use of abdominal drains after LRYGBP appears to be beneficial. Drains allowed early diagnosis of complications and in most cases, the successful treatment of leaks. When bleeding is suspected or documented, appropriate volume replacement therapy is mandatory to maintain adequate hemodynamic parameters. Drain output may orient the surgeon to take preventive measures such as discontinuing anticoagulation and early fluid resuscitation. In this series, in most cases the bleeding spontaneously stopped and no further surgical management was required.

Strictures after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has become an important tool in the bariatric surgery armamentarium. At the second international consensus summit for LSG, a representative group of bariatric surgeons reported its use as a primary procedure, with excellent results and safety. The advantages that have made it so popular are the absence of dumping syndrome, no intestine is bypassed, there is no malabsorption of fundamental nutrients, mortality, and complication rates are lower, and weight loss so far is satisfactory. LSG has been considered a technically easier procedure compared with gastric bypass or biliopancreatic diversion, leading to new groups to adopt it over the latter. However, as any other procedure, LSG has complications that range from 0.7 % to 4%, some of them potentially fatal. The knowledge of their existence and their mechanisms of production is fundamental to preventing them and preserving the excellent record of safety of this technique. One of the infrequent complications of LSG is the stricture of the remnant stomach, which is constructed purposely as a narrow tube and consequently, has a risk of stenosis and obstruction. Opposite to leaks, this complication has been barely mentioned in clinical series. In addition to strictures, there are other causes of obstruction and some will be addressed in this article, which will elaborate in causes, clinical presentation, and management. It even includes technical considerations paramount to avoid mechanical obstruction of the sleeve and guarantee an adequate food intake to the patient in the long term.

Safety and effectiveness of Realize adjustable gastric band: 3-year prospective study in the United States

BACKGROUND The effectiveness and safety of bariatric surgery using laparoscopic adjustable gastric bands have been demonstrated in numerous published studies. We present the results of the first U.S. multicenter trial of the Realize adjustable gastric band, a laparoscopic adjustable gastric band previously available only outside the United States as the Swedish adjustable gastric band. METHODS A total of 405 morbidly obese patients were screened at 12 different centers from May to November 2003 to participate in a prospective, single-arm study of the safety and effectiveness of the laparoscopically implanted Realize band. Changes in excess body weight, the parameters of diabetes and dyslipidemia, and the incidence of complications were assessed at 3 years of follow-up. RESULTS Of the 405 patients, 276 (78.3% women and 61.2% white) qualified for the study. The average age was 38.6 + or - 9.4 years (range 18-61), and the preoperative body mass index was 44.5 + or - 4.7 kg/m(2). The mean hospital stay was 1.2 + or - 1.3 days. At 3 years, the average excess weight loss was 41.1% + or - 25.1% or a decrease in the body mass index of 8.2 kg/m(2) (18.6%) (P < .001). In diabetic patients with a baseline elevated hemoglobin A(1)c level, the level decreased by 1% (P < .001). The total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and triglycerides decreased by 9%, 16%, and 50%, respectively (P < .001), and the high-density lipoprotein cholesterol increased by 25% (P < .001) in patients with abnormal baseline values. One patient required conversion to an open surgical technique. No 30-day mortality occurred. The complication frequencies were generally low and included esophageal dysmotility in 0.4%, late balloon failure in 0.4%, band erosion in 0.4%, slippage in 3.3%, esophageal dilation in 3.3%, pouch dilation in 3.6%, catheter kinking in 1.1%, port displacement in 2.5%, and port disconnection in 4.3%. Reoperations were required in 15.2% of the patients and involved 2 band replacements, 9 band revisions, 5 port replacements, 22 port revisions, and 4 explants. CONCLUSION The results of our study have shown that the Realize adjustable gastric band is safe and effective in a diverse U.S. population of morbidly obese patients. Significant weight loss was achieved throughout the 3 years of follow-up, with corresponding improvements in the indicators of diabetes and dyslipidemia.

Consensus statement of the consortium for LESS cholecystectomy

Many surgeons attempting Laparo-Endoscopic Single Site (LESS) cholecystectomy have found the operation difficult, which is inconsistent with our experience. This article is an attempt to promote a standardized approach that we feel surgeons with laparoscopic skills can perform safely and efficiently. This is a four-trocar approach consistent with the four incisions utilized in conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. After administration of general anesthesia, marcaine is injected at the umbilicus and a 12-mm vertical incision is made through the already existing anatomical scar of the umbilicus. A single four-trocar port is inserted. A 5-mm deflectable-tip laparoscope is placed through the trocar at the 8 o’clock position, a bariatric length rigid grasper is inserted through the trocar at the 4 o’clock position (to grasp the fundus), and a rigid bent grasper is placed through the 10-mm port (to grasp the infundibulum). This arrangement of the instruments promotes minimal internal and external instrument clashing with simultaneous optimization of the operative view. This orientation allows retraction of the gallbladder in a cephalad and lateral direction, development of a window between the gallbladder and the liver which promotes the “critical view” of the cystic duct and artery, and provides triangulation with excellent visualization of the operative field. The operation is concluded with diaphragmatic irrigation of marcaine solution to minimize postoperative pain. Standardization of LESS cholecystectomy will speed adoption, reduce intraoperative complications, and improve the efficiency and safety of the approach.

Revisional surgery after restrictive procedures for morbid obesity.

Bariatric surgery has become more common due to the worldwide obesity epidemic. A shift from open to laparoscopic surgery has occurred in the last 2 decades, because of its advantages. Revisional surgery after bariatric procedures is becoming an important issue, and restrictive procedures account for a large proportion of these interventions. Three restrictive procedures are currently in use: laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding, laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and vertical banded gastroplasty. The first two procedures are more commonly used, and the third is losing favor with surgeons. All three have proven effective, but less than malabsortive or combined procedures. The reasons to reoperate upon a patient and convert a previous bariatric procedure to a different one are failure of the operation, due to insufficient weight loss, or weight regain (secondary obesity); or complications like penetration, infection, bleeding, obstruction, dysphagia, and gastroesophageal reflux, among others. This review will describe the complications or failures leading to the a second operation; the conditions present after the first procedure and the presence of failure or complications; the technical steps required to be taken; and the outcomes and what can be expected afterwards.

Laparoscopic removal of gastric band after early gastric erosion: case report and review of the literature.

Laparoscopic gastric banding is a popular method for treating morbid obesity. One of the most serious complications is band erosion into the gastric lumen. We present the case of a patient who underwent gastric banding and presented with symptoms of gastrointestinal reflux and mild-to-moderate hypertension, fever, and pain. UGI revealed stomach wall erosion and partial migration of the band into the gastric lumen. The band was laparoscopically removed without any further complications. Migration after laparoscopic gastric banding must be immediately addressed to prevent infection. Close monitoring of the band location during adjustments as well as a high index of suspicion is necessary.

Development of Acute Gouty Attack in the Morbidly Obese Population after Bariatric Surgery

Background: Gout is associated with increased body weight. We evaluated the prevalence of gout and acute gouty attacks in the morbidly obese population who underwent bariatric surgery. Methods: The medical records and operative reports of 1,240 patients who underwent bariatric surgery were reviewed retrospectively for weight parameters, BMI, weight loss, medical history of gout, and onset of acute gouty attacks. Results: Of the 1,240 patients, 5 (0.4%) had been previously diagnosed with gout. 2 of these 5 had acute attacks during the postoperative period, and responded succesfully to intravenous colchicine. Conclusion: Although rare, gout must be considered a co-morbid illness in obese and morbidly obese patients. Surgeons should be familiar with the signs and symptoms of attacks in the postoperative period, and be knowledgeable in the management.

Laparoscopic repair of traumatic diaphragmatic hernia.

Posttraumatic diaphragmatic rupture or eventration is still a challenging problem. Herein five cases of patients with such a diaphragmatic lesion treated successfully by laparoscopy are reported with a discussion of the advantages of this mini-invasive surgical approach.