Natasha MacBean
University of Arizona
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Natasha MacBean.
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2015
Cédric Bacour; Philippe Peylin; Natasha MacBean; P. J. Rayner; F. Delage; F. Chevallier; Marie Weiss; J. Demarty; D. Santaren; Frédéric Baret; D. Berveiller; E. Dufrêne; P. Prunet
We investigate the benefits of assimilating in situ and satellite data of the fraction of photosynthetically active radiation (FAPAR) relative to eddy covariance flux measurements for the optimization of parameters of the ORCHIDEE (Organizing Carbon and Hydrology in Dynamic Ecosystem) biosphere model. We focus on model parameters related to carbon fixation, respiration, and phenology. The study relies on two sites—Fontainebleau (deciduous broadleaf forest) and Puechabon (Mediterranean broadleaf evergreen forest)—where measurements of net carbon exchange (NEE) and latent heat (LE) fluxes are available at the same time as FAPAR products derived from ground measurements or derived from spaceborne observations at high (SPOT (Satellite Pour l′Observation de la Terre)) and medium (MERIS (MEdium Resolution Imaging Spectrometer)) spatial resolutions. We compare the different FAPAR products, analyze their consistency with the in situ fluxes, and then evaluate the potential benefits of jointly assimilating flux and FAPAR data. The assimilation of FAPAR data leads to a degradation of the model-data agreement with respect to NEE at the two sites. It is caused by the change in leaf area required to fit the magnitude of the various FAPAR products. Assimilating daily NEE and LE fluxes, however, has a marginal impact on the simulated FAPAR. The results suggest that the main advantage of including FAPAR data is the ability to constrain the timing of leaf onset and senescence for deciduous ecosystems, which is best achieved by normalizing FAPAR time series. The joint assimilation of flux and FAPAR data leads to a model-data improvement across all variables similar to when each data stream is used independently, corresponding, however, to different and likely improved parameter values.
Remote Sensing | 2014
Abdoul Khadre Traore; Philippe Ciais; Nicolas Vuichard; Natasha MacBean; Cécile Dardel; Benjamin Poulter; Shilong Piao; Joshua B. Fisher; Nicolas Viovy; Martin Jung; Ranga B. Myneni
Light and water use by vegetation at the ecosystem level, are key components for understanding the carbon and water cycles particularly in regions with high climate variability and dry climates such as Africa. The objective of this study is to examine recent trends over the last 30 years in Light Use Efficiency (LUE) and inherent Water Use Efficiency (iWUE*) for the major biomes of Africa, including their sensitivities to climate and CO2. LUE and iWUE* trends are analyzed using a combination of NOAA-AVHRR NDVI3g and fAPAR3g, and a data-driven model of monthly evapotranspiration and Gross Primary Productivity (based on flux tower measurements and remote sensing fAPAR, yet with no flux tower data in Africa) and the ORCHIDEE (ORganizing Carbon and Hydrology In Dynamic EcosystEms) process-based land surface model driven by variable CO2 and two different gridded climate fields. The iWUE* data product increases by 10%–20% per decade during the 1982–2010 period over the northern savannas (due to positive trend of vegetation productivity) and the central African forest (due to positive trend of vapor pressure deficit). In contrast to the iWUE*, the LUE trends are not statistically significant. The process-based model simulations only show a positive linear trend in iWUE* and LUE over the central African forest. Additionally, factorial model simulations were conducted to attribute trends in iWUE and LUE to climate change and rising CO2 concentrations. We found that the increase of atmospheric CO2 by 52.8 ppm during the period of study explains 30%–50% of the increase in iWUE* and >90% of the LUE trend over the central African forest. The modeled iWUE* trend exhibits a high sensitivity to the climate forcing and environmental conditions, whereas the LUE trend has a smaller sensitivity to the selected climate forcing.
Scientific Reports | 2018
Natasha MacBean; Fabienne Maignan; Cédric Bacour; Philip Lewis; Philippe Peylin; Luis Guanter; Philipp Köhler; José Gómez-Dans; Mathias Disney
Accurate terrestrial biosphere model (TBM) simulations of gross carbon uptake (gross primary productivity – GPP) are essential for reliable future terrestrial carbon sink projections. However, uncertainties in TBM GPP estimates remain. Newly-available satellite-derived sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) data offer a promising direction for addressing this issue by constraining regional-to-global scale modelled GPP. Here, we use monthly 0.5° GOME-2 SIF data from 2007 to 2011 to optimise GPP parameters of the ORCHIDEE TBM. The optimisation reduces GPP magnitude across all vegetation types except C4 plants. Global mean annual GPP therefore decreases from 194 ± 57 PgCyr−1 to 166 ± 10 PgCyr−1, bringing the model more in line with an up-scaled flux tower estimate of 133 PgCyr−1. Strongest reductions in GPP are seen in boreal forests: the result is a shift in global GPP distribution, with a ~50% increase in the tropical to boreal productivity ratio. The optimisation resulted in a greater reduction in GPP than similar ORCHIDEE parameter optimisation studies using satellite-derived NDVI from MODIS and eddy covariance measurements of net CO2 fluxes from the FLUXNET network. Our study shows that SIF data will be instrumental in constraining TBM GPP estimates, with a consequent improvement in global carbon cycle projections.
Nature | 2014
Natasha MacBean; Philippe Peylin
Evolving agricultural practices dramatically increased crop production in the twentieth century. Two studies now find that this has altered the seasonal flux of atmospheric carbon dioxide. See Letters p.394 & p.398 The atmospheric CO2 record displays a seasonal cycle reflecting seasonal variations in CO2 uptake by terrestrial vegetation. An increase in the amplitude of this seasonal cycle over the past five decades cannot be fully explained at present. Two groups now report that the intensification of agriculture may have been a key contributor to the increase in atmospheric CO2 seasonal amplitude. Ning Zeng et al. used the VEGAS terrestrial biosphere model to show that enhanced mid-latitude agricultural productivity contributed 45% of the increasing amplitude of global net surface carbon fluxes for the period 1961 to 2010, compared to 29% from climate change and 26% from CO2 fertilization. Josh Gray et al. used crop production statistics from the UN Food and Agriculture Organization and a carbon accounting model to demonstrate that as much as a quarter of the observed change in atmospheric CO2 seasonality can be explained by elevated crop productivity, with maize, wheat, rice and soybean major contributors. These studies will contribute to a better understanding of the global carbon cycle, and highlight the extent to which human actions are changing large-scale biosphere–atmosphere interactions.
Global Biogeochemical Cycles | 2017
Yue Li; Hui Yang; Tao Wang; Natasha MacBean; Cédric Bacour; Philippe Ciais; Yiping Zhang; Guangsheng Zhou; Shilong Piao
Reducing parameter uncertainty of process-based terrestrial ecosystem models (TEMs) is one of the primary targets for accurately estimating carbon budgets and predicting ecosystem responses to climate change. However, parameters in TEMs are rarely constrained by observations from Chinese forest ecosystems, which are important carbon sink over the Northern Hemispheric land. In this study, eddy-covariance data from 6 forest sites in China are used to optimize parameters of the ORCHIDEE (ORganizing Carbon and Hydrology In Dymanics EcosystEms) TEM. The model-data assimilation through parameter optimization largely reduces the prior model errors and improves the simulated seasonal cycle and summer diurnal cycle of net ecosystem exchange (NEE), latent heat (LE) fluxes as well as gross primary production (GPP) and ecosystem respiration. Climate change experiments based on the optimized model are deployed to indicate that forest net primary production (NPP) is suppressed in response to warming in the southern China but stimulated in the northeastern China. Altered precipitation has an asymmetric impact on forest NPP at sites in water-limited regions, with the optimization-induced reduction in response of NPP to precipitation decline being as large as 61% at a deciduous broadleaf forest site. We find that seasonal optimization alters forest carbon cycle responses to environmental change, with the parameter optimization consistently reducing the simulated positive response of heterotrophic respiration to warming. Evaluations from independent observations suggest that improving model structure still matters most for long term carbon stock and its changes, in particular nutrient- and age-related changes of photosynthetic rates, carbon allocation and tree mortality.
Scientific Reports | 2018
Natasha MacBean; Fabienne Maignan; Cédric Bacour; Philip Lewis; Philippe Peylin; Luis Guanter; Philipp Köhler; José Gómez-Dans; Mathias Disney
A correction to this article has been published and is linked from the HTML and PDF versions of this paper. The error has not been fixed in the paper.
Geoscientific Model Development | 2015
Ben Poulter; Natasha MacBean; Andrew J. Hartley; Iryna Khlystova; Olivier Arino; Richard A. Betts; Sophie Bontemps; Martin Boettcher; Carsten Brockmann; Pierre Defourny; Stefan Hagemann; Martin Herold; Grit Kirches; Céline Lamarche; Dimitri Lederer; Catherine Ottlé; Marco Peters; Philippe Peylin
Global Ecology and Biogeography | 2015
Wang X; Shilong Piao; Xiangtao Xu; Philippe Ciais; Natasha MacBean; Ranga B. Myneni; Laurent Li
Geoscientific Model Development | 2014
Kim Naudts; James Ryder; M. J. McGrath; Juliane Otto; Yi-Ying Chen; A. Valade; V. Bellasen; G. Berhongaray; Gerhard Bönisch; Matteo Campioli; J. Ghattas; T. De Groote; Vanessa Haverd; Jens Kattge; Natasha MacBean; F. Maignan; Päivi Merilä; Josep Peñuelas; Philippe Peylin; Bernard Pinty; Hans Pretzsch; Ernst-Detlef Schulze; D. Solyga; Nicolas Vuichard; Sebastiaan Luyssaert
Journal of Structural Geology | 2010
Richard T. Walker; Morteza Talebian; Sohei Saiffori; R. A. Sloan; Ali Rasheedi; Natasha MacBean; Abbas Ghassemi