Natasha Waller

Effect of triclosan on microbial activity in australian soils

Triclosan (TCS) antimicrobial compound is used in personal care products such as shampoos and soaps. The TCS compound can survive the treatment process and is often present in the sewage effluent and biosolids. We investigated the impact of TCS upon selected microbiological and biochemical parameters in two contrasting Australian soils. Substrate-induced respiration and nitrification, plus activities of four enzymes (relevant for carbon and nitrogen turnover), were measured using Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development protocols after exposing soils to TCS at concentrations of 0, 1, 5, 10, 50, and 100 mg/kg of soil. Respiration in the sandy soil was not affected by the addition of TCS, but in clay soil it decreased to TCS at 50 mg/kg of soil. The nitrification process was affected in both soils. In the sandy soil, TCS showed a negative effect on the nitrate and nitrite production at 5 mg/kg. In contrast, in the clay soil, the effect was noticeable only at concentrations greater than 50 mg/kg. The response of four enzymes (acid and alkali phosphatase, 3-glucosidase, and chitinase) in the two soils was variable, and only P3-glucosidase showed some response to TCS addition. The study demonstrated that TCS at concentrations below 10 mg/kg can disturb the nitrogen cycle in some soils. A first-tier hazard assessment highlighted the need for further work on TCS impact on soil microorganisms.

Triclosan: its occurrence, fate and effects in the Australian environment

Triclosan (TCS) is an antimicrobial agent used widely in household products such as soaps, household cleaners, cosmetics, sportswear, mouthwash and toothpaste. It is a bioaccumulative compound known for its high toxicity to algae, daphnids, fish and other aquatic organisms. We investigated its occurrence in effluents, biosolids and surface waters in Australia, as well as its fate in Australian soils and wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs), including the effects on microbial processes in soils. The concentrations of TCS in 19 effluents ranged from 23 to 434 ng/L (median 108 ng/L) and in 17 biosolids from 0.09 to 16.79 mg/kg on dry weight basis (median 2.32 mg/kg). TCS at concentrations of up to 75 ng/L were detected in receiving waters from five creeks affected by effluent discharge from WWTPs. The removal rate of TCS in five selected WWTPs ranged from 72 and 93%, ascribed mainly to sorption onto sludge and biological degradation. Biodegradation in a clay loam soil was noted with a half life of 18 days. However the half-lives under field conditions are expected to be very different. The studies on the effect of TCS on soil microbiological processes showed that triclosan can disrupt the nitrogen cyclein sensitive soils at concentrations ≥5 mg/kg. In view of the recent risk assessment by the Australian regulatory agency NICNAS, there is an urgent need to assess exposure to TCS and its effect on ecosystem health.

Bioavailability of residual polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons following enhanced natural attenuation of creosote-contaminated soil

The impact of residual PAHs (2250 +/- 71 microg total PAHs g(-1)) following enhanced natural attenuation (ENA) of creosote-contaminated soil (7767 +/- 1286 microg total PAHs g(-1)) was assessed using a variety of ecological assays. Microtox results for aqueous soil extracts indicated that there was no significant difference in EC(50) values for uncontaminated, pre- and post-remediated soil. However, in studies conducted with Eisenia fetida, PAH bioaccumulation was reduced by up to 6.5-fold as a result of ENA. Similarly, Beta vulgaris L. biomass yields were increased 2.1-fold following ENA of creosote-contaminated soil. While earthworm and plant assays indicated that PAH bioavailability was reduced following ENA, the residual PAH fraction still exerted toxicological impacts on both receptors. Results from this study highlight that residual PAHs following ENA (presumably non-bioavailable to bioremediation) may still be bioavailable to important receptor organisms such as earthworms and plants.

Predicting the efficacy of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon bioremediation in creosote-contaminated soil using bioavailability assays

ABSTRACT Nonexhaustive extraction (propanol, butanol, hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin [HPCD]), persulfate oxidation and biodegradability assays were employed to determine the bioavailability of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in creosote-contaminated soil. After 16 weeks incubation, greater than 89% of three-ring compounds (acenaphthene, anthracene, fluorene, and phenanthrene) and 21% to 79% of four-ring compounds (benz[a]anthracene, chrysene, fluoranthene, and pyrene) were degraded by the indigenous microorganisms under biopile conditions. No significant decrease in five- (benzo[a]pyrene, benzo[b+k]fluoranthene) and six-ring compounds (benz[g,h,i]perylene, indeno[1,2,3-c,d]pyrene) was observed. Desorption of PAHs using propanol or butanol could not predict PAH biodegradability: low-molecular-weight PAH biodegradability was underestimated whereas high-molecular-weight PAH biodegradability was overestimated. Persulfate oxidation and HPCD extraction of creosote-contaminated soil was able to predict three- and four-ring PAH biodegradability; however, the biodegradability of five-ring PAHs was overestimated. These results demonstrate that persulfate oxidation and HPCD extraction are good predictors of PAH biodegradability for compounds with octanol-water partitioning coefficients of < 6.

Pilot scale bioremediation of creosote-contaminated soil efficacy of enhanced natural attenuation and bioaugmentation strategies

ABSTRACT In this study, the efficacy of bioremediation strategies (enhanced natural attenuation with nitrate and phosphate addition [ENA] and bioaugmentation) for the remediation of creosote-contaminated soil (7767 ± 1286 mg kg−1 of the 16 EPA priority PAHs) was investigated at pilot scale. Bioaugmentation of creosote-contaminated soil with freshly grown or freeze dried Mycobacterium sp. strain 1B (a PAH degrading microorganism) was applied following bench scale studies that indicated that the indigenous soil microflora had a limited PAH metabolic activity. After 182 days, the total PAH concentration in creosote-contaminated soil was reduced from 7767 ± 1286 mg kg−1 to 5579 ± 321 mg kg−1, 2250 ± 71 mg kg−1, 2050 ± 354 mg kg−1 and 1950 ± 70 mg kg−1 in natural attenuation (no additions) and ENA biopiles and biopiles augmented with freshly grown or freeze dried Mycobacterium sp. strain 1B respectively. In ENA and bioaugmentation biopiles, between 82% and 99% of three-ring compounds (acenaphthene, anthracene, fluorene, phenanthrene) were removed while four-ring PAH removal ranged from 33 to 81%. However, the extent of PAH degradation did not vary significantly between the ENA treatment and biopiles augmented with Mycobacterium sp. strain 1B. Four-ring PAH removal followed the order fluoranthene > pyrene > benz[a]anthracene > chrysene. The high residual concentration of some four-ring PAHs may be attributable to bioavailability issues rather than a lack of microbial catabolic activity. Comparable results between ENA and bioaugmentation at pilot scale were surprising given the limited degradative capacity of the microbial consortia enriched from the creosote-contaminated soil.

Effects of thiobencarb in combinations with molinate and chlorpyrifos on selected soil microbial processes

The impact of pesticides, namely thiobencarb (TBC), molinate (MOL) and chlorpyrifos (CPF), on soil microbial processes was studied in two Australian soils. Substrate induced respiration (SIR), substrate induced nitrification (SIN) and phosphatases and chitinase enzymatic activities were assessed during a 30-day microcosm study. The pesticides were applied to soils at recommended rates either alone, or as binary mixtures with TBC. Soil samples were sampled at 5, 15 and 30 days after pesticide treatments. Substrate induced respiration was only transiently affected by pesticides in both soils. In contrast, the process of indigenous nitrification was affected by the presence of pesticides in both soils, especially when the pesticides were applied as binary mixtures. Substrate induced nitrification increased with pesticides in the Griffith soil (except with MOL+TBC after 5 days) whereas SIN values were non-significantly different to the control on the Coleambally soil. The binary mixtures of pesticides with TBC resulted in a decrease in SIN in both soils, but the effects disappeared within 30 days. The enzymatic activities were not consistently affected by pesticides, and varied with the soil and pesticides studied. This study showed that, when applied at recommended application rates, TBC, MOL, and CPF (individually or as binary mixtures), had little or only transitory effects on the functional endpoints studied. However, further investigations are needed to assess the effect on microbial densities and community structure despite the low disturbance to the functions noted in this work.