Nathalie Pelletier-Fleury

The age and other factors in the evaluation of compliance with nasal continuous positive airway pressure for obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. A Cox's proportional hazard analysis.

Objective: To elucidate the predictive role of age and other pre-treatment, putative confounding factors on compliance with nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) therapy.Patients and methods: This study was designed as a prospective cohort study in the setting of a sleep laboratory in a teaching hospital at Saint Antoine, Paris. One hundred and sixty-three patients referred to the sleep laboratory with complaints of snoring and excessive daytime sleepiness for whom nCPAP had been prescribed for obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS; defined as an apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) of >15/h of sleep during a polysomnographic recording) were followed for a median period of 887 days. The main outcome measure was the risk ratio for elderly patients associated with nCPAP compliance.Results: Four patients, who remained under treatment, died before the end of the study, and 50 patients stopped their nCPAP therapy for reasons other than death (insomnia, equipment too noisy, etc.). When compliance curves were compared by univariate analysis (log-rank test), the oldest group (57/163 patients, >60 years old) was significantly less compliant with nCPAP than the youngest (P=0.01). However, in the Coxs proportional hazards model, age did not exert any independent effect on compliance with nCPAP after controlling for confounding factors (adjusted relative risk, 1.09, 0.5-2; P=0.70). On the other hand, female sex (adjusted relative risk, 2.8, 1.4-5.4; P=0.002), a body mass index (BMI) of </=30 kg/m(2) (adjusted relative risk, 2.2, 1.2-4; P=0.006), an Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS) score of </=15 (adjusted relative risk, 3.2, 1.1-8.9; P=0.025), an AHI of </=30/h (adjusted relative risk, 2.2, 1.2-4; P=0.01) and a nCPAP of >/=12 cmH(2)O (adjusted relative risk, 2.3, 1.2-4.4; P=0.011) were predictive factors for non-compliance.Conclusion: This study suggests that there is no independent effect of age on compliance with nCPAP therapy.

Economic arguments for the immediate management of moderate-to-severe obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome

The objective of this study was to measure the impact of a 6‐month delay in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with moderate obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS) (apnoea/hypopnoea index (AHI) <30) or severe OSAS (AHI ≥30) on daytime sleepiness, cognitive functions, quality of life and healthcare expenditure (hospitalisations, medical visits, complementary tests, biological tests and drug prescriptions). In addition, this study aimed to analyse the incremental cost effectiveness ratios related to daytime sleepiness or quality of life following immediate introduction of treatment in these two populations. This study was conducted as a multicentre randomised controlled trial and carried out at two teaching hospitals in France. A total of 171 patients were followed for 6 months, with 82 patients randomised to group 1 “immediate polysomnography” and 89 in group 2 “polysomnography within 6 months”. Patients with severe OSAS were deprived of a significant improvement of their daytime sleepiness (5.1±5.0 at the Epworth Sleepiness Scale score in group 1 versus 0.2±3.4 in group 2) and quality of life (12.4±13.3 at the Nottingham Health Profile score in group 1 versus 0.7±10.1 in group 2) during the waiting time. The impact of delayed management in subjects with less severe OSAS only concerned daytime sleepiness (1.9±3.3 in group 1 versus 0.3±4.3 in group 2). Delayed treatment did not affect cognitive functions or healthcare expenditure regardless of the severity of the disease. Incremental cost effectiveness ratios related to rapid introduction of treatment were significantly lower in the patients with more severe OSAS. These results provide fairly clear medical and economic arguments in favour of early management of patients with more severe forms of obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome.

Economic studies and 'technical' evaluation of telemedicine: the case of telemonitored polysomnography.

Information and communication technology (ICT) is not yet integrated into current medical practice and frequently, organizational patterns of health care production are held responsible for this situation. However, and quite paradoxically, measures recently taken in France indicate that a preferential role is granted to ICT in order to promote the development of healthcare networks. In this context, one should carefully examine which factors, other than organizational ones, can explain the very slow diffusion of telemedicine. Actually, medical assessment of telemedicine is very seldom and the medical community is unable to appreciate the extent that this technology would modify the quality of care provided. Furthermore, and as a consequence of the former, there is no economic evaluation of telemedicine applications and its effects, in terms of productivity, remain virtual. In this article, based on an early evaluation of telemonitored polysomnography to diagnose sleep apnea syndrome, we show that it is possible, even at an experimental stage, to produce appropriate and convincing clinical results stating the true technological effectiveness (choice of an adequate clinical trial, selection of appropriate endpoints). Specific attention is given to the technical conditions in which the technology is assessed, we also provide most of the data that should be taken into account to foresee the major organizational transformations of the production processes. Our results show that early clinical ad hoc evaluations of telemedicine applications can be conducted promptly, providing strong clinical results and useful data for any forthcoming economic evaluation.

Cost-Effectiveness of a Community Pharmacist-Led Sleep Apnea Screening Program – A Markov Model

Background Despite the high prevalence and major public health ramifications, obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) remains underdiagnosed. In many developed countries, because community pharmacists (CP) are easily accessible, they have been developing additional clinical services that integrate the services of and collaborate with other healthcare providers (general practitioners (GPs), nurses, etc.). Alternative strategies for primary care screening programs for OSAS involving the CP are discussed. Objective To estimate the quality of life, costs, and cost-effectiveness of three screening strategies among patients who are at risk of having moderate to severe OSAS in primary care. Design Markov decision model. Data Sources Published data. Target Population Hypothetical cohort of 50-year-old male patients with symptoms highly evocative of OSAS. Time Horizon The 5 years after initial evaluation for OSAS. Perspective Societal. Interventions Screening strategy with CP (CP-GP collaboration), screening strategy without CP (GP alone) and no screening. Outcomes measures Quality of life, survival and costs for each screening strategy. Results of base-case analysis Under almost all modeled conditions, the involvement of CPs in OSAS screening was cost effective. The maximal incremental cost for “screening strategy with CP” was about 455€ per QALY gained. Results of sensitivity analysis Our results were robust but primarily sensitive to the treatment costs by continuous positive airway pressure, and the costs of untreated OSAS. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that the “screening strategy with CP” was dominant in 80% of cases. It was more effective and less costly in 47% of cases, and within the cost-effective range (maximum incremental cost effectiveness ratio at €6186.67/QALY) in 33% of cases. Conclusions CP involvement in OSAS screening is a cost-effective strategy. This proposal is consistent with the trend in Europe and the United States to extend the practices and responsibilities of the pharmacist in primary care.

The Effects of Obesity and Mobility Disability in Access to Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening in France: Results from the National Health and Disability Survey

Objectives We aimed to disentangle the effects of obesity and mobility limitation on cervical and breast cancer screening among community dwelling women. Methods The data source was the French national Health and Disability Survey - Household Section, 2008. The Body Mass Index (BMI) was used to categorize obesity status. We constructed a continuous score of mobility limitations to assess the severity of disability (Cronbachs alpha = 0.84). Logistic regressions were performed to examine the association between obesity, mobility limitations and the use of Pap test (n = 8 133) and the use of mammography (n = 7 561). Adjusted odds ratios were calculated (AOR). Interaction terms between obesity and the disability score were included in models testing for effect modifications. Results Compared with non-obese women, the odds of having a Pap test in the past 3 years was 24% lower in obese women (AOR = 0.76; 95% CI: 0.65 to 0.89), the odds of having a mammogram in the past 2 years was 23% lower (AOR = 0.77; 95% CI: 0.66 to 0.91). Each time the disability score was 5 points higher, the odds of having a Pap test decreases by 20% (AOR = 0.96; 95% CI: 0.94 to 0.98), the odds of having a mammogram decreases by 25% (AOR = 0.95; 95% CI: 0.94 to 0.97). There was no significant interaction between obesity and disability score. Conclusion Obesity and mobility limitation are independently associated with a lower likelihood of cervical and breast cancer screening. Protective outreach and follow-up are necessary to reduce inequalities and thus to reduce health disparities in these vulnerable and high-risk populations of obese women with disabilities.

Patients’ with obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS) preferences and demand for treatment: a discrete choice experiment

Rationale Despite its high level of effectiveness, initial acceptance of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and regular use in patients with obstructive sleep apneoa syndrome (OSAS) are still an issue. Alternatively, oral appliances (OAs) can be recommended. To improve patient engagement in their treatment, physicians are advised to take into account patient preferences and to share the therapeutic decision. We aimed to determine patients’ preferences for OSAS treatment-related attributes, and to predict patients’ demand for both CPAP and OAs. Methods A discrete choice experiment (DCE) was performed in 121 newly diagnosed patients consecutively recruited in a sleep unit. Results Regression parameters were the highest for impact on daily life and effectiveness ahead of side effects. In the French context, the demanding probabilities for CPAP and OAs were 60.2% and 36.2%, respectively. They were sensitive to the variation in the amount of out-of-pocket expenses for both CPAP and OAs. Conclusions This first DCE in OSAS emphasises the importance to communicate with patients before the implementation of treatment.

Screening for cervical cancer: What are the determinants among adults with disabilities living in institutions? Findings from a National Survey in France

OBJECTIVES To explore the rate and determinants of the likelihood of cervical cancer screening participation among disabled women living in institutions in France. METHODS The data source was the French national Health and Disability Survey-Institutions Section, 2009. Disability severity was assessed by scoring mobility and cognitive limitations. Chi-square tests revealed the significant factors associated with the screening rates; these factors were used in a multivariate logistic regression of Pap-test use within the 3 years prior to the interview (n=1052, women aged 20-65 years living in institutions for disabled adults). RESULTS The cervical cancer screening rate was particularly low in this population. After adjusting for all other covariates, women with more severe degrees of mobility or cognitive limitations had a lower likelihood of receiving a Pap test. Our findings also showed that being socially isolated, illiterate or underweight significantly decreased screening participation. CONCLUSION Even in institutions, disability severity remains a barrier to cancer screening. Given the increasing prevalence of disabling conditions and cancers, and the lack of previous studies on this specific topic, our findings are highly important from a policy point of view. These findings should alert health authorities to increase their efforts to provide medical care for institutionalized people with disabilities.

Adaptation and validation of the patient assessment of chronic illness care in the French context

BackgroundChronic diseases are major causes of disability worldwide with rising prevalence. Most patients suffering from chronic conditions do not always receive optimal care. The Chronic Care Model (CCM) has been developed to help general practitioners making quality improvements. The Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) questionnaire was increasingly used in several countries to appraise the implementation of the CCM from the patients’ perspective. The objective of this study was to adapt the PACIC questionnaire in the French context and to test the validity of this adaptation in a sample of patients with multiple chronic conditions.MethodsThe PACIC was translated into French language using a forward/backward procedure. The French version was validated using a sample of 150 patients treated for obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) and having multiple chronic co-morbidities. Several forms of validity were analysed: content; face; construct; and internal consistency. The construct validity was investigated with an exploratory factorial analysis.ResultsThe French-version of the PACIC consisted in 18 items, after merging two pairs of items due to redundancy. The high number of items exhibiting floor/ceiling effects and the non-normality of the ratings suggested that a 5-points rating scale was somewhat inappropriate to assess the patients’ experience of care. The construct validity of the French-PACIC was verified and resulted in a bi-dimensional structure. Overall this structure showed a high level of internal consistency. The PACIC score appeared to be significantly related to the age and self-reported health of the patients.ConclusionsA French-version of the PACIC questionnaire is now available to evaluate the patients’ experience of care and to monitor the quality improvements realised by the medical structures. This study also pointed out some methodological issues about the PACIC questionnaire, related to the format of the rating scale and to the structure of the questionnaire.

Effectiveness of intervention led by a community pharmacist for improving recognition of sleep apnea in primary care--a cohort study.

Despite its high prevalence and major public health ramifications, obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) remains underdiagnosed. The aim of this study was to determine whether the involvement of a community pharmacist (CP) in the care pathway of a patient at risk of OSAS, through the implementation of a community pharmacist (CP) intervention, was effective, i.e. increased the use of diagnostic tests in this population. We compared a cohort of patients included in a research protocol (exposed to a CP intervention) with patients having the same characteristics taken from a general population database who did not receive the intervention (unexposed group). The aim of the CP intervention was to educate patients about the risk of untreated OSAS, encouraging them to consult their general practitioner, and urging the doctor to continue investigations. We included 782 patients at risk of OSAS, i.e. taking one or more anti‐hypertensive drugs, being overweight (body mass index >25) and snoring almost every night (88 in the exposed group and 694 in the unexposed group). After a 6‐month follow‐up, the number of patients who underwent an OSAS diagnostic test was significantly higher in the exposed group compared to the unexposed group (22.7 versus 11.4%, P = 0.003). Being exposed to the pharmacist intervention was associated with a higher chance of undergoing a diagnostic test for OSAS, adjusted odds ratio: 2.24 (1.25–4.01). In conclusion, these findings provide arguments for the implementation of a CP OSAS screening intervention in CP routine practice.

Association Between Severity of Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Blood Markers of Liver Injury

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) may contribute to the development of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. We performed a multisite cross-sectional study to evaluate the association between the severity of OSA and blood markers of liver steatosis (using the hepatic steatosis index), cytolysis (based on alanine aminotransferase activity), and significant liver fibrosis (based on the FibroMeter [Echosens] nonalcoholic fatty liver disease score) in 1285 patients with suspected OSA in France. After adjusting for confounders including central obesity, the risk of liver steatosis increased with the severity of OSA (P for trend < .0001) and sleep-related hypoxemia (P for trend < .0003 for mean oxygen saturation). Decreasing mean oxygen saturation during sleep also was associated independently with a higher risk of liver cytolysis (P for trend < .0048). Severe OSA conferred an approximate 2.5-fold increase in risk for significant liver fibrosis compared with patients without OSA, but the association between OSA severity and liver fibrosis was not maintained after adjusting for confounders.