Nathan A. Heller
Tarleton State University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Nathan A. Heller.
The Journal of Education for Business | 2015
Gerald F. Burch; Nathan A. Heller; Jana J. Burch; Rusty Freed; Steve A. Steed
Student engagement is considered to be among the better predictors of learning, yet there is growing concern that there is no consensus on the conceptual foundation. The authors propose a conceptualization of student engagement grounded in A. W. Astins (1984) Student Involvement Theory and W. A. Kahns (1990) employee engagement research where student engagement is built on four components: emotional engagement, physical engagement, cognitive engagement in class, and cognitive engagement out of class. Using this framework the authors develop and psychometrically test a student engagement survey that can be used by researchers to advance engagement theory and by business schools to monitor continuous improvement.
Journal of Management Education | 2015
Gerald F. Burch; Jana J. Burch; Thomas P. Bradley; Nathan A. Heller
Educators have been challenged to identify threshold concepts and develop transformed students. This stands in stark contrast to many curriculum design and delivery models that currently view students as repositories of knowledge. In this article, we argue that educators can reach both goals, identify stumbling blocks and transforming students, through purposeful and insightful blending of a curriculum design and delivery using a conception-focused curriculum (CFC) to design courses built on the integration of concepts and viewing them through the lens of the discipline. This process takes advantage of the student’s previous knowledge and their natural learning tendencies. Educators that use the CFC model will identify threshold concepts, design learning activities that support learning outcomes, access prior knowledge and understandings, and guide students to overcome learning barriers.
Journal of Management Development | 2016
Gerald F. Burch; Jacob A. Heller; Jana J. Burch; Nathan A. Heller
Purpose Empirical research has demonstrated that web-based classes offer similar learning outcomes as face-to-face classes. The purpose of this paper is to examine the unintended effects of delivery method (web-based or face-to-face) on student learning, competency development, and student engagement. Design/methodology/approach Exam grades and a survey were collected from 180 undergraduate business students at a public university in the Southern USA. All students were enrolled in the same course, taught by three instructors. Findings One-way analysis of variance of the mean showed that declarative and procedural knowledge attained was not statistically significantly different for web-based or face-to-face instruction. However, students in the face-to-face sections reported higher attainment of cognitive intelligence competencies, social intelligence competencies, overall student engagement, emotional engagement, cognitive engagement in class, and cognitive engagement out of class although these outcomes were not specifically targeted as learning outcomes. Research limitations/implications Research participants all came from one course, at one university. Practical implications There are potentially beneficial, unintended outcomes associated with face-to-face courses. Web-based learning courses may require a redesigned approach that addresses these benefits by adding course elements and tasks that increase student engagement and creates opportunities for development of cognitive and social intelligence competencies. Originality/value Little research has been conducted on unintended learning outcomes such as competency development and student engagement. Therefore, this study demonstrates that educators should consider factors beyond learning assessment when comparing web-based to face-to-face courses.
Journal of Family Business Management | 2015
Gerald F. Burch; John H. Batchelor; Jana J. Burch; Nathan A. Heller
Purpose – Family businesses consist of a family system, a business system, and an ownership system. Current undergraduate business education only prepares family business students with business system education, thereby leaving the student with a misconception of the environment in which they will work. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach – Business education must change to provide these students with an integrated curriculum that allows them to make connections across disciplines, and provides the additional soft skills and hard skills needed to accomplish the task. Findings – The authors propose a conception focussed curriculum to accomplish this task and make suggestions on how such a system might be implemented. Originality/value – This approach provides family business educators with a model that they can implement, thereby better preparing family business students for their return to their family work.
Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education | 2015
Gerald F. Burch; Jana J. Burch; Nathan A. Heller; John H. Batchelor
Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Learning | 2014
Gerald F. Burch; John H. Batchelor; Nathan A. Heller; Joanna Shaw; Walter R. Kendall; Beverly Turner
Archive | 2012
Nathan A. Heller; Victor L. Heller; Consuelo Ramirez; Linda Gall
Academy of Management Proceedings | 2016
Gerald F. Burch; Robert C. Giambatista; John H. Batchelor; J. Duane Hoover; Jana J. Burch; Nathan A. Heller; Joanna Shaw
Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Learning | 2014
Gerald F. Burch; Nathan A. Heller; Rusty Freed
Advances in Business Research | 2011
Nathan A. Heller