Nathan T. Kurtz
University of Maryland, Baltimore
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Nathan T. Kurtz.
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2014
Melinda A. Webster; Ignatius G. Rigor; Son V. Nghiem; Nathan T. Kurtz; Sinead L. Farrell; Donald K. Perovich; Matthew Sturm
Snow plays a key role in the growth and decay of Arctic sea ice. In winter, it insulates sea ice from cold air temperatures, slowing sea ice growth. From spring to summer, the albedo of snow determines how much insolation is absorbed by the sea ice and underlying ocean, impacting ice melt processes. Knowledge of the contemporary snow depth distribution is essential for estimating sea ice thickness and volume, and for understanding and modeling sea ice thermodynamics in the changing Arctic. This study assesses spring snow depth distribution on Arctic sea ice using airborne radar observations from Operation IceBridge for 2009–2013. Data were validated using coordinated in situ measurements taken in March 2012 during the Bromine, Ozone, and Mercury Experiment (BROMEX) field campaign. We find a correlation of 0.59 and root-mean-square error of 5.8 cm between the airborne and in situ data. Using this relationship and IceBridge snow thickness products, we compared the recent results with data from the 1937, 1954–1991 Soviet drifting ice stations. The comparison shows thinning of the snowpack, from 35.1 ± 9.4 to 22.2 ± 1.9 cm in the western Arctic, and from 32.8 ± 9.4 to 14.5 ± 1.9 cm in the Beaufort and Chukchi seas. These changes suggest a snow depth decline of 37 ± 29% in the western Arctic and 56 ± 33% in the Beaufort and Chukchi seas. Thinning is negatively correlated with the delayed onset of sea ice freezeup during autumn.
Annals of Glaciology | 2011
Thorsten Markus; Ra Massom; Ap Worby; Vi Lytle; Nathan T. Kurtz; Edward Maksym
Abstract In October 2003 a campaign on board the Australian icebreaker Aurora Australis had the objective to validate standard Aqua Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer (AMSR-E) sea-ice products. Additionally, the satellite laser altimeter on the Ice, Cloud and land Elevation Satellite (ICESat) was in operation. To capture the large-scale information on the sea-ice conditions necessary for satellite validation, the measurement strategy was to obtain large-scale sea-ice statistics using extensive sea-ice measurements in a Lagrangian approach. A drifting buoy array, spanning initially 50 km × 100 km, was surveyed during the campaign. In situ measurements consisted of 12 transects, 50–500 m, with detailed snow and ice measurements as well as random snow depth sampling of floes within the buoy array using helicopters. In order to increase the amount of coincident in situ and satellite data an approach has been developed to extrapolate measurements in time and in space. Assuming no change in snow depth and freeboard occurred during the period of the campaign on the floes surveyed, we use buoy ice-drift information as well as daily estimates of thin-ice fraction and rough-ice vs smooth-ice fractions from AMSR-E and QuikSCAT, respectively, to estimate kilometer-scale snow depth and freeboard for other days. the results show that ICESat freeboard estimates have a mean difference of 1.8 cm when compared with the in situ data and a correlation coefficient of 0.6. Furthermore, incorporating ICESat roughness information into the AMSR-E snow depth algorithm significantly improves snow depth retrievals. Snow depth retrievals using a combination of AMSR-E and ICESat data agree with in situ data with a mean difference of 2.3 cm and a correlation coefficient of 0.84 with a negligible bias.
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2009
Nathan T. Kurtz; Thorsten Markus; Donald J. Cavalieri; Lynn C. Sparling; William B. Krabill; Albin J. Gasiewski; John G. Sonntag
Archive | 2018
Son V. Nghiem; Thomas Busche; Thomas Krauß; Kirsteen Tinto; Wolfgang Rack; Pat J. Langhorne; Christian Haas; Caryn Panowicz; Ignatius G. Rigor; Paul Morin; G. Neumann; Markus Bachmann; Nathan T. Kurtz; John G. Sonntag; John Woods; Stephen F. Ackley; Hongjie Xie; Ted Maksym
Geophysical Research Letters | 2018
Alek A. Petty; Marika M. Holland; David A. Bailey; Nathan T. Kurtz
Archive | 2017
Alek A. Petty; D. Schroder; Julienne Stroeve; Thorsten Markus; Jeffrey Miller; Nathan T. Kurtz; Daniel L. Feltham; Daniela Flocco
Archive | 2017
Alek A. Petty; Thorsten Markus; Nathan T. Kurtz
Geophysical Research Letters | 2011
Nathan T. Kurtz; Sinead L. Farrell
Archive | 2010
R. Kwok; Carl Leuschen; Ben Panzer; Aqsa Patel; Nathan T. Kurtz; Thorsten Markus; Benjamin Holt; Prasad Gogineni
Archive | 2010
Nathan T. Kurtz; Sinead L. Farrell; Thorsten Markus; David C. McAdoo