Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Nathaniel B. Miller is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Nathaniel B. Miller.


Nature | 2013

July 2012 Greenland melt extent enhanced by low-level liquid clouds

Ralf Bennartz; Matthew D. Shupe; David D. Turner; Von P. Walden; Konrad Steffen; Christopher J. Cox; Mark S. Kulie; Nathaniel B. Miller; Claire Pettersen

Melting of the world’s major ice sheets can affect human and environmental conditions by contributing to sea-level rise. In July 2012, an historically rare period of extended surface melting was observed across almost the entire Greenland ice sheet, raising questions about the frequency and spatial extent of such events. Here we show that low-level clouds consisting of liquid water droplets (‘liquid clouds’), via their radiative effects, played a key part in this melt event by increasing near-surface temperatures. We used a suite of surface-based observations, remote sensing data, and a surface energy-balance model. At the critical surface melt time, the clouds were optically thick enough and low enough to enhance the downwelling infrared flux at the surface. At the same time they were optically thin enough to allow sufficient solar radiation to penetrate through them and raise surface temperatures above the melting point. Outside this narrow range in cloud optical thickness, the radiative contribution to the surface energy budget would have been diminished, and the spatial extent of this melting event would have been smaller. We further show that these thin, low-level liquid clouds occur frequently, both over Greenland and across the Arctic, being present around 30–50 per cent of the time. Our results may help to explain the difficulties that global climate models have in simulating the Arctic surface energy budget, particularly as models tend to under-predict the formation of optically thin liquid clouds at supercooled temperatures—a process potentially necessary to account fully for temperature feedbacks in a warming Arctic climate.


Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society | 2013

High and Dry: New Observations of Tropospheric and Cloud Properties above the Greenland Ice Sheet

Matthew D. Shupe; David D. Turner; Von P. Walden; Ralf Bennartz; Maria P. Cadeddu; Benjamin B. Castellani; Christopher J. Cox; David Hudak; Mark S. Kulie; Nathaniel B. Miller; Ryan R. Neely; William D. Neff; Penny M. Rowe

Cloud and atmospheric properties strongly influence the mass and energy budgets of the Greenland Ice Sheet (GIS). To address critical gaps in the understanding of these systems, a new suite of cloud- and atmosphere-observing instruments has been installed on the central GIS as part of the Integrated Characterization of Energy, Clouds, Atmospheric State, and Precipitation at Summit (ICECAPS) project. During the first 20 months in operation, this complementary suite of active and passive ground-based sensors and radiosondes has provided new and unique perspectives on important cloud–atmosphere properties. High atop the GIS, the atmosphere is extremely dry and cold with strong near-surface static stability predominating throughout the year, particularly in winter. This low-level thermodynamic structure, coupled with frequent moisture inversions, conveys the importance of advection for local cloud and precipitation formation. Cloud liquid water is observed in all months of the year, even the particularly cold...


Journal of Geophysical Research | 2016

Evaluating and improving cloud phase in the Community Atmosphere Model version 5 using spaceborne lidar observations

Jennifer E. Kay; Line Bourdages; Nathaniel B. Miller; Ariel Morrison; Vineel Yettella; Hélène Chepfer; Brian E. Eaton

Spaceborne lidar observations from the Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observation (CALIPSO) satellite are used to evaluate cloud amount and cloud phase in the Community Atmosphere Model version 5 (CAM5), the atmospheric component of a widely used state-of-the-art global coupled climate model (Community Earth System Model). By embedding a lidar simulator within CAM5, the idiosyncrasies of spaceborne lidar cloud detection and phase assignment are replicated. As a result, this study makes scale-aware and definition-aware comparisons between model-simulated and observed cloud amount and cloud phase. In the global mean, CAM5 has insufficient liquid cloud and excessive ice cloud when compared to CALIPSO observations. Over the ice-covered Arctic Ocean, CAM5 has insufficient liquid cloud in all seasons. Having important implications for projections of future sea level rise, a liquid cloud deficit contributes to a cold bias of 2–3°C for summer daily maximum near-surface air temperatures at Summit, Greenland. Over the midlatitude storm tracks, CAM5 has excessive ice cloud and insufficient liquid cloud. Storm track cloud phase biases in CAM5 maximize over the Southern Ocean, which also has larger-than-observed seasonal variations in cloud phase. Physical parameter modifications reduce the Southern Ocean cloud phase and shortwave radiation biases in CAM5 and illustrate the power of the CALIPSO observations as an observational constraint. The results also highlight the importance of using a regime-based, as opposed to a geographic-based, model evaluation approach. More generally, the results demonstrate the importance and value of simulator-enabled comparisons of cloud phase in models used for future climate projection.


Journal of Climate | 2015

Cloud Radiative Forcing at Summit, Greenland

Nathaniel B. Miller; Matthew D. Shupe; Christopher J. Cox; Von P. Walden; David D. Turner; Konrad Steffen

AbstractThe surface energy budget plays a critical role in determining the mass balance of the Greenland Ice Sheet, which in turn has significant implications for global sea levels. Nearly three years of data (January 2011–October 2013) are used to characterize the annual cycle of surface radiative fluxes and cloud radiative forcing (CRF) from the central Greenland Ice Sheet at Summit Station. The annual average CRF is 33 W m−2, representing a substantial net cloud warming of the central Greenland surface. Unlike at other Arctic sites, clouds warm the surface during the summer. The surface albedo is high at Summit throughout the year, limiting the cooling effect of the shortwave CRF and thus the total CRF is dominated by cloud longwave warming effects in all months. All monthly mean CRF values are positive (warming), as are 98.5% of 3-hourly cases. The annual cycle of CRF is largely driven by the occurrence of liquid-bearing clouds, with a minimum in spring and maximum in late summer. Optically thick liqu...


Journal of Climate | 2017

Observational Evidence Linking Arctic Supercooled Liquid Cloud Biases in CESM to Snowfall Processes

Elin A. McIlhattan; Tristan S. L’Ecuyer; Nathaniel B. Miller

AbstractClouds are a key regulator of Earth’s surface energy balance. The presence or absence of clouds, along with their macroscale and microscale characteristics, is the primary factor modulating the amount of radiation incident on the surface. Recent observational studies in the Arctic highlight the ubiquity of supercooled liquid-containing clouds (LCCs) and their disproportionately large impact on surface melt. Global climate models (GCMs) do not simulate enough Arctic LCCs compared to observations, and thus fail to represent the surface energy balance correctly. This work utilizes spaceborne observations from NASA’s A-Train satellite constellation to explore physical processes behind LCCs and surface energy biases in the Community Earth System Model Large Ensemble (CESM-LE) project output. On average CESM-LE underestimates LCC frequency by ~18% over the Arctic, resulting in a ~20 W m−2 bias in downwelling longwave radiation (DLR) over the ~18 × 106 km2 area examined. Collocated observations of fallin...


Journal of Climate | 2017

Cloud–Atmospheric Boundary Layer–Surface Interactions on the Greenland Ice Sheet during the July 2012 Extreme Melt Event

Amy Solomon; Matthew D. Shupe; Nathaniel B. Miller

AbstractRegional model simulations of the 10–13 July 2012 extreme melt event over the Greenland Ice Sheet (GIS) are used to investigate how low-level liquid-bearing clouds impact surface energy fluxes, and therefore the energy available for melt. A sensitivity study in which the radiation code is modified so that cloud liquid and ice do not emit, absorb, or reflect radiation is used to identify cloud impacts beyond the cloud radiative effect. It is found that Arctic mixed-phase stratocumuli are not produced in the sensitivity experiment, highlighting that cloud radiative fluxes are required to maintain the clouds. A number of feedbacks are found that damp the warming effect of the clouds. Thin mixed-phase clouds increase the downward longwave fluxes by 100 W m−2, but upward daytime surface longwave fluxes increase by 20 W m−2 (60 W m−2 at night) and net shortwave fluxes decrease by 40 W m−2 (partially due to a 0.05 increase in surface albedo), leaving only 40 W m−2 available for melt. This 40 W m−2 is dis...


Journal of Climate | 2017

Greenland Clouds Observed in CALIPSO-GOCCP: Comparison with Ground-Based Summit Observations

Adrien Lacour; Hélène Chepfer; Matthew D. Shupe; Nathaniel B. Miller; Vincent Noel; Jennifer E. Kay; David D. Turner; Rodrigo Guzman

AbstractSpaceborne lidar observations from the Cloud–Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observations (CALIPSO) satellite provide the first-ever observations of cloud vertical structure and phase over the entire Greenland Ice Sheet. This study leverages CALIPSO observations over Greenland to pursue two investigations. First, the GCM-Oriented CALIPSO Cloud Product (CALIPSO-GOCCP) observations are compared with collocated ground-based radar and lidar observations at Summit, Greenland. The liquid cloud cover agrees well between the spaceborne and ground-based observations. In contrast, ground–satellite differences reach 30% in total cloud cover and 40% in cloud fraction below 2 km above ground level, due to optically very thin ice clouds (IWC < 2.5 × 10−3 g m−3) missed by CALIPSO-GOCCP. Those results are compared with satellite cloud climatologies from the GEWEX cloud assessment. Most passive sensors detect fewer clouds than CALIPSO-GOCCP and the Summit ground observations, due to different detec...


Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics | 2018

Super-cooled liquid fogs over the central Greenland ice sheet

Christopher J. Cox; David Noone; Max Berkelhammer; Matthew D. Shupe; William D. Neff; Nathaniel B. Miller; Von P. Walden; Konrad Steffen

Radiation fogs at Summit, Greenland (72.58°N, 38.48°W, 3210 masl) are frequently reported by observers. The fogs are often accompanied by fogbows, indicating the particles are composed of liquid and because of the low temperatures at Summit, this liquid is super-cooled. Here we analyse the formation of these fogs as well as their physical and radiative properties. In situ observations of particle size and droplet number concentration were made using scattering spectrometers 15 near 2 m and 10 m height from 2012 to 2014. These data are complemented by co-located observations of meteorology, turbulent and radiative fluxes, and remote sensing. We find that liquid fogs occur in all seasons with the highest frequency in September and a minimum in April. Due to the characteristics of the boundary-layer meteorology, the fogs are elevated, forming between 2 m and 10 m and the particles then fall toward the surface. The diameter of mature particles is typically 2025 μm in summer. Number concentrations are higher at warmer temperatures and, thus, higher in summer compared to winter. 20 The fogs form at temperatures as warm as warm as -5 °C, while the coldest form at temperatures approaching -40 °C. Facilitated by the elevated condensation, in winter 2/3 of fogs occurred within a relatively warm layer above the surface when the nearsurface air is below -40 °C, as cold as -57 °C, which is well below that which can support liquid water. This implies that fog particles settling through this layer of cold air freeze in the air column before contacting the surface, thereby accumulating at the surface as ice without riming. Liquid fogs under otherwise clear skies impart annually 1.5 W m-2 of cloud radiative forcing 25 (CRF). While this is a relatively small contribution to the surface radiation climatology, individual events are influential. The mean CRF during liquid fog events is 26 W m-2, but can sometimes be much higher. An extreme case study was observed to radiatively force 5 °C of surface warming during the coldest part of the day, effectively damping the diurnal cycle. At lower elevations of the ice sheet where melting is more common, such damping could signal a role for fogs in preconditioning the surface for melting later in the day. 30 Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2018-819 Manuscript under review for journal Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discussion started: 17 October 2018 c


The Cryosphere | 2017

Surface energy budget responses to radiative forcing at Summit, Greenland

Nathaniel B. Miller; Matthew D. Shupe; Christopher J. Cox; David Noone; P. Ola G. Persson; Konrad Steffen


Journal of Geophysical Research | 2016

Evaluating and improving cloud phase in the Community Atmosphere Model version 5 using spaceborne lidar observations: CAM Cloud Phase Evaluation with CALIPSO

Jennifer E. Kay; Line Bourdages; Nathaniel B. Miller; Ariel Morrison; Vineel Yettella; Hélène Chepfer; Brian E. Eaton

Collaboration


Dive into the Nathaniel B. Miller's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Christopher J. Cox

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David D. Turner

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jennifer E. Kay

University of Colorado Boulder

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Von P. Walden

Washington State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David Noone

Oregon State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ariel Morrison

Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Brian E. Eaton

National Center for Atmospheric Research

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mark S. Kulie

University of Wisconsin-Madison

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

P. Ola G. Persson

University of Colorado Boulder

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge