Naveed Sami

Treatment of Pemphigus Vulgaris

AbstractBackground: Pemphigus vulgaris is a rare, chronic, autoimmune mucocutaneous blistering disease. The disease can progress to involve the skin and multiple mucosae. Pemphigus vulgaris can be associated with a high morbidity and significant mortality rate. Treatment of the condition can be challenging. Conventional therapy primarily consists of systemic corticosteroids and immunosuppressant agents. In some patients with pemphigus vulgaris, these agents fail to provide an effective clinical response or have significant adverse effects. Methods: We evaluated data on 792 patients with pemphigus vulgaris retrieved from PubMed, covering the period 1973–2004. Only patients reported in the English literature were included in this review.Recently, several new therapeutic agents and treatment modalities have been described for the treatment of patients with pemphigus vulgaris. Some therapeutic agents that were used in the past and abandoned have recently regained favor. This review focuses on the therapeutic uses of dapsone, methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil, chlorambucil, dexamethasone-cyclophosphamide pulse therapy, immunoablative therapy with cyclophosphamide, plasmapheresis, and extracorporeal photochemotherapy. Newer agents, such as intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) therapy and rituximab (an anti-CD20 chimeric monoclonal antibody), are also discussed. Results and conclusions: Among the oral agents, dapsone may be considered a first-line agent. This is primarily because the risk of potentially fatal adverse effects with this drug is lower than that associated with other available chemotherapeutic agents. In patients who are refractory to oral agents, alternative treatments have been used to prevent further disease progression. Recently, the use of IVIg therapy, with a defined protocol, has been reported to be beneficial. This therapy is promising since it may allow for discontinuation of all other therapies and is safe. The adverse effects from IVIg therapy are minimal. Furthermore, compared with other therapies, it provides a better quality of life.

Diagnostic features of pemphigus vulgaris in patients with bullous pemphigoid. Molecular analysis of autoantibody profile.

Background: The simultaneous presence of features of pemphigus vulgaris (PV) in patients with bullous pemphigoid (BP) has previously been reported in the literature. Objective: The purpose of this retrospective study is to present 13 patients with an initial diagnosis of BP, who subsequently demonstrated coexistent serological features of both BP and PV. Methods: The following information on each patient was documented, at the time of initial diagnosis: clinical profile on presentation, histology, direct immunofluorescence, indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) using monkey esophagus as substrate, salt-split skin (SSS) and an immunoblot assay. Since all 13 patients failed to respond to conventional systemic therapy, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) was used as an alternative treatment modality. Prior to initiating IVIg therapy, in all 13 patients, serological studies were performed. In addition to IIF using monkey esophagus, an immunoblot assay and SSS, an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was performed to detect antibodies to desmogleins. These different assays were done to identify pathological autoantibodies typical of BP and PV. A control group of 25 healthy normal individuals, 37 patients with BP, 17 patients with PV and 12 patients with pemphigus foliaceus were used for comparison of serological studies. Results: At the time of initial presentation, histological and immunopathological studies confirmed the diagnosis of BP in all 13 patients. Prior to the initiation of IVIg therapy, results of IIF using monkey esophagus as substrate demonstrated high levels of anti-intercellular cement substance (anti-ICS) or antikeratinocyte cell surface antibody. Sera of all 13 patients on SSS bound to the epidermal side of the split. In an immunoblot, using bovine gingival lysate as substrate, sera of 6 patients bound to both a 230-kD (BP Ag1) and 180-kD protein (BP Ag2), while 7 sera bound to only a 230-kD protein. All 13 patients had high levels of antibodies to desmoglein 3 on ELISA. In a pilot experiment, the anti-ICS antibody in sera from 6 random patients was found to be predominantly of the IgG4 subclass. Use of IVIg resulted in an effective clinical response and the maintenance of a prolonged clinical remission. Conclusion: In patients with BP, who are nonresponsive to conventional therapy, the presence of two autoimmune diseases or a dual diagnosis should be considered.

The use of rituximab in treatment of epidermolysis bullosa acquisita: Three new cases and a review of the literature

Epidermolysis bullosa acquisita (EBA) is a rare, subepidermal blistering disease affecting the skin and mucous membranes that often remains refractory to standard immunosuppressive therapy. We present three original cases and a review of the literature of 20 cases of refractory EBA treated with rituximab as monotherapy or in combination with other agents. Complete control (with or without therapy) and remission were seen in 56% of patients treated with rituximab monotherapy and 75% of patients treated with rituximab and immunoadsorption (IA). We conclude EBA refractory to standard immunosuppressive therapy may show a more favorable long‐term response to the addition of rituximab; and rituximab in combination with intravenous immunoglobulin or IA may provide utility in terminating acute disease. Additional data are needed to evaluate the safety and long‐term outcomes of rituximab‐based treatment.