Ned L. Williams
University of Utah
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Ned L. Williams.
Gynecologic Oncology | 2016
Andrew Orton; Dustin Boothe; Ned L. Williams; Thomas Buchmiller; Y. Jessica Huang; Gita Suneja; Matthew M. Poppe; David K. Gaffney
PURPOSE Prospective, randomized data does not exist to guide treatment in primary vaginal cancer (PVC). We evaluated the impact of brachytherapy on survival in women with PVC. METHODS AND MATERIALS Women who received radiotherapy for PVC were identified using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Result database. Two retrospective cohorts were created; women who received external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) alone and those who received brachytherapy (alone or in combination of EBRT). Nearest-neighbor propensity score matching was used to balance the groups according to measured covariates. Cox proportional hazard regression modeling was used to estimate the effect of receipt of brachytherapy on survival. RESULTS Two thousand five hundred seventeen vaginal cancer patients were identified. Squamous cell carcinoma made up 75% of tumors. Median overall survival (OS) for patients receiving EBRT alone was 3.6years (95% CI, 3.0-4.2years) versus 6.1years (95% CI 5.2-7.2years) for patients receiving brachytherapy (p=<0.001). Cox proportional hazard model revealed decrease risk of death among patients that received brachytherapy in the matched cohort (HR 0.77; 95% CI 0.68-0.86). Brachytherapy reduced risk of death among patients in all stage groups. No patient demographic or tumor variables favored the use of EBRT alone. Brachytherapy was associated with a decreased risk of death for all FIGO stages. Brachytherapy benefited patients with squamous cell carcinoma (HR 0.80; 95% CI 0.70-0.92) and adenocarcinoma (HR 0.69; 95% CI 0.49-0.95). Tumors larger than 5cm had the greatest benefit from brachytherapy (HR 0.68; 95% CI 0.50-0.91). CONCLUSIONS Brachytherapy should be encouraged for all suitable patients with PVC.
International Journal of Gynecological Cancer | 2017
Dustin Boothe; Ned L. Williams; Bismarck Odei; Matthew M. Poppe; Theresa L. Werner; Gita Suneja; David K. Gaffney
Objective Early-stage high-risk endometrial cancer (HREC) treated with adjuvant radiotherapy (aRT) alone has been associated with an increased risk of distant relapse. The addition of chemotherapy to radiotherapy (aCRT) may benefit overall survival (OS). We investigated the patterns-of-care and OS benefit of aCRT in HREC by analyzing a large national registry. Methods Our query was limited to patients with the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IB and II HREC with either papillary serous, clear cell, or grade 3 adenocarcinoma, diagnosed between 2004 and 2012. Logistic and Cox regression analyses were utilized to identify predictors of aCRT use and OS, respectively. Survival analysis was performed with Kaplan Meier and log-rank methods. Propensity score matching was employed to decrease the potential influence of selection bias. Results A total of 11,746 patients were identified for analysis with 8206 (69.9%) receiving aCRT, and 3540 (30.1%) received aRT. Predictors of aCRT included International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage II (odds ratio [OR], 1.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.22–1.57), papillary serous (OR, 9.44; 95% CI, 8.22–10.85) or clear cell (OR, 3.21; 95% CI, 2.59–3.97) histology, lymph nodes removed (OR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.31–1.69), and receipt of brachytherapy alone (OR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.36–1.78). Estimated 5-year OS was 75.2% for patients receiving aRT only and 79.2% for those receiving aCRT (P < 0.001). When compared with aRT, aCRT was associated with improved OS on multivariate (hazard ratio, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.61–0.99) analysis. A univariate shared-frailty Cox regression after propensity score matching revealed persistence of the OS benefit with aCRT (hazard ratio, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.65–0.84). Conclusions The addition of adjuvant chemotherapy to radiation in HREC is associated with improved OS. Multiple demographic and clinical factors significantly influence the choice of adjuvant therapy in this setting.
American Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2016
Mohamed A. Elshaikh; Sean Vance; David K. Gaffney; Matthew Biagioli; Anuja Jhingran; Shruti Jolly; Elizabeth A. Kidd; Larissa J. Lee; Linna Li; David H. Moore; Gautam G. Rao; Andrew O. Wahl; Ned L. Williams; Catheryn M. Yashar; William Small
Objectives:In women with endometrial carcinoma (EC), tumor recurrences tend to occur in the 2- to 3-year period following surgical staging. Management of disease recurrence in EC poses significant challenges. These patients represent a heterogenous group where histologic subtypes, previous adjuvant management, interval since completion of adjuvant therapy, and size and site(s) of disease recurrence all have important implications on salvage therapies and prognosis. No randomized controlled trials have been published to determine optimal management in this group of patients. An expert panel was convened to reach consensus on the most appropriate management options in this group of patients. Methods:The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment. Results:Five clinical variants were developed to address common scenarios in the management of women with recurrent EC. Group members reached consensus on the appropriateness of specific evaluation and treatment approaches with numerical ratings. Conclusions:In combining available medical literature and expert opinions, this manuscript may serve as an aid for other practitioners in the appropriate management of women with recurrent EC.
Gynecologic oncology reports | 2015
Hilary P. Bagshaw; Ned L. Williams; Y. Jessica Huang; David K. Gaffney
Primary urethral cancer is a rare diagnosis, especially in females. This report presents the utilization of a palladium interstitial implant and a review of the retrospective data published on the management of female urethral cancer. Excellent local control and survival has been obtained with the use of a palladium interstitial implant in combination with external beam radiotherapy and concurrent chemotherapy. This modality represents a novel and effective way to treat primary urethral cancer in females.
Current Oncology Reports | 2015
Ned L. Williams; Theresa L. Werner; Elke A. Jarboe; David K. Gaffney
Oncology | 2015
Shruti Jolly; P.D. Soni; David K. Gaffney; Matthew Biagioli; Mohamed A. Elshaikh; Anuja Jhingran; Elizabeth A. Kidd; Larissa J. Lee; Linna Li; David H. Moore; Gautam G. Rao; Andrew O. Wahl; Ned L. Williams; Catheryn M. Yashar; William Small
Oncology | 2016
Andrew O. Wahl; David K. Gaffney; Anuja Jhingran; Catheryn M. Yashar; Matthew Biagioli; Mohamed A. Elshaikh; Shruti Jolly; Elizabeth A. Kidd; Larissa J. Lee; Linna Li; David H. Moore; Gautam G. Rao; Ned L. Williams; William Small
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2016
Dustin Boothe; Ned L. Williams; Bismarck Odei; Matt Poppe; Theresa L. Werner; Gita Suneja; David K. Gaffney
Cureus | 2016
Samual Francis; Ned L. Williams; Christopher J. Anker; Akram Shaaban; Robin D. Kim; Dennis C. Shrieve
Brachytherapy | 2016
Ned L. Williams; Jonathan Frandsen; R Jeffrey Lee; John Snyder; L Scott Chidester; Jay Bishoff; William Sauce