Neda Amini
Johns Hopkins University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Neda Amini.
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery | 2016
Doris Wagner; Mara McAdams DeMarco; Neda Amini; Stefan Buttner; Dorry L. Segev; Faiz Gani; Timothy M. Pawlik
According to the United States census bureau 20% of Americans will be older than 65 years in 2030 and half of them will need an operation - equating to about 36 million older surgical patients. Older adults are prone to complications during gastrointestinal cancer treatment and therefore may need to undergo special pretreatment assessments that incorporate frailty and sarcopenia assessments. A focused, structured literature review on PubMed and Google Scholar was performed to identify primary research articles, review articles, as well as practice guidelines on frailty and sarcopenia among patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery. The initial search identified 450 articles; after eliminating duplicates, reports that did not include surgical patients, case series, as well as case reports, 42 publications on the impact of frailty and/or sarcopenia on outcome of patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery were included. Frailty is defined as a clinically recognizable state of increased vulnerability to physiologic stressors resulting from aging. Frailty is associated with a decline in physiologic reserve and function across multiple physiologic systems. Sarcopenia is a syndrome characterized by progressive and generalized loss of skeletal muscle mass and strength. Unlike cachexia, which is typically associated with weight loss due to chemotherapy or a general malignancy-related cachexia syndrome, sarcopenia relates to muscle mass rather than simply weight. As such, while weight reflects nutritional status, sarcopenia - the loss of muscle mass - is a more accurate and quantitative global marker of frailty. While chronologic age is an important element in assessing a patients peri-operative risk, physiologic age is a more important determinant of outcomes. Geriatric assessment tools are important components of the pre-operative work-up and can help identify patients who suffer from frailty. Such data are important, as frailty and sarcopenia have repeatedly been demonstrated among the strongest predictors of both short- and long-term outcome following complicated surgical procedures such as esophageal, gastric, colorectal, and hepato-pancreatico-biliary resections.
Surgery | 2016
Stefan Buettner; Faiz Gani; Neda Amini; Gaya Spolverato; Yuhree Kim; Arman Kilic; Doris Wagner; Timothy M. Pawlik
BACKGROUND Although previous reports have focused on factors at the hospital level to explain variations in postoperative outcomes, less is known regarding the effect of provider-specific factors on postoperative outcomes such as failure-to-rescue (FTR) and postoperative mortality. The current study aimed to quantify the relative contributions of surgeon and hospital volume on the volume-outcomes relationship among a cohort of patients undergoing liver resection. METHODS Patients undergoing liver surgery for cancer were identified using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 2001 and 2009. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with mortality and FTR. Point estimates were used to calculate the relative effects of hospital and surgeon volume on mortality and FTR. RESULTS A total of 5,075 patients underwent liver surgery and met inclusion criteria. Median patient age was 62 years (interquartile range, 52-70) and 55.2% of patients were male. Mortality was lowest among patients treated at high-volume hospitals and among patients treated by high-volume surgeons (both P < .001). Similar patterns in FTR were noted relative to hospital and surgeon volume (hospital volume: low vs intermediate vs high; 10.3 vs 9.0 vs 5.2%; surgeon volume: low vs intermediate vs high, 11.1 vs 9.1 vs 4.1%; both P < .05). On multivariable analysis, compared with high-volume surgeons, lower volume surgeons demonstrated greater odds for mortality (intermediate: odds ratio [OR], 2.27 [95% CI, 1.27-4.06; P = .006]; low, OR, 2.83 [95% CI, 1.52-5.27; P = .001]), and FTR (intermediate: OR, 2.86 [95% CI, 1.53-5.34, P = .001]; low, OR, 3.40 [95% CI, 1.75-6.63; P < .001]). While hospital volume accounted for 0.5% of the surgeon volume effect on increased FTR for low-volume surgeons, surgeon volume accounted for nearly all of the hospital volume effect on increased FTR in low-volume hospitals. CONCLUSION The risk of complications, mortality, and FTR were less among both high-volume hospitals and high-volume surgeons, but the beneficial effect of volume on outcomes was attributable largely to surgeon volume.
British Journal of Surgery | 2016
Doris Wagner; S. Büttner; Yuhree Kim; Faiz Gani; Li Xu; Georgios A. Margonis; Neda Amini; Ihab R. Kamel; Timothy M. Pawlik
Although frailty is a known determinant of poor postoperative outcomes, it can be difficult to identify in patients before surgery. The authors sought to develop a preoperative frailty risk model to predict mortality among patients aged 65 years or more.
Journal of Surgical Oncology | 2014
Neda Amini; Aslam Ejaz; Gaya Spolverato; Yuhree Kim; Joseph M. Herman; Timothy M. Pawlik
Data on outcomes after liver‐directed therapy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) are limited due to the rarity of the disease. We sought to define overall utilization and temporal trends of liver‐directed therapy for ICC.
American Journal of Surgery | 2015
Neda Amini; Yuhree Kim; Omar Hyder; Gaya Spolverato; Christopher L. Wu; Andrew J. Page; Timothy M. Pawlik
BACKGROUND We sought to define trends in the use of epidural analgesia (EA) for hepatopancreatic procedures, as well as to characterize inpatient outcomes relative to the use of EA. METHODS The Nationwide Inpatient Sample database was queried to identify all elective hepatopancreatic surgeries between 2000 and 2012. In-hospital outcomes were compared among patients receiving EA vs conventional analgesia using propensity matching. RESULTS EA utilization was 7.4% (n = 3,961). The use of EA among minimally invasive procedures increased from 3.8% in 2000 to 9.1% in 2012. The odds of sepsis (odds ratio [OR] .72, 95% confidence interval [CI] .56 to .93), respiratory failure (OR .79, 95% CI .69 to .91), and postoperative pneumonia (OR .77, 95% CI .61 to .98), as well as overall in-hospital mortality (OR .72, 95% CI .56 to .93) were lower in the EA cohort (all P < .05). In contrast, no association was noted between EA and postoperative hemorrhage (OR .81, 95% CI .65 to 1.01, P = .06). CONCLUSIONS EA use among patients undergoing hepatopancreatic procedures remains low. After controlling for confounding factors, EA remained associated with a reduction in specific pulmonary-related complications, as well as in-hospital mortality.
JAMA Surgery | 2016
Howard Nelson-Williams; Faiz Gani; Arman Kilic; Gaya Spolverato; Yuhree Kim; Doris Wagner; Neda Amini; Aslam Ejaz; Timothy M. Pawlik
IMPORTANCE In an era of accountable care, understanding variation in health care costs is critical to reducing health care spending. OBJECTIVE To identify factors associated with increased hospital costs and quantify variations in costs among individual hospitals in patients undergoing liver and pancreatic surgery in the United States. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Retrospective analysis of total costs among 42 480 patients undergoing hepatopancreaticobiliary surgery from January 1, 2002, through December 31, 2011, using a nationally representative data set (Nationwide Inpatient Sample of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project). Analysis was conducted in May 2015. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Total inpatient costs and proportional variation in inpatient costs among individual hospitals. RESULTS Among the 42 480 patients who underwent liver or pancreatic resection, the median age was 62 years, 52.4% were female, and 72.9% had a Charlson Comorbidity Index of 2 or higher. The median cost for the entire cohort was
Cancer | 2016
Georgios A. Margonis; Yuhree Kim; Kazunari Sasaki; Mario Samaha; Neda Amini; Timothy M. Pawlik
21,535 (interquartile range,
Journal of Surgical Education | 2016
Joseph Lopez; Afshin Ameri; Srinivas M. Susarla; Sashank Reddy; Ashwin Soni; J.W. Tong; Neda Amini; Rizwan Ahmed; James W. May; W. P. Andrew Lee; Amir H. Dorafshar
15,373-
Journal of Surgical Oncology | 2015
Neda Amini; Gaya Spolverato; Yuhree Kim; Malcolm H. Squires; George A. Poultsides; Ryan C. Fields; Carl Schmidt; Sharon M. Weber; Konstantinos I. Votanopoulos; Shishir K. Maithel; Timothy M. Pawlik
31,104), varying from
Annals of Surgery | 2017
Yuhree Kim; Neda Amini; Faiz Gani; Doris Wagner; Daniel J. Johnson; Andrew M. Scott; Aslam Ejaz; Georgios A. Margonis; Li Xu; Stefan Buettner; Jack O. Wasey; Ruchika Goel; Steven M. Frank; Timothy M. Pawlik
3320 to