Neeraj R. Desai

Comparison of 3 different methods used to measure the rapid shallow breathing index

PURPOSE Rapid shallow breathing index (RSBI) is conveniently measured through the ventilator. If continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is used, it may change the RSBI value. We measured the RSBI with a handheld spirometer and through the ventilator, with and without CPAP, to assess differences. MATERIALS AND METHODS Rapid shallow breathing index was measured in 3 ways: (1) CPAP 0 cm H(2)O and fraction of inspired oxygen (Fio(2)) 0.4, (2) CPAP 5 cm H(2)O and Fio(2) 0.4, and (3) ventilator disconnected and Fio(2) 0.21. Tidal volume and respiratory frequency were recorded from ventilator monitor values in methods 1 and 2, and from a handheld spirometer and observed respiratory frequency, in method 3. RESULTS A total of 170 measurements, each using all 3 methods, were obtained from 80 patients admitted to a medical intensive care unit. The mean RSBI values for methods 1, 2, and 3 were 98.1 ± 58.7, 87.6 ± 51.2, and 108.3 ± 65.3, respectively (P < .001). The RSBI decreased by 9.4% when using CPAP 0 cm H(2)O and by 19.1% when using CPAP 5 cm H(2)O. CONCLUSIONS The RSBI values measured through the ventilator with CPAP 5 cm H(2)O are much lower than the values measured with a handheld spirometer. Even the RSBI values measured with CPAP 0 cm H(2)O are significantly lower. This is attributable to the base flow delivered by some ventilators. The difference must be taken into account during weaning assessment.

Diagnosis and management of malignant pleural effusions: state of the art in 2017

Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is a known complication of both thoracic and extra thoracic malignancies. The presence of MPE regardless of the primary site translates into advanced stage disease. Diagnosis and management of MPE with the goals of palliation and improving quality of life poses a challenge for chest physicians. Recently, multiple studies have made attempts to answer questions regarding optimal management in various clinical scenarios. We will review the current evidence and available options for the management of MPE.

Developing an Interventional Pulmonary Service in a Community-Based Private Practice: A Case Study

Interventional pulmonology (IP) is a field that uses minimally invasive techniques to diagnose, treat, and palliate advanced lung disease. Technology, formal training, and reimbursement for IP procedures have been slow to catch up with other interventional subspecialty areas. A byproduct of this pattern has been limited IP integration in private practice settings. We describe the key aspects and programmatic challenges of building an IP program in a community-based setting. A philosophical and financial buy-in by stakeholders and a regionalization of services, within and external to a larger practice, are crucial to success. Our experience demonstrates that a successful launch of an IP program increases overall visits as well as procedural volume without cannibalizing existing practice volume. We hope this might encourage others to provide this valuable service to their own communities.

The Effect of Flow Trigger on Rapid Shallow Breathing Index Measured Through the Ventilator

Background: The rapid shallow breathing index (RSBI) has the best predictive value to assess readiness for weaning from mechanical ventilation. At many institutions, this index is conveniently measured without disconnecting the patient from the ventilator, but this method may be inaccurate. Because modern ventilators have a base flow in the flow trigger mode that may provide a substantial help to the patient, we hypothesized that the RSBI is significantly decreased when measured through the ventilator with flow trigger even without continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and pressure support (PS). Methods: The RSBI was calculated using the values of minute ventilation and respiratory rate obtained either through the digital display of the ventilator or from a digital ventilometer. The RSBI was measured using 3 different methods: method 1, CPAP and PS both 0 cm H2O with flow trigger; method 2, CPAP and PS both 0 cm H2O without flow trigger; and method 3, using digital ventilometer. Results: A total of 165 measurements per method were obtained in 80 adult patients in the medical intensive care unit (MICU). The RSBI (breaths/min/L) values were 70.2 ± 26.5 with method 1, 85.4 ± 30.3 with method 2, and 80.1 ± 30.3 with method 3. The RSBI was significantly decreased using mechanical ventilation with flow trigger as compared with mechanical ventilation without flow trigger (P < .0001) or digital ventilometer (P < .0001). When method 1 was compared with methods 2 and 3, the RSBI decreased by 17% and 12%, respectively. Conclusions: The RSBI measurement is significantly decreased by the base flow delivered through modern ventilators in the flow trigger mode. If RSBI is measured through the ventilator in the flow trigger mode, the difference should be considered when using RSBI to assess readiness for weaning from mechanical ventilation.