Nehal J. Lakhani

2‐Methoxyestradiol, a Promising Anticancer Agent

Estrogens occurring naturally in the body are metabolized to catecholestrogens (2‐ and 4‐hydroxyestradiol) by the cytochrome P450 enzymes. 2‐Hydroxy catecholestrogens are further metabolized by catechol‐O‐methyltransferase to 2‐methoxyestradiol, which is known to be protective against tumor formation. 2‐Methoxyestradiol exhibits potent apoptotic activity against rapidly growing tumor cells. It also possesses antiangiogenic activity through a direct apoptotic effect on endothelial cells. Other molecular mechanisms, including microtubule stabilization by inhibition of the colchicine‐binding site, have been reported. The exact mechanism of action of 2‐methoxyestradiol is still unclear, but it has been shown to be effective in preventing tumor growth in a variety of cell lines. 2‐Methoxyestradiol also possesses cardioprotective activity by inhibiting vascular smooth muscle cell growth in arteries. It has a lower binding affinity for estrogen receptor α compared with that of estradiol, and its affinity for estrogen receptor β is even lower than that of estrogen receptor α, thus it has minimal estrogenic activity. 2‐Methoxyestradiol is distinct because of its inability to engage estrogen receptors as an agonist, and its unique antiproliferative and apoptotic activities are mediated independently of estrogen receptors α and β. A phase I clinical trial of 2‐methoxyestradiol 200, 400, 600, 800, and 1000 mg/day in 15 patients with breast cancer showed significant reduction in bone pain and analgesic intake in some patients, with no significant adverse effects. Another phase I study of 2‐methoxyestradiol 200–1000 mg/day in combination with docetaxel 35 mg/m2/week for 4–6 weeks performed in 15 patients with advanced refractory metastatic breast cancer showed no serious drug‐related adverse effects. A phase II randomized, double‐blind trial of 2‐methoxyestradiol 400 and 1200 mg/day in 33 patients with hormone‐refractory prostate cancer showed that it was well tolerated and showed prostate specific antigen stabilizations and declines. We have started a phase I clinical trial to explore dosages greater than 1000 mg/day.

Phase II Trial of Thalidomide and Carmustine for Patients With Recurrent High-Grade Gliomas

PURPOSE The use of thalidomide as an antiangiogenic agent has met with only limited success in the treatment of malignant gliomas. On the basis of preclinical data demonstrating synergistic antitumor activity when antiangiogenic agents are combined with cytotoxic agents, we explored the clinical activity of the combination of thalidomide and carmustine (BCNU) in patients with recurrent high-grade gliomas. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with a histologic diagnosis of high-grade glioma and radiographic evidence of tumor progression after standard surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy were eligible for the study. Patients received BCNU 200 mg/m2 on day 1 of every 6-week cycle, and 800 mg/d of thalidomide that was escalated to a maximal dose of 1,200 mg/d as tolerated. RESULTS A total of 40 patients (38 with glioblastomas, two with anaplastic gliomas) were accrued to the study. The combination of thalidomide and BCNU was well tolerated; mild myelosuppression and mild to moderate sedation were the most common side effects. The median progression-free survival (100 days) and the objective radiographic response rate (24%) for patients with glioblastoma compared favorably with data from historical controls. CONCLUSION This is one of the first clinical trials to evaluate the strategy of combining a putative antiangiogenic agent with a cytotoxic agent in patients with primary brain tumors. Our data demonstrate that thalidomide in combination with BCNU is well tolerated and has antitumor activity in patients with recurrent high-grade gliomas. Although the combination seems to be more active than either agent alone, such conclusions await confirmatory trials.

Phase I Clinical Trial of Oral 2-Methoxyestradiol, an Antiangiogenic and Apoptotic Agent, in Patients with Solid Tumors

Purpose: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and toxicity profile of the novel anticancer agent, 2-methoxyestradiol (2ME2) administered orally, in patients with solid tumors. Patients and Methods: Twenty patients with refractory solid tumors were enrolled. 2ME2 was given orally starting at 400 mg bid with dose escalation until 3000 mg bid. Tumor biopsies were taken before and after starting the drug to assess for microvessel density by CD 31 and cell proliferation by Ki67 immunohistochemistry. Serial plasma samples collected up to 50 hours after first single oral dose for characterization of pharmacokinetics, were analyzed using liquid chromatography tandem mass-spectrometry. Results: Eleven men and nine women received 2ME2 at dose levels of 400 mg bid (n=3), 800 mg bid (n=3), 1600 mg bid (n=6), 2200 mg bid (n=5) and 3000 mg bid (n=3). There were no dose limiting toxicities, therefore the MTD was not defined. There was one episode of grade 4 angioedema in the 1600 mg bid dose level 38 days into 2ME2 treatment. Other toxicities were mild to moderate. A patient with clear cell carcinoma of the ovary had a partial response at 1600 mg bid dose level lasting over 3 years. Conclusion: MTD for 2ME2 was not reached at dose of 3000 mg bid. The trial was closed due to extremely low plasma concentrations of 2ME2 relative to the doses administered. 2ME2 treatment had no effect on microvessel density (CD31 immunostaining) and cell proliferation (Ki-67 immunostaining). A new formulation of 2ME2 with improved bioavailability is currently being developed.

A phase I/II study of high-dose tamoxifen in combination with vinblastine in patients with androgen-independent prostate cancer.

In this phase I/II clinical trial the antitumor activity of high-dose tamoxifen when administered in combination with vinblastine was assessed and the toxicity profile of this combination characterized. All 25 patients enrolled in this study were required to have androgen-independent prostate cancer and to maintain androgen ablation during treatment. Vinblastine was given by continuous infusion over 5 days. Doses were increased from 0.9 mg/m2/day to 1.5 mg/m2/day in successive cohorts of at least 3 patients, with no further escalation even in the absence of dose-limiting toxicity. Intra-patient dose escalation was permitted. Tamoxifen was administered at a dose of 200 mg/kg on day 1, then 120 mg/kg/day on day 2. Standard response criteria were utilized to assess antitumor activity and CTC toxicity criteria were used. Quality of life (QOL) pain assessments were evaluated at each visit to the clinic. Most patients tolerated the highest dose of vinblastine at 1.5 mg/m2/day by continuous infusion over 5 days with 200 mg/kg/day of tamoxifen on day 1 and day 2. One patient had a greater than 50% decline in prostate-specific antigen that lasted for 170 days. Two patients received dose reductions because of toxicity. The most common serious toxicities included neutropenia, and fatigue. Reversible neurosensory, neuromotor, neurocortical and neurocerebellar toxicities were reported. Six of the 25 patients enrolled in the study (24%) experienced reversible neurologic toxicity of at least grade III. No statistically significant differences between precycle assessment of QOL and subsequent cycles were observed. It is concluded that vinblastine at 1.5 mg/m2/day continuous IV infusion combined with tamoxifen 200 mg/kg/day on day 1 and day 2 is inactive, and not without toxicity in the treatment of advanced metastatic androgen-independent prostate cancer.

Antiangiogenesis therapeutic strategies in prostate cancer

It is now well documented that tumor progression from its early stages to an advanced metastatic state requires the recruitment of new vasculature. The reliance on angiogenesis by tumors renders them susceptible to agents that can interfere with the angiogenic process. Recent interest in the therapeutic potential of using angiogenesis as a target mechanism for anticancer therapy has led to the identification of various antiangiogenic agents that interfere at various stages of the process. This review is a summary of recent progress in the identification and characterization of antiangiogenesis agents with a focus on their utility with respect to prostate cancer. Though we focus on prostate cancer, this knowledge is relevant to any cancer that involves angiogenesis.